its hard not to hate slavs

Why do you think Hitler won in 1933? By the funds of average man?
because rich people were scared that commies will take over and genocide them
so they choose hitler as protection

they didnt want to suffer the fate of kulaks in russia
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Reinhard_Heini and Divineincel
View attachment 5192391
Himmler killed himself using potassium cyanide trying to cross the border with Denmark
Heydrich was killed by Jozef Gabčik and Jan Kubiš
Arthur Greiser was hanged😂
Are these your heroes?
About heydrich, itself it’s funny to mention him/ - cause he killed more polacks than any other, also even after his death it didn’t changed anything, the operation reinhard shows it -, you need to understand it/ his death didn’t bring anything at all/ cause latterly he was moved on by kaltenbrunner.
Heydrich was perished latterly, the Czech did perish for it, also did perish Lidice.

Everything else here is not important, germans fucked the Poles, since the very history/ - since 1800 -, also from Bismarck to Hitler. Reinefarth or weisninger, it’s not important.
Poland is owned by Germans, also from the superior man.
The polack is afraid of us, that’s why his jewish extermination mindset never disappeared.
Poland needs to perish, 4m wasn’t enough by himmler

https://www.google.com/url?q=https:...sQFnoECAsQAg&usg=AOvVaw3RktVPHUHdHDJr7c5Zi97e
 

Attachments

  • C5629914-AD30-4841-9E2F-1B0D54685BD6.jpeg
    C5629914-AD30-4841-9E2F-1B0D54685BD6.jpeg
    332.1 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Torres9
Didn't like slavs mogged in world war 2 :feelsthink:?
The irony in it.
Slavs are cannon fodder, nothing really worth without the Jewish-wasp influence upon the ocean
 

Attachments

  • C255293A-CDFA-4164-AECA-DA843C12B924.png
    C255293A-CDFA-4164-AECA-DA843C12B924.png
    181.6 KB · Views: 0
  • 4C739011-536C-4EC4-A4A9-A2C2DE60FBD8.jpeg
    4C739011-536C-4EC4-A4A9-A2C2DE60FBD8.jpeg
    439.6 KB · Views: 0
  • 8B8A8D2E-4B19-4182-B488-BC569B1AA65B.jpeg
    8B8A8D2E-4B19-4182-B488-BC569B1AA65B.jpeg
    38.7 KB · Views: 0
  • 19C93A0E-586D-4243-A8BA-9D8BC1B5A4E8.png
    19C93A0E-586D-4243-A8BA-9D8BC1B5A4E8.png
    429.2 KB · Views: 0
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: FunnyVALENTINE and Torres9
I'm too slavic for this...
 
  • +1
Reactions: Torres9
About heydrich, itself it’s funny to mention him/ - cause he killed more polacks than any other, also even after his death it didn’t changed anything, the operation reinhard shows it -, you need to understand it/ his death didn’t bring anything at all/ cause latterly he was moved on by kaltenbrunner.
Heydrich was perished latterly, the Czech did perish for it, also did perish Lidice.

Everything else here is not important, germans fucked the Poles, since the very history/ - since 1800 -, also from Bismarck to Hitler. Reinefarth or weisninger, it’s not important.
Poland is owned by Germans, also from the superior man.
The polack is afraid of us, that’s why his jewish extermination mindset never disappeared.
Poland needs to perish, 4m wasn’t enough by himmler

https://www.google.com/url?q=https:...sQFnoECAsQAg&usg=AOvVaw3RktVPHUHdHDJr7c5Zi97e
1780939373864
1780939408125

There wouldn’t be a Germany without Poland. Now get on your knees
 
Living on stolen land, being subhumans and having no history/ that’s it
Stolen land in question:
1780939643001

Give us back Sorbs land and Berlin (slavic name)
 
Stolen land in question:
View attachment 5192550
Give us back Sorbs land and Berlin (slavic name)
“Slavic is Germanic, the terminology itself”
The Slavs in what is known as Germania were originally called Veneti, as they were on the Adriatic Sea; they received the name Slavs from the Suebi (suevi-slavi), a Germanic tribe who had challenged their rule.* *Bugoslawski, Eduard. Introduction to the History of the Slavs. Jena 1904, pp. 110–112.
 

