Is there a proper way to rate women's apperance?

[vision_n]

there is dimo, angularity, misc,

means she can be beautiful "objectively" but not attractive for some men

also dont let me start on body, although it doesnt play a lot of role, because for e.g. we rate jordan barret's face and not his body as a whole

terra chad here

i remember @Daddy's Home has already created a thread about this


for me, if i'd rate only the face, i'd look at the facial harmony first, 2nd dimo

@prettyboylite @nestivv @Insomnia @tomacōck @Aox Ofwar

 

[nestivv]

Well, when it comes to women, I don't look at jaw angle, her eyes tilt, gonial angle and other shit. I just look at her face and think: I would or I wouldn't

 

[vision_n]

Well, when it comes to women, I don't look at jaw angle, her eyes tilt, gonial angle and other shit. I just look at her face and think: I would or I wouldn't

so you just let your "unconsciousness" decide?

 

[iamnotgrayipromise]

so you just let your "unconsciousness" decide?

if you have to objectively asses a womans face to determine if you find her attractive or not you are too far gone and it never began

 

[vision_n]

determine if you find her attractive

i can do it myself

the "rate" is a try to put her on the looks scale, because some people see one girl as a htb and the other ones as a stacy

1.

2.

 

[Peco]

Well, when it comes to women, I don't look at jaw angle, her eyes tilt, gonial angle and other shit. I just look at her face and think: I would or I wouldn't

Should be the same with men. Nobody needs all the ratio bullshit to tell if someone is good looking or not.

 

[1966Ford]

Its usually

LTB

MTB

HTB

STACYLITE

STACY



PLEASE MARK AS SOLUTION!

 

[vision_n]

Should be the same with men. Nobody needs all the ratio bullshit to tell if someone is good looking or not.

I am trying to talk about objectivity here, you competely misunderstood me

 

[Peco]

so you just let your "unconsciousness" decide?

What else would you fucking do

 

[iamnotgrayipromise]

i can do it myself

the "rate" is a try to put her on the looks scale, because some people see one girl as a htb and the other ones as a stacy

View attachment 5252325

1.
View attachment 5252327

2.
View attachment 5252330

yea but why does it matter? okay you find a scale that works, now what? if you love a girl it doesnt matter where she stands

 

[takoprit333]

JBG

 

[Peco]

I am trying to talk about objectivity here, you competely misunderstood me

Objectivity is a myth in terms of looks. You either are good looking or you are not. That's true for everyone. If you have 2 good looking people it just comes down to preference.

 

[prettyboylite]

No idea on this topic mate

 

[Daddy's Home]

I discussed this in my famous thread of the top 30 most beautiful women on the planet (which became very outdated shortly after, in the sense that I personally found at least 6-7 other girls who now would easily enter the top 5-10-15 in all ranks, but I also discussed this risk and relativity of things in that thread, so it's no wonder this happens)

[OFFICIAL LIST] Top 30 Most Beautiful & Attractive Girls On The Planet (Combined Golden Ratio + Sexual Dimorphism & Appeal + Side Profile)

First of all, hello to all users of this forum! I am coming before you now, at the end of 2025, because we can finally say that we have the science, measurements and technology necessary to finally categorize / separate people and their level of attractiveness in the most objective way...

looksmax.org

For example, here's a video below where Valeria Mazza, the queen of TikTokcells who considered her perfect and Eve, who were happy that she could mog Lima or Gio, is destroyed by 5 unknown terra stacys (unknown to TikTokcells, but known to the underground users on this forum)



There are many things you can analyze and take as reference methods, but you will always be faced with a choice in the end between I want a cute girlfriend, but who will give me children who will grow up to be average or below average looking adults, or I want a hot girlfriend, but who may seem more trans / masculine and not that cute, but who will give me handsome children..

The looks Inflation is crazy and changes the way we see and analyze normal people a lot

Even in my own country, I see TikTok videos of a bunch of girls in their early 20s who think they're "really cute" and wonder why guys don't want them / like them / or if they're gay because they're not attracted to them, while the guys in the comments are like, "I mog you / you're cooked" like, bro..

Even traditional Stacys, if analyzed now by today's standards, are found to have a lot of flaws, and many can even be mog by up and coming 18 year old stacys on TikTok, like the famous case with Megan Fox and Laura Brown in the video below, where even Laura's normie sisters knew her level of looks, which is crazy..

 

[Rick_bozo]

count how much strokes you need for cum and its their rating

 

[nature]

there is dimo, angularity, misc,

means she can be beautiful "objectively" but not attractive for some men

also dont let me start on body, although it doesnt play a lot of role, because for e.g. we rate jordan barret's face and not his body as a whole

View attachment 5252253

terra chad here
View attachment 5252256

i remember @Daddy's Home has already created a thread about this


for me, if i'd rate only the face, i'd look at the facial harmony first, 2nd dimo

@prettyboylite @nestivv @Insomnia @tomacōck @Aox Ofwar

body