Ghost324
Iron
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2025
- Posts
- 12
- Reputation
- 5
Premise: I want to start a constructive and interesting discussion here. If you're only here to post the usual mindless crap, don’t even bother replying.
Is Lookmaxxing worth it after thirty?
Opinions on this topic vary wildly. Some say no, some say yes, but usually without reaching a solid conclusion.
Let’s start from the beginning: aging is generally a negative thing, regardless of aesthetics. Why? Because as we grow older, we often have to trade a comfortable, fun, and carefree life for one that becomes increasingly serious and filled with responsibilities. Not to mention that every day on this earth brings you closer to death.
Given this premise, we need to find a way to optimize how we live, perhaps avoiding the fate of our parents—most of whom let themselves go, consumed by time, with the sole purpose of raising their children.
There’s no point debating when the biological peak occurs. Generally, we could say between 15 and 30, though more accurately, you hit your peak at 25, followed by a decline in physical performance.
To answer the initial question, we must reflect on the role aesthetics play in our lives. Some think it’s only for getting laid or finding a woman. However, in everyday life, aesthetics influence others' opinions and how they treat us due to the Halo Effect (look it up if you don’t know what it is).
Based on this, we can conclude that staying "attractive" is essential for living life to the fullest. Letting yourself go or not being at your best shouldn't even be an option—not just for advantages and opportunities, but for your own health.
With that said, let’s address a specific question:
Suppose that, due to circumstances, you are thirty-five, broke, and facing major financial issues. One day, you find someone willing to help. They offer you $100,000 but mention that if they had found you ten years earlier, they would have offered double. What do you do? Do you refuse the help because it’s not ten years ago and it’s not the "best possible contract"? You’d probably just take the money.
In short: if you had to choose between $0 or $5, which would you pick? Obviously the $5. It’s the only logical choice to reach your goals.
The same logic applies to women. If you had to choose between 0 or 10 women, what would you pick? Probably 10. This answer doesn't change whether you are 15, 20, or 30.
Many are held back by the fact that they didn't have success in their youth. They use this as an excuse to remain stagnant in negativity and invisibility, guaranteeing a future even worse than their past—one shaped by a futile existence based on regret. Not having women in your teens doesn't mean it has to stay that way forever.
Here are a few more reasons:
Do you think your sex drive disappears after a certain age? No, at most, it might decrease.
And ask yourself: when you want to have sex after thirty, what kind of women do you want? Unattractive ones or hot ones? Obviously, hot ones. How do you date attractive women?
You’re either attractive or you have money.
Which is better?
Attracting through looks. Why?
When a woman is drawn to your looks, it's out of desire and instinctive nature; an "honest love" can grow from that.
Conversely, attraction based on money leads to "Opportunistic Love," based on what is called "Pragmatic Hypergamous Mating." Besides the "guarantee" of a beautiful woman exploiting you for money, you also risk becoming the classic father who no longer has sex with his wife—not to mention she might go looking elsewhere.
The reasoning is simple and consistent, but it requires effort and discipline to execute.
It’s unrealistic to believe a man’s aesthetic and physical prime is later than what nature dictates. However, it’s wrong to believe that after your prime, you are condemned to total decay. To attract women—especially attractive ones—the "code" remains the same: aesthetics. Especially considering that your relative value increases as the average of your peers drops significantly.
The brain’s programming doesn't change as you age. Therefore, after thirty, it becomes essential to improve or maintain yourself to avoid suffering physically, mentally, and socially (Halo Effect).
How? There are various ways to counter the signs of physical decline:
* Hair loss? Minoxidil, Finasteride, or Dutasteride.
* Aging skin/loss of collagen? Microneedling, biorevitalization.
* Expression lines (eyes, forehead, mouth)? Botox or fillers.
* Body? Training and diet.
* Testosterone? HRT or supportive therapy.
The "hack" isn't so much about looking young, but about being attractive.
These are just a few essentials—the same things celebrities do to stay attractive for as long as possible.
In summary, is it worth it?
I’d say yes. The reasons mentioned above are clear. It’s not a cryptic or strange answer; it’s a matter of common sense and logic.
