wtf are u talking abt my gut is stronger than you faggot nigger gymcel
true but it can still boost bone growth on puberty, ihave heard.
Calm down i was being nice g
maybe at like 12 years old sure
i mean its when puberty starts, if starts at 12 yeah, if it starts at 14, obviosuly the more nourished you are the earlier it will start.maybe at like 12 years old sure
but most 12 year olds are eating cheetos and jerking off in their rooms
haha healthnut is sucha cool name but yea. it makes you age slower and health indicators obv perfect but cant grow bones after puberty that easily, but its with every natural diet. gotta take roids or hgh to grow bones.
No fucking way they got a forum called rawprimalhttps://rawprimal.org/topic/223/is-raw-primal-just-cope
Idk maybe this explains something, is it cope or nah?
some goys arguing about it
View attachment 4643129View attachment 4643142
no fucking way they got a forum called looksmaxNo fucking way they got a forum called rawprimal
raped lipids & cardiovascular system speedrun
what are you even talking abt lmao, "raped lipids" JFLLL
https://rawprimal.org/topic/223/is-raw-primal-just-cope
Idk maybe this explains something, is it cope or nah?
some goys arguing about it
View attachment 4643129View attachment 4643142
https://rawprimal.org/topic/223/is-raw-primal-just-cope
Idk maybe this explains something, is it cope or nah?
some goys arguing about it
people who associate raw primal with looksmaxxing especially thinking it'll help piss me offhttps://rawprimal.org/topic/223/is-raw-primal-just-cope
Idk maybe this explains something, is it cope or nah?
some goys arguing about it
View attachment 4643129View attachment 4643142
Op is correct to question the retardation of raw meat cope. Get it through your head people, we ate like this to survive not thrive.https://rawprimal.org/topic/223/is-raw-primal-just-cope
Idk maybe this explains something, is it cope or nah?
some goys arguing about it
View attachment 4643129View attachment 4643142
i mean goatis is pretty good looking
our ancestors thrived if we got enough of food, you cant thrive from non-food, animal food is the only natural food for humans. but yeah most people were dying young from stress of hunting.
Getting enough food wasn’t thriving, starvation was common and the second anyone could get their hands on any, they cooked it for a reason. Just because something’s natural doesn’t make it ideal. Ancient civilizations ditched the same shit that modern humans do out of novelty to post about on the internet as an act of being above the goyim or whatever it is they do it for. The thriving aspect meaning longer lifespans and fewer diseases all happened after people moved on from raw meat
how can cooking = exposing food to high temperatures be beneficial for the nutrient density of the food as it ndamageds the 3D structure of the nutrients and makes it harder for the body to digest them?Getting enough food wasn’t thriving, starvation was common and the second anyone could get their hands on any, they cooked it for a reason. Just because something’s natural doesn’t make it ideal. Ancient civilizations ditched the same shit that modern humans do out of novelty to post about on the internet as an act of being above the goyim or whatever it is they do it for. The thriving aspect meaning longer lifespans and fewer diseases all happened after people moved on from raw meat
What are you talking about? You do realize cooking is about bioavailability right? What does nutrient density have to do with how much your body is able to extract in order to use? Even some animals smart enough to do it cook their food
yeah cooking destroys bioavailability, it literally biochemically damages the 3D strcture of the nutrients, they are DAMAGED from HIGH HEAT. put your hand to a hot pan and you can see the damage.What are you talking about? You do realize cooking is about bioavailability right? What does nutrient density have to do with how much your body is able to extract in order to use? Even some animals smart enough to do it cook their food
No.. you have the wrong understanding. Cooking alters some nutrients but it increases bioavailability, by consuming raw meat you’re intentionally not allowing your modern day biology to take advantage of nutrients that become inaccessible to it without heat to break them down into a state that allows you to do so. Not sure why you keep going on about this 3d structure stuff when your entire digestive system is meant to break down structures through the use of enzymes and acid anyway
Based on a meta analisys with 1,2 million participants lol
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
chatgptcel, alters = destroys, how can you increase bioavailabity (the state where nutrient is structurally unchanged) by destroying it? "heat breaks down food into more bioavailable state" proof of that, literally none, only multistep biochemical reactions can do so, not heat. yeah enzymes and acid do break down food, they dont cook it. damage/cooking is not same as breaking down to smaller chemicals, it destroys doesnt break. raw animal foods are the best. But yeah if you are talking about VEGETABLES then cooking makes them easier to digest and ONLY vegetables, NEVER raw animal foods. Even science admits cooking destroys micronutrients from animal foods, its factual.No.. you have the wrong understanding. Cooking alters some nutrients but it increases bioavailability, by consuming raw meat you’re intentionally not allowing your modern day biology to take advantage of nutrients that become inaccessible to it without heat to break them down into a state that allows you to do so. Not sure why you keep going on about this 3d structure stuff when your entire digestive system is meant to break down structures through the use of enzymes and acid anyway
First of all, even if I was using an ai as my source which isn’t the case. You’re free to have your beliefs anyways, it doesn’t remove from the validity of anything I said whatsoever.
