Jesus Christ is God

[Deleted member 129366]

This is so.

 

[Grilldaddy❤️]

Water

 

[Deleted member 122761]

No God is not a concept. Low-IQ thread ngl

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Im also a Christian. Methodist

 

[Jager]

This is so.

yes christ is lord amen

 

[Zeke Yeager]

Werent you just advocating for tnd just a moment ago

 

[Diamond Dave]

Christ is a very important figure, though Christianity is not my path.

 

[Deleted member 129366]

Christ is a very important figure, though Christianity is not my path.

I respect this standpoint. You are obviously capable of civil discourse. A rarity.

 

[liberiangrimreaper]

I love seeing how you creatures can be wannabe-nazi racists and praise a God lmao

You’re determined to the 7th layer of hell and I’ll call God to make sure you make it there you fuckwad

 

[romanstock]

Romans following Jupiter: die dumb jews god u people really are pathetic
Romans following jew god: roman empire dies jews get banking monopoly slowly gather up all money now sitting on top of society

christcucks: keep following the jew god! that's totally going to save us!!!

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

This is so.

How come the bible claims god has never been seen by anyone but jesus has been "seen by many".retard

 

[takethewhitepill]

Ave Christus Rex

 

[PSL Les]

John 10:30 - I and the Father am one

 

[takethewhitepill]

How come the bible claims god has never been seen by anyone but jesus has been "seen by many".retard

"No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known." John 1:18. Nice job reading the verse you quote, retard.

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

"No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known." John 1:18. Nice job reading the verse you quote, retard.

"No one saw god but god made god go on earth and people saw god" johnny sins 69:41

 

[takethewhitepill]

"No one saw god but god made god go on earth and people saw god" johnny sins 69:41

Yeah, pretty much. Do you have a real internal critique or did I take down your entire argument by reading the verse you quoted?

 

[iblamexyz]

This is so.

Amen Brother

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

Yeah, pretty much. Do you have a real internal critique or did I take down your entire argument by reading the verse you quoted?

You didnt take down shit retard you just proved ur "god" is a paradox and called it a win.

 

[Deleted member 160598]

Amen twin

 

[iblamexyz]

I love seeing how you creatures can be wannabe-nazi racists and praise a God lmao

You’re determined to the 7th layer of hell and I’ll call God to make sure you make it there you fuckwad

not how Christianity works fuck nut

 

[Deleted member 160598]

Amen Brother

Based

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

Amen Brother

Reppin ur posts cause u reppin mine

 

[liberiangrimreaper]

not how Christianity works fuck nut

Yes it does

my prayers work better than the average being because I am different from you gentile goys

I am one of the 144,000 angels that are promised to heaven

 

[iblamexyz]

Yes it does

my prayers work better than the average being because I am different from you gentile goys

I am one of the 144,000 angels that are promised to heaven

If you don’t put your faith in Jesus Christ you ain’t getting shit

 

[liberiangrimreaper]

If you don’t put your faith in Jesus Christ you ain’t getting shit

Cope

The one and only Yeshua told me in my wet dream that my prayers have been promised thousands of years ago

goycel can’t comprehend

 

[takethewhitepill]

You didnt take down shit retard you just proved ur "god" is a paradox and called it a win.

Your argument was:

How come the bible claims god has never been seen by anyone but jesus has been "seen by many".retard

You want to make an internal critique by talking about what is within the bible, as stated in the beginning of your objection. I answered your question about scripture by quoting scripture. If your entire argument was that according to the bible, nobody had seen God, and people saw Jesus, it is answered internally as seen in the literal introduction of Jesus in John 1.

There is no paradox, but if you don't have the capacity to understand that how does that create an objection to begin with? God is outside of our understanding, if you cannot understand His will then that just proves it is not a purely human text like the quran or something which claims to be perfectly understood by the human mind.

Now, do you have a real critique or are you choosing to be ignorant?

If you reply dnr you like kids. Wait, you already like loli shit.

 

[Deleted member 160598]

Your argument was:

You want to make an internal critique by talking about what is within the bible, as stated in the beginning of your objection. I answered your question about scripture by quoting scripture. If your entire argument was that according to the bible, nobody had seen God, and people saw Jesus, it is answered internally as seen in the literal introduction of Jesus in John 1.

There is no paradox, but if you don't have the capacity to understand that how does that create an objection to begin with? God is outside of our understanding, if you cannot understand His will then that just proves it is not a purely human text like the quran or something which claims to be perfectly understood by the human mind.

