it's over for you once you reach 24 - UNDENIABLE PROOF!!! | High IQ only please.

[mcmentalonthemic]

I have always held the belief that if you're not successful OR on track to being successful by 24 - IT'S OVER

Spoiler: Compilation

Which is why once i reach 24 I will not post a single time on this forum [though thats years away]
But I have found EVIDENCE of my beliefs

His and his psychologist friend's theory is that if you're 5 years old, 1 year to you is technically 20% of your life
But if you are 50 years old, 1 year to you is 2% of your life, which is why time feels so much faster as you grow up.

So not only is your life over in a metaphorical expression sense once you reach 24
YOUR LIFE IS 50% FINISHED once you reach 24, when adjusted for age time dilation.

---

So not only do I believe in it, random looksmax.org user mcmentalonthemic
But Super Jew elite Sam Altman believes it.
This was at a moment [2017] where Sammy was much more open about his beliefs/way of thinking. His interviews at the time felt less staged and media trained. [though he has always been a compulsive liar]

---

@Former Shortcel @aids @Jason Voorhees @Dr. Mog
special thanks to @PsychoDsk for making me lose 20k by following his investment advice btw

 

[Brava]

yea ill get into prime by then, im not worried

 

[topology]

His and his psychologist friend's theory is that if you're 5 years old, 1 year to you is technically 20% of your life
But if you are 50 years old, 1 year to you is 2% of your life, which is why time feels so much faster as you grow up.

So not only is your life over in a metaphorical expression sense once you reach 24
YOUR LIFE IS 50% FINISHED once you reach 24, when adjusted for age time dilation.

Am I doing the math wrong? Is it not by age 9 assuming a 80 year life span?

 

[Acquiescence]

Fuck

 

[polonaecel]

I have always held the belief that if you're not successful OR on track to being successful by 24 - IT'S OVER

Spoiler: Compilation

View attachment 5004624View attachment 5004625View attachment 5004627View attachment 5004629View attachment 5004630

Which is why once i reach 24 I will not post a single time on this forum [though thats years away]
But I have found EVIDENCE of my beliefs
View attachment 5004635
His and his psychologist friend's theory is that if you're 5 years old, 1 year to you is technically 20% of your life
But if you are 50 years old, 1 year to you is 2% of your life, which is why time feels so much faster as you grow up.

So not only is your life over in a metaphorical expression sense once you reach 24
YOUR LIFE IS 50% FINISHED once you reach 24, when adjusted for age time dilation.

---

So not only do I believe in it, random looksmax.org user mcmentalonthemic
But Super Jew elite Sam Altman believes it.
This was at a moment [2017] where Sammy was much more open about his beliefs/way of thinking. His interviews at the time felt less staged and media trained. [though he has always been a compulsive liar]

---

@Former Shortcel @aids @Jason Voorhees @Dr. Mog
special thanks to @PsychoDsk for making me lose 20k by following his investment advice btw

Me and Seth Walsh have a bone to pick with sam altman.

 

[polonaecel]

Am I doing the math wrong? Is it not by age 9 assuming a 80 year life span?

Over for us post 9 cels

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

Am I doing the math wrong? Is it not by age 9 assuming a 80 year life span?

add up 1 divided by your age for every year you have lived
so year 1 is 1 divided by 1, year 2 is 1 divided by 2, year 3 is 1 divided by 3, and so on
keep summing these values year by year
then find the age where this running total reaches half of the total sum you would get by doing this up to an old age like 80
when you do that, the halfway point happens around age 23 to 24

 

[CoolMan78]

I have always held the belief that if you're not successful OR on track to being successful by 24 - IT'S OVER

Spoiler: Compilation

View attachment 5004624View attachment 5004625View attachment 5004627View attachment 5004629View attachment 5004630

Which is why once i reach 24 I will not post a single time on this forum [though thats years away]
But I have found EVIDENCE of my beliefs
View attachment 5004635
His and his psychologist friend's theory is that if you're 5 years old, 1 year to you is technically 20% of your life
But if you are 50 years old, 1 year to you is 2% of your life, which is why time feels so much faster as you grow up.

So not only is your life over in a metaphorical expression sense once you reach 24
YOUR LIFE IS 50% FINISHED once you reach 24, when adjusted for age time dilation.

---

So not only do I believe in it, random looksmax.org user mcmentalonthemic
But Super Jew elite Sam Altman believes it.
This was at a moment [2017] where Sammy was much more open about his beliefs/way of thinking. His interviews at the time felt less staged and media trained. [though he has always been a compulsive liar]

---

@Former Shortcel @aids @Jason Voorhees @Dr. Mog
special thanks to @PsychoDsk for making me lose 20k by following his investment advice btw

High IQ Indeed Mirin Rep Ratio

 

[inyerta]

 

[topology]

add up 1 divided by your age for every year you have lived
so year 1 is 1 divided by 1, year 2 is 1 divided by 2, year 3 is 1 divided by 3, and so on
keep summing these values year by year
then find the age where this running total reaches half of the total sum you would get by doing this up to an old age like 80
when you do that, the halfway point happens around age 23 to 24

Sigma 1/n (1 to Z where Z is a natural number) & the midpoint of that. It's the same thing as Sqrt(Z). I don't feel like doing the proof for it but you can ask any AI model.

