[JBWcopers BTFO] [High-IQ ONLY] Why Tinder “experiments” are retarded and inconclusive + ending racepill

Status
Not open for further replies.
Between two people around the same attractiveness level, the white one is usually considered more attractive/desirable. This increases slightly the higher you go in the attractiveness scale.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NothingCanStopMe and Copeful
can someone translate for me what he is talking about? didnt read my low iq brain is lazy

Tinder experiment no reliable because external factor

Unreliable experiment = unreliable and inapplicable theory
 
Between two people around the same attractiveness level, the white one is usually considered more attractive/desirable. This increases slightly the higher you go in the attractiveness scale.

Yes, this is why i said the average white > average ethnic.
 
You cope way too hard. The slaying ethnics are the ones who look closest to white. You should be embarrassed to use such an example. Blacks do this garbage to prove that we look good but its soo shameful.

Caucasian features are universally considered more attractive, so ethnics that have them will also be considered more attractive. This is a fact. Stop fucking coping
 
Yes, this is why i said the average white > average ethnic.
Yeah no shit, anyone who thinks a PSL 6 ethnic is less desirable than an avg white guy is delusional.
Either you're attractive or you're not.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr and Copeful
I meant in place of the ethnics. Stop coping with "muh caucasian". You could literally substitute 4.5 PSL ethnics and I guarantee you the results would be the same. I just chose chads/stacies to make the comparison clear
Lmao nah ethnic white worship is legit af.
Caucasian features are universally considered more attractive, so ethnics that have them will also be considered more attractive. This is a fact. Stop fucking coping
Just debunked your entire thread.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10191, Deleted member 6217, Good_Little_Goy and 1 other person
Yeah no shit, anyone who thinks a PSL 6 ethnic is less desirable than an avg white guy is delusional.
Either you're attractive or you're not.

Youd be surprised. People believe that even 6 psl ethnics are unattractive to women bc of tinder results. Look at this thread.

 
Caucasian features are universally considered more attractive, so ethnics that have them will also be considered more attractive. This is a fact. Stop fucking coping
Yes so the one whos genetic make up is closest to an attractive white person wins. JBW proved again. Stop making these shit threads
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: TsarTsar444, Good_Little_Goy, goat2x and 1 other person
Yes so the one whos genetic make up is closest to an attractive white person wins. JBW proved again. Stop making these shit threads

That's not JBW idiot. JBW = 4 PSL white has greater SMV than 5+ PSL ethnics. PSL already takes into account phenotype and evaluates attractiveness based on their facial structure/features. And because caucasian features are considered the most attractive, a 5+ psl ethnic most likely has caucasoid features. It is what it is
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr
TLDR

Tinder results are inconclusive because of how few experiments are done (relatively speaking), they’re not controlled for location (if an experiment is done in Alabama, which is disproportionately more racist, obviously ethnics won’t perform as well there - compared to somewhere like Los Angeles) and by how easily ELO can be affected by Asian women that are only swiping on white men, even at the expense of attractive ethnics.

So what he’s trying to say is that outside of a few demographic groups that will LITERALLY take a 4 PSL white dude over a 5 PSL ethnic, most groups will take the most attractive person, regardless of race.

Which id hope to be the case

This 6.5 PSL + Indian woman is not the equivalent of a 5.5 PSL white girl imo

She’s just 6.5+ PSL simple as that

View attachment 610571

@personalityinkwell Read this reply
 
TLDR

Tinder results are inconclusive because of how few experiments are done (relatively speaking), they’re not controlled for location (if an experiment is done in Alabama, which is disproportionately more racist, obviously ethnics won’t perform as well there - compared to somewhere like Los Angeles) and by how easily ELO can be affected by Asian women that are only swiping on white men, even at the expense of attractive ethnics.

So what he’s trying to say is that outside of a few demographic groups that will LITERALLY take a 4 PSL white dude over a 5 PSL ethnic, most groups will take the most attractive person, regardless of race.

Which id hope to be the case

This 6.5 PSL + Indian woman is not the equivalent of a 5.5 PSL white girl imo

She’s just 6.5+ PSL simple as that

View attachment 610571

giphy.gif


I am indeed mirin' your IQ and willingness to read this thread. Thank you son
 
  • Love it
Reactions: 6485b025t
That's not JBW idiot. JBW = 4 PSL white has greater SMV than 5+ PSL ethnics. PSL already takes into account phenotype and evaluates attractiveness based on their facial structure/features. And because caucasian features are considered the most attractive, a 5+ psl ethnic most likely has caucasoid features. It is what it is
Bro... most Indians and arabs are incel while average white guys get laid easily in college if they’re somewhat nt

almost all men prefer white girls, even normie know this.

