IT'S OVER IF YOU ARE CIRCUMCISED (INSANE INFO) *DON'T CIRCUMCISE CHILDREN*

[0hMan]

View attachment 2520219

WHAT IS THIS GUY??? (Curry or Med)

One of my paki friends but does not look paki since most of them are darker. Why is it that Pakistan in the Indian subcontinent has people who are light and dark. Is his skin olive or curry. Can curry people have olive skin?

looksmax.org

Lmao. You are curry, not med.

 

[vrilmaxxer]

XD

 

[vrilmaxxer]

WHAT IS THIS GUY??? (Curry or Med)

One of my paki friends but does not look paki since most of them are darker. Why is it that Pakistan in the Indian subcontinent has people who are light and dark. Is his skin olive or curry. Can curry people have olive skin?

looksmax.org

Lmao. You are curry, not med.

Thats my paki friend bruh, it says in title

 

[0hMan]

Thats my paki friend bruh, it says in title

Uh huh.

 

[vrilmaxxer]

Uh huh.

Yeah man it says in title I am Georgian living in Canada, and btw how did you know I am Canadian?

 

[0hMan]

Yeah man it says in title I am Georgian living in Canada, and btw how did you know I am Canadian?

 

[vrilmaxxer]

View attachment 2520230

Oh.

 

[Deleted member 30019]

Recently read this article on Psychology Today and it's pretty insane, SUMMERY AT THE BOTTOM
*First author is Patrick O’Connor, Psy.D.

As psychologists, we are deeply concerned by the recently announced CDC guidelines promoting circumcision for all males, and in particular children. The CDC guidelines are based on a sharply criticized 2012 policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The 2012 statement was condemned by a large group of physicians, medical organizations, and ethicists from European, Scandinavian, and Commonwealth countries as “culturally biased” and “different from [the conclusions] reached by physicians in other parts of the Western world, including Europe, Canada and Australia” (Frisch et al., 2013).

The new CDC guidelines highlight methodologically flawed studies from Africa that have no relevance to the United States. They chose to ignore studies that were conducted in the United States and show no link between circumcision and the risk of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV (Thomas et al., 2004).

Worse, the CDC has completely ignored the psychological effects of genital cutting on male children.

This article outlines the psychological research that demonstrates the relationship between circumcision and psychological harm. The authors, along with other psychologists, have appealed to the CDC and Congress to reevaluate this policy in light of the psychological harm it will cause infants, children, and teens.

Psychological Effects on Infants
1. Circumcision Causes Immediate Harm

Circumcision is often performed on infants without anesthetic or with a local anesthetic that is ineffective at substantially reducing pain (Lander et al., 1997). In a study by Lander and colleagues (1997), a control group of infants who received no anesthesia was used as a baseline to measure the effectiveness of different types of anesthesia during circumcision. The control group babies were in so much pain—some began choking and one even had a seizure—they decided it was unethical to continue. It is important to also consider the effects of post-operative pain in circumcised infants (regardless of whether anesthesia is used), which is described as “severe” and “persistent” (Howard et al., 1994). In addition to pain, there are other negative physical outcomes including possible infection and death (Van Howe, 1997, 2004).

2. Pain from Circumcision in Infancy Alters the Brain

Research has demonstrated the hormone cortisol, which is associated with stress and pain, spikes during circumcision (Talbert et al., 1976; Gunnar et al., 1981). Although some believe that babies “won’t remember” the pain, we now know that the body “remembers” as evidenced by studies which demonstrate that circumcised infants are more sensitive to pain later in life (Taddio et al., 1997). Research carried out using neonatal animals as a proxy to study the effects of pain on infants’ psychological development have found distinct behavioral patterns characterized by increased anxiety, altered pain sensitivity, hyperactivity, and attention problems (Anand & Scalzo, 2000). In another similar study, it was found that painful procedures in the neonatal period were associated with site-specific changes in the brain that have been found to be associated with mood disorders (Victoria et al., 2013).

3. Infant Circumcision has Psychological Consequences for Men

Over the last decade there has been a movement of men who were circumcised as infants and have articulated their anger and sadness over having their genitals modified without their consent. Goldman (1999) notes that shame and denial is one major factor that limits the number of men who publicly express this belief. Studies of men who were circumcised in infancy have found that some men experienced symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder, depression, anger, and intimacy problems that were directly associated with feelings about their circumcision (Boyle, 2002; Goldman, 1999; Hammond, 1999).

