ITV DESTROYS OOFY DOOFY PILL

[whiteissuperior]

 

[BigBoy]

Just lol shit video

 

[Deleted member 16357]

His argument is shit.
He says the examples are cherrypicked, but they just point out all the couples walking in livestreams on youtube (a lot of the time they will post full livestreams too, or videos with thousands of examples, and even explicitly state when they see a chad walking with a group of girls).
He says the couples are just looksmatched, but even if we accepted this point, why would they be looksmatched if the couples are young and females are supposed to have a million options ready to do anything for them according to the blackpill?
He says they could be dead bedrooms, betabuxx, etc. as if there are that many millionaires walking around in these livestream videos, and as if a dead beadrooms relationship would be showing affection in public.

 

[Xangsane]

 

[Zer0/∞]

His argument is shit.
He says the examples are cherrypicked, but they just point out all the couples walking in livestreams on youtube (a lot of the time they will post full livestreams too, or videos with thousands of examples, and even explicitly state when they see a chad walking with a group of girls).
He says the couples are just looksmatched, but even if we accepted this point, why would they be looksmatched if the couples are young and females are supposed to have a million options ready to do anything for them according to the blackpill?
He says they could be dead bedrooms, betabuxx, etc. as if there are that many millionaires walking around in these livestream videos, and as if a dead beadrooms relationship would be showing affection in public.

I honestly get more mad seeing a oofy doofy with a girl than a chad, they are outcompeting us by fucking our looksmatches, the average chad doesn't fucking anything below a becky @Matthias8272

 

[Matthias8272]

I honestly get more mad seeing a oofy doofy with a girl than a chad, they are outcompeting us by fucking our looksmatches, the average chad doesn't fucking anything below a becky @Matthias8272

That makes 0 sense to me personally, but I feel the blame is always on the women as they select their partner and chad is blinded by hormones. So the better looking the guy the more greedy the girl is

 

[Zer0/∞]

That makes 0 sense to me personally, but I feel the blame is always on the women as they select their partner and chad is blinded by hormones. So the better looking the guy the more greedy the girl is

my looksmatch is an obese indian girl, so no one except 5'4 white oofy doofies fucks them

 

[Matthias8272]

my looksmatch is an obese indian girl, so no one except 5'4 white oofy doofies fucks them

If he's white and she's a fat ethnic i wouldn't consider that oofy doofy, that would be jbw

 

[Zer0/∞]

If he's white and she's a fat ethnic i wouldn't consider that oofy doofy, that would be jbw

she was the ugliest indian girl I've ever seen in my life and he was literally a 5'3 ginger LTN

 

[Matthias8272]

she was the ugliest indian girl I've ever seen in my life and he was literally a 5'3 ginger LTN

yeah a white ltn, if he was indian then perhaps it would be oofy doofy. however at that point you would have to consider whether he's rich. If not then it would be oofy doofy, however that would just mean that the girl is capable of hypergamy but isn't doing so. Therefore it's better than an ugly girl expecting a lot whilst offering little. He has leverage due to being white

 

[Zer0/∞]

yeah a white ltn, if he was indian then perhaps it would be oofy doofy. however at that point you would have to consider whether he's rich. If not then it would be oofy doofy, however that would just mean that the girl is capable of hypergamy but isn't doing so. Therefore it's better than an ugly girl expecting a lot whilst offering little. He has leverage due to being white

also, there was the 5'1 darkskin curry classmate I had dating a 5'4 blonde white girl, ruined my mental health seeing them hug and hold hands everyday in highschool

 

[Matthias8272]

also, there was the 5'1 darkskin curry classmate I had dating a 5'4 blonde white girl, ruined my mental health seeing them hug and hold hands everyday in highschool

yep that's oofy doofy but like I said here:

if not then it would be oofy doofy, however that would just mean that the girl is capable of hypergamy but isn't doing so. Therefore it's better than an ugly girl expecting a lot whilst offering little.

 

[Brus Wane]

His argument is shit.
He says the examples are cherrypicked, but they just point out all the couples walking in livestreams on youtube (a lot of the time they will post full livestreams too, or videos with thousands of examples, and even explicitly state when they see a chad walking with a group of girls).

