Is this cricketer disproportionate due to his height?

D

Deleted member 15081

Sphinx
Joined
Aug 24, 2021
Posts
2,801
Reputation
3,029
He is 2.16 metres tall,
Images
Images 2
Images 1

I also want to know at what height does facial attractiveness and frame start to suffer?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Lolcel, Deleted member 15305, Jason Voorhees and 3 others
@MisterMercedes @Kingkellz @larsanova69
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Looks little bit uncanny yeah
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15081
Looks little bit uncanny yeah
Does his height affect his frame?, like make it too narrow and does it also affect his face?, like does he have that disproportionate downward growth, assymetry etc. common with giants like these?
 
What a chad
 
@Ryan
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Ryan
How w the fuck can u bowl with that height and small frame??? Your body will snap on a few months.

Look at the great Aussie or English of SA pairs of fast bowlers. 6'-6'4'', strong frames, strong core, decent wingspans.

Even people like Jimmy Anderson or Brett Lee look strong and solid
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15081
How w the fuck can u bowl with that height and small frame??? Your body will snap on a few months.

Look at the great Aussie or English of SA pairs of fast bowlers. 6'-6'4'', strong frames, strong core, decent wingspans.

Even people like Jimmy Anderson or Brett Lee look strong and solid
Do you think his frame would be good for 6'1" to 6'2" height?, and can this guy actually improve his narrow frame by working on his bideltoid or is it done for him cause that's his maximum bideltoid possibility?
And do you think he also has a disproportionate face due to his height and should one yearn for his height or a 6' to 6'4" height is what most people should consider top tier?
 
would look great at 5'9
 
I also want to know at what height does facial attractiveness and frame start to suffer?
6'3+ is where long midface and narrow frames start to be common

i suffer from both of those
 
  • +1
Reactions: dashundalon and Deleted member 15081
would look great at 5'9
Really?, what makes you say that?, and does this cricketer have bad proportions facially and body wise?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5786
Do you think his frame would be good for 6'1" to 6'2" height?, and can this guy actually improve his narrow frame by working on his bideltoid or is it done for him cause that's his maximum bideltoid possibility?
And do you think he also has a disproportionate face due to his height and should one yearn for his height or a 6' to 6'4" height is what most people should consider top tier?
No bhai he is pretty fucked
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15081
6'3+ is where long midface and narrow frames start to be common

i suffer from both of those
What about Chico?, proportional frame, proportional face
 
@volcelfatcel @AcneScars @Preston
Dhoom 2 Superstar GIF by Hrithik Roshan
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep, volcelfatcel and AcneScars
Really?, what makes you say that?, and does this cricketer have bad proportions facially and body wise?
Because 5'9 - 5'10 is the best height aesthetic wise. ppl on this forum coping with the taller the better but in reality its not true and if you are not 10 iq dog you will understand that
if he looked like this at 5'9, he'd be more attractive than his acromegaly tier height
1633708972813
1633708981464
1633708987563
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15305, Jason Voorhees and Deleted member 15081
Because 5'9 - 5'10 is the best height aesthetic wise. ppl on this forum coping with the taller the better but in reality its not true and if you are not 10 iq dog you will understand that
if he looked like this at 5'9, he'd be more attractive than his acromegaly tier height
View attachment 1356625View attachment 1356628View attachment 1356629
In a way you're right👍🏻
But I feel up till even 6'3" can be considered fine, cause most people here seem to agree that after that point facial attractiveness starts to suffer
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Deleted member 5786
Another day another Dev question @StrangerDanger
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: StrangerDanger and Jason Voorhees
No bhai he is pretty fucked
What about this West Indies bowler? -
Jason Holder CWC19
Images
Download

He is 2.01 metres, does his frame and face suffer cause of his ginormous height?
 
Mog battle of this guy and @we_chillingfosho
20210917 024729 1 12
Images 6
 
Good but would be more handsome if he was indian
 
No bhai he is pretty fucked
How about the Dutch Giant? -
ECk7oDVWwAAjxCa

Do you think he is facially and frame wise proportional? Do you think his height should be aimed?, did he use roids?, do you think his pectus excavatum is a result of his height?
 
How about the Dutch Giant? -
View attachment 1358538
Do you think he is facially and frame wise proportional? Do you think his height should be aimed?, did he use roids?, do you think his pectus excavatum is a result of his height?
Wdym? Isn't he like 7ft.
 
I mean should someone yearn for his height or for something like 6'3" - 6'4" ?
You can't "yearn for his height" anyway. Yes something like 6'4 would be more ideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15081
You can't "yearn for his height" anyway. Yes something like 6'4 would be more ideal
Yeah, I know but say it is somehow possible, should one wish for reaching his height?
 
ideal height is 5'8-10 @OldVirgin
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot and Deleted member 5786
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 5786

Similar threads

Klasik616
Replies
5
Views
59
PARISIEN
PARISIEN
maxiparket
Serious Height>>>>face
Replies
4
Views
117
_Tigrim_
_Tigrim_
S
Replies
4
Views
141
sb23
S
STAMPEDE
Replies
2
Views
268
Julian23
Julian23
UnionPage
Replies
7
Views
147
meathead
meathead

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top