Now, do you have a real critique or are you choosing to be ignorant?

If you reply dnr you like kids. Wait, you already like loli shit.

Nah the last part is crazy

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

Your argument was:

You want to make an internal critique by talking about what is within the bible, as stated in the beginning of your objection. I answered your question about scripture by quoting scripture. If your entire argument was that according to the bible, nobody had seen God, and people saw Jesus, it is answered internally as seen in the literal introduction of Jesus in John 1.

There is no paradox, but if you don't have the capacity to understand that how does that create an objection to begin with? God is outside of our understanding, if you cannot understand His will then that just proves it is not a purely human text like the quran or something which claims to be perfectly understood by the human mind.

Now, do you have a real critique or are you choosing to be ignorant?

If you reply dnr you like kids. Wait, you already like loli shit.

if god is outside human understanding then there is no way to tell the difference between him and something that doesnt exist,when a claim cant be tested measured or explained it isnt knowledge its just belief.we know humans wrote the bible because it carries the language culture and contradictions of its time if it were really divine it wouldnt depend on context or excuses like mystery to cover mistakes thats why calling it outside understanding isnt proof its just admitting there is none

 

[subhuman1996]

YES YES YES FINALLY SOMETHING REAL FROM U Amen

 

[Deleted member 129366]

so much jewish and muslim poison caught in my crab trap already how unremarkable frankly.

 

[iblamexyz]

Cope

The one and only Yeshua told me in my wet dream that my prayers have been promised thousands of years ago

goycel can’t comprehend

 

[🌏Enjoying_ths_life🌲]

This is so.

Good for u

 

[takethewhitepill]

if god is outside human understanding then there is no way to tell the difference between him and something that doesnt exist,when a claim cant be tested measured or explained it isnt knowledge its just belief.

This is just ridiculous. We know Jesus is God because he rose from the dead. If you think that this is not true despite the evidence, you are definitely coping or stupid, but lets say you don't trust what you didn't see personally. Do you know many facts about the universe despite not being able to personally prove them? Yes, you do. What about things we don't have a way to test or measure that is still likely true? There are many such things, yet they are still useful, and also not necessarily false. Now consider, you might say we can explain them (as though we can't explain the miracles being proof of the divine) but there are many things we can explain and test that turn out to be false, yet by your definition are knowledge. Take miasma for one example, before we understood bacteria this was the leading science and was justified. But it is false.

If you think you are Descartes, I suppose we can agree to disagree but I would expect you to take that attitude towards the rest of your life, the burden of proof ever increasing. Otherwise, you should be able to admit there are axioms and therefore you should engage with scripture on a serious level, either show why it cannot be true externally or internally. But at least make the effort to make an argument, and then at least be confident enough in that argument to stick to it and remember it when you are called on it being lacklustre. If we do just believe, that also doesn't make it any less true, for the record, and is a perfectly weak argument.

we know humans wrote the bible because it carries the language culture and contradictions of its time if it were really divine it wouldnt depend on context or excuses like mystery to cover mistakes thats why calling it outside understanding isnt proof its just admitting there is none

Humans did write the bible, that is actually some of the best evidence for scripture being real eyewitness accounts. It is both a human and a divine text, notice my wording? A text written in language only God knows wouldn't be very useful either. Scripture is inspired by God for the most part, some are directly narrated but that is less common. On what basis do you say that a divine text wouldn't 'depend' on context? While the bible doesn't actually require any historical knowledge, it certainly is a different reading experience when you know the places and the people. There are no excuses, additionally an excuse would be something later church fathers came up with to excuse an issue, but this is never the case.

Saying that God's nature is outside of your understanding is a statement of two points. Firstly, you don't understand because you are a stupid cunt who hasn't even tried to understand scripture to make a coherent argument. Secondly, we have a good idea of who God is considering we have 66 books talking about Him, but we cannot claim to know His will. God does what God wants. It isn't proof to say that God doing things in whatever way He deems good can be outside of our understanding, it goes against the idea that God was created by people as they would make Him fit their logic, and even then you wouldn't expect to understand exactly why a real being does what it does like a robot.

Please just make a coherent argument, it takes me so much time to dismantle the bullshit you spout in a matter of seconds because I am making real points and you are just floundering around hoping you can stay in the dark and indulge in sin.