Attachments

  • 9BA68BAF-78DB-456E-A7D2-4FB11C8692FB.jpeg
    9BA68BAF-78DB-456E-A7D2-4FB11C8692FB.jpeg
    81.6 KB · Views: 0
“Slavic is Germanic, the terminology itself”
The Slavs in what is known as Germania were originally called Veneti, as they were on the Adriatic Sea; they received the name Slavs from the Suebi (suevi-slavi), a Germanic tribe who had challenged their rule.* *Bugoslawski, Eduard. Introduction to the History of the Slavs. Jena 1904, pp. 110–112.
This text literally proves that Veneti were Slavic people thus making your kind the one that has stolen the land:feelskek:, learn how to read
 
and im a slav myself

i imagine how hard i would despise these apes if i was any other race

truly gypsies are better ,curries and such
Self-hate is disgusting.

Get away from me with that shit.

I'd rather be around a raging narcissist all day than some low T fag who hates themself.
 
This text literally proves that Veneti were Slavic people thus making your kind the one that has stolen the land:feelskek:, learn how to read
This gives nothing, cause they were anyways owned Buch rjurik at the time.
Just like rjurik the Slavs are Slavs/ they are shipped and owned by everyone.
The only genius who stopped it was Peter I, he also banned all Jewish degenerates from his land cause they did performance slavery.
 
Tibetan > Nordic > Central European > Western European > Med > Slav > Mongolian > Latino > Central Asian> Amerimutt > Chink > Gook > Curry > Negro > Kurd > Jew
 
Last edited:
This gives nothing, cause they were anyways owned Buch rjurik at the time.
Just like rjurik the Slavs are Slavs/ they are shipped and owned by everyone.
The only genius who stopped it was Peter I, he also banned all Jewish degenerates from his land cause they did performance slavery.
Germans have up to 40% of Slavic admixture (especially south and east germanic people)
While Slavs have only up to 20% of germanic ancestry
1780940672387

1780940729747

What is happening now is the most important factor, 40% of austrian kids aren’t even fully German (mixed with other non-europeans) Germany isn’t monoethnic anymore, 3 mln of turkish diaspora
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Gomez
Why do these threads get made daily
True Slavs are white. Even though we are considered lower class whites in some countries, we are still white the same goes for the Irish.​
Nordic > Central European > Western European > Slav
If you lined them up, you wouldn't be able to correctly label who belongs to which group.​
 
  • +1
Reactions: Divineincel
Germans have up to 40% of Slavic admixture (especially south and east germanic people)
While Slavs have only up to 20% of germanic ancestry
View attachment 5192642
View attachment 5192647
What is happening now is the most important factor, 40% of austrian kids aren’t even fully German (mixed with other non-europeans) Germany isn’t monoethnic anymore, 3 mln of turkish diaspora
That’s a non matter, Slavs are Mongolians.
They very admixture comes from polacks, the prussaks were mixed with polacks by most cause of them/ or even today.
As günther Hans noticed “ 40-45% of Germany may be nordic”/ others are yet not.
There’s nothing strange with it/ cause Prussia did live with the polacks.
But the Slavs/ what about them ?
Russians don’t have a terminology/ their Volk is named after an Germanic Volksstamm.
The polacks/Czechs were owned by us, also by most of history.
It’s embarrassing as would Hitler say.
Also Austria is not “Slavic”, it’s mostly alpine-dinaric, there’s a admixture of Russians-Bolgars in there, but not much
 
Last edited:
Why do these threads get made daily
True Slavs are white. Even though we are considered lower class whites in some countries, we are still white the same goes for the Irish.

