Is this guys infields Real? Taysocial.

[Just inject]

He pulls chicks and bangs them fast. He is average height and looks black dude.

 

[Deleted member 3259]

He runs articulate and educated BBC game, thats why. Basically he doesnt speak black and he can hold a normal conversation like a white person, so that + being black puts him into a minority within a minority.

 

[Amnesia]

looks looks looks

thats all u need

 

[reptiles]

looks looks looks

thats all u need

More specifically maxilla

 

[DianabolDownie]

dn rd because greycel

Spoiler

finally I can say it

 

[SixFootManlet]

BEE BEE CEE

 

[Just inject]

looks looks looks

thats all u need

He is not even good looking. And the chicks be is picking up are more attractive than him.

 

[Just inject]

Cope you cucks.

 

[Deleted member 3573]

Nah looks threshold is lower than you think for some girls but everyone cold approaching has a lower success rate, even a Chad like Paul Janka. Go on Good Looking loser forums. Some of you guys need to seriously visit that site to balance yourselves mentally and lose your virginities if you haven't. Just be above average and get rejected a lot is LEGIT. Low inhibition-maxx too.

 

[eduardkoopman]

In short. I quickly seem to so:
A little above average looking man; who also is a great conversationalist, has good body-language, is good at reading women, and escaltes sexually when its goes well.

He is very great socially and sexually. I can see it, as he is analyzing himself on what he should had done ideally. The fact that he even knows what he should had done ideally, is verry high EQ (emotional intelligence).

It seems, the clips only show the ones that went well; and it seems sometimes they start filming after he already talking with her for some time.

Besides average+ (he's imo a bit above average). He has:
- legit tight conversation skills, and
- tight body language. and
- he is good at reading the woman her signals/body language and level of interest. and
- he is not pussy to get sexual when she shows signals she likes him.
And his concept, to only go for women that show interest is good.
We all know, within 5 seconds orso a woman decided if you're fuckable or not. So don't waste time, and ruin your confidence, on uninterested women.

I posted about body language

 

[Just inject]

In short. I quickly seem to so:
A little above average looking man; who also is a great conversationalist, has good body-language, is good at reading women, and escaltes sexually when its goes well.

He is very great socially and sexually. I can see it, as he is analyzing himself on what he should had done ideally. The fact that he even knows what he should had done ideally, is verry high EQ (emotional intelligence).

It seems, the clips only show the ones that went well; and it seems sometimes they start filming after he already talking with her for some time.

Besides average+ (he's imo a bit above average). He has:
- legit tight conversation skills, and
- tight body language. and
- he is good at reading the woman her signals/body language and level of interest. and
- he is not pussy to get sexual when she shows signals she likes him.
And his concept, to only go for women that show interest is good.
We all know, within 5 seconds orso a woman decided if you're fuckable or not. So don't waste time, and ruin your confidence, on uninterested women.

I posted about body language

His first (the chick at the end)vid contradicts only women that show you interest. The vid is even called talk to chicks that dont like you.The Australian chick was pulling the whole "I'm a lesbian card". She could have very well been into him and just giving him a little shit but that whole thing with the asthma seems scripted as fuck. She ditched the uber just to fuck him. There were some angle where the camera man was right up in there grill.

 

[Maxillacel]

here we cope

 

[Just inject]

In short. I quickly seem to so:
A little above average looking man; who also is a great conversationalist, has good body-language, is good at reading women, and escaltes sexually when its goes well.

He is very great socially and sexually. I can see it, as he is analyzing himself on what he should had done ideally. The fact that he even knows what he should had done ideally, is verry high EQ (emotional intelligence).

It seems, the clips only show the ones that went well; and it seems sometimes they start filming after he already talking with her for some time.

Besides average+ (he's imo a bit above average). He has:
- legit tight conversation skills, and
- tight body language. and
- he is good at reading the woman her signals/body language and level of interest. and
- he is not pussy to get sexual when she shows signals she likes him.
And his concept, to only go for women that show interest is good.
We all know, within 5 seconds orso a woman decided if you're fuckable or not. So don't waste time, and ruin your confidence, on uninterested women.

I posted about body language

He ain't even an amazing conversationalist, most puas out there say dont go interview mode but that the majority of what tay does. Even one of the vids is called get laid with boring convos. In fact alot of what he is doing is anti game. They like mostly yes girls in most vids except for that Australian girl pulling out the "I'm a lesbian shit" which seems kinda scripted.

 

[eduardkoopman]

His first (the chick at the end)vid contradicts only women that show you interest. The vid is even called talk to chicks that dont like you.

I don't look at video title, nor at what they say. Body language is more important, and imo that woman showed very positive body language, aka "yes"woman body language. I would do with bodylanguage first, and what is said second. Body tells way more.

He ain't even an amazing conversationalist, most puas out there say dont go interview mode but that the majority of what tay does. Even one of the vids is called get laid with boring convos. In fact alot of what he is doing is anti game. They like mostly yes girls in most vids except for that Australian girl pulling out the "I'm a lesbian shit" which seems kinda scripted.

Anti-game = good game. Often enough, in my opinion. Tight game, can often be bad game because it comes of fishy. Looking back, my tighest game (imo) experiences, didn't end that well often. Even though I was impressed myself, how great my game was. I recall a few instances, like that. But a few flaws in game, actually gave better results overall. Imi, overall. It's best to have good game combined with some flaws.

As far as your comment about "yes" girls. That Australian girls was in my book, also a yes gril. If you mute the sound and just watch the body language. You mostly only see yes.
We all know, that women within 5 seconds or so, decide if you're fuckable anyways, or not fuckable. So imo, only yes girls is where it's at. And the body of a woman often shows if she is a yes girl, more so then what she says.

 

[Just inject]

I don't look at video title, nor at what they say. Body language is more important, and imo that woman showed very positive body language, aka "yes"woman body language. I would do with bodylanguage first, and what is said second. Body tells way more.


Anti-game = good game. Often enough, in my opinion. Tight game, can often be bad game because it comes of fishy. Looking back, my tighest game (imo) experiences, didn't end that well often. Even though I was impressed myself, how great my game was. I recall a few instances, like that. But a few flaws in game, actually gave better results overall. Imi, overall. It's best to have good game combined with some flaws.

As far as your comment about "yes" girls. That Australian girls was in my book, also a yes gril. If you mute the sound and just watch the body language. You mostly only see yes.
We all know, that women within 5 seconds or so, decide if you're fuckable anyways, or not fuckable. So imo, only yes girls is where it's at. And the body of a woman often shows if she is a yes girl, more so then what she says.

What he is doing does not seem like game. Seems like basic normal guy convo with the exception that he injects sexual tension and comment. I just find some his shit questionable because he is using a very high quality cam very close. Even with zoom you can tell that he is literally hovering right next to them at certain points. Reminds of some of these youtube pranksters that get exposed. Higher quality cams are usually alot less discreet and easier to notice.As apposed to some students infield on his insta where the cam much lower quality and a more hidden angle/father away.

Further I just realized this vid sets of my bullshit meter



She said she had a flight in 2hours. But is willing to miss to get dicked down some dudes she just met. Plus the whole " I'll let you sleep with me if you guess my ethnicity." And "let's get in cab to go the hotel" to fuck. Were laughably fake. Even his own fans were calling him out in the comments. Pretty bad acting, especially if the full interaction (obviously cut pieces out.) Was 5minutes.

I have very limited cold approach experience,probably around 100 approaches and this does not seem like it would happen.

You cold approach man? You seem to have some experience I'm still a newbie, with 1 lay. It seems to be very much a looks based endeavor.

 

[Just inject]

I'm also surprised he is still posting infields after youtube has been cracking down on puas lately lot of channel getting banned. Even RSD deleted all theirs and is going the self help route.
I'm also surprised he is still posting infields after youtube has been cracking down on puas lately lot of channel getting banned. Even RSD deleted all theirs and is going the self help route.

 

[Maxillacel]

What he is doing does not seem like game. Seems like basic normal guy convo with the exception that he injects sexual tension and comment. I just find some his shit questionable because he is using a very high quality cam very close. Even with zoom you can tell that he is literally hovering right next to them at certain points. Reminds of some of these youtube pranksters that get exposed. Higher quality cams are usually alot less discreet and easier to notice.As apposed to some students infield on his insta where the cam much lower quality and a more hidden angle/father away.