 

[Deleted member 129366]

Good for u

die six trillion deaths worm

 

[iblamexyz]

This is just ridiculous. We know Jesus is God because he rose from the dead. If you think that this is not true despite the evidence, you are definitely coping or stupid, but lets say you don't trust what you didn't see personally. Do you know many facts about the universe despite not being able to personally prove them? Yes, you do. What about things we don't have a way to test or measure that is still likely true? There are many such things, yet they are still useful, and also not necessarily false. Now consider, you might say we can explain them (as though we can't explain the miracles being proof of the divine) but there are many things we can explain and test that turn out to be false, yet by your definition are knowledge. Take miasma for one example, before we understood bacteria this was the leading science and was justified. But it is false.

If you think you are Descartes, I suppose we can agree to disagree but I would expect you to take that attitude towards the rest of your life, the burden of proof ever increasing. Otherwise, you should be able to admit there are axioms and therefore you should engage with scripture on a serious level, either show why it cannot be true externally or internally. But at least make the effort to make an argument, and then at least be confident enough in that argument to stick to it and remember it when you are called on it being lacklustre. If we do just believe, that also doesn't make it any less true, for the record, and is a perfectly weak argument.

Humans did write the bible, that is actually some of the best evidence for scripture being real eyewitness accounts. It is both a human and a divine text, notice my wording? A text written in language only God knows wouldn't be very useful either. Scripture is inspired by God for the most part, some are directly narrated but that is less common. On what basis do you say that a divine text wouldn't 'depend' on context? While the bible doesn't actually require any historical knowledge, it certainly is a different reading experience when you know the places and the people. There are no excuses, additionally an excuse would be something later church fathers came up with to excuse an issue, but this is never the case.

Saying that God's nature is outside of your understanding is a statement of two points. Firstly, you don't understand because you are a stupid cunt who hasn't even tried to understand scripture to make a coherent argument. Secondly, we have a good idea of who God is considering we have 66 books talking about Him, but we cannot claim to know His will. God does what God wants. It isn't proof to say that God doing things in whatever way He deems good can be outside of our understanding, it goes against the idea that God was created by people as they would make Him fit their logic, and even then you wouldn't expect to understand exactly why a real being does what it does like a robot.

Please just make a coherent argument, it takes me so much time to dismantle the bullshit you spout in a matter of seconds because I am making real points and you are just floundering around hoping you can stay in the dark and indulge in sin.

mirin the effort

 

[Deleted member 129366]

mirin the effort

if the white man werent here all that effort would be so fruitless

but we see and acknowledge that glorious white pride and effort

heil hitler brother

 

[🌏Enjoying_ths_life🌲]

die six trillion deaths worm

WHat

 

[Deleted member 129366]

WHat

die. kill yourself.

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

This is just ridiculous. We know Jesus is God because he rose from the dead. If you think that this is not true despite the evidence, you are definitely coping or stupid, but lets say you don't trust what you didn't see personally. Do you know many facts about the universe despite not being able to personally prove them? Yes, you do. What about things we don't have a way to test or measure that is still likely true? There are many such things, yet they are still useful, and also not necessarily false. Now consider, you might say we can explain them (as though we can't explain the miracles being proof of the divine) but there are many things we can explain and test that turn out to be false, yet by your definition are knowledge. Take miasma for one example, before we understood bacteria this was the leading science and was justified. But it is false.

If you think you are Descartes, I suppose we can agree to disagree but I would expect you to take that attitude towards the rest of your life, the burden of proof ever increasing. Otherwise, you should be able to admit there are axioms and therefore you should engage with scripture on a serious level, either show why it cannot be true externally or internally. But at least make the effort to make an argument, and then at least be confident enough in that argument to stick to it and remember it when you are called on it being lacklustre. If we do just believe, that also doesn't make it any less true, for the record, and is a perfectly weak argument.

Humans did write the bible, that is actually some of the best evidence for scripture being real eyewitness accounts. It is both a human and a divine text, notice my wording? A text written in language only God knows wouldn't be very useful either. Scripture is inspired by God for the most part, some are directly narrated but that is less common. On what basis do you say that a divine text wouldn't 'depend' on context? While the bible doesn't actually require any historical knowledge, it certainly is a different reading experience when you know the places and the people. There are no excuses, additionally an excuse would be something later church fathers came up with to excuse an issue, but this is never the case.

