
Jason Voorhees
π―ππ― ππππ π΅πππππ
- Joined
- May 15, 2020
- Posts
- 58,228
- Reputation
- 161,690
Jfl 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Jai Hind!!!!!
Israeli jew hindu best duo!!!!
Some indian got an erection from reading that
Curry getting orgasmView attachment 3710542View attachment 3710543Hindu symbol of peace jfl.
Time has come for these muzzies to be shown their place for these goatfucking muslims mutilated dicks to get put back in the cage where they belong. I like seeing videos of these mullahs dead bodies by the side of the road. Every bomb blast video, every missile strike that results in the bloodied decaying bodies of Muslims to be washed up on the streets make it happy. It is blissful to see them getting murdered and trampled on like cockroaches.
It fills my heart with joy to see fear in their eyes as their pedo faggots get ass raped and destroyed. Hopefully we get more content from this. I'll save it all in a folder and jerk off to it everyday showing it to muzzies who cross the line. I wish I could see their dead bodies in person. Would be the most satisfying moment ever
Maybe the indians should bring this flagCurry getting orgasm
I wouldn't trust anything atm. Everything is propoganda
Disagree. Hindus and muslims are existential enemiesI feel like Indians hate Muslims soley because they want western validation
Muslims ruled 1000 years over them, that's why they're obsessed with being anti-Islam. And people still think the two-nation theory is incorrect.I feel like Indians hate Muslims soley because they want western validation
Disagree. Hindus and muslims are existential enemies
Is it to do with the religious teaching or more so to do with Muslims past rule over IndiaMuslims ruled 1000 years over them, that's why they're obsessed with being anti-Islam. And people still think the two-nation theory is incorrect.![]()
Does this mean you and @cromagnon are joining forces to defeat the Haitian cannibal menace?
Muslim rule over India, but eh, those rulers came from outside of South Asia mainly (initially anyway) so it makes little sense to hate their own Islamic people (in India anyway).Is it to do with the religious teaching or more so to do with Muslims past rule over India
Do the shiks hate Muslims too?Muslim rule over India, but eh, those rulers came from outside of South Asia mainly (initially anyway) so it makes little sense to hate their own Islamic people (in India anyway).
Muslim rule over India, but eh, those rulers came from outside of South Asia mainly (initially anyway) so it makes little sense to hate their own Islamic people (in India anyway).
Muslims committed atrocitiesIs it to do with the religious teaching or more so to do with Muslims past rule over India
In the past, they used to because they fought against Afghans. The Sikhs got together to repel the Afghans who had invaded Punjab (which is around 55% in Pakistan and 45% in India) and then they decided to take some Afghan land themselves. When Jinnah (the founding father of Pakistan) invited the Sikhs to join Pakistan, they refused. Instead, they decided to stay with India. In later years, they were affected by sectarian wars between dindus and Sikhs in the 1980s which has caused some division among Punjabis in India. Some want their own country, others don't. Pakistan has done a good job of facilitating pilgrims to Sikhs since their holiest city is actually in the Pakistani side of Punjab, so many Sikhs don't necessarily hate Pakistan, I'd say they're mostly neutral although some are pro-India. It depends on who you're dealing with. Sikhs believe they should protect people so they do not believe in hating anyone on the basis of their religion. However like I said, some are still pro-India and can be extremists. For instance, soldiers of the Indian army who were Sikh committed some atrocities in Kashmir in the 20th centuries, some decades ago.Do the shiks hate Muslims too?
They had a small invading force but conquests (like Muhammad of Ghor or Mahmud of Ghazni) relied on alliances local recruits and expanding armies. Empires like the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal Empire were built and maintained by tens of thousands of soldiers administrators most of them were Indian not foreigners.It was just 150 Muslim turks that conquered the entire Indian sub continent for a thousand years.
![]()
Khalji dynasty - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
![]()
Tughlaq dynasty - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
"JAI SHREEEEE RAMMMMMMM SAAAAAAAR EEENDDDDIIIAAAA LUBBBBBBBBB IZZRAAUUHULLLLL VVVOMANNN!!!!!!"
They had a small invading force but conquests (like Muhammad of Ghor or Mahmud of Ghazni) relied on alliances local recruits and expanding armies. Empires like the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal Empire were built and maintained by tens of thousands of soldiers administrators most of them were Indian not foreigners.
