is there any chads with 1.15 midface ratio

D

Deleted member 30188

Just do it brah
Joined
May 26, 2023
Posts
7,217
Reputation
9,494
need to cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Barrett has 1.2 iirc, he is however very polarizing. Most PSL Gods have between 0.96-1.03.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Blackgymmax, Deleted member 29155, Emiqrox and 2 others
PSLGODRICHARD
 
Barrett has 1.2 iirc, he is however very polarizing. Most PSL Gods have between 0.96-1.03.
and barrett has no appeal to women guess im fucked
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackgymmax
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29155, Sens and Deleted member 31944
The higher your MFR the better developed you are (assuming you don‘t have a genetic mutation for hammerhead IPD which would be a brutal flaw)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 28864
  • So Sad
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
Did he state that in an interview?
I bet he bragged about it like the little bragger he is

Jordan Barret if you read this I hope you get run over by a truck so you become a truecel.
 
The higher your MFR the better developed you are (assuming you don‘t have a genetic mutation for hammerhead IPD which would be a brutal flaw)
MFR?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 31944
I bet he bragged about it like the little bragger he is

Jordan Barret if you read this I hope you get run over by a truck so you become a truecel.
does he lurk on here?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 31944
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30188
Compact midface with adequate chin height looks great. Even 1.15
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30188
No way at 14 though the pictures of him at that age looked brutal.

Can you provide the source on this? That’s insane at 14 yo.. slayed the hottest Aussie foids in the Byron Bay area of Australia.
 
how do u calculate this
 
mfr should be ipd/midface length and not the other way around. the terms compact and long give the idea of a smaller and a bigger number, respectively, so this notation fits better.
 
  • +1
Reactions: fuse
how do u calculate this
take a dead straight front pic (try to minimize lens distortion, too) and then measure your ipd (distance between pupils) and your midface length (vertical distance from pupil to top lip) and then divide the second value by the first. voila
 
Ideal is 1-1.05 but 1.15 is a lot better than something < 0.9 which is death tier
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackgymmax
Are u black
 
The higher your MFR the better developed you are (assuming you don‘t have a genetic mutation for hammerhead IPD which would be a brutal flaw)
Thats false. You look retarded if your midface are too compact. Nothing too much is good.
 
Thats false. You look retarded if your midface are too compact. Nothing too much is good.
Everything evolutionary beneficial is good even in excess. Even a 90 degree gonial angle is the ideal biomechanically wise and also the one cro magnon humans in nature had, horses and even dolphins have 90 degrees too, although their mandibles are very long, which would make one expect that they‘re a little downgrown.
Don‘t even try to pick the cartoon caricature example of different gonial angles, there everything except the gonial angle stays the same, which is impossible in reality.
So what‘s false again?
 
Everything evolutionary beneficial is good even in excess. Even a 90 degree gonial angle is the ideal biomechanically wise and also the one cro magnon humans in nature had, horses and even dolphins have 90 degrees too, although their mandibles are very long, which would make one expect that they‘re a little downgrown.
Don‘t even try to pick the cartoon caricature example of different gonial angles, there everything except the gonial angle stays the same, which is impossible in reality.
So what‘s false again?
What is benefical does not mean it will look good In humans. For example hollow cheek is sign of malnutrition but it makes us attractive.
 
What is benefical does not mean it will look good In humans. For example hollow cheek is sign of malnutrition but it makes us attractive.
Hollow cheeks are a sign of buccinator atrophy, a wide bigonial width, high cheekbones and a deep canine fossa. They shouldn't be caused by malnutrition. Just because there are people having it due to malnutrition doesn't make it tied to it.
Health = evolutionary beneficial = attractiveness
 
Hollow cheeks are a sign of buccinator atrophy, a wide bigonial width, high cheekbones and a deep canine fossa. They shouldn't be caused by malnutrition. Just because there are people having it due to malnutrition doesn't make it tied to it.
Health = evolutionary beneficial = attractiveness
Buccinator atrophy is a meme
 
  • +1
Reactions: temporomandibular32
He does have insane appeal. In pictures he makes Chico look average
he is not a good looking dude in the real world just a freak remember a model face is not always an attrative one
 
There are Chads with very high fwhr, but having a large and well developed mandible is crucial.
very high fwhr + small and recessed mandible = genetic garbage and probably the least attractive combination there is
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: DelonLover1999 and Deleted member 29155
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: StacyAttractant, StacyRepellent and gribsufer1

Similar threads

LDAR_67
Replies
1
Views
50
xenovia
xenovia
Danman7323
Replies
3
Views
56
zeke.htn
zeke.htn
C
Replies
1
Views
23
foidrepeller271
foidrepeller271
N
Replies
0
Views
36
NP0047900
N
Paul Paulovski
Replies
1
Views
31
someonesomeday
someonesomeday

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →