It should be illegal for anyone below lmtn to reproduce , and also illegal for anyone below 5'8(male) / 5'1 (female)

[saiflv]

It should be illegal for anyone below lmtn to reproduce , and also illegal for anyone below 5'8(male) / 5'1 (female) to reproduce

 

[IttyBittyKitty]

 

[Quetila]

why would 5’8 and 5’1 be able to reproduce? retard

 

[saiflv]

why would 5’8 and 5’1 be able to reproduce? retard

ik people with parents shorter than this grow above 6ft

 

[Quetila]

ik people with parents shorter than this grow above 6ft

nobody cares about ur anecdotes

 

[horseman.]

You cant completely wipe out genetic traits like being unattractive or short. They will always exist and a rule like this will only create more social prejudice towards these groups than there already is

 

[saiflv]

You cant completely wipe out genetic traits like being unattractive or short. They will always exist and a rule like this will only cause more social prejudice towards these groups than there already is

actually now that I think about it, you aren't wrong, it would just raise beauty standards higher than they are, people at the bottom would still be at the bottom (despite the fact that they are more attractive than people are in general currently), and would be treated as an unattractive person

 

[trueascender11]

It should be illegal for anyone below lmtn to reproduce , and also illegal for anyone below 5'8(male) / 5'1 (female) to reproduce

shut up

 

[n1ks09]

actually now that I think about it, you aren't wrong, it would just raise beauty standards higher than they are, people at the bottom would still be at the bottom (despite the fact that they are more attractive than people are in general currently), and would be treated as an unattractive person

Thats what i thought. It seems right to make it illegal but still it would do anything at the end due to what u r saying

 

[Zaref]

You cant completely wipe out genetic traits like being unattractive or short. They will always exist and a rule like this will only create more social prejudice towards these groups than there already is

This retard doesn't realize attractiveness is inherently relative and positional, not absolute. All traits like symmetry, height, facial ratios, status signals derive their value from comparative advantage within a population, not some fixed Platonic ideal. Elevate every human alive to the level of HTN tomorrow, and the hierarchy would emerge again. Novel aesthetic standards would emerge to reestablish differentiation.

The same tail end inequalities in mating success would reassert themselves, because human mate selection is an arms race wired by evolution for relative fitness, not egalitarian equilibrium.

Such universal upgrading merely shifts the baseline upward while preserving the distribution of outcomes.

 

[saiflv]

This retard doesn't realize attractiveness is inherently relative and positional, not absolute. All traits like symmetry, height, facial ratios, status signals derive their value from comparative advantage within a population, not some fixed Platonic ideal. Elevate every human alive to the level of HTN tomorrow, and the hierarchy would emerge again. Novel aesthetic standards would emerge to reestablish differentiation.

The same tail end inequalities in mating success would reassert themselves, because human mate selection is an arms race wired by evolution for relative fitness, not egalitarian equilibrium.

Such universal upgrading merely shifts the baseline upward while preserving the distribution of outcomes.

Yeah, I realised this as well