Further I just realized this vid sets of my bullshit meter



She said she had a flight in 2hours. But is willing to miss to get dicked down some dudes she just met. Plus the whole " I'll let you sleep with me if you guess my ethnicity." And "let's get in cab to go the hotel" to fuck. Were laughably fake. Even his own fans were calling him out in the comments. Pretty bad acting, especially if the full interaction (obviously cut pieces out.) Was 5minutes.

I have very limited cold approach experience,probably around 100 approaches and this does not seem like it would happen.

You cold approach man? You seem to have some experience I'm still a newbie, with 1 lay. It seems to be very much a looks based endeavor.

 

[Deleted member 245]

Holy fucking shit this forum is going downhill.

Get this PUA bullshit out of the LOOKSMAXING section. All PUA is staged and is ran by con artists.

Fucking greycels are going to ruin this site

OP kill yourself you low IQ subhuman

looks looks looks

thats all u need

looks looks looks

thats all u need

looks looks looks

thats all u need

looks looks looks

thats all u need

looks looks looks

thats all u need

looks looks looks

thats all u need

looks looks looks

thats all u need

looks looks looks

thats all u need

looks looks looks

thats all u need

looks looks looks

thats all u need

 

[Deleted member 2100]

dn rd because greycel

Spoiler

finally I can say it

shut the fuck up bluecel

 

[Rift]

shut the fuck up bluecel

MOGGED

 

[eduardkoopman]

Okay, I watched this for you. To be able to give my view/opinion. Because, I normally don't watch this type of stuff, because it don't interest me much anymore.

Further I just realized this vid sets of my bullshit meter

She said she had a flight in 2hours. But is willing to miss to get dicked down some dudes she just met. Plus the whole " I'll let you sleep with me if you guess my ethnicity." And "let's get in cab to go the hotel" to fuck. Were laughably fake. Even his own fans were calling him out in the comments. Pretty bad acting, especially if the full interaction (obviously cut pieces out.) Was 5minutes.

Firstly, I didn't get from the video that she missed her plane since she wasn't in extreme hurry and she was there already being quite unhaisty. So there was alwyas room for a quickie, and she still could catch the flight.
Nor is it 100% sure from that video, they actually had sex. He might had just had to help her packing, and she resisted and gave a good bye kiss at the airport. Who knows. It's not 100% sure.It's assumprion based that they had sex.

Overall. with that video, I didn't see it to be fake (aka, a hired woman). It's a pitty there are alot of cuts in it.

I like his style. I like his comments. I like his reationalisation. I like his attitude.
In my opnion, that guy is at a really high level of skill when it comes to (in order of importance): body language; (interal) attitude; and conversation-talk-skills.

What makes him good, at this imo. I think it's this:
1. he looks a little bit above average
2. he screens for yes-girls ( he said so in the comments in the video. that attitude is 100% correct). A woman knows with 5 seconds if she finds you bangeable or not.

3. you focus in what you posted alot about what was said, by her and by him. It's not as important, as her and his body language. And her body language imo was totally into him, really soon. SoI guess, he notices body language very well, to see if she is a "yes"girl. What makes her totally yes girl? She shakes his hand good, full and long-ish; 100% good sign. She puts her body into his direction fully, giving him full attention; 100% good sign. And when he touched her that couple of times, she had zero pull-back reaction but stayed; 100% good sign. And when he moved closer into her "space" she didn't flinch or step back or moved back at all; 100% good sign.

4. I like his combination. Of these 3 things also: Confidence to that level that he dared to chat her up and constantly moves forward; yet portraying nervousness/clumbsiness at the same time. So he comes on strong in action (aka, he chats her up, he touches her within minutes on her body, and moves forward pretty constantly towards more); yet in his deminour he is more weak. Which imo, is a great combination. Difficult to have though, or to portrait well. but this dude likely has a lot of experience talking with strangers.
the 3rd aspect I like. he is constantly moving forward. Or asking or pushing to go forward, to a more intimate level. This is good, and yet difficult to do for most men (difficult because fearing to lose a good conversation). But moving forward, is actually a very good/comfortable thing to do with yes women. Not doing that, is actually what makes it awkward/difficult. But this all comes from the concept also. that men think they need to clown/entertain their way into a woman her pants. And this fear comes, from that men think they will be rejected or that it will be unwanted. While if it is unwanted, that dudes actual fault is already imo, that:
he is talking to a woman that decided already in this first 5 seconds that he wasn't bangeable; yet this dude being unable to read her reactions/body language or thinking he clown/entertain his way into her pants (I made this mistake in the past alot alot, due to woring views). Back again to the initial statement; she already knows if she wants to bang you. And i she wants to bang you, she ain't going to respond bad to you touching her hand, troking arm, getting closer into her space, etc.. Because she will only physically rspond bad to guysdo that, that she deemed unbangeable. If that happens, maybe at maxx give it a 2nd try. But actaully more, fucking eject asap.