correlation does not equal causationBased on a meta analisys with 1,2 million participants lol
Association of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with the risk of mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis of cohort studies with 1,232,694 participants - PubMed
Our results found LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL was associated with the higher risk of all-cause mortality and CVD risk, indicating that adults with high LDL-C should take interventions to regulate the LDL-C level lower than 130 mg/dL.
There is very few things that are better proven
Id rather be brainwashed by real science than by some bald dude in a forrest
“real science” and it’s all biased and paid by the big companies to offset the real resultsId rather be brainwashed by real science than by some bald dude in a forrest
Whats your evidence then for your claim about cholesterol being pal
you dont know what causes evolution lmao. there most logical reasonn why we evolved is high micronutrients, not macronutrients but also them of course from animal foods. we were the first animals that can crack the skull of animals with rocks and get to eat the brain and bone marrow, other animals cant crack those bones with their skulls as easily or at all. and it makes sense eating animal brain would make our brains smarter also, there are other reasons than nutrition of course but primarily the biological reason. search on google: anthropologist Jessica Thompson theory
First of all you dont need much cholesterol to do so, very unlikely to be deficient
sure get your testosterone out of a bottle, your literal life essence manufactured and paid for by jews in a lab. makes a lot of sense
i mean it cannot be further from cope, literally, surgeries are cope since u only do them cuz ur malnourished in most cases, its fixing symptomshttps://rawprimal.org/topic/223/is-raw-primal-just-cope
Idk maybe this explains something, is it cope or nah?
some goys arguing about it
View attachment 4643129View attachment 4643142
Name one person that has became permanently and irreveribly infertile from roids
I personally get it from the chinese, and i physique mog you to death btw
every single person on roids has reduced fertility markers and at a certain point will turn infertile without the usage of hcg or others
Wow thats really a problem when you can buy hcg online for 50 bucks
most of them become infertile, the longer you take roids the bigger chance
why do you need hcg though? why would it be needed if roids are good?
bone growth is possible i think, bone remodelling ofc no thomaybe at like 12 years old sure
but most 12 year olds are eating cheetos and jerking off in their rooms
yeah the bone can only grow outwardsbone growth is possible i think, bone remodelling ofc no tho
only at young ages, motherfuckers past the age of 16 thinking it’ll grow their bones are deludedbone growth is possible i think, bone remodelling ofc no tho
They are sp good bevause ypu can easilt remove all sides of most roids with hcg and such
Then you shpuld be able to nsme one right?
Again, you're just making things up, this just isn't true. We do know what causes evolution from directly observing everything in nature. Also my argument is that raw meat is not ideal for thriving, our change in processing our food is what has been proven to show our brains having began accelerated growth in size, so I'm not sure what we're arguing about at this point.
you need more pharmaceuticals to combat the side effects of one.