Saying that God's nature is outside of your understanding is a statement of two points. Firstly, you don't understand because you are a stupid cunt who hasn't even tried to understand scripture to make a coherent argument. Secondly, we have a good idea of who God is considering we have 66 books talking about Him, but we cannot claim to know His will. God does what God wants. It isn't proof to say that God doing things in whatever way He deems good can be outside of our understanding, it goes against the idea that God was created by people as they would make Him fit their logic, and even then you wouldn't expect to understand exactly why a real being does what it does like a robot.

Please just make a coherent argument, it takes me so much time to dismantle the bullshit you spout in a matter of seconds because I am making real points and you are just floundering around hoping you can stay in the dark and indulge in sin.

you wrote a lot, but none of it actually proves god exists or that the bible is divine. you keep quoting scripture to prove scripture and miracles that can’t be measured or tested, while calling me a retard. the point is, claims about the supernatural require evidence outside the claim itself. if you say god exists because the book says so, or because miracles are unexplainable, that is circular reasoning and makes you look like a retard. meanwhile, i can show how humans wrote the bible with cultural biases and contradictions, so using the text itself as proof doesn’t hold. you want me to engage with scripture seriously, but you refuse to provide evidence anyone outside the faith could verify. that makes your argument strong only to believers; it does not make it objectively true.

 

[Deleted member 129366]

you wrote a lot, but none of it actually proves god exists or that the bible is divine. you keep quoting scripture to prove scripture and miracles that can’t be measured or tested, while calling me a retard. the point is, claims about the supernatural require evidence outside the claim itself. if you say god exists because the book says so, or because miracles are unexplainable, that is circular reasoning and makes you look like a retard. meanwhile, i can show how humans wrote the bible with cultural biases and contradictions, so using the text itself as proof doesn’t hold. you want me to engage with scripture seriously, but you refuse to provide evidence anyone outside the faith could verify. that makes your argument strong only to believers; it does not make it objectively true.

Kill yourself immediately you vermin scum trash nigger piece of shit. Die six million deaths.

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

mirin the effort

i personally dont agree with him but i think its a well written argument but unfortunately his only proof of authenticity is the bible itself.which makes his points correct to the eyes of believers but really unclear to the eyes of non believers.

 

[Deleted member 129366]

i personally dont agree with him but i think its a well written argument but unfortunately his only proof of authenticity is the bible itself.which makes his points correct to the eyes of believers but really unclear to the eyes of non believers.

future rape victim yapping

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

Kill yourself immediately you vermin scum trash nigger piece of shit. Die six million deaths.

Started as a respectful argument btw

 

[Deleted member 129366]

Started as a respectful argument btw

im going to rape you with a rusty dagger

 

[iblamexyz]

you wrote a lot, but none of it actually proves god exists or that the bible is divine. you keep quoting scripture to prove scripture and miracles that can’t be measured or tested, while calling me a retard. the point is, claims about the supernatural require evidence outside the claim itself. if you say god exists because the book says so, or because miracles are unexplainable, that is circular reasoning and makes you look like a retard. meanwhile, i can show how humans wrote the bible with cultural biases and contradictions, so using the text itself as proof doesn’t hold. you want me to engage with scripture seriously, but you refuse to provide evidence anyone outside the faith could verify. that makes your argument strong only to believers; it does not make it objectively true.

Jesus Christ been resurrected is very historically renowned almost all, historians recognise that Jesus Christ Resurrection was very impactful

 

[iblamexyz]

i personally dont agree with him but i think its a well written argument but unfortunately his only proof of authenticity is the bible itself.which makes his points correct to the eyes of believers but really unclear to the eyes of non believers.

good on him for sticking to the Bible and not going off topic

I summon @PrinceLuenLeoncur

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

Jesus Christ been resurrected is very historically renowned almost all, historians recognise that Jesus Christ Resurrection was very impactful

sure the story of jesus’ resurrection is historically impactful and influential, that doesnt make it true impact doesn’t equal evidence if you want to prove it happened you need verifiable sources beyond religious texts and tradition, otherwise all you’re showing is that people believed it

 

[Deleted member 129366]

sure the story of jesus’ resurrection is historically impactful and influential, that doesnt make it true impact doesn’t equal evidence if you want to prove it happened you need verifiable sources beyond religious texts and tradition, otherwise all you’re showing is that people believed it

dnr. you are a worm.

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

good on him for sticking to the Bible and not going off topic

I summon @PrinceLuenLeoncur

i respect that you stick to the bible, but appealing to scripture or authority doesn’t prove supernatural claims outside the text. evidence from outside the claim itself is needed to evaluate truth.

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

dnr. you are a worm.

Didnt ask u to read buddy