Bows to master Mike Tyson, who said it perfectly in an overly animalistic way to a female reporter once (one shouldn't say it though, always stay friendly, and just eject in friendly/pleasant way):



5. His convo skills are good.
I disagree prety stringly on this statement of yours: "Seems like basic normal guy convo with the exception that he injects sexual tension and comment."
Not that I think words are that important in communication. So maybe not worth much debate anyways.
But this guy, is imo not having basic normal guy convo. I'll try to tell you why I think so.
5.1 Firstly i like to say, many guys think being a "clown/entertainer" is being a good conversationalist for dating (that is true in general life, but for dating imo less important and more of risk of time waiste). And this black guy lacked in doing that (being clown/entertainer). But the concept that one can clown/entertain one way into a woman her pants, is imo 100% wrong. Remember always; she knows within 5 seconds if she is willing to dick you or not. If a guy is doing the clown/entertainer route; he waistes alot of time on creating female (platonic)friends. That/A guy only has to move forward, to that moment where the sex happens (and she already knows if she is up for that or not, now or later on).
5.2 He talks about feelings alot. And that is not normal basic guy talk at all. Guys are usually more talking about concepts, facts, figures, ideas, etc..; but not about feelings. This is very good, because women are all about feelings. They run on feelings, and often only gets feelings of irritation talking about concepts, facts, figures, ideas, etc.. (aka, normal guy talk)
5.3 he talks himself down a bit regularly. And that is not normal basic guy talk at all. Most guys want to talk strong about themselfes, (but actually act soft/weak/passive/opussy). This guy is kinda opposite; he is strong/forward in his actions yet talking a bit weak about himself. Imo, a great combo, yet difficult to do (well) for most guys, I think.

I have very limited cold approach experience,probably around 100 approaches and this does not seem like it would happen.
I'm still a newbie, with 1 lay. It seems to be very much a looks based endeavor.

Limited? 100 is quit an amount already compared to the average man. Most likely get to that amount in a lifestime of 80 years orso maybe.
For pua standards, it might likely be newbie. Imo, it's entering into decently amateaur experienced level, of chatting up random stranger women.

I agree. It's a very looks based endeavor. BUT, all of dating is very looks based. There is no "cheat" way to meet women, that bypasses looks. (well actually there is imo, but it's rediculously difficult for most to get: 1. Alot of status/power/fame or 2. Filthy rich (can get golddigers this way, and alot of women are also golddiggers).
Chatting up random women, is very harsh on looks also. It is okay to do I think, if you are average looking or above that. Below that looks level, it might get very brutal. Because women who look at a man that they immediately find unfuckable, gets the kind of treatment that is even more brutal then I (normie looks) get. And I got pretty brutal treatment already as a 4psl or (in real life) 6/10 type of looking guy.

You cold approach man? You seem to have some experience I'm still a newbie, with 1 lay. It seems to be very much a looks based endeavor.

I have to go back into my past, for that (even pre dating apps time). I'm kinda old already (36). Back 11 years ago I started chatting up random women for about 3-4 years. I must have chatted up about 500 (or more) women in that time. I had about 1% succes rate also. And got 5 lays that way. Then I enetered into a long term relationship for plenty years that ended a couple of years ago. Then I went the Buddhist celibate monk lifestyle for about 2 years. But I recently decided to stop that choice, and I started to become more interested in my health and now looks also. So I am bussy now, in finding a good routine with that. Likely, I will soon again go/try dating. But i will likely be rusty as fuck, after these many years. But my better looks, hopefully will help.

 

[DidntRead]

bullshit

 

[Gazzamogga]

Okay, I watched this for you. To be able to give my view/opinion. Because, I normally don't watch this type of stuff, because it don't interest me much anymore.