Btw not muslims were bad like Hindus make them out to be. Mughals and Delhi sultanate integrated into Indian society well they patronized Indian art, architecture, and language, and ruled with the help of Hindu and other non-Muslim elites.
@ζιθ¦ι΄ι¨They had a small invading force but conquests (like Muhammad of Ghor or Mahmud of Ghazni) relied on alliances local recruits and expanding armies. Empires like the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal Empire were built and maintained by tens of thousands of soldiers administrators most of them were Indian not foreigners.
Btw not muslims were bad like Hindus make them out to be. Mughals and Delhi sultanate integrated into Indian society well they patronized Indian art, architecture, and language, and ruled with the help of Hindu and other non-Muslim elites.
![]()
Ghaznavids - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
The initial invasion was small, the Number of Turkic people was small. Pajeet recruits means nothing
They just used pajeets to kill other pajeets
It's very interesting learning the geopolitical issues of south Asia.In the past, they used to because they fought against Afghans. The Sikhs got together to repel the Afghans who had invaded Punjab (which is around 55% in Pakistan and 45% in India) and then they decided to take some Afghan land themselves. When Jinnah (the founding father of Pakistan) invited the Sikhs to join Pakistan, they refused. Instead, they decided to stay with India. In later years, they were affected by sectarian wars between dindus and Sikhs in the 1980s which has caused some division among Punjabis in India. Some want their own country, others don't. Pakistan has done a good job of facilitating pilgrims to Sikhs since their holiest city is actually in the Pakistani side of Punjab, so many Sikhs don't necessarily hate Pakistan, I'd say they're mostly neutral although some are pro-India. It depends on who you're dealing with. Sikhs believe they should protect people so they do not believe in hating anyone on the basis of their religion. However like I said, some are still pro-India and can be extremists. For instance, soldiers of the Indian army who were Sikh committed some atrocities in Kashmir in the 20th centuries, some decades ago.
@GengarMuslims committed atrocities
Thay is how colonization works. Building small colonies and expanding by recruiting people of their own that are loyal to you by giving gifts, land and rewards to wage war and defeat the ones that oppose you. The British also did the same thing![]()
Ghaznavids - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
The initial invasion was small, the Number of Turkic people was small. Pajeet recruits means nothing
They just used pajeets to kill other pajeets
It started with the Arabs in the 8th century, when an 18 year old commander conquered Sindh which is in southeastern Pakistan after the Hindus there looted Muslim boats constantly, even keeping Muslim hostages. But at the time, they couldn't spread the faith beyond Sindh as there were Hindus who halted their expansion and would sometimes defeat the Arabs in battle. In the subsequent centuries, local Sufi saints helped revert many Hindus to revert to Islam. Then a few centuries later came Babur, a Turkic-Mongol hybrid (ethnically Mongol, culturally Turkic), who created the Mughal Empire (Mughal being the bastardized version of the word "Mongol") because he used gunpowder weapons from China and which was a recent invention that secured his victory. After that, Muslims kept ruling until the British came.It was just 150 Muslim turks that conquered the entire Indian sub continent for a thousand years.
![]()
Khalji dynasty - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
![]()
Tughlaq dynasty - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Not sure what @Jason Voorhees is talking about "Muslims committing atrocities," can you elaborate? Which period are we talking about? Which events?It's very interesting learning the geopolitical issues of south Asia.
@Gengar
is it true?
Not sure what @Jason Voorhees is talking about "Muslims committing atrocities," can you elaborate? Which period are we talking about? Which events?
I see. Fair enough, they were the enemies of my ancestors at one point. Can't defend that. I thought you were talking relatively recent issues.Ghazni, Alauddin Khalji, Ghori looting temples and forceful conversions. Sikh gurus being executed by mughals etc
Believe it or not Afghanistan used to be Buddhist land before islamI see. Fair enough, they were the enemies of my ancestors at one point. Can't defend that. I thought you were talking relatively recent issues.![]()
The taliban blew up ancient Buddhist structuresBelieve it or not Afghanistan used to be Buddhist land before islam
I'm very much aware. Along with Northwestern Pakistan. My ancestors were Buddhists too.Believe it or not Afghanistan used to be Buddhist land before islam
The taliban blew up ancient Buddhist structures
@The Homelander my moms side and dads side support eachother
Afghans were Buddhists ??I'm very much aware. Along with Northwestern Pakistan. My ancestors were Buddhists too.
