Israel stands with India tweet

Jason Voorhees

Jason Voorhees

𝕯𝖝𝕯 π–ˆπ–—π–Šπ–œ π•΅π–Šπ–˜π–™π–Šπ–—
Joined
May 15, 2020
Posts
58,214
Reputation
161,650
Jfl :lul:

1000182452
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Sonneillon, ascension, Bars and 23 others
Jai Hind!!!!!
Israeli jew hindu best duo!!!!
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Willmogulater, Bars, itzyaboyJJ and 7 others
Some indian got an erection from reading that
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Bars, Basedman420, itzyaboyJJ and 7 others
IMG 3446
IMG 3447
Hindu symbol of peace jfl.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: DravidianFootjob, e1488shciozl, Bars and 11 others
Jai Hind!!!!!
Israeli jew hindu best duo!!!!
Some indian got an erection from reading that
Curry getting orgasm

Time has come for these muzzies to be shown their place for these goatfucking muslims mutilated dicks to get put back in the cage where they belong. I like seeing videos of these mullahs dead bodies by the side of the road. Every bomb blast video, every missile strike that results in the bloodied decaying bodies of Muslims to be washed up on the streets make it happy. It is blissful to see them getting murdered and trampled on like cockroaches.
It fills my heart with joy to see fear in their eyes as their pedo faggots get ass raped and destroyed. Hopefully we get more content from this. I'll save it all in a folder and jerk off to it everyday showing it to muzzies who cross the line. I wish I could see their dead bodies in person. Would be the most satisfying moment ever
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Bars, Basedman420, itzyaboyJJ and 2 others
Did they take down thier own? :lul:
IMG 1152
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: distance decay, itzyaboyJJ, It'snotover and 3 others
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: e1488shciozl, Bars, itzyaboyJJ and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: Bars, It'snotover, Sicilian Cyclops and 2 others
I feel like Indians hate Muslims soley because they want western validation
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX and ztoned
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual, It'snotover, klip11 and 3 others
I feel like Indians hate Muslims soley because they want western validation
Muslims ruled 1000 years over them, that's why they're obsessed with being anti-Islam. And people still think the two-nation theory is incorrect. :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Basedman420, back/forward, Jason Voorhees and 2 others
Disagree. Hindus and muslims are existential enemies
Muslims ruled 1000 years over them, that's why they're obsessed with being anti-Islam. And people still think the two-nation theory is incorrect. :forcedsmile:
Is it to do with the religious teaching or more so to do with Muslims past rule over India
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar and Jason Voorhees
Is it to do with the religious teaching or more so to do with Muslims past rule over India
Muslim rule over India, but eh, those rulers came from outside of South Asia mainly (initially anyway) so it makes little sense to hate their own Islamic people (in India anyway).
 
  • +1
Reactions: back/forward, Shahnameh, Jason Voorhees and 1 other person
Muslim rule over India, but eh, those rulers came from outside of South Asia mainly (initially anyway) so it makes little sense to hate their own Islamic people (in India anyway).
Do the shiks hate Muslims too?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: ascension, ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨ and santnewgen
Do the shiks hate Muslims too?
In the past, they used to because they fought against Afghans. The Sikhs got together to repel the Afghans who had invaded Punjab (which is around 55% in Pakistan and 45% in India) and then they decided to take some Afghan land themselves. When Jinnah (the founding father of Pakistan) invited the Sikhs to join Pakistan, they refused. Instead, they decided to stay with India. In later years, they were affected by sectarian wars between dindus and Sikhs in the 1980s which has caused some division among Punjabis in India. Some want their own country, others don't. Pakistan has done a good job of facilitating pilgrims to Sikhs since their holiest city is actually in the Pakistani side of Punjab, so many Sikhs don't necessarily hate Pakistan, I'd say they're mostly neutral although some are pro-India. It depends on who you're dealing with. Sikhs believe they should protect people so they do not believe in hating anyone on the basis of their religion. However like I said, some are still pro-India and can be extremists. For instance, soldiers of the Indian army who were Sikh committed some atrocities in Kashmir in the 20th centuries, some decades ago.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Kroker, back/forward, ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨ and 1 other person
Salludon should move to America, I don’t want bro to get nuked πŸ’”
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ascension, It'snotover, ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨ and 1 other person
It was just 150 Muslim turks that conquered the entire Indian sub continent for a thousand years.