Firstly, I didn't get from the video that she missed her plane since she wasn't in extreme hurry and she was there already being quite unhaisty. So there was alwyas room for a quickie, and she still could catch the flight.
Nor is it 100% sure from that video, they actually had sex. He might had just had to help her packing, and she resisted and gave a good bye kiss at the airport. Who knows. It's not 100% sure.It's assumprion based that they had sex.

Overall. with that video, I didn't see it to be fake (aka, a hired woman). It's a pitty there are alot of cuts in it.

I like his style. I like his comments. I like his reationalisation. I like his attitude.
In my opnion, that guy is at a really high level of skill when it comes to (in order of importance): body language; (interal) attitude; and conversation-talk-skills.

What makes him good, at this imo. I think it's this:
1. he looks a little bit above average
2. he screens for yes-girls ( he said so in the comments in the video. that attitude is 100% correct). A woman knows with 5 seconds if she finds you bangeable or not.

3. you focus in what you posted alot about what was said, by her and by him. It's not as important, as her and his body language. And her body language imo was totally into him, really soon. SoI guess, he notices body language very well, to see if she is a "yes"girl. What makes her totally yes girl? She shakes his hand good, full and long-ish; 100% good sign. She puts her body into his direction fully, giving him full attention; 100% good sign. And when he touched her that couple of times, she had zero pull-back reaction but stayed; 100% good sign. And when he moved closer into her "space" she didn't flinch or step back or moved back at all; 100% good sign.

4. I like his combination. Of these 3 things also: Confidence to that level that he dared to chat her up and constantly moves forward; yet portraying nervousness/clumbsiness at the same time. So he comes on strong in action (aka, he chats her up, he touches her within minutes on her body, and moves forward pretty constantly towards more); yet in his deminour he is more weak. Which imo, is a great combination. Difficult to have though, or to portrait well. but this dude likely has a lot of experience talking with strangers.

5. His convo skills are good.
I disagree prety stringly on this statement of yours: "Seems like basic normal guy convo with the exception that he injects sexual tension and comment."
Not that I think words are that important in communication. So maybe not worth much debate anyways.
But this guy, is imo not having basic normal guy convo. I'll try to tell you why I think so.
5.1 Firstly i like to say, many guys think being a "clown/entertainer" is being a good conversationalist for dating (that is true in general life, but for dating imo less important and more of risk of time waiste). And this black guy lacked in doing that (being clown/entertainer). But the concept that one can clown/entertain one way into a woman her pants, is imo 100% wrong. Remember always; she knows within 5 seconds if she is willing to dick you or not. If a guy is doing the clown/entertainer route; he waistes alot of time on creating female (platonic)friends. That/A guy only has to move forward, to that moment where the sex happens (and she already knows if she is up for that or not, now or later on).
5.2 He talks about feelings alot. And that is not normal basic guy talk at all. Guys are usually more talking about concepts, facts, figures, ideas, etc..; but not about feelings. This is very good, because women are all about feelings. They run on feelings, and often only gets feelings of irritation talking about concepts, facts, figures, ideas, etc.. (aka, normal guy talk)
5.3 he talks himself down a bit regularly. And that is not normal basic guy talk at all. Most guys want to talk strong about themselfes, (but actually act soft/weak/passive/opussy). This guy is kinda opposite; he is strong/forward in his actions yet talking a bit weak about himself. Imo, a great combo, yet difficult to do (well) for most guys, I think.


Limited? 100 is quit an amount already compared to the average man. Most likely get to that amount in a lifestime of 80 years orso maybe.
For pua standards, it might likely be newbie. Imo, it's entering into decently amateaur experienced level, of chatting up random stranger women.

I agree. It's a very looks based endeavor. BUT, all of dating is very looks based. There is no "cheat" way to meet women, that bypasses looks. (well actually there is imo, but it's rediculously difficult for most to get: 1. Alot of status/power/fame or 2. Filthy rich (can get golddigers this way, and alot of women are also golddiggers).
Chatting up random women, is very harsh on looks also. It is okay to do I think, if you are average looking or above that. Below that looks level, it might get very brutal. Because women who look at a man that they immediately find unfuckable, gets the kind of treatment that is even more brutal then I (normie looks) get. And I got pretty brutal treatment already as a 4psl or (in real life) 6/10 type of looking guy.


