It only takes 1% of women (even less) to solve the incel problem.

[Deleted member 9003]

i disagree

a small percentage of women could fuck all the low status males out of pity and give them a sex outlet

they won't do it though because ALL WOMEN HATE INCELS

THIS IS DIFFERENT THAN MEN BECAUSE SOME MEN FEEL EMPATHY FOR UGLY WOMEN

Yea it’s called prostitutes.

And men have higher sex drives than women who are biologically programmed to have higher standards.

 

[thickdickdaddy27]

No bc it’s not about busting a nut it’s about the genuine desire, validation, loyalty, etc. It would solve literal inceldom but it wouldn’t solve the real problem

Blackpill for ur headtops

 

[Wallenberg]

BS, everyone here would fuck a fat chick

Nope.

 

[curryslayerordeath]

U feel comfortable fucking someone who thinks ur disgusting?

Cuz I've done it and felt like throwing up ded srs would have claimed rape if i was a foid

Nigga it’s not supposed to be about the situation of a specific person, rather the differences in psychology between the genders (and also the way cucked men perceive those differences).

If u want an example of the impact on a broad scale, look at the situation of young Japanese men.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

Yea it’s called prostitutes.

And men have higher sex drives than women who are biologically programmed to have higher standards.

Caveman times were worse

proves my point

women won't fuck men low status men for free

 

[Deleted member 9003]

proves my point

women won't fuck men low status men for free

It is what it is.

 

[Deleted member 7580]

BS, everyone here would fuck a fat chick, specially the guys like you who talk shit most

Maybe if I was a kebab
Non brown guys wouldn’t even get a boner for a fat white queen tbh

reminds me of my brown coworker who was in love with his fiancé, wanted to throw up when I saw her. She was a fat white chick

Seriously 90% non brown guys won’t fuck a fat white chick

 

[Wallenberg]

Maybe if I was a kebab
No brown guys would even get a boner for a fat white queen tbh

reminds me of my brown coworker who was in love with his fiancé, wanted to throw up when I saw her. She was a fat white chick

Seriously 90% non brown guys won’t fuck a fat white chick

I have noticed the same phenomena. Ethnic guys going after subhuman white girls.

 

[Deleted member 7580]

I have noticed the same phenomena. Ethnic guys going after subhuman white girls.

Bruh and many are proud lol lol

1/10 white is hotter than Adriana Lima to Indians and Muslims

 

[Deleted member 4612]

It is what it is.

that doesnt debunk my main point though

Maybe if I was a kebab
No brown guys would even get a boner for a fat white queen tbh

reminds me of my brown coworker who was in love with his fiancé, wanted to throw up when I saw her. She was a fat white chick

Seriously 90% non brown guys won’t fuck a fat white chick

I have noticed the same phenomena. Ethnic guys going after subhuman white girls.

a small percentage would, point of this thread

 

[Wallenberg]

Bruh and many are proud lol lol

1/10 white is hotter than Adriana Lima to Indians and Muslims

Good for them I guess. As a white guy, I can't relate to them.

 

[Deleted member 9003]

that doesnt debunk my main point though

I feel like anyone can have sex at least once. Unless you’re truecel or really aspie

 

[Deleted member 4612]

Most incels wouldn’t want to Fuck the kind of women who would agree to that anyway. How is it better than a prostitute jfl if they’re doing it out of Pity.

I would rather Fuck a semi attractive whore than some charity worker femcel.

"most" incels.

thanks for proving my point
a small percentage would fuck endless uglies

 

[Deleted member 9787]

they have no incentive

 

[MentalistKebab]

Nope.

Maybe if I was a kebab
Non brown guys wouldn’t even get a boner for a fat white queen tbh

reminds me of my brown coworker who was in love with his fiancé, wanted to throw up when I saw her. She was a fat white chick

Seriously 90% non brown guys won’t fuck a fat white chick

Cope, there is enough Tinder evidence how thirsty ugly white dudes are to fat women. You guys just larping to keep yourself look cool in male dominated spaces.

90% guy would fuck a legit deformed girls if they are horny, fat ones isnt even a question.

 

[Wallenberg]

Cope, there is enough Tinder evidence how thirsty ugly white dudes are to fat women. You guys just larping to keep yourself look cool in male dominated spaces.