Psychological Effects on Children and Adolescents
1. Medical Procedures in Childhood are Often Experienced as Traumatic

The CDC fails to consider that many medical procedures, even those that are described as routine, are often experienced as traumatic by children and adolescents (Levine & Kline, 2007). Circumcision, for example, clearly meets the clinical definition of trauma because it involves a violation of physical integrity. In fact, research has demonstrated that medical traumas in childhood and adolescence share many of the same psychological elements of childhood abuse, such as physical pain, fear, loss of control, and the perception that the event is a form of punishment (Nir, 1985; Shalev, 1993, Shopper, 1995).

2. Procedures Involving Children’s Genitals Produce Negative Psychological Effects

The psychological consequences of medical procedures are even greater when they involve a child’s genitals. Studies have examined the psychological effects of medical photography of the genitals (Money, 1987), repeated genital examinations (Money, 1987), colposcopy (Shopper, 1995), cystscopy and catheterization (Shopper, 1995), voiding cystourethrogram (Goodman et al., 1990), and hypospadias repair (INSA, 1994). The studies found that these procedures often produce symptoms which are very similar to those of childhood sexual abuse, including dissociation and the development of a negative body image. The effects often persist into adulthood as evidenced by a study that examined the effects of childhood penile surgery for hypospadias. Men who had this surgery in childhood experienced more depressive symptoms, anxiety, and interpersonal difficulties than men who did not have the surgery (Berg & Berg, 1983).

3. Circumcision Causes Significant Psychological Harm in Children and Adolescents

Circumcision in childhood and adolescence has significant negative psychological consequences. Following a traumatic event, many children experience anxiety, depression, and anger; and many others try to avoid and suppress these painful feelings (Gil, 2006). In addition, children often experience a debilitating loss of control that negatively affects their ability to regulate emotions and make sense of the traumatic experience (Van der Kolk, 2005). In a study of adults circumcised in childhood, Hammond (1999) found that many men conceptualized their circumcision experience as an act of violence, mutilation, or sexual assault. Kennedy (1986) detailed the psychological effects of circumcision in a case study describing the psychotherapy of a boy who was circumcised at three years of age. The sense of inadequacy, feelings of victimization, and violent sexual fantasies experienced during this boy’s adolescence were found to be both consciously and unconsciously linked to his experience with losing part of his penis (Kennedy, 1986). In a study examining the psychological effects of circumcision on boys between four and seven years of age, Cansever (1965) used psychological testing to measure boys’ level of distress. The results of the study indicated that circumcision was perceived as an aggressive attack on the body that left children feeling damaged and mutilated (Cansever, 1968). Cansever (1968) also noted that these boys experienced changes in body image (with many feeling smaller and incomplete), feelings of inadequacy and helplessness, as well as a tendency to withdraw psychologically.

4. The Majority of Boys Circumcised as Children and Adolescents Meet Diagnostic Criteria for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

The most comprehensive study available that assesses the psychological impact of circumcision on children after infancy was conducted by Ramos and Boyle (2000) and involved 1072 pre-adolescent and adolescent boys who were circumcised in a hospital setting. Using an adapted version of a clinically established PTSD interview rating scale, the study’s authors determined that 51 percent of these boys met the full diagnostic criteria for PTSD and noted that other variables such as age at circumcision (pre-adolescence versus adolescence) and time elapsed since the procedure (months versus years) were not predictive of a PTSD diagnosis (Ramos & Boyle, 2000). As a point of comparison, the rate of PTSD among veterans of the Iraq war is approximately 20 percent (NIH, 2009).

5. By Encouraging Circumcision, Medical Professionals are Shaming Boys’ Bodies

If the CDC guidance is followed, medical providers will be communicating a psychologically damaging message to boys with intact genitals—that their penises are somehow “bad” or inferior. The negative effects of such communications have been studied with regard to intersex children and have been found to be frightening, shaming, and embarrassing to the child (Rusch et al., 2000). This is a particularly cruel message to send to adolescents, many of whom are already experiencing concerns regarding body image.