Lots of incels are ethnics obsessed with white women.

Ethnic guys would rather commit suicide or go er instead of getting with an ethnic girl

Go to bodybuilding.com and you’d see lots of threads saying I’m black/Indian/arab/Asian and want white girls but can’t get them.

Most men prefer 4 pls white girl over 5 psl ethnic girl, unless ethnic chick looks white
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Copeful
That's not JBW idiot. JBW = 4 PSL white has greater SMV than 5+ PSL ethnics. PSL already takes into account phenotype and evaluates attractiveness based on their facial structure/features. And because caucasian features are considered the most attractive, a 5+ psl ethnic most likely has caucasoid features. It is what it is
Jbw means you get a boost for looking white. If a curry somehow looks like tom cruise from whatever combination and is white passing, it doesn't disprove jbw. For your male examples of how much jbw is cope, you use the most white passing ethnics. You look like a clown. I bet the dark curry would get obliterated by a white chadlite on tinder
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful, Deleted member 4614, TsarTsar444 and 2 others
N
TLDR

Tinder results are inconclusive because of how few experiments are done (relatively speaking), they’re not controlled for location (if an experiment is done in Alabama, which is disproportionately more racist, obviously ethnics won’t perform as well there - compared to somewhere like Los Angeles) and by how easily ELO can be affected by Asian women that are only swiping on white men, even at the expense of attractive ethnics.

So what he’s trying to say is that outside of a few demographic groups that will LITERALLY take a 4 PSL white dude over a 5 PSL ethnic, most groups will take the most attractive person, regardless of race.

Which id hope to be the case

This 6.5 PSL + Indian woman is not the equivalent of a 5.5 PSL white girl imo

She’s just 6.5+ PSL simple as that

View attachment 610571
Not 6.5 psl lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Good_Little_Goy
who could have thought, when you have bones and you are gl it doesnt matter even if you are a gay alien like barrett you will still slay
 
yeah, jbw is cope

even americancels fail to greencardmaxx in colombia


 
  • +1
Reactions: Copeful
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: TsarTsar444, Blackgymmax and Good_Little_Goy
  • Love it
Reactions: goat2x
yeah, jbw is cope

even americancels fail to greencardmaxx in colombia



jfl watch his most recent video where he backtracks on using that guy as an example
that guy doesn't look white at all, I would peg him as arab or some shit

like what @Blackgymmax was talking about, ethnics getting bonus for 'looking white'
whites will get penalised for looking ethnic
 
  • +1
Reactions: BonesAndHarmony and Blackgymmax
jfl watch his most recent video where he backtracks on using that guy as an example
that guy doesn't look white at all, I would peg him as arab or some shit

like what @Blackgymmax was talking about, ethnics getting bonus for 'looking white'
whites will get penalised for looking ethnic
If tsh had the coloring of salludon and a rhino, i have 0 fucking doubt he would be roughly salludon SMV tier
 
  • +1
Reactions: Good_Little_Goy
jfl watch his most recent video where he backtracks on using that guy as an example
that guy doesn't look white at all, I would peg him as arab or some shit

like what @Blackgymmax was talking about, ethnics getting bonus for 'looking white'
whites will get penalised for looking ethnic
And nose matters alot for ethnics because its one of the biggest race indicators. A good rhino can give you the mixed guy vibe
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful and Good_Little_Goy
TLDR

Tinder results are inconclusive because of how few experiments are done (relatively speaking), they’re not controlled for location (if an experiment is done in Alabama, which is disproportionately more racist, obviously ethnics won’t perform as well there - compared to somewhere like Los Angeles) and by how easily ELO can be affected by Asian women that are only swiping on white men, even at the expense of attractive ethnics.

So what he’s trying to say is that outside of a few demographic groups that will LITERALLY take a 4 PSL white dude over a 5 PSL ethnic, most groups will take the most attractive person, regardless of race.

Which id hope to be the case

This 6.5 PSL + Indian woman is not the equivalent of a 5.5 PSL white girl imo

She’s just 6.5+ PSL simple as that

View attachment 610571
Mirin that undereye support
 
in b4 dn rd



326467d0-2ce1-407a-b067-0ed92989a02b-jpeg.605914


Tinder match rate across the world for a white male : MapPorn


9d0ec740-27da-434c-bf30-809ebb4d10e5-jpeg.594926


21a08365-eb36-4218-9ac4-189281652821-gif.594914


Just fucking end it you donkeys. End either this disgusting cope or your pitiable existence. In this thread I will be detailing the several reasons as to why Tinder experiments are inapplicable and a completely insubstantial foundation for your dogshit "racepill" as well as whatever other cancerous copes they have been used to corroborate on this shithole forum.