I have to go back into my past, for that (even pre dating apps time). I'm kinda old already (36). Back 11 years ago I started chatting up random women for about 3-4 years. I must have chatted up about 500 (or more) women in that time. I had about 1% succes rate also. And got 5 lays that way. Then I enetered into a long term relationship for plenty years that ended a couple of years ago. Then I went the Buddhist celibate monk lifestyle for about 2 years. But I recently decided to stop that choice, and I started to become more interested in my health and now looks also. So I am bussy now, in finding a good routine with that. Likely, I will soon again go/try dating. But i will likely be rusty as fuck, after these many years. But my better looks, hopefully will help.

You're one of the highest IQ posters

 

[Deleted member 4209]

> be black

> be nt

 

[Just inject]

Okay, I watched this for you. To be able to give my view/opinion. Because, I normally don't watch this type of stuff, because it don't interest me much anymore.

Firstly, I didn't get from the video that she missed her plane since she wasn't in extreme hurry and she was there already being quite unhaisty. So there was alwyas room for a quickie, and she still could catch the flight.
Nor is it 100% sure from that video, they actually had sex. He might had just had to help her packing, and she resisted and gave a good bye kiss at the airport. Who knows. It's not 100% sure.It's assumprion based that they had sex.

Overall. with that video, I didn't see it to be fake (aka, a hired woman). It's a pitty there are alot of cuts in it.

I like his style. I like his comments. I like his reationalisation. I like his attitude.
In my opnion, that guy is at a really high level of skill when it comes to (in order of importance): body language; (interal) attitude; and conversation-talk-skills.

What makes him good, at this imo. I think it's this:
1. he looks a little bit above average
2. he screens for yes-girls ( he said so in the comments in the video. that attitude is 100% correct). A woman knows with 5 seconds if she finds you bangeable or not.

3. you focus in what you posted alot about what was said, by her and by him. It's not as important, as her and his body language. And her body language imo was totally into him, really soon. SoI guess, he notices body language very well, to see if she is a "yes"girl. What makes her totally yes girl? She shakes his hand good, full and long-ish; 100% good sign. She puts her body into his direction fully, giving him full attention; 100% good sign. And when he touched her that couple of times, she had zero pull-back reaction but stayed; 100% good sign. And when he moved closer into her "space" she didn't flinch or step back or moved back at all; 100% good sign.

4. I like his combination. Of these 3 things also: Confidence to that level that he dared to chat her up and constantly moves forward; yet portraying nervousness/clumbsiness at the same time. So he comes on strong in action (aka, he chats her up, he touches her within minutes on her body, and moves forward pretty constantly towards more); yet in his deminour he is more weak. Which imo, is a great combination. Difficult to have though, or to portrait well. but this dude likely has a lot of experience talking with strangers.
the 3rd aspect I like. he is constantly moving forward. Or asking or pushing to go forward, to a more intimate level. This is good, and yet difficult to do for most men (difficult because fearing to lose a good conversation). But moving forward, is actually a very good/comfortable thing to do with yes women. Not doing that, is actually what makes it awkward/difficult. But this all comes from the concept also. that men think they need to clown/entertain their way into a woman her pants. And this fear comes, from that men think they will be rejected or that it will be unwanted. While if it is unwanted, that dudes actual fault is already imo, that:
he is talking to a woman that decided already in this first 5 seconds that he wasn't bangeable; yet this dude being unable to read her reactions/body language or thinking he clown/entertain his way into her pants (I made this mistake in the past alot alot, due to woring views). Back again to the initial statement; she already knows if she wants to bang you. And i she wants to bang you, she ain't going to respond bad to you touching her hand, troking arm, getting closer into her space, etc.. Because she will only physically rspond bad to guysdo that, that she deemed unbangeable. If that happens, maybe at maxx give it a 2nd try. But actaully more, fucking eject asap.