They had a small invading force but conquests (like Muhammad of Ghor or Mahmud of Ghazni) relied on alliances local recruits and expanding armies. Empires like the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal Empire were built and maintained by tens of thousands of soldiers administrators most of them were Indian not foreigners.

Btw not muslims were bad like Hindus make them out to be. Mughals and Delhi sultanate integrated into Indian society well they patronized Indian art, architecture, and language, and ruled with the help of Hindu and other non-Muslim elites.
 


Pakshit and ShitIndia livestream ^
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
They had a small invading force but conquests (like Muhammad of Ghor or Mahmud of Ghazni) relied on alliances local recruits and expanding armies. Empires like the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal Empire were built and maintained by tens of thousands of soldiers administrators most of them were Indian not foreigners.

Btw not muslims were bad like Hindus make them out to be. Mughals and Delhi sultanate integrated into Indian society well they patronized Indian art, architecture, and language, and ruled with the help of Hindu and other non-Muslim elites.

The initial invasion was small, the Number of Turkic people was small. Pajeet recruits means nothing

They just used pajeets to kill other pajeets

Apperntly they would just set horses on fire and send them towards the indian elephants who would get scared and trample the indian soldiers
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees, ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨ and CEO
They had a small invading force but conquests (like Muhammad of Ghor or Mahmud of Ghazni) relied on alliances local recruits and expanding armies. Empires like the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal Empire were built and maintained by tens of thousands of soldiers administrators most of them were Indian not foreigners.

Btw not muslims were bad like Hindus make them out to be. Mughals and Delhi sultanate integrated into Indian society well they patronized Indian art, architecture, and language, and ruled with the help of Hindu and other non-Muslim elites.
@ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨
 
  • +1
Reactions: ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨

The initial invasion was small, the Number of Turkic people was small. Pajeet recruits means nothing

They just used pajeets to kill other pajeets
Shark Tank Mark GIF by ABC Network

Shark Tank Writing GIF


Yes "Saar" I know the drill.
When the shitskin juden speaks. This good aryan goy listens and takes notes...
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Shahnameh and Jason Voorhees
In the past, they used to because they fought against Afghans. The Sikhs got together to repel the Afghans who had invaded Punjab (which is around 55% in Pakistan and 45% in India) and then they decided to take some Afghan land themselves. When Jinnah (the founding father of Pakistan) invited the Sikhs to join Pakistan, they refused. Instead, they decided to stay with India. In later years, they were affected by sectarian wars between dindus and Sikhs in the 1980s which has caused some division among Punjabis in India. Some want their own country, others don't. Pakistan has done a good job of facilitating pilgrims to Sikhs since their holiest city is actually in the Pakistani side of Punjab, so many Sikhs don't necessarily hate Pakistan, I'd say they're mostly neutral although some are pro-India. It depends on who you're dealing with. Sikhs believe they should protect people so they do not believe in hating anyone on the basis of their religion. However like I said, some are still pro-India and can be extremists. For instance, soldiers of the Indian army who were Sikh committed some atrocities in Kashmir in the 20th centuries, some decades ago.
It's very interesting learning the geopolitical issues of south Asia.

