is using hgh at 21 worth it? (KNOWLEDGEBLE USERS ONLY)

D

ducksoover

Gold
Joined
Jan 17, 2023
Posts
783
Reputation
745
So what sort of benefits would I be able to see with 2IU hgh/day for 6 months or even a year?

is it even worth it besides better physique? my physique is already really good so I'm looking for any other benefits. I don't want to be a bloatmaxxed ogre.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Equilibrium
using hgh for anything apart from height growth is retarded, just pray you have deficient gh levels so it actually works
 
i dont know why you would take hgh post puberty
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksmaxxing223
So what sort of benefits would I be able to see with 2IU hgh/day for 6 months or even a year?

is it even worth it besides better physique? my physique is already really good so I'm looking for any other benefits. I don't want to be a bloatmaxxed ogre.
better sleep, better skin, bone deaging, bone increase
 
  • JFL
Reactions: looksmaxxing223
So what sort of benefits would I be able to see with 2IU hgh/day for 6 months or even a year?

is it even worth it besides better physique? my physique is already really good so I'm looking for any other benefits. I don't want to be a bloatmaxxed ogre.
take mk677 instead, it’ll give the same amount of 2IU of hgh at 1/20 the cost of injections
 
  • JFL
Reactions: lestoa and looksmaxxing223
hgh makes your skin worse
IMG 2094
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Equilibrium, looksmaxxing223 and lestoa
You literally proved my point. HGH is far too risky, and all he's using it for is for muscle gain. ATP just use test or something
oh my bad didn’t realize you were high inhib, dw then you can leave the looksmaxxing to the rest of us
 
  • JFL
Reactions: looksmaxxing223
oh my bad didn’t realize you were high inhib, dw then you can leave the looksmaxxing to the rest of us
"high inhib" hgh is a looksmin if you are not gh deficient.
 
hgh is not good for anti aging and brings you closer to death with every dose you take

ghkcu is better

mk is bullshit.
uhuh
IMG 2097
 
how did i start an autist war on this thread? I want answers ! I don't have time to research this thoroughly im a full time wagie + student. I'm on break right now as we speak :lul:
 
How nigga you didn't even answer my question
how did i start an autist war on this thread? I want answers ! I don't have time to research this thoroughly im a full time wagie + student. I'm on break right now as we speak :lul:

If you go into a supranormal range with your GH levels is associated with increased disease risks and reduced life expectancy.
If you go into a supronarmol range its a health min and not good for anti aging.

All of this only applys if you have a deficit in your GH levels. And no one of you mf's have a deficit of GH levels.
If you would have a deficit of GH levels you mfs would have way worse problems.


When you go into a supranormal range its a healthmin. HGH is not recommended for anti aging.

ghkcu is better for anti aging.


There is not a single study that blasting HGH in a supranormal range will expand your lifespan.
 
  • +1
Reactions: aids
Stop cherry picking out-of-context abstracts to support your point.
You literally have just circled MK-677 on an abstract regarding its effect on diet-induced catabolism. The LITERAL EFFECT of MK-677 is that it mimics ghrelin to stimulate IGF-1 in your body. No shit it's going to be relevant there!
I'm literally sat here for a good few minutes trying to decipher your dumbass fucking arguments because they are hardly coherent.

Self-proclaimed high IQ user who is literally using random sites off Google and an out-of-context study from 1998 to argue with people in 2024.
Insane.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Equilibrium
If you go into a supranormal range with your GH levels is associated with increased disease risks and reduced life expectancy.
If you go into a supronarmol range its a health min and not good for anti aging.

All of this only applys if you have a deficit in your GH levels. And no one of you mf's have a deficit of GH levels.
If you would have a deficit of GH levels you mfs would have way worse problems.


When you go into a supranormal range its a healthmin. HGH is not recommended for anti aging.

ghkcu is better for anti aging.


There is not a single study that blasting HGH in a supranormal range will expand your lifespan.
Interested to know about GHKCU since I know nothing if you have any good literature on it and its benefits to skin?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Equilibrium and lestoa
If you go into a supranormal range with your GH levels is associated with increased disease risks and reduced life expectancy.
If you go into a supronarmol range its a health min and not good for anti aging.

