Is this Chad’s physique natty/ achievable natty?

[Dr. Mog]

When you think of the word natty, the guy on the far right is what comes to your mind initially. What about the Jiu Jiutsu guy here on the far left? Is that achieveable natty? My guess is he is prolly around 13% bf.

(6’3 btw)

 

[vincentzygo]

wheres the chad

 

[ijustwannaascendlol]

Ogre

 

[Dr. Mog]

wheres the chad

Under your oneitis bedsheets.

Regardless you get my point.

 

[Litekiller11]

Under your oneitis bedsheets.

Regardless you get my point.

seriously when you said that free weights are better than machines , you're just saying dumb stuff

 

[kingofkings]

It’s really hard to look that big when you're low bf and natty. His upper chest for example is looking really thick considering his bf. On top of that, he’s 6'3" which makes it even harder to fill out. He also has the tell-tale roid traps.

You never know for sure because there are legit freaks out there with perfect genetics for building muscle (naturally sky high T and low myostatin production). He's either an extreme outlier or on compounds

 

[Dr. Mog]

seriously when you said that free weights are better than machines , you're just saying dumb stuff

And I stand with my point.

Both will build muscles yes and if looking big is the only thing you are after then go for it. You will have a gymcelling journey almost injury free and safe.

But if you are like me and with the type of competitive people around me, gymcelling has now gotten boring. Every nerd around me is just now into it. What’s more impressive is a combination of combat sports (a statusmaxxing hobby) and athletics, mostly track. Both of which will be a heck ton easier if you just learned how to balance a bar and do free weights. Why? Cause free weights lifting and cables are transferable to real world movements.

I’ve squatted on the smith machine and I’ve squatted with free weights; I’ve gained way more IOIs and eyes locking when I squat on the free weight section albeit ditching 15-20 lbs off the bar while doing so compared to the smith. Take it how you want but imo it just shows that you are ready for the real world in a subtle way.

 

[AustrianMogger]

View attachment 4076531
When you think of the word natty, the guy on the far right is what comes to your mind initially. What about the Jiu Jiutsu guy here on the far left? Is that achieveable natty? My guess is he is prolly around 13% bf.

(6’3 btw)

Cant see the chad

 

[FLAWLESSTT]

And I stand with my point.

Both will build muscles yes and if looking big is the only thing you are after then go for it. You will have a gymcelling journey almost injury free and safe.

But if you are like me and with the type of competitive people around me, gymcelling has now gotten boring. Every nerd around me is just now into it. What’s more impressive is a combination of combat sports (a statusmaxxing hobby) and athletics, mostly track. Both of which will be a heck ton easier if you just learned how to balance a bar and do free weights. Why? Cause free weights lifting and cables are transferable to real world movements.

I’ve squatted on the smith machine and I’ve squatted with free weights; I’ve gained way more IOIs and eyes locking when I squat on the free weight section albeit ditching 15-20 lbs off the bar while doing so compared to the smith. Take it how you want but imo it just shows that you are ready for the real world in a subtle way.

Still cant see the chad bro

 

[zharupodrugu]

maybe its achievable but hes already in coping gymcel territory. u dont need so much muscles anyway

 

[A_Ron_Kool_Aid]

Maybe with top tier genetics and like 5-10 years of training

 

[AverageCurryEnjoyer]

just have the correct genetics and you're good. if you got 9 inch wrists then proceed

 

[prescient]

Is this question real? I doubt you have ever trained in gym.

99 percent of people who create content related to bodybuilding are NOT natty Otherwise, they wouldn't even be visible on social media with their natural ass physique.

Right guy is not natty as well. No one gets this physique naturally. This low body fat percentage with these upper torso/shoulder mass is impossible unless you are genetically gifted. He has one in a million tier genetics if he got this naturally but i dont think so.

 

[prescient]

Maybe with top tier genetics and like 5-10 years of training

You wont get better after 3 years of training. You basically try to maintain peak achievable muscle mass after 3 years.

95 percent of the work is already done in 3 years.

No human being in this damn planet has genetic potential of achieving this naturally as well.

 

[Sektor]

View attachment 4076531
When you think of the word natty, the guy on the far right is what comes to your mind initially. What about the Jiu Jiutsu guy here on the far left? Is that achieveable natty? My guess is he is prolly around 13% bf.

(6’3 btw)

The right one yesedt one fuck no even with crazy genetics and consistency

 

[A_Ron_Kool_Aid]

You wont get better after 3 years of training. You basically try to maintain peak achievable muscle mass after 3 years.

95 percent of the work is already done in 3 years.

No human being in this damn planet has genetic potential of achieving this naturally as well.

Not saying this is a NATURAL physique, nor should you WANT this physique. But I defo think you can achieve this or something similiar with really good genetics. And honestly I feel like he looks bigger in terms of muscle a lot more than he actually is. It's more so a really wide frame, tall. With a shit ton of muscle. But not naturally unatainable

 

[A_Ron_Kool_Aid]

You wont get better after 3 years of training. You basically try to maintain peak achievable muscle mass after 3 years.

95 percent of the work is already done in 3 years.

As someone who used to do bodybuilding a decent amount. This aint really too accurate

 

[prescient]

As someone who used to do bodybuilding a decent amount. This aint really too accurate

Yeah it is. Sure speaking for natty.

 

[A_Ron_Kool_Aid]

Yeah it is. Sure speaking for natty.

Agree to disagree. But there are countless examples that say otherwise.

 

[Litekiller11]

And I stand with my point.

Both will build muscles yes and if looking big is the only thing you are after then go for it. You will have a gymcelling journey almost injury free and safe.

But if you are like me and with the type of competitive people around me, gymcelling has now gotten boring. Every nerd around me is just now into it. What’s more impressive is a combination of combat sports (a statusmaxxing hobby) and athletics, mostly track. Both of which will be a heck ton easier if you just learned how to balance a bar and do free weights. Why? Cause free weights lifting and cables are transferable to real world movements.

I’ve squatted on the smith machine and I’ve squatted with free weights; I’ve gained way more IOIs and eyes locking when I squat on the free weight section albeit ditching 15-20 lbs off the bar while doing so compared to the smith. Take it how you want but imo it just shows that you are ready for the real world in a subtle way.

Delulu at some point , but i get your point , you are a smart fellow for noticing this side no one talks about .
looking big imo is better at the long road .
the thing is you can run calisthenics or a fighting hobby or any hobby that increase status rather than using freeweights that could lead you to injuries