Dogmaticcels, (namely JBWcopers, self-hating ethnic cucks and Tinder experiment worshippers)
ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK!!

You have been warned.

Thesis: For an experiment to be considered valid and generalizable, it must occur in a neutral environment where any and all external parameters are either irrelevant to the outcome of the experiment, or controlled such that they do not influence the results significantly. The parameters under which Tinder "experiments" are conducted violate these criteria in that they either 1. directly influence the results to a large degree, or 2. are uncontrollable

These parameters include: extremely skewed gender ratios, inadequate # of trials relative to the population which these experiments are being applied to, differing demographical makeups between experiments and an unfair, partial, disruptive algorithm. The conjunction of these wayward parameters renders any results produced by Tinder experiments inconclusive. These experiments therefore cannot, in good conscience, be utilized to corroborate any generalized theories on the SMP as a whole.

This includes the racepill. The notion that an average white (4 PSL) has greater SMV than above average ethnics (4.5+ PSL) has little to no merit outside of lookism forums. The racepill in this sense is false, and is nothing more than an autistic delusion contrived in the depths of the blackpill echo chamber in order to satiate =<4 PSL whites clinging to whatever feeble hope they can and ugly self-hating ethnics coping with “muh racism is why women don’t want me”.




-------------Invalidity of Parameters------------

Skewed Gender ratios ~ I have already made a thread discussing this, but in short Tinder is naturally dominated by males looking for ONS. This inherently inflates the value of the minority of females using the app, and deflates the value of the male majority. Of course, the ratio present on Tinder (80/20 M/F if I'm being generous - It can be argued that it is further skewed due to bots) is absurd and not applicable on a wider scale for obvious reasons. Indeed, the general population is not 80% male and 20% female - believe it or not.

Sample size + # of Trials ~ You fools ran what, like 10 different experiments spanning a couple of hours? And you then go on to formulate the racepill and are now mindlessly applying it to the 170 million women in the US (even more if you include Canada)? Yeah, no. If you bastards have ever taken a science class, you'll know about the principles of "sample size" and "multiple trials". 10 measly experiments are inconsequential relative to the entire US population. Run at least 10 experiments in EVERY state (which accounts for demographical differences), compile the average results THEN we'll talk. Until then, these "studies" are essentially irrelevant. You cannot extrapolate the behavior of the entire female gender on the basis of 10 (I don't even think you've done 10, I always see the same ones) "experiments" performed on an inherently flawed platform. Stop presenting them as some incontrovertible, end-all be-all evidence you clowns. Many more trials must be run and in several locations for any conclusions to be drawn

Demographics ~ Take a white trucel and plop him down in China, and BOOM. Suddenly he's a 6 PSL chad, pulling in matches left and right. This should prove to you that the demographical makeup of where the experiment is run can influence results significantly. Obviously an extreme example, but the point stands nonetheless. In the matter of ethnics, placing one in the middle of Alabama (a.k.a KKK central, with a very low ethnic population) will undoubtedly have a negative influence on his results due to the particular sociopolitical environment of that region. Now take that same ethnic and put him in a more racially diverse area where ethnics are better integrated, and his match rate will improve drastically.

Tinder's algorithm ~ Tinder's algorithm is incredibly dubious, eventually reducing the visibility of profiles if they fail to attract a substantial amount of attention. The underlying mechanism behind this is the "ELO" score. Essentially, this score is calculated by taking into account the ability of a user to match with other users of predetermined attractiveness. In the matter of ethnics, it only takes a handful of 3 PSL white-worshipping noodles to swipe left and it's over. Tinder's ELO algorithm will erroneously determine that the gl ethnic is ugly as fuck because he cannot even match with ugly noodles, and from thereon his visibility (the amount of women that see him) decreases - therefore significantly reducing his potential to receive matches. With this disruptive underlying algorithm at play, it is impossible to draw conclusions due to the fact that low ELO females rejecting gl ethnics has a substantial impact on their visibility.



