Is there a rating website like eyeme.io used to be?

Prettyboy

Prettyboy

Adonis
Joined
Jul 5, 2021
Posts
11,009
Reputation
36,782
eyeme.io roped, do anyone know a site where you can get ratings on your photos from females en masse (aside from photofeeler)?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lmao and Deleted member 14693
eyeme.io roped, do anyone know a site where you can get ratings on your photos from females en masse (aside from photofeeler)?
just go outside incel
 
  • +1
Reactions: babineux
photoeval
 
  • +1
Reactions: Prettyboy
Tinder™
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22126, Deleted member 21340, babineux and 2 others
Photofeeler, bro. U can choose gender/age of evaluating ppl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Prettyboy
women don't go to sites like that tbh

just ask women to rate you on OD, tho it'll be biased in your favor
 
  • +1
Reactions: babineux
https://hotness.ai copied the same source code and algorithm as the original EyeMe website.

The rating is an aggregate of hundreds of thousands of female likes based on the features and ratios your face has present

women don't go to sites like that tbh

just ask women to rate you on OD, tho it'll be biased in your favor

The data set is from Tinder, Okcupid and Bumble statistical aggregates, they don't need to be using that website.
DuroData and swipestats.io sell this data for anyone who has cash.

I agree going on apps is the true measurement, but since the data is from dating apps anyway, the site will very accurately gauge where you fall on the 0-10 spectrum (or, where your photo falls - a good photo can add a full point) in womens eyes.

Only potential downside I could see is this site uses the same dataset as EyeMe which is from 2020 - women have very likely become even pickier since then, a 9 on this rating scale could be a 8.5 or less today
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Prettyboy
eyeme.io roped, do anyone know a site where you can get ratings on your photos from females en masse (aside from photofeeler)?
I am genuinely interested as to why you would want to be rated by females on sites like that. I am not judging or hating, I am genuinely interested in knowing your concept or reasons for it.

Is it for fun? Is it to boost your ego? Is it to see who thinks you are hot and contact those girls? I don't know. I would do it to hook up with some girls, I guess. But that's just me. ✌️
 
photoeval
Thx, I’ve just registered on it, sent out a few dozens of votes to get voted. Most females seems to be 2/5 stars tbh

Tinder™
Mhm tinder is more about elo management than anything as @Niko69 (pbuh) has stated, its not good for getting rated
And Im not even coping, i have > 10k matches


Photofeeler, bro. U can choose gender/age of evaluating ppl
Results vary waay too much on PF , or maybe thats just for me

Professional high quality photograph of me:
3C65904C 3379 496A BBD4 9D5CF5CD1EBD


Me smiling on a low effort selfie in a half dark room:
9D8A4191 36BC 48F9 B0BB 0E3C9EBE019C


https://hotness.ai copied the same source code and algorithm as the original EyeMe website.

The rating is an aggregate of hundreds of thousands of female likes based on the features and ratios your face has present



The data set is from Tinder, Okcupid and Bumble statistical aggregates, they don't need to be using that website.
DuroData and swipestats.io sell this data for anyone who has cash.

I agree going on apps is the true measurement, but since the data is from dating apps anyway, the site will very accurately gauge where you fall on the 0-10 spectrum (or, where your photo falls - a good photo can add a full point) in womens eyes.

Only potential downside I could see is this site uses the same dataset as EyeMe which is from 2020 - women have very likely become even pickier since then, a 9 on this rating scale could be a 8.5 or less today
E2BD7DC0 6019 44DC B633 A44E461A0362


No matter what photo I upload it always gives me this, do you also encounter it?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lmao and Deleted member 14693
women don't go to sites like that tbh

just ask women to rate you on OD, tho it'll be biased in your favor

Thx, I’ve just registered on it, sent out a few dozens of votes to get voted. Most females seems to be 2/5 stars tbh


Mhm tinder is more about elo management than anything as @Niko69 (pbuh) has stated, its not good for getting rated
And Im not even coping, i have > 10k matches



Results vary waay too much on PF , or maybe thats just for me

Professional high quality photograph of me:
View attachment 1835053

Me smiling on a low effort selfie in a half dark room:
View attachment 1835054


View attachment 1835055

No matter what photo I upload it always gives me this, do you also encounter it?
I have rarely used those algorithms ever since eyeme.io went down, but if I recall, it's pretty bad at detecting anything but full frontals.