Muslims committed atrocities
@Gengar
is it true?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar and Jason Voorhees

The initial invasion was small, the Number of Turkic people was small. Pajeet recruits means nothing

They just used pajeets to kill other pajeets
Thay is how colonization works. Building small colonies and expanding by recruiting people of their own that are loyal to you by giving gifts, land and rewards to wage war and defeat the ones that oppose you. The British also did the same thing
 
  • +1
Reactions: ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨, Shahnameh and CEO
It was just 150 Muslim turks that conquered the entire Indian sub continent for a thousand years.


It started with the Arabs in the 8th century, when an 18 year old commander conquered Sindh which is in southeastern Pakistan after the Hindus there looted Muslim boats constantly, even keeping Muslim hostages. But at the time, they couldn't spread the faith beyond Sindh as there were Hindus who halted their expansion and would sometimes defeat the Arabs in battle. In the subsequent centuries, local Sufi saints helped revert many Hindus to revert to Islam. Then a few centuries later came Babur, a Turkic-Mongol hybrid (ethnically Mongol, culturally Turkic), who created the Mughal Empire (Mughal being the bastardized version of the word "Mongol") because he used gunpowder weapons from China and which was a recent invention that secured his victory. After that, Muslims kept ruling until the British came.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
It's very interesting learning the geopolitical issues of south Asia.


@Gengar
is it true?
Not sure what @Jason Voorhees is talking about "Muslims committing atrocities," can you elaborate? Which period are we talking about? Which events?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨
Ghazni, Alauddin Khalji, Ghori looting temples and forceful conversions. Sikh gurus being executed by mughals etc
Not sure what @Jason Voorhees is talking about "Muslims committing atrocities," can you elaborate? Which period are we talking about? Which events?
 
  • +1
Reactions: ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨ and Gengar
Ghazni, Alauddin Khalji, Ghori looting temples and forceful conversions. Sikh gurus being executed by mughals etc
I see. Fair enough, they were the enemies of my ancestors at one point. Can't defend that. I thought you were talking relatively recent issues. :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual, Jason Voorhees and ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨
I see. Fair enough, they were the enemies of my ancestors at one point. Can't defend that. I thought you were talking relatively recent issues. :forcedsmile:
Believe it or not Afghanistan used to be Buddhist land before islam
 
  • +1
Reactions: ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨ and Gengar
  • +1
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard, Jason Voorhees and Gengar
Believe it or not Afghanistan used to be Buddhist land before islam
I'm very much aware. Along with Northwestern Pakistan. My ancestors were Buddhists too.

Screenshot 2025 01 25 195902


It would explain why I have around 20% Steppe despite having no Steppe haplogroups and that's because it's said female-mediated Steppe migrations took place there, but that's the only place where female-mediated Steppe took place. Elsewhere in South Asia was male-mediated Steppe, evidenced by the overwhelming presence of R1a-Z93, a Steppe haplogroup.

That said, many Afghans were also Zoroastrians. It's the Afghans that shared a nation with mine that were Buddhists.
 
  • +1
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard and Jason Voorhees
WE LUB ISRAEL
1000046037
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Shahnameh, ζˆ‘ιœ€θ¦ι˜΄ιƒ¨, Sub5 & Celibate and 1 other person
I'm very much aware. Along with Northwestern Pakistan. My ancestors were Buddhists too.

View attachment 3710629

It would explain why I have around 20% Steppe despite having no Steppe haplogroups and that's because it's said female-mediated Steppe migrations took place there, but that's the only place where female-mediated Steppe took place. Elsewhere in South Asia was male-mediated Steppe, evidenced by the overwhelming presence of R1a-Z93, a Steppe haplogroup.

That said, many Afghans were also Zoroastrians. It's the Afghans that shared a nation with mine that were Buddhists.
Afghans were Buddhists ??
1000046593
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Gengar
I'm very much aware. Along with Northwestern Pakistan. My ancestors were Buddhists too.

View attachment 3710629

It would explain why I have around 20% Steppe despite having no Steppe haplogroups and that's because it's said female-mediated Steppe migrations took place there, but that's the only place where female-mediated Steppe took place. Elsewhere in South Asia was male-mediated Steppe, evidenced by the overwhelming presence of R1a-Z93, a Steppe haplogroup.