View attachment 3710629
It would explain why I have around 20% Steppe despite having no Steppe haplogroups and that's because it's said female-mediated Steppe migrations took place there, but that's the only place where female-mediated Steppe took place. Elsewhere in South Asia was male-mediated Steppe, evidenced by the overwhelming presence of R1a-Z93, a Steppe haplogroup.
That said, many Afghans were also Zoroastrians. It's the Afghans that shared a nation with mine that were Buddhists.
The history of my state is very boring unlike north India. No one conquered us, no colonies, no great unification like Chola, Vijaynagar, Mughals. No minorities to fight ,No wars nothing the closest we have gotten to something like this is small naval battles with Portuguese, Dutch, and British arriving in Kerala that thr locals one but they solved everything through diplomacy anyway. @loyolaxavvierretardI'm very much aware. Along with Northwestern Pakistan. My ancestors were Buddhists too.
View attachment 3710629
It would explain why I have around 20% Steppe despite having no Steppe haplogroups and that's because it's said female-mediated Steppe migrations took place there, but that's the only place where female-mediated Steppe took place. Elsewhere in South Asia was male-mediated Steppe, evidenced by the overwhelming presence of R1a-Z93, a Steppe haplogroup.
That said, many Afghans were also Zoroastrians. It's the Afghans that shared a nation with mine that were Buddhists.
Kerala never had a lot of problems that plagued the BIMARU states. What do you think of the parties though ?The history of my state is very boring unlike north India. No one conquered us, no colonies, no great unification like Chola, Vijaynagar. No minorities to fight ,No wars nothing the closest we have gotten to getting conquered is The Portuguese, Dutch, and British arruving in Kerala but local solved everything through diplomacy anyway.
They were also Zoroastrians. They became Islamic no later than the 11th century because that's when Mahmud of Ghazni ended up invading South Asia.Afghans were Buddhists ??
View attachment 3710656
looks like all that dicksucking to israel from india actually worked at the end
Many people from South India are basically my distant cousins. Many share the same paternal haplogroup as me, it's because some of my (male) ancestors from the IVC era migrated towards what is now South India. The haplogroup I have originated around the Indus valley (in Pakistan), but peaks mostly in South Indians and is rare among Indo-Aryans in Pakistan and India.The history of my state is very boring unlike north India. No one conquered us, no colonies, no great unification like Chola, Vijaynagar, Mughals. No minorities to fight ,No wars nothing the closest we have gotten to getting conquered is The Portuguese, Dutch, and British arruving in Kerala but local solved everything through diplomacy anyway. @loyolaxavvierretard
Now they're an unstoppable force. If Israel is on your side, then so is the US, the UK, and the whole western world.looks like all that dicksucking to israel from india actually worked at the end
now they are " protected " by the jews![]()
Indo Aryans have higher Steppe than Iranian-N that is what contributes to their looks not thr higher INMany people from South India are basically my distant cousins. Many share the same paternal haplogroup as me, it's because some of my (male) ancestors from the IVC era migrated towards what is now South India. The haplogroup I have originated around the Indus valley (in Pakistan), but peaks mostly in South Indians and is rare among Indo-Aryans in Pakistan and India.![]()
Yes, Indo-Aryans with medium to high Steppe usually also have Steppe Y-DNA haplogroups like R1a-Z93. Some will even have Steppe mtDNA haplogroups. However, for someone who lacks both a Steppe Y-DNA haplogroup as well as a Steppe mtDNA haplogroup, I still have a decent amount of Steppe (~20%, could also be 19% but also 23%, I've not ran my qpAdm yet). This must come from the female-mediated Steppe, since Swat Valley was known for being the only place in South Asia that received a female-mediated Steppe input.Indo Aryans have higher Steppe than Iranian-N that is what contributes to their looks not thr higher IN
I am mostly Farmer/Iran_N, rest is followed by Steppe and SAHG. Iran_N would be 50+%, Steppe around 20% and SAHG around 23%. I still need to run my qpAdm, but I also heard that qpAdm is pretty bad anyway. Not sure why South Asians are obsessed with it.Indo Aryans have higher Steppe than Iranian-N that is what contributes to their looks not thr higher IN