SUMMERY: The article emphasises the detrimental psychological repercussions of circumcision, especially on newborns and children. It emphasises that circumcision, which is frequently performed without proper anaesthesia, can cause acute injury as well as long-term pain sensitivity, leading to post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and relationship troubles in some males circumcised as children. Furthermore, it contends that advocating circumcision sends a negative message to boys with intact genitals, potentially affecting their self-esteem and body image. In light of these psychological issues, the authors advocate for a reevaluation of the CDC guidelines.

SO IF YOU ARE CIRCUMCISED, YOU HAVE PTSD AND BAD EMOTION CONTROL = NO DARK TRIAD

Circumcision is necessary to worship Allah. Otherwise you will have too much testosterone to bow to anyone

 

[vrilmaxxer]

Circumcision is necessary to worship Allah. Otherwise you will have too much testosterone to bow to anyone

XDD

 

[GabachoCopium]

dnrd

but yeah foreskin mogs so hard

 

[actual9cmjawslayer]

It's over if you put so much stock in psychology. "PTSD", lol. "Depression", lol. What a crock of first world pussy ass bullshit.

Pain is good. Circumcision without anesthesia ain't gonna cause life long retardation unless you're gullible enough to believe in such crap and looking for reasons as to why you're such an emotionally unstable pussy.

Look at the ancient Spartans thrust into the agoge at the tender age of 5 or 6, where they would be mercilessly beaten and starved from day one. Then you have first world citizens of today who give weight to articles like this and wonder why females never find them attractive.

except the fact that newborns create many many times more neurons than a child or adult, have far higher neurogenesis so such experiences are far more profound in their effects and can cause epigenetic changes just lol at your iq

MRIs can literally detect the brain damage circumcision causes and its life long

Not to mention the penis is painful and dick tip still sensitive for weeks and years after so when the baby is held by the mother or breastfed what was meant to be oxytocin releasing relaxing happy bonding moment turns to uncomfortable irritable pain

Basically the child is always irritable after you mutilate its penis and that is very damaging for such a fragile impressionable mind

 

[0hMan]

Circumcision is necessary to worship Allah. Otherwise you will have too much testosterone to bow to anyone

 

[TuscanMogger]

What is circum even for. Just cut some skin out of your newborn for leukemia brahh!1!!1

Religious reasons mainly in Judaism and Islam one other benefit is no dick cheese

 

[Lefty Rankin]

I am a multi millionaire and soon to be a self made billionaire. I am also a harnesser of vril and future leader of the last battalion. You do not know me.

Let me translate.

"My grandma's got a little over 500k in various assets. I'm her favorite grandson, and I myself have invested over $1,200 in Bitcoin. In World of Warcraft I'm an unstoppable high dark elf wizard in control of 3 realms."

 

[vrilmaxxer]

Let me translate.

"My grandma's got a little over 500k in various assets. I'm her favorite grandson, and I myself have invested over $1,200 in Bitcoin. In World of Warcraft I'm an unstoppable high dark elf wizard in control of 3 realms."

Damn I got WOW mogged its over for me I am going to fucking rope

 

[Lefty Rankin]

except the fact that newborns create many many times more neurons than a child or adult, have far higher neurogenesis so such experiences are far more profound in their effects and can cause epigenetic changes just lol at your iq

MRIs can literally detect the brain damage circumcision causes and its life long

Not to mention the penis is painful and dick tip still sensitive for weeks and years after so when the baby is held by the mother or breastfed what was meant to be oxytocin releasing relaxing happy bonding moment turns to uncomfortable irritable pain

Basically the child is always irritable after you mutilate its penis and that is very damaging for such a fragile impressionable mind

I know all about the neuro sensitivity in newborns. And painful experiences will either make you stronger or turn you into a pussy. Sure, if you grow up constantly hearing that things are and should be traumatizing then they will be.

My son's two years old and shakes his uncircumcised dick like a grown man after pissing. No pain. He's fine and dandy. When he falls to the ground and scrapes his face I stop his mother from running over to comfort him. I tell him that he's ok, order him to stand up and to stop crying. It works. The tears go away in a matter of seconds. When I don't do that and his mother comforts him he will cry for up to two minutes.

I cannot believe that a group of people who have so much hate for Western society, even calling it "soyciety", would embrace the very schools of thought and conditioning that mold young men into soft little bitches.

Psychology is bullshit. Things are only traumatizing if you let them be. And life is fucking hard. It's bloody painful and nobody owes you shit, so you better get use to it from a young age.

