Is This Frame Mogger Ranking Accurate?

[PubertyMaxxer]

According to AI / ChatGTP :



For males only, a cautious estimated ranking would be:

Rank	Regional male subpopulation	Estimated skeletal SHR
1	Western Dinaric Alps: Montenegro, Herzegovina, Dalmatian hinterland	~1.38–1.42
2	Caucasus highland groups: Georgia, Armenia, North Caucasus	~1.37–1.41
3	Northern / Central Europeans: Netherlands, Germany, Scandinavia, Czechia	~1.35–1.39
4	East African Nilotic groups	~1.35–1.39
5	West / Central Africans	~1.34–1.38
6	Southern Europeans: Italy, Greece, Iberia, Balkans outside Dinaric core	~1.34–1.38
7	Middle Eastern / North African groups	~1.33–1.37
8	Eastern Europeans: Poland, Ukraine, Russia, Hungary, Romania	~1.33–1.37
9	South Asians	~1.32–1.36
10	East Asians	~1.31–1.35
11	Arctic / Northeast Asian cold-adapted groups	~1.30–1.34

But this is not a measured global leaderboard. It is an inference from studies reporting shoulder breadth and pelvic breadth separately.


The best-supported high-end candidate is the western Dinaric male zone—especially Montenegro, Herzegovina, and inland Dalmatia—because males there combine very large shoulder breadth, tall stature, and relatively narrow pelvic breadth. East African Nilotic groups may have high limb-length ratios, but not necessarily the highest shoulder-to-pelvis ratio.


For individual men, the normal range is roughly 1.30–1.45, with 1.40+ already broad-shouldered and 1.45+ uncommon.

Dinaric Slavs live in my Head rent free , just gotta hope they have Micropenises at least

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

@Jesus_ist_König
@ecstazy
@sync!
@Vireon
@KT-34

 

[silently_said]

Seems about accurate except for EEs having similar ones to MENAs

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Seems about accurate except for EEs having similar ones to MENAs

What would be the truth?

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Seems about accurate except for EEs having similar ones to MENAs

EE mog or what?

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Seems about accurate except for EEs having similar ones to MENAs

MENA mog?

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Bump

 

[BatemanNigga]

Me at #1

 

[silently_said]

EE mog or what?

Yeah I think it should be them at 6th with Southern Euros at 7th and MENA at 8th

 

[Brava]

Feel like Scandinavians would be higher

 

[Deleted member 159945]

According to AI / ChatGTP :



For males only, a cautious estimated ranking would be:

Rank	Regional male subpopulation	Estimated skeletal SHR
1	Western Dinaric Alps: Montenegro, Herzegovina, Dalmatian hinterland	~1.38–1.42
2	Caucasus highland groups: Georgia, Armenia, North Caucasus	~1.37–1.41
3	Northern / Central Europeans: Netherlands, Germany, Scandinavia, Czechia	~1.35–1.39
4	East African Nilotic groups	~1.35–1.39
5	West / Central Africans	~1.34–1.38
6	Southern Europeans: Italy, Greece, Iberia, Balkans outside Dinaric core	~1.34–1.38
7	Middle Eastern / North African groups	~1.33–1.37
8	Eastern Europeans: Poland, Ukraine, Russia, Hungary, Romania	~1.33–1.37
9	South Asians	~1.32–1.36
10	East Asians	~1.31–1.35
11	Arctic / Northeast Asian cold-adapted groups	~1.30–1.34

But this is not a measured global leaderboard. It is an inference from studies reporting shoulder breadth and pelvic breadth separately.


The best-supported high-end candidate is the western Dinaric male zone—especially Montenegro, Herzegovina, and inland Dalmatia—because males there combine very large shoulder breadth, tall stature, and relatively narrow pelvic breadth. East African Nilotic groups may have high limb-length ratios, but not necessarily the highest shoulder-to-pelvis ratio.


For individual men, the normal range is roughly 1.30–1.45, with 1.40+ already broad-shouldered and 1.45+ uncommon.