3/4 pics or pics with sunglasses etc, the AI can't detect it. Side profiles, it doesn't detect at all IIRC.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862 and Prettyboy
Results vary waay too much on PF , or maybe thats just for me

Professional high quality photograph of me:
View attachment 1835053

Me smiling on a low effort selfie in a half dark room:
View attachment 1835054
What did you put there as people who evaluate you? I usually have about the same results on different selfies, only the first case — girls 20-24 are selected, the second — everyone can vote
 
eyeme.io roped, do anyone know a site where you can get ratings on your photos from females en masse (aside from photofeeler)?
1661268368614
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Lmao and Prettyboy
Thx, I’ve just registered on it, sent out a few dozens of votes to get voted. Most females seems to be 2/5 stars tbh


Mhm tinder is more about elo management than anything as @Niko69 (pbuh) has stated, its not good for getting rated
And Im not even coping, i have > 10k matches



Results vary waay too much on PF , or maybe thats just for me

Professional high quality photograph of me:
View attachment 1835053

Me smiling on a low effort selfie in a half dark room:
View attachment 1835054


View attachment 1835055

No matter what photo I upload it always gives me this, do you also encounter it?


Ill tell u the reality about photofeeler, its good for like boyfriend type material pics but any pic where you might look douchey so for example most shirtless pics and all of that will not be rated as high.
 
  • +1
Reactions: zharupodrugu
There is this website.
how pretty am i

There is possibility of using AI to understand to compute your SMV (sexual market value). Because if you are an 8/10 and broke and shy your SMV goes down... Attractiveness is only a fraction of the whole dating value equations....
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230102-001714.png
    Screenshot_20230102-001714.png
    186.6 KB · Views: 0
  • Woah
Reactions: Xangsane
There is this website.
how pretty am i

There is possibility of using AI to understand to compute your SMV (sexual market value). Because if you are an 8/10 and broke and shy your SMV goes down... Attractiveness is only a fraction of the whole dating value equations....
How did you find this calculator?
 
There is this website.
how pretty am i

There is possibility of using AI to understand to compute your SMV (sexual market value). Because if you are an 8/10 and broke and shy your SMV goes down... Attractiveness is only a fraction of the whole dating value equations....
Access denied
 
Sign up dude...
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
The AI is still learning I guess, because it is not very logical.
The one thing that makes sense is the impact of the number of girls that you have approached. Let's say you can get 1 date out of 5 contacts, it is still 20% success rate!
I'll make a hypothetical scenario if I approached 100 girls.
 
Good. Even though work in progress, I think this AI can bring a lot of clarity in what matters in SMV. Hard cord black pillers say 100% of SMV is attractiveness, I think there is more to the equation.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
Sign up

Negative impact of attractiveness?? The AI is still learning I guess, because it is not very logical.
The one thing that makes sense is the impact of the number of girls that you have approached. Let's say you can get 1 date out of 5 contacts, it is still 20% success rate!
I'll make a hypothetical scenario if I approached 100 girls.
Not good:
1672624503527
 
Good. Even though work in progress, I think this AI can bring a lot of clarity in what matters in SMV. Hard cord black pillers say 100% of SMV is attractiveness, I think there is more to the equation.
That AI looks like a redpilled betabux bullshit for now tho. In what world driving an economy car handicaps you more than times than being a manlet? (Following the table @Xangsane posted)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane
Good. Even though work in progress, I think this AI can bring a lot of clarity in what matters in SMV. Hard cord black pillers say 100% of SMV is attractiveness, I think there is more to the equation
That AI looks like a redpilled betabux bullshit for now tho. In what world driving an economy car handicaps you more than times than being a manlet? (Following the table @Xangsane posted)
Agree, I've seen the AI only yesterday while the website exists for like 2 years. I guess 1 day of training won't get much results. Some AI models are trained using billions of Data accumulated over decades. I guess people have to give accurate answers and at the end the AI will be smart enough to give accurate results. The problem are the trolls that give shitty responses and thus the IA becomes shitty:(
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane

Similar threads

K
Replies
1
Views
128
Yonee
Yonee
E
Replies
21
Views
289
actualunderstander
actualunderstander
LilJojo
Replies
17
Views
275
Bitchwhipper2
Bitchwhipper2
mvp2v1
Replies
2
Views
201
mvp2v1
mvp2v1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top