TL;DR - TINDER EXPERIMENTS INAPPLICABLE ON LARGE SCALE BC THEY DO NOT FOLLOW PROPER EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL. FAILURE TO ACCOUNT FOR EXTERNAL PARAMETERS = DISQUALIFIED FOR GENERALIZATION TO BROADER POPULATION = FALSIFIED, HALF-BAKED DOGSHIT THEORIES THAT HAVE BECOME MASTURBATION MATERIAL ON LOOKISM FORUMS


---------The nail in the coffin for racepill ~ "Perspective" theory--------


OMGGG!!! GUYYSS THIS GIRL IS SO HOTT! SWIPING RIGHT TEEHEE!!


014919f6-2d6d-473e-bb6e-5904c64b8909-jpeg.581865

(White normie)

EW, THIS GIRL? SHE LOOKS ETHNIC THOUGH. NOT ATTRACTED

10 Things You Can Do To Look and Feel Like Princess Jasmine from ...

(gl ethnic)

REVERSING GENDERS IN CASE YOU DO NOT GET THE COMPARISON

OMGGG!!! GIRLLSSS THIS GUY IS SO HOTT! SWIPING RIGHT TEEHEE!!

View attachment 607408

(White normie)

EW, THIS DUDE? HE LOOKS ETHNIC THOUGH. NOT ATTRACTED


Hot Indian Men


(gl ethnic)


qrHBTMAiupsVw6D3TNE9cBJBw6yV5TCIyRhi_7_sXw8=w320-h173-no


JFL!!!!

Really puts things into "perspective", doesn't it? You could substitute a Stacy/chadlite or even HTN and the effect would be the same, so don’t bark about the people I’ve chosen.

Reminder that I have made this exact argument multiple times and you fags have yet to provide a response. The best you have come up with is "Most guys would prefer the white girl bro, so most girls would prefer the white guy".


View attachment 610007


Just lol. My question to you is this:

Do you? Do you find average white females more attractive than good-looking ethnic females? No, you say? Then why in the FUCK would women find average white males more attractive than good-looking ethnic males? Huh???

Explain that to me, brainlets. You can have sexual preferences for whites (as I am sure the majority of this forum does), but that does not mean that a 4 PSL white m/fogs a 5+ or even 4.5 PSL ethnic. Sure, there will be the delusional noodlewhores and curryfoids that are white-worshipping and attracted to even 2 PSL trucels for their white skin. Or the white supremacists that will swipe left even if you are a 7.5 PSL ethnic, if you live in a KKK-tier location. It is what is is.

Just fucking laughing out loud at your Neanderthal IQ if you unironically think race > facial aesthetics. What’s far more important is the bone mass in your face and the harmony in your facial features, not the fucking color of your skin/your racial background. Just lol @ ur intelligence if you still think a handful of wildly conflicting and intrinsically flawed Tinder experiments definitively establish that gl ethnics (4.5+ PSL) have lower SMV than average whites (4 PSL). The real "racepill" is that whites have, on average, better facial features/structures than other races, which is where their advantage lies. Meaning that the average white > average ethnic. But a better looking ethnic will always mog.


This debate is OVER copers.

It is, and always will be face >>>>>>> race

giphy.gif


Tagging high-IQ users

@NordicIranian @Blackout.xl @SubhumanCurrycel @abmonger @Sikkunt23 @inceletto @personalityinkwell


Tagging JBWcopers, self-hating cucks, and those that took Tinder experiments as gospel without questioning their authenticity in any way

@Biggdink @MentalistKebab @Vidyacoper @DharkDC @john2 @TsarTsar444



tenor.gif
Stop the cope man, you don't need Tinder experiments to know that ethnics are incels, it's just common sense
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Copeful
Well it depends what type of ethnics you're talking about. If you're talking about white passing ethnics then no shit the race factor drops lol.
 
Did read since some points are right, it's still false, what's interesting about the average 4psl white vs that curry 7psl Chad you posted is how if only how if you simply put a 5psl guy vs the 7psl Chad, the 5psl guy will 100% obliterate him in India on Tinder results in the same place
 
  • +1
Reactions: Copeful
Jbw means you get a boost for looking white. If a curry somehow looks like tom cruise from whatever combination and is white passing, it doesn't disprove jbw. For your male examples of how much jbw is cope, you use the most white passing ethnics. You look like a clown. I bet the dark curry would get obliterated by a white chadlite on tinder

Keep fucking coping you moron. You have changed the definition of JBW to fit your argument. “Muh whitepassing” what the fuck does that even mean.