Dinaric Slavs live in my Head rent free , just gotta hope they have Micropenises at least

Lowk mostly agree but nilotic groups at only fourth place?


but for everything else I agree

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Lowk mostly agree but nilotic groups at only fourth place?


but for everything else I agree

Nilotic Dinkas look like Stilt Walking Clowns

Their Leg to Body Ratio is fucked up. It’s actually too high. Despite slightly above average ratio being preferred , theirs just starts to look ridiculous.

Their Pelvic Breadth isn’t particularly narrow compared to Clavicle Breadth. They have linear lanky Framelet Build. Montenegrins and Dalmatians mog hard .

 

[butterfly401]

i have the best frame in the game

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

i have the best frame in the game

PUA Game you mean?

 

[sync!]

i disagree with this list
i would say
1. middle eastern
2. rest of the list

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

i disagree with this list
i would say
1. middle eastern
2. rest of the list

Then you disagree with scientific facts

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Bumperino

 

[sync!]

Then you disagree with scientific facts

science is man/made

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

science is man/made

Coping hard I see

 

[pfl]

black bois are puny low t narrow frame wimps
brutal @IronMike

 

[IronMike]

No not accurate

 

[eon]

No not accurate

View attachment 5294582View attachment 5294583View attachment 5294585View attachment 5294587View attachment 5294588View attachment 5294591View attachment 5294593View attachment 5294595View attachment 5294596

 

[pfl]

No not accurate

View attachment 5294582View attachment 5294583View attachment 5294585View attachment 5294587View attachment 5294588View attachment 5294591View attachment 5294593View attachment 5294595View attachment 5294596

true. blacks need to be lower

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

No not accurate

View attachment 5294582View attachment 5294583View attachment 5294585View attachment 5294587View attachment 5294588View attachment 5294591View attachment 5294593View attachment 5294595View attachment 5294596

true. blacks need to be lower
View attachment 5294607View attachment 5294616View attachment 5294618View attachment 5294619View attachment 5294621
View attachment 5294624

There is no comprehensive global dataset ranking male skeletal biacromial-to-biiliac ratio (SHR) by ethnicity or regional population. Anthropometric studies typically report shoulder breadth and pelvic breadth separately, and the ratio is rarely published in a standardized way across populations.


Based on available anthropometric literature, a tentative ranking from higher to lower average male SHR would look something like this:

Approx. rank	Population/region	Relative SHR
1	Western Herzegovina (Bosnian Croats)	Extremely high
2	Montenegro	Extremely high
3	Dalmatian Croats	Very high
4	Highland Serbs	Very high
5	Northwest Caucasus (Circassians, Abkhazians)	Very high
6	Chechens and Ingush	High
7	Dutch (especially northern)	High
8	Northern Germans	High
9	Scandinavians	High
10	British / Irish	Moderately high
11	Central Europeans (Czechs, Austrians, Swiss Germans)	Moderate–high
12	Northern French	Moderate
13	Hungarians	Moderate
14	Romanians	Moderate
15	Northern Italians	Moderate
16	Spaniards and Portuguese	Moderate–low
17	Southern Italians	Moderate–low
18	Greeks	Moderate–low
19	Anatolian Turks	Moderate–low
20	Levantine Arabs	Relatively low
21	Gulf Arabs	Relatively low
22	South Asians	Low
23	East Asians	Low
24	Southeast Asians	Lowest among major world regions

The populations most consistently described as having exceptionally robust upper-body skeletal proportions are those from the Dinaric Alps (especially western Herzegovina and Montenegro), followed by parts of the North Caucasus. These conclusions are better supported than any precise numeric ranking of SHR, because direct cross-population SHR measurements are scarce.

 

[IronMike]

There is no comprehensive global dataset ranking male skeletal biacromial-to-biiliac ratio (SHR) by ethnicity or regional population. Anthropometric studies typically report shoulder breadth and pelvic breadth separately, and the ratio is rarely published in a standardized way across populations.


