Is wheatwaffles' smv caclulator legit?

Xylmaxxing

Xylmaxxing

Banned
Joined
Sep 7, 2024
Posts
294
Reputation
161
For reference this is his smv formula.

I tweaked the formula for STRs and ONS, since looks are 100% in those cases and you won't outright state your P length and IQ to a foid unless you're a freak or autistic.

So, first calculate your (Looks/10)^5 * (Height/10)^3 * (Body/10)^2 and then find the 10th root of this number to find your SMV.

Seems like a high IQ method but feels kinda wrong, seeing that an htn (6/10) with a decent frame (6/10) and average height (5/10) would have an SMV of 5.6 (Strong MTN).
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: flippasav, xnj, Deleted member 108505 and 1 other person
Are you mad at ur grade
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
For reference this is his smv formula.

I tweaked the formula for STRs and ONS, since looks are 100% in those cases and you won't outright state your P length and IQ to a foid unless you're a freak or autistic.

So, first calculate your (Looks/10)^5 * (Height/10)^3 * (Body/10)^2 and then find the 10th root of this number to find your SMV.

Seems like a high IQ method but feels kinda wrong, seeing that an htn (6/10) with a decent frame (6/10) and average height (5/10) would have an SMV of 5.6 (Strong MTN).
Truly a high IQ thread. His smv formula is alr, but as black pill states face is everything, no matter what body you have or height face is what attracts women. Smv does not matter much if ur attractive. For an unattractive dude smv will boost his attractiveness
 
Are you mad at ur grade
Not really, just that the method feels kind of out of touch with reality.

For example, Jeremy Meeks would have a looks smv of 8.3. (Taking face as 10, Height as 7 and physique as 7) Kinda low thinking that he's a literal PSL god who rose from being a criminal to a supermodel all due to looks.
 
autistic no woman will actually do allat when they see u ur either ugly or good looking
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: bosnian, Deleted member 99142 and Gaygymmaxx
Truly a high IQ thread. His smv formula is alr, but as black pill states face is everything, no matter what body you have or height face is what attracts women. Smv does not matter much if ur attractive. For an unattractive dude smv will boost his attractiveness
Height and physique also do matter a lot tbh. Its just that all of these factors do not matter in a linear manner.

For example, height acts as a multiplier for your face, sure, but only if you aren't short (5'7-5'8), in which case, even an htn face won't help you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin and Deleted member 108505
autistic no woman will actually do allat when they see u ur either ugly or good looking
Well its a method to see if they will see you as ugly or good looking.

No foid will calculate your midface ratio before dating you, but subconsciously it plays a big part in your looks and how she perceives you
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 108505
Height and physique also do matter a lot tbh. Its just that all of these factors do not matter in a linear manner.

For example, height acts as a multiplier for your face, sure, but only if you aren't short (5'7-5'8), in which case, even an htn face won't help you.
True, extremes will drain ur attractiveness, avg height, avg body with an htn or chadlite face will always be appealing to women no matter what ur smv is
 
i thought it was irl scale and i gave myself a 6 (so accidentally overrated) with that and got 6.95, doesn’t seem accurate but it’s like a good metric i guess
 
its decent but maybe accurate maybe not
 
For reference this is his smv formula.

I tweaked the formula for STRs and ONS, since looks are 100% in those cases and you won't outright state your P length and IQ to a foid unless you're a freak or autistic.

So, first calculate your (Looks/10)^5 * (Height/10)^3 * (Body/10)^2 and then find the 10th root of this number to find your SMV.

Seems like a high IQ method but feels kinda wrong, seeing that an htn (6/10) with a decent frame (6/10) and average height (5/10) would have an SMV of 5.6 (Strong MTN).
6.5/10 face x 10/10 height x 6/10 body is my stats (I’m 6’5 so I’d assume 10/10) and that would put me at like a 7.3/10 SMV idk if that’s even accurate as that’s Low CL smv despite face obv being law
 
6.5/10 face x 10/10 height x 6/10 body is my stats (I’m 6’5 so I’d assume 10/10) and that would put me at like a 7.3/10 SMV idk if that’s even accurate as that’s Low CL smv despite face obv being law
How tall are you?
 
  • +1
Reactions: grungymallard97
i thought it was irl scale and i gave myself a 6 (so accidentally overrated) with that and got 6.95, doesn’t seem accurate but it’s like a good metric i guess
What are your individual ratings for face height body
 
What are your individual ratings for face height body
i just said what i did my face in the calculation im prob a 5 but it was 7.5 for height and 3 for body (was 6 but subtract 3 for bmi 16)
 
i just said what i did my face in the calculation im prob a 5 but it was 7.5 for height and 3 for body (was 6 but subtract 3 for bmi 16)
Imo the body part is bs. He doesn't take into consideration the main things like bideltoid width and proportions.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 94729
Imo the body part is bs. He doesn't take into consideration the main things like bideltoid width and proportions.
yeah my body isn’t amazing but 3 is kinda crazy
 
Nah he’s just an illiterate autist who makes us look bad
 
True, extremes will drain ur attractiveness, avg height, avg body with an htn or chadlite face will always be appealing to women no matter what ur smv is
True tbh, thats why this formula doesn't make sense to me. An htn with average frame and height would be a mid mtn (5.4) according to this.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 108505

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top