I hope this analysis is useful to those called "oldcells" who feel discouraged by some clueless kid. Remember: the Blackpill never goes away; it’s hardwired into the human brain.
Is Lookmaxxing worth it after thirty?
Opinions on this topic vary wildly. Some say no, some say yes, but usually without reaching a solid conclusion.
Let’s start from the beginning: aging is generally a negative thing, regardless of aesthetics. Why? Because as we grow older, we often have to trade a comfortable, fun, and carefree life for one that becomes increasingly serious and filled with responsibilities. Not to mention that every day on this earth brings you closer to death.
Given this premise, we need to find a way to optimize how we live, perhaps avoiding the fate of our parents—most of whom let themselves go, consumed by time, with the sole purpose of raising their children.
There’s no point debating when the biological peak occurs. Generally, we could say between 15 and 30, though more accurately, you hit your peak at 25, followed by a decline in physical performance.
To answer the initial question, we must reflect on the role aesthetics play in our lives. Some think it’s only for getting laid or finding a woman. However, in everyday life, aesthetics influence others' opinions and how they treat us due to the Halo Effect (look it up if you don’t know what it is).
Based on this, we can conclude that staying "attractive" is essential for living life to the fullest. Letting yourself go or not being at your best shouldn't even be an option—not just for advantages and opportunities, but for your own health.
With that said, let’s address a specific question:
Suppose that, due to circumstances, you are thirty-five, broke, and facing major financial issues. One day, you find someone willing to help. They offer you $100,000 but mention that if they had found you ten years earlier, they would have offered double. What do you do? Do you refuse the help because it’s not ten years ago and it’s not the "best possible contract"? You’d probably just take the money.
In short: if you had to choose between $0 or $5, which would you pick? Obviously the $5. It’s the only logical choice to reach your goals.
The same logic applies to women. If you had to choose between 0 or 10 women, what would you pick? Probably 10. This answer doesn't change whether you are 15, 20, or 30.
Many are held back by the fact that they didn't have success in their youth. They use this as an excuse to remain stagnant in negativity and invisibility, guaranteeing a future even worse than their past—one shaped by a futile existence based on regret. Not having women in your teens doesn't mean it has to stay that way forever.
Here are a few more reasons:
Do you think your sex drive disappears after a certain age? No, at most, it might decrease.
And ask yourself: when you want to have sex after thirty, what kind of women do you want? Unattractive ones or hot ones? Obviously, hot ones. How do you date attractive women?
You’re either attractive or you have money.
Which is better?
Attracting through looks. Why?
When a woman is drawn to your looks, it's out of desire and instinctive nature; an "honest love" can grow from that.
Conversely, attraction based on money leads to "Opportunistic Love," based on what is called "Pragmatic Hypergamous Mating." Besides the "guarantee" of a beautiful woman exploiting you for money, you also risk becoming the classic father who no longer has sex with his wife—not to mention she might go looking elsewhere.
The reasoning is simple and consistent, but it requires effort and discipline to execute.
It’s unrealistic to believe a man’s aesthetic and physical prime is later than what nature dictates. However, it’s wrong to believe that after your prime, you are condemned to total decay. To attract women—especially attractive ones—the "code" remains the same: aesthetics. Especially considering that your relative value increases as the average of your peers drops significantly.
The brain’s programming doesn't change as you age. Therefore, after thirty, it becomes essential to improve or maintain yourself to avoid suffering physically, mentally, and socially (Halo Effect).
How? There are various ways to counter the signs of physical decline:
* Hair loss? Minoxidil, Finasteride, or Dutasteride.
* Aging skin/loss of collagen? Microneedling, biorevitalization.
* Expression lines (eyes, forehead, mouth)? Botox or fillers.
* Body? Training and diet.
* Testosterone? HRT or supportive therapy.
The "hack" isn't so much about looking young, but about being attractive.
These are just a few essentials—the same things celebrities do to stay attractive for as long as possible.
In summary, is it worth it?
I’d say yes. The reasons mentioned above are clear. It’s not a cryptic or strange answer; it’s a matter of common sense and logic.
I hope this analysis is useful to those called "oldcells" who feel discouraged by some clueless kid. Remember: the Blackpill never goes away; it’s hardwired into the human brain.
