It’s never enough

[registerfasterusing]

T

 

[Anamnesis]

never never never

 

[futureschizo]

and thats not okay its all or nothing

 

[registerfasterusing]

and thats not okay its all or nothing

Nah it’s something

 

[futureschizo]

Nah it’s something

so its all or something?

 

[registerfasterusing]

so its all or something?

All and nothing are the same

 

[futureschizo]

All and nothing are the same

no they're opposties

elaborate am i missing something here

 

[registerfasterusing]

no they're opposties

elaborate am i missing something here

low iq

 

[small_solomon]

T

And it never will be sadly

 

[futureschizo]

low iq

js answer the question nigga or do you not know

 

[isis_Bleach]

who cares what foids think theyre never happy

 

[registerfasterusing]

js answer the question nigga or do you not know

both are absolute so how are they any different

 

[futureschizo]

who cares what foids think theyre never happy

always want more and more

very rarely are they satisfied

 

[futureschizo]

both are absolute so how are they any different

I got that much but in practice its completely different

Like having all the money in the world vs none of it

 

[registerfasterusing]

I got that much but in practice its completely different

Like having all the money in the world vs none of it

neither are possible cuz currency isn’t absolute

That’s why I’m saying it’s something u can never have nothing or all, everything exists to a degree but not entirely
Absolutes are exclusively theoritical

 

[futureschizo]

neither are possible cuz currency isn’t absolute

That’s why I’m saying it’s something u can never have nothing or all, everything exists to a degree but not entirely
Absolutes are exclusively theoritical

oh my god this shit is actually high iq.. I never even thought about ts

 

[registerfasterusing]

oh my god this shit is actually high iq.. I never even thought about ts

u being deadass nigga?

 

[futureschizo]

u being deadass nigga?

not really but that sounded smart so i went w it

 

[tomahawk]

All and nothing are the same

Shit take

 

[tomahawk]

neither are possible cuz currency isn’t absolute

That’s why I’m saying it’s something u can never have nothing or all, everything exists to a degree but not entirely
Absolutes are exclusively theoritical

Water

 

[registerfasterusing]

Shit take

Water

Nigger

 

[tomahawk]

both are absolute so how are they any different

Nothing will never equal more

 

[tomahawk]

Nigger

You stated one thing and tried proving a different one

 

[registerfasterusing]

Nothing will never equal more

if it’s permeated its is equal to nothing

 

[literallytaxidriver]

The mog never stops

 

[tomahawk]

You're basically claiming either:
1. Not one thing is of value so they're all equal
This claim is foolish. There cannot be things of no practical value. With a knife you kill, with food you feed, with brains you think, this all is the potentiality of things. Such is, by definition, their inherent value.
2. Permeated things are of no value because they, in comparison to else, are null since all has it.
This take may be even worse. If every single person has food, it doesn't mean that the food is of no value, nor does it mean the food is of no use.

 

[tomahawk]

low iq

How may things of contrast be equal? How can you claim that everything that is is of no worth? How weak and ungrateful must one be to be of such opinion?

 

[registerfasterusing]

You're basically claiming either:
1. Not one thing is of value so they're all equal
This claim is foolish. There cannot be things of no practical value. With a knife you kill, with food you feed, with brains you think, this all is the potentiality of things. Such is, by definition, their inherent value.
2. Permeated things are of no value because they, in comparison to else, are null since all has it.
This take may be even worse. If every single person has food, it doesn't mean that the food is of no value, nor does it mean the food is of no use.

Idk how u came to the conclusion of 1 from what I said

2 no nigga cuz it has to be the same amount, like I said earlier if it exists in degrees it’s not absolute
Things can gain value cuz of their scarcity and the degree and circumstances to which they are possessed
Food is a retarded example cuz it’s niggas die without out tbh that’s irrelevant to the argument, would be ethics no

 

[registerfasterusing]

How may things of contrast be equal? How can you claim that everything that is is of no worth? How weak and ungrateful must one be to be of such opinion?

coming to conclusions I didn’t necessarily assert

Nigga blowing everything out of proportion, alr nigga maybe my statements were a bit broad but that doesn’t discredit the concept

 

[tomahawk]

Food is a retarded example cuz it’s niggas die without out tbh that’s irrelevant to the argument, would be ethics no

You're just proving my point

2 no nigga cuz it has to be the same amount

What does it change?

, like I said earlier if it exists in degrees it’s not absolute

If a certain is of use and every has it it doesn't lose it's use, therefore it's value too

Things can gain value cuz of their scarcity and the degree and circumstances to which they are possessed

You claim that absolutes are irrelevant out of hypotheticity, but propose a scenario where all is permeated which is purely hypothetical. Never will things be equally permeated, that alone must make then of value.

 

[tomahawk]

coming to conclusions I didn’t necessarily assert

You claimed that all is nothing, what can you even misunderstand from that?

Nigga blowing everything out of proportion, alr nigga maybe my statements were a bit broad but that doesn’t discredit the concept

Out of proportion? You're the one claiming two contrasting absolutes are of equality, not me.

 

[registerfasterusing]

You're just proving my point

how

What does it change?

If a certain is of use and every has it it doesn't lose it's use, therefore it's value too

You claim that absolutes are irrelevant out of hypotheticity, but propose a scenario where all is permeated which is purely hypothetical. Never will things be equally permeated, that alone must make then of value.

nigger acting like I said things aren’t of value, go back to my original statement and read again

ye I never said any of this nigga

 

[registerfasterusing]

You claimed that all is nothing, what can you even misunderstand from that?

nah I didn’t say all is nothing tho

 

[tomahawk]

both are absolute so how are they any different

.
This claim is stupid.

 

[tomahawk]

All and nothing are the same

nah I didn’t say all is nothing tho

 

[kwk3998]

Outdoor cats mog because they’re basically wild animals

 

[registerfasterusing]

same =/= ‘is’
I meant their purpose is equal @tomahawk

 

[kwk3998]

Outdoor cats mog because they’re basically wild animals

Shit wrong thread

 

[tomahawk]

same =/= ‘is’
I meant their purpose is equal @tomahawk

You have to specify
If you call something the same you equalize

 

[registerfasterusing]

You have to specify
If you call something the same you equalize

neither are possible cuz currency isn’t absolute

That’s why I’m saying it’s something u can never have nothing or all, everything exists to a degree but not entirely
Absolutes are exclusively theoritical

does this specify

 

[xzylecrey]

neither are possible cuz currency isn’t absolute

That’s why I’m saying it’s something u can never have nothing or all, everything exists to a degree but not entirely
Absolutes are exclusively theoritical

You're basically claiming either:
1. Not one thing is of value so they're all equal
This claim is foolish. There cannot be things of no practical value. With a knife you kill, with food you feed, with brains you think, this all is the potentiality of things. Such is, by definition, their inherent value.
2. Permeated things are of no value because they, in comparison to else, are null since all has it.
This take may be even worse. If every single person has food, it doesn't mean that the food is of no value, nor does it mean the food is of no use
Do better

 

[tomahawk]

does this specify

You have to specify directly
Why the fuck must I be some kind of detective to understand whatever you're saying??

 

[registerfasterusing]

You have to specify directly
Why the fuck must I be some kind of detective to understand whatever you're saying??

Ig I’m saying things need antagonisms to exist and have value

 

[tomahawk]

Ig I’m saying things need antagonisms to exist and have value

Good take
Kinda water

 

[registerfasterusing]

Good take
Kinda water

yeah it is but when I first discovered this after being a deleuze nigger it was like groundbreaking for some reason