Bows to master Mike Tyson, who said it perfectly in an overly animalistic way to a female reporter once (one shouldn't say it though, always stay friendly, and just eject in friendly/pleasant way):



5. His convo skills are good.
I disagree prety stringly on this statement of yours: "Seems like basic normal guy convo with the exception that he injects sexual tension and comment."
Not that I think words are that important in communication. So maybe not worth much debate anyways.
But this guy, is imo not having basic normal guy convo. I'll try to tell you why I think so.
5.1 Firstly i like to say, many guys think being a "clown/entertainer" is being a good conversationalist for dating (that is true in general life, but for dating imo less important and more of risk of time waiste). And this black guy lacked in doing that (being clown/entertainer). But the concept that one can clown/entertain one way into a woman her pants, is imo 100% wrong. Remember always; she knows within 5 seconds if she is willing to dick you or not. If a guy is doing the clown/entertainer route; he waistes alot of time on creating female (platonic)friends. That/A guy only has to move forward, to that moment where the sex happens (and she already knows if she is up for that or not, now or later on).
5.2 He talks about feelings alot. And that is not normal basic guy talk at all. Guys are usually more talking about concepts, facts, figures, ideas, etc..; but not about feelings. This is very good, because women are all about feelings. They run on feelings, and often only gets feelings of irritation talking about concepts, facts, figures, ideas, etc.. (aka, normal guy talk)
5.3 he talks himself down a bit regularly. And that is not normal basic guy talk at all. Most guys want to talk strong about themselfes, (but actually act soft/weak/passive/opussy). This guy is kinda opposite; he is strong/forward in his actions yet talking a bit weak about himself. Imo, a great combo, yet difficult to do (well) for most guys, I think.


Limited? 100 is quit an amount already compared to the average man. Most likely get to that amount in a lifestime of 80 years orso maybe.
For pua standards, it might likely be newbie. Imo, it's entering into decently amateaur experienced level, of chatting up random stranger women.

I agree. It's a very looks based endeavor. BUT, all of dating is very looks based. There is no "cheat" way to meet women, that bypasses looks. (well actually there is imo, but it's rediculously difficult for most to get: 1. Alot of status/power/fame or 2. Filthy rich (can get golddigers this way, and alot of women are also golddiggers).
Chatting up random women, is very harsh on looks also. It is okay to do I think, if you are average looking or above that. Below that looks level, it might get very brutal. Because women who look at a man that they immediately find unfuckable, gets the kind of treatment that is even more brutal then I (normie looks) get. And I got pretty brutal treatment already as a 4psl or (in real life) 6/10 type of looking guy.


I have to go back into my past, for that (even pre dating apps time). I'm kinda old already (36). Back 11 years ago I started chatting up random women for about 3-4 years. I must have chatted up about 500 (or more) women in that time. I had about 1% succes rate also. And got 5 lays that way. Then I enetered into a long term relationship for plenty years that ended a couple of years ago. Then I went the Buddhist celibate monk lifestyle for about 2 years. But I recently decided to stop that choice, and I started to become more interested in my health and now looks also. So I am bussy now, in finding a good routine with that. Likely, I will soon again go/try dating. But i will likely be rusty as fuck, after these many years. But my better looks, hopefully will help.

He suggested an instadate and she then objected that she had a flight in 2 hours .Not much later she wanted him to hope in the car with her. The whole " I will have sex you with you if you guess my ethnicity" seemed like some B level porno acting.I would assume he was implying they fucked since the name of the vid " how I got laid in 5 minutes." Even if they did not fuck. I dont know why someone would risk missing their flight to hang out with someone they just met.

 

[eduardkoopman]

He suggested an instadate and she then objected that she had a flight in 2 hours .Not much later she wanted him to hope in the car with her. The whole " I will have sex you with you if you guess my ethnicity" seemed like some B level porno acting.I would assume he was implying they fucked since the name of the vid " how I got laid in 5 minutes." Even if they did not fuck. I dont know why someone would risk missing their flight to hang out with someone they just met.

To add.
Why the fuck, discussing wether some dude you don't know fucked a woman you don't know, or didn't fuck her.
100% irrelevant. The only fucking that I care about, is the one done between me and some woman.
From the video I saw; I liked his advice, and guestimated it was not a hired woman. On both I could be wrong.

 

[Just inject]

To add.
Why the fuck, discussing wether some dude you don't know fucked a woman you don't know, or didn't fuck her.
100% irrelevant. The only fucking that I care about, is the one done between me and some woman.
From the video I saw; I liked his advice, and guestimated it was not a hired woman. On both I could be wrong.

