It was easier to get a girlfriend before the internet

lurking truecel

lurking truecel

Good old lurker
Joined
Jul 12, 2024
Posts
18,901
Reputation
29,167
Screenshot 20250607 192523

I saw a girl posted this on her facebook :feelsokman:
 
  • +1
Reactions: MFMF, KKKuroiso, Someguy XD and 1 other person
I don't want to be that guy but... water.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops, lurking truecel and KKKuroiso
Yep i was about to pull a stacy before insta era
But jews were waiting me.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NormieKilla, lurking truecel and KKKuroiso
Doesn’t it go way deeper then that because girl also would have to rely on men more cause they were not so encouraged to have their own career
I mean it was mostly to show it was 5 guys on one girl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Someguy XD
Yep i was about to pull a stacy before insta era
But jews were waiting me.
I mean it was meant to show the 5:1 ratio, i guess now its 90:1 but still
 
To be honnest yes it was far more easier. Between 2005 to 2010, you would probably not get an above-average becky effortlessly (let alone Stacy) but you could absolutely meet and date normal looking chicks (the same who think they are +9/10 nowadays).

Mind you that it was not even the greatest time for men neither. The 2000's weren't all that good, but as opposed to the 2010's-2020's, those years were the golden age.

It is just insane and completely sickening how social medias and all kind of jew apps have turned an entire gender into insufferable cunts and deprived so many normal looking guys to a healthy dating life...
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops, gymcel64 and lurking truecel
Yes, back in the old days people would hang out with each other outside, just living in the moment, without staring at their phones...
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops and lurking truecel
Opinion so water even normies agree
This post was about the girl being with 5 guys as the typical ratio between women and men. Meaning it wasnt easier back then. But the number is more like 1:90 now(girls:guys)
 

Similar threads

userfromdead
Replies
7
Views
35
makhachev
makhachev
DnrGriffith
Replies
7
Views
32
ghenghis
ghenghis
RichmondBread
Replies
5
Views
64
RichmondBread
RichmondBread
KhatriMaxx
Replies
4
Views
31
John_Locke11
John_Locke11
Shrek2OnDvD
Replies
3
Views
43
fraudislaw
fraudislaw

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top