 

[Xangsane]

Recently read this article on Psychology Today and it's pretty insane, SUMMERY AT THE BOTTOM
*First author is Patrick O’Connor, Psy.D.

As psychologists, we are deeply concerned by the recently announced CDC guidelines promoting circumcision for all males, and in particular children. The CDC guidelines are based on a sharply criticized 2012 policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The 2012 statement was condemned by a large group of physicians, medical organizations, and ethicists from European, Scandinavian, and Commonwealth countries as “culturally biased” and “different from [the conclusions] reached by physicians in other parts of the Western world, including Europe, Canada and Australia” (Frisch et al., 2013).

The new CDC guidelines highlight methodologically flawed studies from Africa that have no relevance to the United States. They chose to ignore studies that were conducted in the United States and show no link between circumcision and the risk of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV (Thomas et al., 2004).

Worse, the CDC has completely ignored the psychological effects of genital cutting on male children.

This article outlines the psychological research that demonstrates the relationship between circumcision and psychological harm. The authors, along with other psychologists, have appealed to the CDC and Congress to reevaluate this policy in light of the psychological harm it will cause infants, children, and teens.

Psychological Effects on Infants
1. Circumcision Causes Immediate Harm

Circumcision is often performed on infants without anesthetic or with a local anesthetic that is ineffective at substantially reducing pain (Lander et al., 1997). In a study by Lander and colleagues (1997), a control group of infants who received no anesthesia was used as a baseline to measure the effectiveness of different types of anesthesia during circumcision. The control group babies were in so much pain—some began choking and one even had a seizure—they decided it was unethical to continue. It is important to also consider the effects of post-operative pain in circumcised infants (regardless of whether anesthesia is used), which is described as “severe” and “persistent” (Howard et al., 1994). In addition to pain, there are other negative physical outcomes including possible infection and death (Van Howe, 1997, 2004).

2. Pain from Circumcision in Infancy Alters the Brain

Research has demonstrated the hormone cortisol, which is associated with stress and pain, spikes during circumcision (Talbert et al., 1976; Gunnar et al., 1981). Although some believe that babies “won’t remember” the pain, we now know that the body “remembers” as evidenced by studies which demonstrate that circumcised infants are more sensitive to pain later in life (Taddio et al., 1997). Research carried out using neonatal animals as a proxy to study the effects of pain on infants’ psychological development have found distinct behavioral patterns characterized by increased anxiety, altered pain sensitivity, hyperactivity, and attention problems (Anand & Scalzo, 2000). In another similar study, it was found that painful procedures in the neonatal period were associated with site-specific changes in the brain that have been found to be associated with mood disorders (Victoria et al., 2013).

3. Infant Circumcision has Psychological Consequences for Men

Over the last decade there has been a movement of men who were circumcised as infants and have articulated their anger and sadness over having their genitals modified without their consent. Goldman (1999) notes that shame and denial is one major factor that limits the number of men who publicly express this belief. Studies of men who were circumcised in infancy have found that some men experienced symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder, depression, anger, and intimacy problems that were directly associated with feelings about their circumcision (Boyle, 2002; Goldman, 1999; Hammond, 1999).

Psychological Effects on Children and Adolescents
1. Medical Procedures in Childhood are Often Experienced as Traumatic

The CDC fails to consider that many medical procedures, even those that are described as routine, are often experienced as traumatic by children and adolescents (Levine & Kline, 2007). Circumcision, for example, clearly meets the clinical definition of trauma because it involves a violation of physical integrity. In fact, research has demonstrated that medical traumas in childhood and adolescence share many of the same psychological elements of childhood abuse, such as physical pain, fear, loss of control, and the perception that the event is a form of punishment (Nir, 1985; Shalev, 1993, Shopper, 1995).

2. Procedures Involving Children’s Genitals Produce Negative Psychological Effects

The psychological consequences of medical procedures are even greater when they involve a child’s genitals. Studies have examined the psychological effects of medical photography of the genitals (Money, 1987), repeated genital examinations (Money, 1987), colposcopy (Shopper, 1995), cystscopy and catheterization (Shopper, 1995), voiding cystourethrogram (Goodman et al., 1990), and hypospadias repair (INSA, 1994). The studies found that these procedures often produce symptoms which are very similar to those of childhood sexual abuse, including dissociation and the development of a negative body image. The effects often persist into adulthood as evidenced by a study that examined the effects of childhood penile surgery for hypospadias. Men who had this surgery in childhood experienced more depressive symptoms, anxiety, and interpersonal difficulties than men who did not have the surgery (Berg & Berg, 1983).