Sqrt(80) is the mid point. I got Claude to draw a graph:

 

[1966Ford]

I'm 28

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

Sigma 1/n (1 to Z where Z is a natural number) & the midpoint of that. It's the same thing as Sqrt(Z). I don't feel like doing the proof for it but you can ask any AI model.

Sqrt(80) is the mid point. I got Claude to draw a graph:

the sum of 1 divided by n does not grow like the square root of n, it grows like the natural log of n
so the halfway point is not square root of the final age
the correct way to approximate it is sum 1 divided by n is about ln of n plus a constant
so the halfway condition becomes
ln of age divided by ln of 80 equals one half

solve that and you get age equals square root of 80
which is about 9

that matches the graph you showed, not 23 to 24
so there are two different things being mixed up
the discrete sum calculation gives about 23
the smooth log approximation gives about 9

they are not the same model, and the square root claim only comes from the log version, not from the actual sum directly

 

[topology]

the sum of 1 divided by n does not grow like the square root of n, it grows like the natural log of n
so the halfway point is not square root of the final age
the correct way to approximate it is sum 1 divided by n is about ln of n plus a constant
so the halfway condition becomes
ln of age divided by ln of 80 equals one half

solve that and you get age equals square root of 80
which is about 9

that matches the graph you showed, not 23 to 24
so there are two different things being mixed up
the discrete sum calculation gives about 23
the smooth log approximation gives about 9

they are not the same model, and the square root claim only comes from the log version, not from the actual sum directly

Let L = lifespan (80)
Subjective time lived by age T is the cumulative weight of all years to date, where year n has weight 1/n. Halfway point a is the age where cumulative subjective time equals half the total.

Case 1 (smooth):

S(T) = integral(1->T) 1/t dt = ln T - ln 1 = ln T

Half-condition:

S(a) / S(L) = 1/2
ln a / ln L = 1/2
ln a = (1/2) * ln L
a = L^(1/2) = sqrt(L)

a = sqrt(80)

Case 2 (discrete):

H(T) = sigma(n=1 -> T) 1/n = 1+ 1/2 + 1/3 + ... + 1/T

H(80) is about 4.965
H(a) = H(80) / 2 = 2.4825
H(a) is between H(6) and H(7)

H(24) gives 76.1%

Do I not understand something? Seems wrong either way?

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

Let L = lifespan (80)
Subjective time lived by age T is the cumulative weight of all years to date, where year n has weight 1/n. Halfway point a is the age where cumulative subjective time equals half the total.

Case 1 (smooth):

S(T) = integral(1->T) 1/t dt = ln T - ln 1 = ln T

Half-condition:

S(a) / S(L) = 1/2
ln a / ln L = 1/2
ln a = (1/2) * ln L
a = L^(1/2) = sqrt(L)

a = sqrt(80)

Case 2 (discrete):

H(T) = sigma(n=1 -> T) 1/n = 1+ 1/2 + 1/3 + ... + 1/T

H(80) is about 4.965
H(a) = H(80) / 2 = 2.4825
H(a) is between H(6) and H(7)

H(24) gives 76.1%

Do I not understand something? Seems wrong either way?

in your setup, the rule is explicit
each year has weight 1 divided by n
and you add those exact chunks

that’s the harmonic sum

when you replace that with the integral, you’re no longer doing the same thing
you’re smoothing out big early chunks into a curve that is too low at the start


and that matters a lot because
year 1 = 1
year 2 = 0.5
year 3 = 0.33


those are huge contributions, and the smooth ln curve simply doesn’t capture that properly

so when you do

ln a divided by ln 80 equals one half
and get square root of 80

you’ve solved the midpoint of the smooth approximation, not the midpoint of the actual sum you defined

that’s why your own numbers contradict it

you computed
half of total is about 2.48
and you only reach that around 23

and you also noticed
at 24 you’re already at about 76 percent, which shows how front loaded the real sum is, but not nearly as extreme as the ln version predicts

so the clean way to say it is

your discrete model answer is about 23
your continuous shortcut answer is about 9

they are not supposed to match, and the gap exists because the approximation breaks down badly at small n

 

[topology]

in your setup, the rule is explicit
each year has weight 1 divided by n
and you add those exact chunks

that’s the harmonic sum

when you replace that with the integral, you’re no longer doing the same thing
you’re smoothing out big early chunks into a curve that is too low at the start


and that matters a lot because
year 1 = 1
year 2 = 0.5
year 3 = 0.33


those are huge contributions, and the smooth ln curve simply doesn’t capture that properly

so when you do

ln a divided by ln 80 equals one half
and get square root of 80

you’ve solved the midpoint of the smooth approximation, not the midpoint of the actual sum you defined

that’s why your own numbers contradict it

you computed
half of total is about 2.48
and you only reach that around 23

and you also noticed
at 24 you’re already at about 76 percent, which shows how front loaded the real sum is, but not nearly as extreme as the ln version predicts

so the clean way to say it is

your discrete model answer is about 23
your continuous shortcut answer is about 9

they are not supposed to match, and the gap exists because the approximation breaks down badly at small n

The point was to show they're not near 23/24 either way. I don't see how the discrete model answer is about 23 when we've established it's about 3/4 and not 1/2?

