It's dumb that nobody could get a perfect rating

[Meteor21]

Why are the best looking people on the planet like 7 PSL max?

What would an 8 PSL person look like, show me with AI.

This exists with rating things in general. Why is the best pizza Dave Portnoy tried a 9.4/10? That's retarded. If it's literally the best it should be 10/10.

 

[Looxmaxzer]

Why are the best looking people on the planet like 7 PSL max?

What would an 8 PSL person look like, show me with AI.

This exists with rating things in general. Why is the best pizza Dave Portnoy tried a 9.4/10? That's retarded. If it's literally the best it should be 10/10.

Psl this psl that, looks are subjective past 7/10, after chadlite u are just gonna have to depend on status

 

[cobicado901]

Why are the best looking people on the planet like 7 PSL max?

What would an 8 PSL person look like, show me with AI.

This exists with rating things in general. Why is the best pizza Dave Portnoy tried a 9.4/10? That's retarded. If it's literally the best it should be 10/10.

That’s so fucking dumb. It’s obvious that u didn’t take statistics in high school or college lol, this is basic shit.

 

[Meteor21]

That’s so fucking dumb. It’s obvious that u didn’t take statistics in high school or college lol, this is basic shit.

Then elaborate, I don't care about your stupid assertions

 

[Meteor21]

Looksmaxxers on suicide watch after I question their religion

 

[tuberculosisinmybal]

i'm rated perfectly

 

[Mogs Me]

That’s so fucking dumb. It’s obvious that u didn’t take statistics in high school or college lol, this is basic shit.

Op the type of nigga to try quantum tunneling through a brick wall by running to it and slamming his whole body to see what’s through it instead of walking around it

 

[Meteor21]

Op the type of nigga to try quantum tunneling through a brick wall by running to it and slamming his whole body to see what’s through it instead of walking around it

Bro is upset

 

[cobicado901]

Then elaborate, I don't care about your stupid assertions

idk how the PSL scale is formed.
but 10/10 would be probably 1/1 gazillion

this can be wrong if interpreted in the wrong way but I will explain like y are a 8y old: let’s say if 8.5 is the max of someone alive (Matt boomer or something like that), then he is 1/8 billion. A 9 can be 1/100 billion and so on so on, bell curve blah blah blah (search what a bell curve is on google)

how can someone score like 9.7? it would be crazy, we would need to hit the lottery billions and billions of times so someone can reach those looks

ofc a 10 is nearly impossible cause there’s always something to improve in the ratio (even by 0.00000000001 psl)

 

[Meteor21]

idk how the PSL scale is formed.
but 10/10 would be probably 1/1 gazillion

this can be wrong if interpreted in the wrong way but I will explain like y are a 8y old: let’s say if 8.5 is the max of someone alive (Matt boomer or something like that), then he is 1/8 billion. A 9 can be 1/100 billion and so on so on, bell curve blah blah blah (search what a bell curve is on google)

how can someone score like 9.7? it would be crazy, we would need to hit the lottery billions and billions of times so someone can reach those looks

ofc a 10 is nearly impossible cause there’s always something to improve in the ratio (even by 0.00000000001 psl)

Ok, you're not explaining why it'd have to be 1/gazillion rather than 1/billion. Or why 7 psl is the max. Also you're not acknowledging that there is a max, after a certain point someone can't be more gl. You explained nothing.

 

[cobicado901]

Ok, you're not explaining why it'd have to be 1/gazillion rather than 1/billion. Or why 7 psl is the max. You explained nothing.

Idk who formed it but of course you have to give it some margin if u want an objective criteria.

it would make less sense if 10/10 is like 1 in a thousand. There would be a lot lol. And u can notice differences and make comparasions between 10/10 people (there’s gonna be a 10/10 person more beautiful than another 10/10 person and this doesn’t make sense, the scale would be flawed).

it doesn’t have to be 7, it can be 9 and the difference between 9 - 9.1 be the same as to 7 - 8 (then the bell curve would be changed, quadrants blah blah blah) its just what the person who created preferred (if the math and differences are consistent) but making a 10/10 alive doesn’t make sense.

 

[Meteor21]

Idk who formed it but of course you have to give it some margin if u want an objective criteria.

it would make less sense if 10/10 is like 1 in a thousand. There would be a lot lol. And u can notice differences and make comparasions between 10/10 people (there’s gonna be a 10/10 person more beautiful than another 10/10 person and this doesn’t make sense, the scale would be flawed).

it doesn’t have to be 7, it can be 9 and the difference between 9 - 9.1 be the same as to 7 - 8 (then the bell curve would be changed, quadrants blah blah blah) its just what the person who created preferred (if the math and differences are consistent) but making a 10/10 alive doesn’t make sense.

Bud, I didn't say 1/1000, 1/billion. At that point idk why you can't have a perfect person, if such a thing exists. Regardless ai should be able to create such a thing and I doubt it'd be far off from the best looking people

 

[cobicado901]

Bud, I didn't say 1/1000, 1/billion. At that point idk why you can't have a perfect person, if such a thing exists. Regardless ai should be able to create such a thing and I doubt it'd be far off from the best looking people

It’s always evolving and there’s always more people on earth, with different genetics etc.

if 1/billion, there’s 8 people 10/10 (in theory) and ofc those 8 won’t score the same if you go under analysis in every single centimeter of their face. The PSL scale was to be this precise (for autists because no one cares irl)

even if it’s no “far off from the best looking people” it would be off lol, that’s why u need a different number. but anyways PSL scale was just to be this “objective” and precise. it doesn’t matter don’t think about it. I was just countering your point from a statistics view.

 

[Meteor21]

It’s always evolving and there’s always more people on earth, with different genetics etc.

if 1/billion, there’s 8 people 10/10 (in theory) and ofc those 8 won’t score the same if you go under analysis in every single centimeter of their face. The PSL scale was to be this precise (for autists because no one cares irl)

even if it’s no “far off from the best looking people” it would be off lol, that’s why u need a different number. but anyways PSL scale was just to be this “objective” and precise. it doesn’t matter don’t think about it. I was just countering your point from a statistics view.

I don't think you succeeded, my point stands, it's a math equation, more people shouldn't influence how gl a person can get