its brutal when u realise that the migrant crisis is all just about lookism

[FiendFiend]

The old farts in the comments saying they will let all them in and shit. Trust me if the boats and illegal crossings just had a bunch of hot women coming over, you wouldnt hear any outrage it would actually be welcomed.

However struggling men who come and make a career and future for themselves to send money back homes are treated like shit. Same can be send for the ukrainian women refugees who come to west europe.

Difference between these idiots and me is i believe migration of any sort, even of the same race is a mistake. I believe unless a land is uninhabited like in antartica or back in the day in the americas, no one should be migrating away from their home as it will intefere with other cultures, create civil conflict, and if one gender from a certain country goes unproportionally away from the country it will have negative effects on the country.

No to any migration. London is London, not Londongrad, Londinistan. Warsaw is warsaw not varshava. Closed borders no matter who is trying to hop the fence, regardless of skin colour, its always been like this through most of european history only post the first world war we let east europeans jump borders in mass due to the russian civil war and conflicts there. Then a couple decades after now muslim men on boats are coming.

There should be 0 empathy for any sort of migrant.

 

[VohnnyBoy]

nah im ok with fine fatimas, pajeetas and shaniquas coming to my country, but their men better be shot on borders tho

 

[stevielake]

The rise in anti-Indians in the west has become mainstream now. I'm seeing white college girls on TikTok use the word Pajeet; it's crazy. Their PR is in the fucking toilet. Blacks and Muslims have low SMV too, but it's offset by positive halos -- NBA/Thug and Saudi Prince/Exotic. Indians have nothing. They don't seem to care.

 

[FiendFiend]

nah im ok with fine fatimas, pajeetas and shaniquas coming to my country, but their men better be shot on borders tho

i genually wont be shocked if they start doing this if birth rates plummet badly, i know a lot of u niggas will gladly support this and clap this on, I will not be doing that because its putting a bandade on a massive gaping bullet wound, instead of actually taking the bullet up and stitching the skin back up we are finding shitty ccheap ways to fix it.

 

[FiendFiend]

The rise in anti-Indians in the west has become mainstream now. I'm seeing white college girls on TikTok use the word Pajeet; it's crazy. Their PR is in the fucking toilet. Blacks and Muslims have low SMV too, but it's offset by positive halos -- NBA/Thug and Saudi Prince/Exotic. Indians have nothing. They don't seem to care.

deportations for sure will begin of men. I think this is the age of deportation no doubt, however if birth rates continue to plummet the establishment will definitley definitley import foreign women, dont even think for a second they wont. They wont cheap easy shitty solutions instead of fixing their economy, living standards, society they want to try fix it thru shitty easy cheap and quick means. They will do it no doubt

 

[TAChipmunk]

I am a Londoner.

If London is London, what does that mean, and who lives in it?

London initially was called 'Londinium', which began life as Roman settlement, and the Roman legion who made it was very ethnically diverse. There were mercenaries from areas in North Africa, as we can deduce from isotope analysis of skeletal remains, and then carbon date them, as well as armies from Italic people of the epicentre of the empire, as well as Dacians, Thracians, even groups from Antioch which was a multicultural city.

It's hard to delineate sovereignty of something to one group, when one group is made up of many different groups, that then change hands and share/ lose cultural and generic influence over time, so it begs the question, what are you even actually 'preserving'?

 

[FiendFiend]

I am a Londoner.

If London is London, what does that mean, and who lives in it?

London initially was called 'Londinium', which began life as Roman settlement, and the Roman legion who made it was very ethnically diverse. There were mercenaries from areas in North Africa, as we can deduce from isotope analysis of skeletal remains, and then carbon date them, as well as armies from Italic people of the epicentre of the empire, as well as Dacians, Thracians, even groups from Antioch which was a multicultural city.

It's hard to delineate sovereignty of something to one group, when one group is made up of many different groups, that then change hands and share/ lose cultural and generic influence over time, so it begs the question, what are you even actually 'preserving'?

lol this is very dishonest, picking the most ethnic parts of the roman empire then saying "they held parts of london". Very dishonest. Just another lie made to justify white replacement.

"londons always been diverse", even lets say north africans held a part of quaters in the city they were military men. Thats like when the ghurkas setup base in scotland and lived in barracks there and saying "well scotland has always been diverse, the ghurkas had their own neighbourhood" or some shit.

Its super dishonest cuz they only ever made up like 1 % of the population if even that. London is under peace time, it isnt invaded, its under the british government, a country mandated and given the mandate to rule by the 99% british population prior. The british were never asked about a vote on migration.

To somehow justify london being 33% white british because of this retarded view of history shows that the education system is even perpetuating white replacement.

 

[FiendFiend]

I am a Londoner.

If London is London, what does that mean, and who lives in it?

London initially was called 'Londinium', which began life as Roman settlement, and the Roman legion who made it was very ethnically diverse. There were mercenaries from areas in North Africa, as we can deduce from isotope analysis of skeletal remains, and then carbon date them, as well as armies from Italic people of the epicentre of the empire, as well as Dacians, Thracians, even groups from Antioch which was a multicultural city.