All of this only applys if you have a deficit in your GH levels. And no one of you mf's have a deficit of GH levels.
If you would have a deficit of GH levels you mfs would have way worse problems.


When you go into a supranormal range its a healthmin. HGH is not recommended for anti aging.

ghkcu is better for anti aging.


There is not a single study that blasting HGH in a se supranormal range will expand your lifespan.
How does it make your skin worse tho
 
Having read the entire abstract. From a sample size of eight people (JFL), it was concluded that MK-677 reversed diet-induced nitrogen wasting.
In layman's terms, you retain more protein on MK-677. Hardly fucking relevant.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Equilibrium and lestoa
If you go into a supranormal range with your GH levels is associated with increased disease risks and reduced life expectancy.
If you go into a supronarmol range its a health min and not good for anti aging.

All of this only applys if you have a deficit in your GH levels. And no one of you mf's have a deficit of GH levels.
If you would have a deficit of GH levels you mfs would have way worse problems.


When you go into a supranormal range its a healthmin. HGH is not recommended for anti aging.

ghkcu is better for anti aging.


There is not a single study that blasting HGH in a supranormal range will expand your lifespan.
If you want to start anti aging.

Blast accutane, blast 2,5mg dutasteride and blast ghkcu

DHT is the main reason you guys turn oger.

Obviously dont take any DHT blockers while you are in puberty.

the easiest way to looksmax is unironically to take fucking pills
MK is the most disgusting faggot drug on earth, it only gives you diabetes.

If you want craniofacial growth in puberty

blast androgens, hgh and ai in puberty and pray to god that your body will react good on the drug
after that, take ASAP DHT blockers - DHT is a worthless hormone after puberty.

And in the future, please use your brain more often.
Its common sense that if you go in supranormal ranges its a healthmin.

btw you know whats funny ?

your bone density decreases on mk

you want the opposite right ?



if you are taking MK for heightmaxxing its even more retarded
 
  • +1
Reactions: Equilibrium
Interested to know about GHKCU since I know nothing if you have any good literature on it and its benefits to skin?
Thats what i found about GHKCU





its literally insane for anti aging

besides that, take DHT blockers
DHT is one of the main reasons why men age.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Equilibrium and aids
There is not a single study that blasting HGH in a supranormal range will expand your lifespan.
Well if I cared about lifespan I wouldn't be roiding lol.

so you're telling me there's absolutely no benefits health wise, sure, but fuck my health I just want to look better.

are there any advantages aesthetically?
 
Thats what i found about GHKCU





its literally insane for anti aging

besides that, take DHT blockers
DHT is one of the main reasons why men age.
I don't want to block DHT yet since I'm 19, though I just recently was discussing on another thread how Astaxanthin cream can (allegedly) localise the inhibition of DHT, e.g., on your face if applied as a moisturiser.
Are there any alternatives that are better-researched? I would ideally like to block DHT on my face only since that'll help to mitigate acne.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lestoa
Well if I cared about lifespan I wouldn't be roiding lol.

so you're telling me there's absolutely no benefits health wise, sure, but fuck my health I just want to look better.

are there any advantages aesthetically?
Besides craniofacial growth no when you take it in puberty no.
I didnt wanted to say that HGH is shit for looksmaxxing, no not at all.
Its just not good for your health and for anti aging.
Blasting steroids can be a looksmax if you do it right and do something about the side effects.

Its just taking HGH in a supranormal range after puberty is useless for craniofacial growth. Shouldve took in puberty and not post.
 
I don't want to block DHT yet since I'm 19
Yea just wait. DHT blockers should only be taken after the age of 20 so post puberty.
And if you still dont want to take DHT blockers its okay. Just so you know that DHT is still one of the biggest factor of aging. But its up to you.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: aids

Similar threads

lowtierhuman
Replies
20
Views
297
lowtierhuman
lowtierhuman
20/04/2008
Replies
73
Views
1K
DORIAN
DORIAN
Hexmask
Replies
23
Views
446
mfk
mfk
D
Replies
12
Views
293
retardpill
retardpill

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top