If the curry chad posted here he’d be told 6.5 PSL but over in west due to pheno (fOiDs aRe rAcIsT bRo). Keep fucking coping idiot
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr
Keep fucking coping you moron. You have changed the definition of JBW to fit your argument. “Muh whitepassing” what the fuck does that even mean.

If the curry chad posted here he’d be told 6.5 PSL but over in west due to pheno (fOiDs aRe rAcIsT bRo). Keep fucking coping idiot
I never changed the definition. If you have a white family and some how you end up looking like a black guy you don't get a white bonus. LOOKING white = JBW you fucking idiot. You don't even understand JBW yourself to the point where you use a white looking curry to prove ethnic beauty.
 
I never changed the definition. If you have a white family and some how you end up looking like a black guy you don't get a white bonus. LOOKING white = JBW you fucking idiot. You don't even understand JBW yourself to the point where you use a white looking curry to prove ethnic beauty.

I CHOSE HER BECAUSE I LIKE HER YOU FAGGOT. I COULDVE CHOSEN LITERALLY ANY OTHER ABOVE AVERAGE ETHNIC GIRL AND YOUR PREFERENCE WOULD NOT CHANGE. STOP COPING
 
Ye
I CHOSE HER BECAUSE I LIKE HER YOU FAGGOT. I COULDVE CHOSEN LITERALLY ANY OTHER ABOVE AVERAGE ETHNIC GIRL AND YOUR PREFERENCE WOULD NOT CHANGE. STOP COPING
Btw salludon looks like upgraded prime david gandy. How the fuck do ethnics use him as ethnic beauty lmao. Jfl, do your above average ethnics look like tanned white chicks? Theres a trend on IG where sub par white girls tan their skin to mog ethnic women into oblivion LMAOOO.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Copeful
I CHOSE HER BECAUSE I LIKE HER YOU FAGGOT. I COULDVE CHOSEN LITERALLY ANY OTHER ABOVE AVERAGE ETHNIC GIRL AND YOUR PREFERENCE WOULD NOT CHANGE. STOP COPING
I love sexy brown girls more than white chicks even the most ethnic looking fobs but nigga OVERALL dudes want whiter features over ethnics. Except for asians for some reason
 
  • +1
Reactions: Copeful
Just write a big wall of text and make it seem valid theory.

You realize the reason the average white male gets lower matches within the West is probably also because of the fact the average MALE gets less matches right? It basically just means JBW is legit and regardless of attractiveness it will upscale once they're visiting non white countries (Specifically in continents like Africa + Asia)

Also, you're just being like every race coper (sfcels & coping ethnics) by picking out extremes and acting as if it somehow disproves every "race pill" ever discussed.

Different chads of different phenotypes are still considered more attractive. Looking Indian or having an Indian accent is still a huge failo, and West Asian people are universally considered UGLY.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Copeful
You realize the reason the average white male gets lower matches within the West is probably also because of the fact the average MALE gets less matches right? It basically just means JBW is legit and regardless of attractiveness it will upscale once they're visiting non white countries (Specifically in continents like Africa + Asia)

JBW only exists in non-white countries and certain areas in the West. I have discussed this in the thread already.

"You can have sexual preferences for whites (as I am sure the majority of this forum does), but that does not mean that a 4 PSL white m/fogs a 5+ or even 4.5 PSL ethnic. Sure, there will be the delusional noodlewhores and curryfoids that are white-worshipping and attracted to even 2 PSL trucels for their white skin. Or the white supremacists that will swipe left even if you are a 7.5 PSL ethnic, if you live in a KKK-tier location. It is what is is"


99 times out of 100 it will be face >> race


Also, you're just being like every race coper (sfcels & coping ethnics) by picking out extremes and acting as if it somehow disproves every "race pill" ever discussed.

I picked extremes so that the comparison would be clear. Like I've said, you could substitute HTN ethnics and the comparison would still be valid.
 
Bro... most Indians and arabs are incel while average white guys get laid easily in college if they’re somewhat nt

almost all men prefer white girls, even normie know this.

Lots of incels are ethnics obsessed with white women.

Ethnic guys would rather commit suicide or go er instead of getting with an ethnic girl

Go to bodybuilding.com and you’d see lots of threads saying I’m black/Indian/arab/Asian and want white girls but can’t get them.

Most men prefer 4 pls white girl over 5 psl ethnic girl, unless ethnic chick looks white
Ive seen this shit w black women. Even if shes mixed, looks dark and 5psl, gets mogged by 4 psl whitey ALTHOUGH MIXED WHITE PASSING 5 PSL+ CHICK almost indefinitely OBLITERATES
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7580
JBW only exists in non-white countries and certain areas in the West. I have discussed this in the thread already.