90% guy would fuck a legit deformed girls if they are horny, fat ones isnt even a question.

Cope. No, I wouldn't fuck fat or deformed girls. But if you do... good for you I guess?

 

[antiantifa]

Man would you fuck a fat chick ? No
Girls feel same about ugly guys

a lot of men are pathetic enough to fuck fat chicks.

 

[antiantifa]

A small portion of women could fuck all the incels FOR FREE, ending inceldom. but no woman even, not a single one, tries this

why not? because they don't care

meanwhile, a man will lay his LIFE on the line for a woman he's NEVER EVEN TALKED TO.

"muh we're equal from a moral standpoint"

BULLSHIT

@Gunnersup @FastBananaCEO @TRUE_CEL @Colvin76

there's not even that many incels

 

[antiantifa]

I'd say based on what I've seen about 30-40% male incels, about 15-20% female incels. Typically male incels because of non-NT(shit personality) and/or bad looks. Female incels typically because of non-NT.

 

[RAITEIII]

lmao

why do you have to make this about ME?

why not about the whole male population?

It's not about u. I'm just talking to you.

I dont see in what way a man can be benefited by sleeping with someone who is NOT attracted to them. If anything it can potentially have the opposite effect.

 

[Deleted member 4362]

Yeah. It's like 1/10 landwhales complaining that they don't get GL men.

 

[Wallenberg]

View attachment 977549

Yeah?

 

[Deleted member 4362]

Yeah?

Online dating experiment with Pig Woman

For any doubters believing that female hypergamy doesn't exist take a look at the kind of attention this profile receives by countless thirsty men. Women simply have a much higher SMV (sexual market value). Why would women settle for an average male around her looksmatch when she can attract men...

hfboards.mandatory.com

 

[Wallenberg]

View attachment 977560

Online dating experiment with Pig Woman

For any doubters believing that female hypergamy doesn't exist take a look at the kind of attention this profile receives by countless thirsty men. Women simply have a much higher SMV (sexual market value). Why would women settle for an average male around her looksmatch when she can attract men...

hfboards.mandatory.com

Yes, I know..?

 

[Ritalincel]

Survival of the fittest. Some people were just meant to not reproduce.

Look, I don't know you and you don't know me. I don't presume to know what is best either, but I want to make a case against having this mindset because I think that, in the broadest terms, the course of human civilization depends on it. To preface, I am not saying that this attitude towards life is "wrong", or that a more compassionate and optimistic attitude is "right", but I want to point out that these two opposing ways of seeing the world impact our actions throughout life and thereby perpetuate themselves into other people's mindsets. I am saying that it's up to each one of us -- you included -- to decide which type of world we want to live in -- a "survival of the fittest" world or a compassionate world -- and then act accordingly.

For example, you personally have likely only adopted this attitude because other people who hold this exact mindset have screwed you over enough times to harden you into thinking this way. This taught you that the world is largely full of uncaring and uncompassionate strangers. If you then act accordingly, pursuing your own agenda at the expense of others, you will only perpetuate that cycle, instilling this mindset into another person and so on.

I absolutely recognize how ruthless we can be towards one another. And I also fully agree that there is value in that recognition; you can save yourself and your family a ton of hardship by being on the lookout for people potentially shafting you and yours. But the state of your community, your country, and even the world is only a sum total of all of our actions combined.

The opposite of the above can hold just as true; if you treat the world as if it were largely full of people who try to do good and hold compassion towards one another and then you act as if that were true -- showing care and compassion to those around you -- then you will perpetuate that mindset instead and you will touch some people along the way and inspire them to live too in compassion and generosity.

I think as a society, we are definitely moving away from compassion and it has had an extreme snowballing effect. I guess my argument is that if you personally wish the world weren't heading towards a "survival of the fittest" mentality reigning supreme and unchallenged, then I earnestly believe that it's your duty to be a force for the opposite mindset. Thanks for reading and I sincerely wish you the best, whether this has swayed you or not.