True that lol, I could give a shit if he got his dick wet. Just the vid title is misleading if he didn't.
Probably right though who the fuck knows. It's hard to discern what's fake. Considering alot of guys have got caught both in the dating shit and pranks/social experiments.

 

[Just inject]

Buuuuuuump
Buuuuuump
Buuuuuump

 

[Rasputin]

Biggest cope of 2020. You guys who talks about body language should put a dick on your ass. He can still make out those girls ONS but I bet 100% they ALL, they ALL will deny him afterwards. All that work just to kiss or bang those girls is going to trash aftwards. PUA is the biggest shit you will ever find when it comes to girls. Cmon it’s 2020, there’s no room for this anymore.​

 

[Just inject]

Biggest cope of 2020. You guys who talks about body language should put a dick on your ass. He can still make out those girls ONS but I bet 100% they ALL, they ALL will deny him afterwards. All that work just to kiss or bang those girls is going to trash aftwards. PUA is the biggest shit you will ever find when it comes to girls. Cmon it’s 2020, there’s no room for this anymore.​

He still getting puss(assuming it real.) While incels are jerking them self's off to hentai.

 

[Just inject]

Bumpity bump

 

[Just inject]

Buuumo

 

[Deleted member 4044]

He's real. I saw this guy on the rsdforum 4-5 years ago when he was starting. He was uncalibrated and had not much game then, but had a good vibe.

Some people (especially a truecel Asian guy) were ragging on him and I told him he had potential and to keep at it.

Amazing he is now getting 100s of thousands of views for his vids

He is 5'9 from what I remember.
What is his psl? 4.5-5?

 

[Just inject]

He's real. I saw this guy on the rsdforum 4-5 years ago when he was starting. He was uncalibrated and had not much game then, but had a good vibe.

Some people (especially a truecel Asian guy) were ragging on him and I told him he had potential and to keep at it.

Amazing he is now getting 100s of thousands of views for his vids

He is 5'9 from what I remember.
What is his psl? 4.5-5?
View attachment 213191

Did he have vids back then?

Some of his vids seem suspect as fuck. Camera it literally hovering inches away at some points. Even if its hidden girls would be able to sense some guy following them form place to place. It does not even look like game, some of the verbal are shit,boring interview mode style convo, he even says his verbal are shit. He seems to just getting super down yes girls who are already into him.(assuming they ain't hired).

That one vid vid "how I got laid in 5 mintues." Confirms to he is.more than likely staging shit. Girl has a flight in 2 hours but is willing to miss it just to get dicked down by a guy she had a couple minute convo with. Not to mention that awful scripted sounding, "I would be willing to have sex if you guess my ethnicity". I'm no cold approach master but chicks dont say shit like that especially that early on, even dtf ones.

 

[eduardkoopman]

some of the verbal are shit,boring interview mode style convo, he even says his verbal are shit. He seems to just getting super down yes girls who are already into him.

This part is filled wit alot of wrong believes or opinions.

In my experience so far (all my lays were easy lays, I spitted imo great game on some low-interested women and got nothing. and I spitted sucky game often at the women I did lay. Thus game, is a minor factor).
The wrong believes are imo:
* "boring interview mode style convo". The false beleive seems to be, that if one has great style convo a girl/woman will sleep with you because of your convo skills. Imo, A women knows within 5 seconds if she finds you bangable. Likewise, no ugly fat chick can cool convo her way into my pants either, maybe I like hanging with her because she is fun to talk with but no sex. Some chicks maybe could convo their way into my pants, if she just meets the bare minimum and I get drunk enough. But she should also wondering if she should even want to try that, because she will get the shitty treatment and sex (which hurts one self-esteem). Likewise it will be for us guys. Therefore personally, it's only yes girls or nothing.
* "He seems to just getting super down yes girls who are already into him" The false beleive seems to be, that you can talk no girls into bed, or that it's even smart to invest time/energy to try to talkover uninterested or low-interested (aka, 90+% of time unintrested also). I never could. And hanging around trying to convince uninterested or low-interested women is also very exhausting and hurtfull for sense of confidence. Because one basically spends time aorund negativity

 

[Linoob]

It's almost like being a good looking tall black man makes talking to women easier.

 

[Just inject]

buuump