"You can have sexual preferences for whites (as I am sure the majority of this forum does), but that does not mean that a 4 PSL white m/fogs a 5+ or even 4.5 PSL ethnic. Sure, there will be the delusional noodlewhores and curryfoids that are white-worshipping and attracted to even 2 PSL trucels for their white skin. Or the white supremacists that will swipe left even if you are a 7.5 PSL ethnic, if you live in a KKK-tier location. It is what is is"


99 times out of 100 it will be face >> race



I picked extremes so that the comparison would be clear. Like I've said, you could substitute HTN ethnics and the comparison would still be valid.
If anything the extremes make it even less clear since it's just showing extreme logic aka gl people > less gl people. Try morphing Chico dark and you'll realize how much pheno matters. Also your reference to some previous post doesn't tell me anything about what's wrong regarding my point.
 
If anything the extremes make it even less clear since it's just showing extreme logic aka gl people > less gl people.

The point of this thread is disprove the diehard JBWcopers that believe an average white has greater appeal than gl ethnics. You can see in the thread that ppl are still trying to argue that 4 psl white > 5+ PSl ethnics. Even with this extreme logic they still believe this, because some gl ethnics didn't perform well on a few Tinder experiments. It's insane
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr and Deleted member 685
The point of this thread is disprove the diehard JBWcopers that believe an average white has greater appeal than gl ethnics. You can see in the thread that ppl are still trying to argue that 4 psl white > 5+ PSl ethnics. Even with this extreme logic they still believe this, because some gl ethnics didn't perform well on a few Tinder experiments. It's insane
Well there's no hope for them so no point in argueing tbh. Most guys who are like this refuse to discuss anything which may refute their opinion
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr and Copeful
yeah, jbw is cope

even americancels fail to greencardmaxx in colombia



This dude is white?
To be fair. He looks more Arabic or Latin, then white to me.

To add. JBW, doesn't mean you will never get rejected. But JBW, means that you will have options.

Check this brutal JBW video.


Wtf up with this gender ratios Bs?
China has one of the worst gender ratios for men, and JBW theory is very brutal there.

It is what it is.
 
in b4 dn rd



326467d0-2ce1-407a-b067-0ed92989a02b-jpeg.605914


Tinder match rate across the world for a white male : MapPorn


9d0ec740-27da-434c-bf30-809ebb4d10e5-jpeg.594926


21a08365-eb36-4218-9ac4-189281652821-gif.594914


Just fucking end it you donkeys. End either this disgusting cope or your pitiable existence. In this thread I will be detailing the several reasons as to why Tinder experiments are inapplicable and a completely insubstantial foundation for your dogshit "racepill" as well as whatever other cancerous copes they have been used to corroborate on this shithole forum.

Dogmaticcels, (namely JBWcopers, self-hating ethnic cucks and Tinder experiment worshippers)
ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK!!

You have been warned.

Thesis: For an experiment to be considered valid and generalizable, it must occur in a neutral environment where any and all external parameters are either irrelevant to the outcome of the experiment, or controlled such that they do not influence the results significantly. The parameters under which Tinder "experiments" are conducted violate these criteria in that they either 1. directly influence the results to a large degree, or 2. are uncontrollable

These parameters include: extremely skewed gender ratios, inadequate # of trials relative to the population which these experiments are being applied to, differing demographical makeups between experiments and an unfair, partial, disruptive algorithm. The conjunction of these wayward parameters renders any results produced by Tinder experiments inconclusive. These experiments therefore cannot, in good conscience, be utilized to corroborate any generalized theories on the SMP as a whole.

This includes the racepill. The notion that an average white (4 PSL) has greater SMV than above average ethnics (4.5+ PSL) has little to no merit outside of lookism forums. The racepill in this sense is false, and is nothing more than an autistic delusion contrived in the depths of the blackpill echo chamber in order to satiate =<4 PSL whites clinging to whatever feeble hope they can and ugly self-hating ethnics coping with “muh racism is why women don’t want me”.




-------------Invalidity of Parameters------------

Skewed Gender ratios ~ I have already made a thread discussing this, but in short Tinder is naturally dominated by males looking for ONS. This inherently inflates the value of the minority of females using the app, and deflates the value of the male majority. Of course, the ratio present on Tinder (80/20 M/F if I'm being generous - It can be argued that it is further skewed due to bots) is absurd and not applicable on a wider scale for obvious reasons. Indeed, the general population is not 80% male and 20% female - believe it or not.