 

[Deleted member 9003]

Look, I don't know you and you don't know me. I don't presume to know what is best either, but I want to make a case against having this mindset because I think that, in the broadest terms, the course of human civilization depends on it. To preface, I am not saying that this attitude towards life is "wrong", or that a more compassionate and optimistic attitude is "right", but I want to point out that these two opposing ways of seeing the world impact our actions throughout life and thereby perpetuate themselves into other people's mindsets. I am saying that it's up to each one of us -- you included -- to decide which type of world we want to live in -- a "survival of the fittest" world or a compassionate world -- and then act accordingly.

For example, you personally have likely only adopted this attitude because other people who hold this exact mindset have screwed you over enough times to harden you into thinking this way. This taught you that the world is largely full of uncaring and uncompassionate strangers. If you then act accordingly, pursuing your own agenda at the expense of others, you will only perpetuate that cycle, instilling this mindset into another person and so on.

I absolutely recognize how ruthless we can be towards one another. And I also fully agree that there is value in that recognition; you can save yourself and your family a ton of hardship by being on the lookout for people potentially shafting you and yours. But the state of your community, your country, and even the world is only a sum total of all of our actions combined.

The opposite of the above can hold just as true; if you treat the world as if it were largely full of people who try to do good and hold compassion towards one another and then you act as if that were true -- showing care and compassion to those around you -- then you will perpetuate that mindset instead and you will touch some people along the way and inspire them to live too in compassion and generosity.

I think as a society, we are definitely moving away from compassion and it has had an extreme snowballing effect. I guess my argument is that if you personally wish the world weren't heading towards a "survival of the fittest" mentality reigning supreme and unchallenged, then I earnestly believe that it's your duty to be a force for the opposite mindset. Thanks for reading and I sincerely wish you the best, whether this has swayed you or not.

Yea I agree. I’m closer to a compassionate mindset.

 

[Deleted member 4887]

Look, I don't know you and you don't know me. I don't presume to know what is best either, but I want to make a case against having this mindset because I think that, in the broadest terms, the course of human civilization depends on it. To preface, I am not saying that this attitude towards life is "wrong", or that a more compassionate and optimistic attitude is "right", but I want to point out that these two opposing ways of seeing the world impact our actions throughout life and thereby perpetuate themselves into other people's mindsets. I am saying that it's up to each one of us -- you included -- to decide which type of world we want to live in -- a "survival of the fittest" world or a compassionate world -- and then act accordingly.

For example, you personally have likely only adopted this attitude because other people who hold this exact mindset have screwed you over enough times to harden you into thinking this way. This taught you that the world is largely full of uncaring and uncompassionate strangers. If you then act accordingly, pursuing your own agenda at the expense of others, you will only perpetuate that cycle, instilling this mindset into another person and so on.

I absolutely recognize how ruthless we can be towards one another. And I also fully agree that there is value in that recognition; you can save yourself and your family a ton of hardship by being on the lookout for people potentially shafting you and yours. But the state of your community, your country, and even the world is only a sum total of all of our actions combined.

The opposite of the above can hold just as true; if you treat the world as if it were largely full of people who try to do good and hold compassion towards one another and then you act as if that were true -- showing care and compassion to those around you -- then you will perpetuate that mindset instead and you will touch some people along the way and inspire them to live too in compassion and generosity.

I think as a society, we are definitely moving away from compassion and it has had an extreme snowballing effect. I guess my argument is that if you personally wish the world weren't heading towards a "survival of the fittest" mentality reigning supreme and unchallenged, then I earnestly believe that it's your duty to be a force for the opposite mindset. Thanks for reading and I sincerely wish you the best, whether this has swayed you or not.

People with norwood 2 and lower can follow that treat everyone with kindness agenda. For us baldie's we should unironically try to fuck over everyone that we meet to get even with our situation

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

A small portion of women could fuck all the incels FOR FREE, ending inceldom. but no woman even, not a single one, tries this

why not? because they don't care

meanwhile, a man will lay his LIFE on the line for a woman he's NEVER EVEN TALKED TO.

"muh we're equal from a moral standpoint"

BULLSHIT

@Gunnersup @FastBananaCEO @TRUE_CEL @Colvin76

extremely high iq, if inceldom is truly a so called social pandemic then like covid the world (or in this case females) can come together and take care of the problem in an instant.