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

The point was to show they're not near 23/24 either way. I don't see how the discrete model answer is about 23 when we've established it's about 3/4 and not 1/2?

found a short explaining it, do not know how to explain it any further

 

[topology]

found a short explaining it, do not know how to explain it any further

The guy literally agrees with me..? At age 7 you have lived 50% of your life..?

That video uses the exact same math I provided as proof?

 

[Copeful]

^^ JFL at these nerdcels
chad is cracking your oneitis while you do integrals on a incel forum

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

The guy literally agrees with me..? At age 7 you have lived 50% of your life..?

That video uses the exact same math I provided as proof?

just loool i did not watch it before hand
give me a moment to do the maths myself

 

[Framemaxxx]

I dont think thats how it works

The Real Reason Our Later Years Seem to Fly By

Our new study shows why time feels like it speeds up with age. The good news: Older adults cherish and recall their meaningful experiences more vividly than the younger do.

www.psychologytoday.com

Assessment of time perception: the effect of aging - PubMed

Studies concerning time perception lack a validated assessment tool and a consensual "gold-standard" measure. Moreover, the present evidence suggests modification of timing with aging. This study aimed to develop and validate a neuropsychological tool to measure time perception and to study...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

The guy literally agrees with me..? At age 7 you have lived 50% of your life..?

That video uses the exact same math I provided as proof?

Time perception - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

turns out it's based on a person named 'lemich' 's model
some psychology shit, not pure maths
newer piece that agrees with the nigga:

https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2023/pub/fermilab-pub-23-370-ad.pdf#:~:text=rigidity%20of%20the%20Lemlich%E2%80%99s%20model,While

 

[Regular Doomer]

Don't beat yourself up with this type of crap!

truth is no one is making it before 35 in this life, at elast not 99% of people, even those that make it only do it after 35 or even 40s

life is no easy and you're not late at all, 24 years is NOTHING this is the age of kids, you just finished school, sometimes not even that, there is no worries about it

Just chill and keep living a good life and trying your best

I am 29 and just starting my life, barely making, but I am on the right track, you shouldn't mistake your sucess with the lack of personal value or competence, the world is not fair and there is no meritocracy to begin with, it is all luck

 

[ltnbrownacnecel]

 

[tansel]

I'm 28

damn

 

[Regular Doomer]

I don't know a single person that bought their homes before 40, and I mean NONE!

there is nothing wrong with being a nobody "looser" at 24, this is the time to be one without any guilt

 

[Saint Casanova]

Even the universe is proving your point

 

[1966Ford]

damn

I know....

Enjoy your life youngin' and keep ascendingv

Once these girls turn 18, they stay same age

 

[Dr. Mog]

So not only is your life over in a metaphorical expression sense once you reach 24

I made a thread on this EXACT topic a year ago

If you are 20 years old and reading this you have already reached the midpoint of your life. Here’s how…

The time perception argument (1/age): This is the “proportional theory of time.” Basically, each year feels shorter because it’s a smaller fraction of your life lived. At 10, one year is 10% of your life. At 40, it’s 2.5%. So subjectively, you do feel like the midpoint of life is around your...

looksmax.org

Wish I could get the link for the first picrel you’ve posted in the compilation spoiler so that I could like it. 100% true.

 

[Deleted member 360680]

I have always held the belief that if you're not successful OR on track to being successful by 24 - IT'S OVER

Spoiler: Compilation

View attachment 5004624View attachment 5004625View attachment 5004627View attachment 5004629View attachment 5004630

Which is why once i reach 24 I will not post a single time on this forum [though thats years away]
But I have found EVIDENCE of my beliefs
View attachment 5004635
His and his psychologist friend's theory is that if you're 5 years old, 1 year to you is technically 20% of your life
But if you are 50 years old, 1 year to you is 2% of your life, which is why time feels so much faster as you grow up.

So not only is your life over in a metaphorical expression sense once you reach 24
YOUR LIFE IS 50% FINISHED once you reach 24, when adjusted for age time dilation.

---

So not only do I believe in it, random looksmax.org user mcmentalonthemic
But Super Jew elite Sam Altman believes it.
This was at a moment [2017] where Sammy was much more open about his beliefs/way of thinking. His interviews at the time felt less staged and media trained. [though he has always been a compulsive liar]

---

@Former Shortcel @aids @Jason Voorhees @Dr. Mog
special thanks to @PsychoDsk for making me lose 20k by following his investment advice btw

Damn i am 16 and i have wasted most of my life so far to litrally nothing. Well i suppose i better stop wasting time and do something valuble