If you lined them up, you wouldn't be able to correctly label who belongs to which group.​
Son, Slavs are mainly not white.
Russia got mongolised, even before the revolution of 1917 it happened/ the Russians did Mix with the Mongol horde before communism could even exist.
That same applies to all slaves, polacks are bastards trough history cause of the same Mongols.
They steal and rape, what is seen by history, when they didn’t let the soviets in Czechoslovakia [ cause the Czechs didn’t gave some territories, that “were” to give to the polacks ].
Poland could destroy Germany, yet they didn’t cause of their stupidly and slave thinking like bewusstsein
 
That’s a non matter, Slavs are Mongolians.
They very admixture comes from polacks, the prussaks were mixed with polacks by most cause of them/ or even today.
As günther Hans noticed “ 40-45% of Germany may be nordic”/ others are yet not.
There’s nothing strange with it/ cause Prussia did live with the polacks.
But the Slavs/ what about them ?
Russians don’t have a terminology/ their Volk is named after an Germanic Volksstamm.
The polacks/Czechs were owned by us, also by most of history.
It’s embarrassing as would Hitler say.
Also Austria is not “Slavic”, it’s mostly alpine-dinaric, there’s a admixture if Russians-Bolgars in there, but not much
Mongolians up to 5%…
And the prussaks were later were the ones unifying Germany
I don’t know about russians, they are subhuman in pair with Ukrainians
Czechs weren’t exactly owned, their monarchs were rulling HRE from 1346 to 1612 and Poles as I am implying created Prussia
Austrians are the closest genetically to Czechs
 
Mongolians up to 5%…
And the prussaks were later were the ones unifying Germany
I don’t know about russians, they are subhuman in pair with Ukrainians
Czechs weren’t exactly owned, their monarchs were rulling HRE from 1346 to 1612 and Poles as I am implying created Prussia
Austrians are the closest genetically to Czechs
I don’t deny it, the Prussians did great, but they are arrogant what is seen in 1848, when the king refused to take the crown from the very folk.
Bismarck had problems, and those problems existed trough various problems cause of the Prussians.
They didn’t wanted to unification the very Germany, they wanted to stay like it.
On your 5%.
It’s more, very much more actually/ I think you never heard what Patton said on the Russian horde.
I respect some polacks, saying all of them are subhumans is too stupid and ignorance.
Anyways it’s seen/ cause the Czechs live on German territory, mostly it’s Böhmen und mähren which was ruled by Germans .
Nothing to say on the Czechs, they are a bastard race, nothing good in them/ they don’t look like the Austrians one.
 
I don’t deny it, the Prussians did great, but they are arrogant what is seen in 1848, when the king refused to take the crown from the very folk.
Bismarck had problems, and those problems existed trough various problems cause of the Prussians.
They didn’t wanted to unification the very Germany, they wanted to stay like it.
On your 5%.
It’s more, very much more actually/ I think you never heard what Patton said on the Russian horde.
I respect some polacks, saying all of them are subhumans is too stupid and ignorance.
Anyways it’s seen/ cause the Czechs live on German territory, mostly it’s Böhmen und mähren which was ruled by Germans .
Nothing to say on the Czechs, they are a bastard race, nothing good in them/ they don’t look like the Austrians one.
1780943483565

Genetically they are close.
There are good Russians (whites in the civil war) but they are minority, something like 70/30. Ukrainians are hardly slavs though, more of a tartarian, mongolic, turkish and jewish scum. Czechs had superior cities in medieval period
 

Similar threads

sub5withgf
Replies
11
Views
65
DrRodger
DrRodger
valentine
Replies
39
Views
345
Ältai.Anabolic
Ältai.Anabolic
Moggador
Replies
8
Views
40
prolarper
prolarper
أحمد
Replies
16
Views
59
Jason5000
Jason5000
zimione
Replies
5
Views
32
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist

Users who are viewing this thread

  • pleasevanity
  • chang cypionate
  • Svancara
  • Gomez
  • Calamitous
  • Reinhard_Heini
  • LegendaryKennen
  • greenteafan01
  • Jason5000
Back
Top