Sample size + # of Trials ~ You fools ran what, like 10 different experiments spanning a couple of hours? And you then go on to formulate the racepill and are now mindlessly applying it to the 170 million women in the US (even more if you include Canada)? Yeah, no. If you bastards have ever taken a science class, you'll know about the principles of "sample size" and "multiple trials". 10 measly experiments are inconsequential relative to the entire US population. Run at least 10 experiments in EVERY state (which accounts for demographical differences), compile the average results THEN we'll talk. Until then, these "studies" are essentially irrelevant. You cannot extrapolate the behavior of the entire female gender on the basis of 10 (I don't even think you've done 10, I always see the same ones) "experiments" performed on an inherently flawed platform. Stop presenting them as some incontrovertible, end-all be-all evidence you clowns. Many more trials must be run and in several locations for any conclusions to be drawn

Demographics ~ Take a white trucel and plop him down in China, and BOOM. Suddenly he's a 6 PSL chad, pulling in matches left and right. This should prove to you that the demographical makeup of where the experiment is run can influence results significantly. Obviously an extreme example, but the point stands nonetheless. In the matter of ethnics, placing one in the middle of Alabama (a.k.a KKK central, with a very low ethnic population) will undoubtedly have a negative influence on his results due to the particular sociopolitical environment of that region. Now take that same ethnic and put him in a more racially diverse area where ethnics are better integrated, and his match rate will improve drastically.

Tinder's algorithm ~ Tinder's algorithm is incredibly dubious, eventually reducing the visibility of profiles if they fail to attract a substantial amount of attention. The underlying mechanism behind this is the "ELO" score. Essentially, this score is calculated by taking into account the ability of a user to match with other users of predetermined attractiveness. In the matter of ethnics, it only takes a handful of 3 PSL white-worshipping noodles to swipe left and it's over. Tinder's ELO algorithm will erroneously determine that the gl ethnic is ugly as fuck because he cannot even match with ugly noodles, and from thereon his visibility (the amount of women that see him) decreases - therefore significantly reducing his potential to receive matches. With this disruptive underlying algorithm at play, it is impossible to draw conclusions due to the fact that low ELO females rejecting gl ethnics has a substantial impact on their visibility.



TL;DR - TINDER EXPERIMENTS INAPPLICABLE ON LARGE SCALE BC THEY DO NOT FOLLOW PROPER EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL. FAILURE TO ACCOUNT FOR EXTERNAL PARAMETERS = DISQUALIFIED FOR GENERALIZATION TO BROADER POPULATION = FALSIFIED, HALF-BAKED DOGSHIT THEORIES THAT HAVE BECOME MASTURBATION MATERIAL ON LOOKISM FORUMS


---------The nail in the coffin for racepill ~ "Perspective" theory--------


OMGGG!!! GUYYSS THIS GIRL IS SO HOTT! SWIPING RIGHT TEEHEE!!


014919f6-2d6d-473e-bb6e-5904c64b8909-jpeg.581865

(White normie)

EW, THIS GIRL? SHE LOOKS ETHNIC THOUGH. NOT ATTRACTED

10 Things You Can Do To Look and Feel Like Princess Jasmine from ...

(gl ethnic)

REVERSING GENDERS IN CASE YOU DO NOT GET THE COMPARISON

OMGGG!!! GIRLLSSS THIS GUY IS SO HOTT! SWIPING RIGHT TEEHEE!!

View attachment 607408

(White normie)

EW, THIS DUDE? HE LOOKS ETHNIC THOUGH. NOT ATTRACTED


Hot Indian Men


(gl ethnic)


qrHBTMAiupsVw6D3TNE9cBJBw6yV5TCIyRhi_7_sXw8=w320-h173-no


JFL!!!!

Really puts things into "perspective", doesn't it? You could substitute a Stacy/chadlite or even HTN and the effect would be the same, so don’t bark about the people I’ve chosen.

Reminder that I have made this exact argument multiple times and you fags have yet to provide a response. The best you have come up with is "Most guys would prefer the white girl bro, so most girls would prefer the white guy".


View attachment 610007


Just lol. My question to you is this:

Do you? Do you find average white females more attractive than good-looking ethnic females? No, you say? Then why in the FUCK would women find average white males more attractive than good-looking ethnic males? Huh???