3. Circumcision Causes Significant Psychological Harm in Children and Adolescents

Circumcision in childhood and adolescence has significant negative psychological consequences. Following a traumatic event, many children experience anxiety, depression, and anger; and many others try to avoid and suppress these painful feelings (Gil, 2006). In addition, children often experience a debilitating loss of control that negatively affects their ability to regulate emotions and make sense of the traumatic experience (Van der Kolk, 2005). In a study of adults circumcised in childhood, Hammond (1999) found that many men conceptualized their circumcision experience as an act of violence, mutilation, or sexual assault. Kennedy (1986) detailed the psychological effects of circumcision in a case study describing the psychotherapy of a boy who was circumcised at three years of age. The sense of inadequacy, feelings of victimization, and violent sexual fantasies experienced during this boy’s adolescence were found to be both consciously and unconsciously linked to his experience with losing part of his penis (Kennedy, 1986). In a study examining the psychological effects of circumcision on boys between four and seven years of age, Cansever (1965) used psychological testing to measure boys’ level of distress. The results of the study indicated that circumcision was perceived as an aggressive attack on the body that left children feeling damaged and mutilated (Cansever, 1968). Cansever (1968) also noted that these boys experienced changes in body image (with many feeling smaller and incomplete), feelings of inadequacy and helplessness, as well as a tendency to withdraw psychologically.

4. The Majority of Boys Circumcised as Children and Adolescents Meet Diagnostic Criteria for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

The most comprehensive study available that assesses the psychological impact of circumcision on children after infancy was conducted by Ramos and Boyle (2000) and involved 1072 pre-adolescent and adolescent boys who were circumcised in a hospital setting. Using an adapted version of a clinically established PTSD interview rating scale, the study’s authors determined that 51 percent of these boys met the full diagnostic criteria for PTSD and noted that other variables such as age at circumcision (pre-adolescence versus adolescence) and time elapsed since the procedure (months versus years) were not predictive of a PTSD diagnosis (Ramos & Boyle, 2000). As a point of comparison, the rate of PTSD among veterans of the Iraq war is approximately 20 percent (NIH, 2009).

5. By Encouraging Circumcision, Medical Professionals are Shaming Boys’ Bodies

If the CDC guidance is followed, medical providers will be communicating a psychologically damaging message to boys with intact genitals—that their penises are somehow “bad” or inferior. The negative effects of such communications have been studied with regard to intersex children and have been found to be frightening, shaming, and embarrassing to the child (Rusch et al., 2000). This is a particularly cruel message to send to adolescents, many of whom are already experiencing concerns regarding body image.

SUMMERY: The article emphasises the detrimental psychological repercussions of circumcision, especially on newborns and children. It emphasises that circumcision, which is frequently performed without proper anaesthesia, can cause acute injury as well as long-term pain sensitivity, leading to post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and relationship troubles in some males circumcised as children. Furthermore, it contends that advocating circumcision sends a negative message to boys with intact genitals, potentially affecting their self-esteem and body image. In light of these psychological issues, the authors advocate for a reevaluation of the CDC guidelines.

SO IF YOU ARE CIRCUMCISED, YOU HAVE PTSD AND BAD EMOTION CONTROL = NO DARK TRIAD

Hindutva propaganda

 

[Angutoid]

Sleeve dick cope

 

[rubberduck]

Water
I was circumcised but will definitely not circumcise my children

 

[vrilmaxxer]

Sleeve dick cope

I am circumcised, it’s over for us

 

[BWC_virgin]

How is this shit still legal in the first world, it’s genital mutilation literally because of the Jews. glad my parents are high iq and didn’t circumcise me.

 

[sub5outsider]

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

I always take pleasure in threads where I have an excuse to describe my pp

Its riddled with raised fordyce spots, bent to the left and slightly downwards. My ball hair is white, then as the hair works its way up, grey,auburn, orangeish, and then immediately cuts to black as it runs into my belly button.

1/3 of my dick and my left ball has lost all pigmentation, it immediately cuts to a pinkish white. I may have damaged it or something due to years of excessive death-grip, dry masturbation...
Not to mention im cut.... and there was a lot of foreskin cut off.