That said, many Afghans were also Zoroastrians. It's the Afghans that shared a nation with mine that were Buddhists.
The history of my state is very boring unlike north India. No one conquered us, no colonies, no great unification like Chola, Vijaynagar, Mughals. No minorities to fight ,No wars nothing the closest we have gotten to something like this is small naval battles with Portuguese, Dutch, and British arriving in Kerala that thr locals one but they solved everything through diplomacy anyway. @loyolaxavvierretard
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar and loyolaxavvierretard
The history of my state is very boring unlike north India. No one conquered us, no colonies, no great unification like Chola, Vijaynagar. No minorities to fight ,No wars nothing the closest we have gotten to getting conquered is The Portuguese, Dutch, and British arruving in Kerala but local solved everything through diplomacy anyway.
Kerala never had a lot of problems that plagued the BIMARU states. What do you think of the parties though ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
The history of my state is very boring unlike north India. No one conquered us, no colonies, no great unification like Chola, Vijaynagar, Mughals. No minorities to fight ,No wars nothing the closest we have gotten to getting conquered is The Portuguese, Dutch, and British arruving in Kerala but local solved everything through diplomacy anyway. @loyolaxavvierretard
Many people from South India are basically my distant cousins. Many share the same paternal haplogroup as me, it's because some of my (male) ancestors from the IVC era migrated towards what is now South India. The haplogroup I have originated around the Indus valley (in Pakistan), but peaks mostly in South Indians and is rare among Indo-Aryans in Pakistan and India. :ogre:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
looks like all that dicksucking to israel from india actually worked at the end

now they are " protected " by the jews :ROFLMAO:
Now they're an unstoppable force. If Israel is on your side, then so is the US, the UK, and the whole western world.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Funnyunenjoyer1
Many people from South India are basically my distant cousins. Many share the same paternal haplogroup as me, it's because some of my (male) ancestors from the IVC era migrated towards what is now South India. The haplogroup I have originated around the Indus valley (in Pakistan), but peaks mostly in South Indians and is rare among Indo-Aryans in Pakistan and India. :ogre:
Indo Aryans have higher Steppe than Iranian-N that is what contributes to their looks not thr higher IN
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
Indo Aryans have higher Steppe than Iranian-N that is what contributes to their looks not thr higher IN
Yes, Indo-Aryans with medium to high Steppe usually also have Steppe Y-DNA haplogroups like R1a-Z93. Some will even have Steppe mtDNA haplogroups. However, for someone who lacks both a Steppe Y-DNA haplogroup as well as a Steppe mtDNA haplogroup, I still have a decent amount of Steppe (~20%, could also be 19% but also 23%, I've not ran my qpAdm yet). This must come from the female-mediated Steppe, since Swat Valley was known for being the only place in South Asia that received a female-mediated Steppe input.
 
  • +1
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard and Jason Voorhees
Indo Aryans have higher Steppe than Iranian-N that is what contributes to their looks not thr higher IN
I am mostly Farmer/Iran_N, rest is followed by Steppe and SAHG. Iran_N would be 50+%, Steppe around 20% and SAHG around 23%. I still need to run my qpAdm, but I also heard that qpAdm is pretty bad anyway. Not sure why South Asians are obsessed with it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard

Similar threads

Sub5 & Celibate
Replies
7
Views
120
Sub5 & Celibate
Sub5 & Celibate
Sub5 & Celibate
Replies
21
Views
158
Hernan
Hernan
Sub5 & Celibate
Replies
10
Views
130
CorinthianLOX
CorinthianLOX
Manchild_v2
Replies
0
Views
37
Manchild_v2
Manchild_v2
The Homelander
Replies
18
Views
184
Old Bvll
Old Bvll

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top