It's hard to delineate sovereignty of something to one group, when one group is made up of many different groups, that then change hands and share/ lose cultural and generic influence over time, so it begs the question, what are you even actually 'preserving'?

goy slop Uk education system, "london has always been multicultural" then shows like a pic of the only black guy in london from 1700. Smh.

 

[GenerationalAutism]

"people react differently to hot foids they can fuck than they do to brown criminals who do nothing but rape"

 

[GenerationalAutism]

I am a Londoner.

If London is London, what does that mean, and who lives in it?

London initially was called 'Londinium', which began life as Roman settlement, and the Roman legion who made it was very ethnically diverse. There were mercenaries from areas in North Africa, as we can deduce from isotope analysis of skeletal remains, and then carbon date them, as well as armies from Italic people of the epicentre of the empire, as well as Dacians, Thracians, even groups from Antioch which was a multicultural city.

It's hard to delineate sovereignty of something to one group, when one group is made up of many different groups, that then change hands and share/ lose cultural and generic influence over time, so it begs the question, what are you even actually 'preserving'?

stop lying you jewish retard

 

[TAChipmunk]

stop lying you jewish retard
View attachment 4156998

White ≠ English

English ≠ not one single purebred tribe

 

[GenerationalAutism]

White ≠ English

English ≠ not one single purebred tribe

u didnt even watch the gif u retard

if the vast majority of whites were white british in 2001, what does that tell you about 1961 u spastic

"the english aren't one purebred tribe!" - lol as if you seriously think some guy having 1% more danish admixture than his neighbour is the same as his neighbour being paki.

you're just a lying fucking kike

 

[Tyler1]

stop lying you jewish retard
View attachment 4156998

Brutal

 

[TAChipmunk]

u didnt even watch the gif u retard

if the vast majority of whites were white british in 2001, what does that tell you about 1961 u spastic

"the english aren't one purebred tribe!" - lol as if you seriously think some guy having 1% more danish admixture than his neighbour is the same as his neighbour being paki.

you're just a lying fucking kike

So then you disagree with the OP, because he said he doesn't like immigration of any kind, even if it's just one Dane coming to London, whereas you're implying you're OK with it.

 

[GenerationalAutism]

So then you disagree with the OP, because he said he doesn't like immigration of any kind, even if it's just one Dane coming to London, whereas you're implying you're OK with it.

obviously i disagree w OP he said he's pro migrant

 

[GenerationalAutism]

also 2% foreigners is obv diff to 70% foreigners even if all foreigners are equal, u tard

 

[buddhistking]

Water, even normies know about female privilege

 

[Traxanas]

I am a Londoner.

If London is London, what does that mean, and who lives in it?

London initially was called 'Londinium', which began life as Roman settlement, and the Roman legion who made it was very ethnically diverse. There were mercenaries from areas in North Africa, as we can deduce from isotope analysis of skeletal remains, and then carbon date them, as well as armies from Italic people of the epicentre of the empire, as well as Dacians, Thracians, even groups from Antioch which was a multicultural city.

It's hard to delineate sovereignty of something to one group, when one group is made up of many different groups, that then change hands and share/ lose cultural and generic influence over time, so it begs the question, what are you even actually 'preserving'?

london’s roman diversity was imperial, not native. when rome left, so did its legions.

what lasted was the english nation forged from anglo-saxons and later shaped by normans and vikings. that mixing settled into a stable people and culture. the lesson is not endless change but the creation of something distinct worth preserving.

small, assimilated inflows can be absorbed (especially if WHITE due to cultural/ethnic similarities).

mass immigration generally cannot. it destabilizes rather than enriches. preserving english identity means defending that continuity, not repeating the churn of empire.

secondly, the cultures that come in are in no way worth intermingling with judging by the disproportionate crime rates and cultural differences that conflict.

mass immigration is not policy, it is betrayal, it only serves the elites. it plants the seeds of civil strife, even war, across europe likely within decades. when the reckoning comes, those who engineered this global neoliberal experiment will risk facing nuremberg-tier judgment at a bare minimum.

 

[TAChipmunk]

obviously i disagree w OP he said he's pro migrant

OP said he's against migration of any kind

No to any migration. London is London, not Londongrad, Londinistan. Warsaw is warsaw not varshava. Closed borders no matter who is trying to hop the fence, regardless of skin colour, its always been like this through most of european history.

There should be 0 empathy for any sort of migrant.

also 2% foreigners is obv diff to 70% foreigners even if all foreigners are equal, u tard

I didn't say I was pro-immigration anywhere.

My point is that preserving something is futile because you're never going to be preserving any one thing, and demarcating something as complex as ethnicity and race practically doesn't work. I'm not pro-immigration, I'm just saying being anti-immigrant on those means OP has stated can be intellectually dismantled fairly easily.

 

[GenerationalAutism]

OP said he's against migration of any kind




I didn't say I was pro-immigration anywhere.

My point is that preserving something is futile because you're never going to be preserving any one thing, and demarcating something as complex as ethnicity and race practically doesn't work. I'm not pro-immigration, I'm just saying being anti-immigrant on those means OP has stated can be intellectually dismantled fairly easily.

this is such retarded logic

it's like saying colours don't exist because anything you actually see in real life is always a mix of colours, and that therefore it doesn't matter if someone paints your entire house black, furniture included