When he said cherrypicked, he was referring to the pics of salman rushdie and the fat monkey with the cumskin foid, not those from the street video.

And he makes one good point.
There's no empirical evidence for oofy doofy and that's why advocates of this theory have to resort to this.

There is evidence, however, for the opposite. (Women choosing based mostly on looks).

［2023 Study］The importance of physical attractiveness and ambition/intelligence to the mate choices of women and their parents.

Tldr ; Physical attractiveness overwhelmingly matters MORE than intelligence & ambition , not just to FOIDS but to HER PARENTS AS WELL. (and neither party will admit this) Abstract When women make mate choices, they face potential conflict with their parents. Evolutionary theory predicts, and...

looksmax.org

He says the couples are just looksmatched, but even if we accepted this point, why would they be looksmatched if the couples are young and females are supposed to have a million options ready to do anything for them according to the blackpill?

Do you disagree? They seem pretty looksmatched to me.

Anyway, who said they'd have millions of options ready to do anything for them?

The millions of options most blackpillers refer to are the simps, beta orbiters and potential FWBs for them to choose from.

They won't necessarily be out there risking life and limb for one particular toilet.

ITV already said later on in the video that they'd be able to fuck across and upwards but won't get commitment at the same rate, hence they'd have to "settle". I'm just paraphrasing here FYI.

He says they could be dead bedrooms, betabuxx, etc. as if there are that many millionaires walking around in these livestream videos, and as if a dead beadrooms relationship would be showing affection in public.

Yeah he might be grasping at straws here since there's no evidence to suggest that but it's not entirely impossible.

Think about it. It's in ones best interest to show a happy demeanor to the public, especially if they know you're in a r/s and you want them to believe you're a "happy couple".

Goes for both men and women.

Take the PM of Finland who is soon to be out of office. Her husband has been dancing and flirting with randos in nightclubs while she herself was (most likely, but the MF denied it jfl) having an affair with a rock singer.

They kept their image of a "good happy family with kids" up till like 2-3 days ago since she'll be out of govt shortly and hence no reason to keep up the façade.

 

[Deleted member 28270]

You just need insta to see all the oofie doofie couples

 

[Deleted member 16357]

There's no empirical evidence for oofy doofy and that's why advocates of this theory have to resort to this.

Street videos are empirical evidence. It isn’t suddenly not empirical evidence just because it isn’t in a scientific journal. Also, it’s funny cause he’s actually cherrypicking examples of cherrypicking: most oofy doofy believers post street footage and livestreams etc.
And it is very hard to criticize this method, because in scientific studies like the one you gave, it doesn’t actually test the theory against their sexual past or current partner (like oofy doofy), but instead a choice for a hypothetical scenario.

Anyway, who said they'd have millions of options ready to do anything for them?

The millions of options most blackpillers refer to are the simps, beta orbiters and potential FWBs for them to choose from.

They won't necessarily be out there risking life and limb for one particular toilet.

ITV already said later on in the video that they'd be able to fuck across and upwards but won't get commitment at the same rate, hence they'd have to "settle". I'm just paraphrasing here FYI.

There would be no reason a girl would have to settle for her looksmatch if extreme hypergamy existed. Basically all blackpillers think extreme hypergamy exists (including inceltv himself in other videos). Therefore…
It’s just another shitty attempt to immunize the blackpill against criticism, a nice motte and bailey fallacy where at one second you can say the most controversial theories, and the other when your shitty ideas are being criticized and you run to the least controversial, trivial interpretation of the theory.

I didn’t touch on whether he was right or wrong about the looksmatch thing because it’s irrelevant to my argument.

Think about it. It's in ones best interest to show a happy demeanor to the public, especially if they know you're in a r/s and you want them to believe you're a "happy couple".

You are comparing no name normies walking down the street to famous people who constantly have a spotlight on them. Who are they signalling to? The old homeless guys?

Not to mention this is merely a rationalization of what you already believe. If a public couple showing affection is evidence against them being an affectionate couple, then it is logically necessary that not showing public affection as a couple is evidence for them being an affectionate couple. This is absurd.