Explain that to me, brainlets. You can have sexual preferences for whites (as I am sure the majority of this forum does), but that does not mean that a 4 PSL white m/fogs a 5+ or even 4.5 PSL ethnic. Sure, there will be the delusional noodlewhores and curryfoids that are white-worshipping and attracted to even 2 PSL trucels for their white skin. Or the white supremacists that will swipe left even if you are a 7.5 PSL ethnic, if you live in a KKK-tier location. It is what is is.

Just fucking laughing out loud at your Neanderthal IQ if you unironically think race > facial aesthetics. What’s far more important is the bone mass in your face and the harmony in your facial features, not the fucking color of your skin/your racial background. Just lol @ ur intelligence if you still think a handful of wildly conflicting and intrinsically flawed Tinder experiments definitively establish that gl ethnics (4.5+ PSL) have lower SMV than average whites (4 PSL). The real "racepill" is that whites have, on average, better facial features/structures than other races, which is where their advantage lies. Meaning that the average white > average ethnic. But a better looking ethnic will always mog.


This debate is OVER copers.

It is, and always will be face >>>>>>> race

giphy.gif


Tagging high-IQ users

@NordicIranian @Blackout.xl @SubhumanCurrycel @abmonger @Sikkunt23 @inceletto @personalityinkwell


Tagging JBWcopers, self-hating cucks, and those that took Tinder experiments as gospel without questioning their authenticity in any way

@Biggdink @MentalistKebab @Vidyacoper @DharkDC @john2 @TsarTsar444



tenor.gif
Yes Bro the racepill is cope.

3f05ca13b0235d128b23c35039eb5fb4.png


^Look how universally attractive and high PSL I am bro.

Shit thread, kys
 
Yes Bro the racepill is cope.

3f05ca13b0235d128b23c35039eb5fb4.png


^Look how universally attractive and high PSL I am bro.

Shit thread, kys

Bro what do you mean that abo is a insane giga slayer.
 
This is complete, utter, and baseless cope. The concept of being "good looking" is invariably tied to race since whites in recent history dominated the world and thus attraction became eurocentric. You cannot separate the two. Having a small nose for example is considered attractive and is more common in whites. The idea of a better looking ethnic only exists for those ethnics who have features that are more eurocentric (like the example in your post of the ethnic men and women).

What is shown in social and news and entertainment media invariably affects your attractiveness, and as of now, although the effect is definitely diminishing, the average white has a much higher SMV than everyone else. The effect may be less pronounced in diverse cities, but when it comes to match rate on tinder and more importantly response rate and people actually willing to go on dates and meet random men, whites have a huge advantage. Date rate is rarely discussed but if actually experimented upon, you will have a very strong advantage for whites. This is because people see white faces everywhere, whether it be in the movies, outside, in real life, or online. This establishes a sense of familiarity and comfort.

Familarity and comfort is utmost important when a woman decides to meet a random man. Because of stereotypes that portray blacks as criminals, Indians and Arabs as rapists, and Asians as feminine and weak, many women may even match with them but not decide to meet them. This is where the disadvantage in race lies, not even attraction wise
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Copeful
This is complete, utter, and baseless cope. The concept of being "good looking" is invariably tied to race since whites in recent history dominated the world and thus attraction became eurocentric. You cannot separate the two. Having a small nose for example is considered attractive and is more common in whites. The idea of a better looking ethnic only exists for those ethnics who have features that are more eurocentric (like the example in your post of the ethnic men and women).

What is shown in social and news and entertainment media invariably affects your attractiveness, and as of now, although the effect is definitely diminishing, the average white has a much higher SMV than everyone else. The effect may be less pronounced in diverse cities, but when it comes to match rate on tinder and more importantly response rate and people actually willing to go on dates and meet random men, whites have a huge advantage. Date rate is rarely discussed but if actually experimented upon, you will have a very strong advantage for whites. This is because people see white faces everywhere, whether it be in the movies, outside, in real life, or online. This establishes a sense of familiarity and comfort.

Familarity and comfort is utmost important when a woman decides to meet a random man. Because of stereotypes that portray blacks as criminals, Indians and Arabs as rapists, and Asians as feminine and weak, many women may even match with them but not decide to meet them. This is where the disadvantage in race lies, not even attraction wise

WRONG.

arabincel-gif.620764




5f0e03fdba6b4012998132-gif.517626
 
bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: WadlowMaxxing
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Xangsane
Replies
259
Views
11K
chadhamed
chadhamed
D
Replies
15
Views
3K
Celery
C
Acne Victim
Replies
44
Views
4K
Deleted member 27746
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top