Evil cock has he caging wtf

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

How is this shit still legal in the first world, it’s genital mutilation literally because of the Jews. glad my parents are high iq and didn’t circumcise me.

Raw milk is illegal, scam food pyramid hasnt been removed from medical textbooks, shampoo is what causes dandruff, baby cocks are dismembered ect..

 

[anhedonia16]

Recently read this article on Psychology Today and it's pretty insane, SUMMERY AT THE BOTTOM
*First author is Patrick O’Connor, Psy.D.

As psychologists, we are deeply concerned by the recently announced CDC guidelines promoting circumcision for all males, and in particular children. The CDC guidelines are based on a sharply criticized 2012 policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The 2012 statement was condemned by a large group of physicians, medical organizations, and ethicists from European, Scandinavian, and Commonwealth countries as “culturally biased” and “different from [the conclusions] reached by physicians in other parts of the Western world, including Europe, Canada and Australia” (Frisch et al., 2013).

The new CDC guidelines highlight methodologically flawed studies from Africa that have no relevance to the United States. They chose to ignore studies that were conducted in the United States and show no link between circumcision and the risk of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV (Thomas et al., 2004).

Worse, the CDC has completely ignored the psychological effects of genital cutting on male children.

This article outlines the psychological research that demonstrates the relationship between circumcision and psychological harm. The authors, along with other psychologists, have appealed to the CDC and Congress to reevaluate this policy in light of the psychological harm it will cause infants, children, and teens.

Psychological Effects on Infants
1. Circumcision Causes Immediate Harm

Circumcision is often performed on infants without anesthetic or with a local anesthetic that is ineffective at substantially reducing pain (Lander et al., 1997). In a study by Lander and colleagues (1997), a control group of infants who received no anesthesia was used as a baseline to measure the effectiveness of different types of anesthesia during circumcision. The control group babies were in so much pain—some began choking and one even had a seizure—they decided it was unethical to continue. It is important to also consider the effects of post-operative pain in circumcised infants (regardless of whether anesthesia is used), which is described as “severe” and “persistent” (Howard et al., 1994). In addition to pain, there are other negative physical outcomes including possible infection and death (Van Howe, 1997, 2004).

2. Pain from Circumcision in Infancy Alters the Brain

Research has demonstrated the hormone cortisol, which is associated with stress and pain, spikes during circumcision (Talbert et al., 1976; Gunnar et al., 1981). Although some believe that babies “won’t remember” the pain, we now know that the body “remembers” as evidenced by studies which demonstrate that circumcised infants are more sensitive to pain later in life (Taddio et al., 1997). Research carried out using neonatal animals as a proxy to study the effects of pain on infants’ psychological development have found distinct behavioral patterns characterized by increased anxiety, altered pain sensitivity, hyperactivity, and attention problems (Anand & Scalzo, 2000). In another similar study, it was found that painful procedures in the neonatal period were associated with site-specific changes in the brain that have been found to be associated with mood disorders (Victoria et al., 2013).

3. Infant Circumcision has Psychological Consequences for Men

Over the last decade there has been a movement of men who were circumcised as infants and have articulated their anger and sadness over having their genitals modified without their consent. Goldman (1999) notes that shame and denial is one major factor that limits the number of men who publicly express this belief. Studies of men who were circumcised in infancy have found that some men experienced symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder, depression, anger, and intimacy problems that were directly associated with feelings about their circumcision (Boyle, 2002; Goldman, 1999; Hammond, 1999).

Psychological Effects on Children and Adolescents
1. Medical Procedures in Childhood are Often Experienced as Traumatic

The CDC fails to consider that many medical procedures, even those that are described as routine, are often experienced as traumatic by children and adolescents (Levine & Kline, 2007). Circumcision, for example, clearly meets the clinical definition of trauma because it involves a violation of physical integrity. In fact, research has demonstrated that medical traumas in childhood and adolescence share many of the same psychological elements of childhood abuse, such as physical pain, fear, loss of control, and the perception that the event is a form of punishment (Nir, 1985; Shalev, 1993, Shopper, 1995).