Based on available anthropometric literature, a tentative ranking from higher to lower average male SHR would look something like this:

Approx. rank	Population/region	Relative SHR
1	Western Herzegovina (Bosnian Croats)	Extremely high
2	Montenegro	Extremely high
3	Dalmatian Croats	Very high
4	Highland Serbs	Very high
5	Northwest Caucasus (Circassians, Abkhazians)	Very high
6	Chechens and Ingush	High
7	Dutch (especially northern)	High
8	Northern Germans	High
9	Scandinavians	High
10	British / Irish	Moderately high
11	Central Europeans (Czechs, Austrians, Swiss Germans)	Moderate–high
12	Northern French	Moderate
13	Hungarians	Moderate
14	Romanians	Moderate
15	Northern Italians	Moderate
16	Spaniards and Portuguese	Moderate–low
17	Southern Italians	Moderate–low
18	Greeks	Moderate–low
19	Anatolian Turks	Moderate–low
20	Levantine Arabs	Relatively low
21	Gulf Arabs	Relatively low
22	South Asians	Low
23	East Asians	Low
24	Southeast Asians	Lowest among major world regions

The populations most consistently described as having exceptionally robust upper-body skeletal proportions are those from the Dinaric Alps (especially western Herzegovina and Montenegro), followed by parts of the North Caucasus. These conclusions are better supported than any precise numeric ranking of SHR, because direct cross-population SHR measurements are scarce.

Blacks areas need to occupy spots 1-10

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Blacks areas need to occupy spots 1-10

Which black area? Tell me how ChatGTP Can delude me??? :


There is no comprehensive anthropometric database that ranks Sub-Saharan African populations by skeletal biacromial-to-biiliac ratio (SHR). Most available studies report stature, limb lengths, or individual breadth measurements rather than this specific ratio. So any ranking is necessarily tentative.


Based on published anthropometry, the highest average male SHR values in Sub-Saharan Africa are most likely found among populations with relatively broad shoulders and medium-to-narrow pelvises rather than the very linear Nilotic body type.


A qualitative ranking would be:

Approx. rank	Population/region	Expected SHR
1	Southern African Europeans (e.g. Afrikaners, British South Africans)	Very high (European-derived)
2	Highland Ethiopian/Eritrean groups*	High
3	Some Southern African Bantu populations (e.g. Zulu, Xhosa, Sotho)	Moderately high
4	West African populations (e.g. Yoruba, Igbo, Akan)	Moderate to moderately high
5	East African Bantu populations	Moderate
6	Nilotic populations (Dinka, Nuer, Shilluk)	Moderate
7	Central African rainforest populations	Moderate to lower

*Ethiopians and Eritreans are geographically in Sub-Saharan Africa but are often analyzed separately in anthropological studies because of their distinct population history.


Why aren’t the Dinka necessarily highest?


The Dinka are exceptional for:

• very great height,
• extremely long legs,
• very narrow, linear builds.

Those characteristics do not automatically produce the highest shoulder-to-pelvis ratio. A high SHR depends on shoulder breadth relative to pelvic breadth, not on height or limb length alone. Dinka men often have relatively narrow shoulders in absolute terms compared with broad-framed Dinaric Europeans, even though they are much taller.


Broad body-build trends

• Dinaric Europeans: broad shoulders + relatively narrow pelvis → very high SHR.
• Nilotic East Africans: narrow torso overall + very long limbs → high linearity, but not necessarily the highest SHR.
• Southern African Bantu populations: generally somewhat more robust torsos than Nilotic populations, giving moderately high SHR.

So if you were ranking purely by estimated male skeletal SHR, no Sub-Saharan African population is currently supported by evidence as exceeding the core Dinaric populations (western Herzegovina, Montenegro, parts of coastal Croatia). The available evidence instead suggests a variety of body builds across Sub-Saharan Africa, with considerable overlap and without a definitive population ranking for this specific ratio.