 

[Brus Wane]

Street videos are empirical evidence. It isn’t suddenly not empirical evidence just because it isn’t in a scientific journal. Also, it’s funny cause he’s actually cherrypicking examples of cherrypicking: most oofy doofy believers post street footage and livestreams etc.
And it is very hard to criticize this method, because in scientific studies like the one you gave, it doesn’t actually test the theory against their sexual past or current partner (like oofy doofy), but instead a choice for a hypothetical scenario.

What?! No way! Empirical evidence is the information obtained through observation and documentation of certain behavior and patterns or through an experiment. Empirical evidence is a quintessential part of the scientific method of research that is applicable in many disciplines.

A video doesn't tell you anything. What's the context behind all those couples? Are there any factors that influence why they are in a relationship that we do not know about? Eg. Betabux , JBW , just be first theory, 10 inch horse cock etc

It doesn't not give us any answers on why they picked that particular man to be their husband/boyfriend. No insight whatsoever.

You can't conclude oofy doofy based on that.

This method can & should be criticized because it's basically like a work of art at a museum.

Different people with different views are just gonna draw their own conclusions from it till the cows come home and there's nothing objective or informative about this "study". Basically all grasping at straws.

There would be no reason a girl would have to settle for her looksmatch if extreme hypergamy existed. Basically all blackpillers think extreme hypergamy exists (including inceltv himself in other videos). Therefore…
It’s just another shitty attempt to immunize the blackpill against criticism, a nice motte and bailey fallacy where at one second you can say the most controversial theories, and the other when your shitty ideas are being criticized and you run to the least controversial, trivial interpretation of the theory.

Extreme hypergamy & women settling can both be true at the same time, can't it?

Are these 2 things mutually exclusive somehow?

1. Extreme hypergamy = all women want the top 20% of men , for example

2. Obviously they can't get them so some go down the Chad only path & become single.

Then the others decide to "settle" for nonChads.

3. Those who decided to settle are those you see in the video.

I don't see the motte & bailey fallacy in this am I missing something?

hypergamy =/= women won't settle

Your statement saying

There would be no reason a girl would have to settle for her looksmatch if extreme hypergamy existed.

is demonstrably false.

Let's say I only want 5'9+ slim blonde hair blue eyed girls but can't get them.

Surely when you see people like me hanging out with short ethnic girls won't make you go "oh look that girl must have got him with her great personality"

Your first thought would probably be "that dude had to settle & take what he could"

You are comparing no name normies walking down the street to famous people who constantly have a spotlight on them. Who are they signalling to? The old homeless guys?

Not to mention this is merely a rationalization of what you already believe. If a public couple showing affection is evidence against them being an affectionate couple, then it is logically necessary that not showing public affection as a couple is evidence for them being an affectionate couple. This is absurd.

Nah you took my stuff out of context. You said that they wouldn't be holding hands if they were in a DBR situation etc...

I say why not?

Forget the Finland PM example that wasn't a good one.

But regardless of your martial or relationship problems, you'd still want to show that everything is going good to the general public and there's no trouble in paradise right?

If I lost money in the stock market or I was grieving someone's death, I'd still put on a tough front when I'm out in public. Doesn't have to be for anyone in particular but just to show that I'm ok.

Btw are you an oofy doofy theory believer? If so, why?

 

[Zer0/∞]

yep that's oofy doofy but like I said here:

I saw this LTN average height gook hugging and cuddling his noodle gf today, extreme ragefuel because he should be an incel while his girl fucks white chad and a obese 350 lbs fat fuck 6’2 chink with his 4’10 Asian gf, it’s dysgenic, all they’ll produce are the next generation of incels

 

[thecel]

I saw this LTN average height gook hugging and cuddling his noodle gf today, extreme ragefuel because he should be an incel while his girl fucks white chad and a obese 350 lbs fat fuck 6’2 chink with his 4’10 Asian gf, it’s dysgenic, all they’ll produce are the next generation of incels

all Asian foids fuck Maher tier moids

 

[Deleted member 24940]

>muh studies

Go outside you see oofy doofys everywhere with their gfs