2. Procedures Involving Children’s Genitals Produce Negative Psychological Effects

The psychological consequences of medical procedures are even greater when they involve a child’s genitals. Studies have examined the psychological effects of medical photography of the genitals (Money, 1987), repeated genital examinations (Money, 1987), colposcopy (Shopper, 1995), cystscopy and catheterization (Shopper, 1995), voiding cystourethrogram (Goodman et al., 1990), and hypospadias repair (INSA, 1994). The studies found that these procedures often produce symptoms which are very similar to those of childhood sexual abuse, including dissociation and the development of a negative body image. The effects often persist into adulthood as evidenced by a study that examined the effects of childhood penile surgery for hypospadias. Men who had this surgery in childhood experienced more depressive symptoms, anxiety, and interpersonal difficulties than men who did not have the surgery (Berg & Berg, 1983).

3. Circumcision Causes Significant Psychological Harm in Children and Adolescents

Circumcision in childhood and adolescence has significant negative psychological consequences. Following a traumatic event, many children experience anxiety, depression, and anger; and many others try to avoid and suppress these painful feelings (Gil, 2006). In addition, children often experience a debilitating loss of control that negatively affects their ability to regulate emotions and make sense of the traumatic experience (Van der Kolk, 2005). In a study of adults circumcised in childhood, Hammond (1999) found that many men conceptualized their circumcision experience as an act of violence, mutilation, or sexual assault. Kennedy (1986) detailed the psychological effects of circumcision in a case study describing the psychotherapy of a boy who was circumcised at three years of age. The sense of inadequacy, feelings of victimization, and violent sexual fantasies experienced during this boy’s adolescence were found to be both consciously and unconsciously linked to his experience with losing part of his penis (Kennedy, 1986). In a study examining the psychological effects of circumcision on boys between four and seven years of age, Cansever (1965) used psychological testing to measure boys’ level of distress. The results of the study indicated that circumcision was perceived as an aggressive attack on the body that left children feeling damaged and mutilated (Cansever, 1968). Cansever (1968) also noted that these boys experienced changes in body image (with many feeling smaller and incomplete), feelings of inadequacy and helplessness, as well as a tendency to withdraw psychologically.

4. The Majority of Boys Circumcised as Children and Adolescents Meet Diagnostic Criteria for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

The most comprehensive study available that assesses the psychological impact of circumcision on children after infancy was conducted by Ramos and Boyle (2000) and involved 1072 pre-adolescent and adolescent boys who were circumcised in a hospital setting. Using an adapted version of a clinically established PTSD interview rating scale, the study’s authors determined that 51 percent of these boys met the full diagnostic criteria for PTSD and noted that other variables such as age at circumcision (pre-adolescence versus adolescence) and time elapsed since the procedure (months versus years) were not predictive of a PTSD diagnosis (Ramos & Boyle, 2000). As a point of comparison, the rate of PTSD among veterans of the Iraq war is approximately 20 percent (NIH, 2009).

5. By Encouraging Circumcision, Medical Professionals are Shaming Boys’ Bodies

If the CDC guidance is followed, medical providers will be communicating a psychologically damaging message to boys with intact genitals—that their penises are somehow “bad” or inferior. The negative effects of such communications have been studied with regard to intersex children and have been found to be frightening, shaming, and embarrassing to the child (Rusch et al., 2000). This is a particularly cruel message to send to adolescents, many of whom are already experiencing concerns regarding body image.

SUMMERY: The article emphasises the detrimental psychological repercussions of circumcision, especially on newborns and children. It emphasises that circumcision, which is frequently performed without proper anaesthesia, can cause acute injury as well as long-term pain sensitivity, leading to post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and relationship troubles in some males circumcised as children. Furthermore, it contends that advocating circumcision sends a negative message to boys with intact genitals, potentially affecting their self-esteem and body image. In light of these psychological issues, the authors advocate for a reevaluation of the CDC guidelines.

SO IF YOU ARE CIRCUMCISED, YOU HAVE PTSD AND BAD EMOTION CONTROL = NO DARK TRIAD

dnrd

 

[vrilmaxxer]

Raw milk is illegal, scam food pyramid hasnt been removed from medical textbooks, shampoo is what causes dandruff, baby cocks are dismembered ect..

destroy the ZOG

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

No foreskin for your FACE

 

[BrownTriad]

Jesus was circumcised

 

[Deleted member 29442]

in my own experience this is all cope lol circumcision is the best thing that ever happened to me

 

[cyko]

Over for my jewish