hypernormie
Only the truth is beautiful.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2022
- Posts
- 5,884
- Reputation
- 7,777
Despite the years of research, the books, the skull measurements, the traveling to distant lands to document foreign peoples and methodically categorizing all of their cultural traits, phenotypic idiosyncrasies and behavioral attitudes it wasn't the white man who intitially harnessed racial knowledge for malice, it was the jew.
How incredible is that?
The white man studying foreign races in some clinical, anthropological manner, almost purely out of intellectual curiosity like studying an ant or a bird and for all of this rigorous study it was not the white man but the jew who first realized that this information had value beyond simple classification.
It was the jew who realized that most non white people are so dysfunctional relative to white society that merely presenting them in it was enough to sow its destruction.
Imagine that. Introduce a white person to a foreign culture and what do they do? Usually they have a stimulating effect, they improve it in some way or another. It's in their nature to bring order onto their environment. For many of these other races (barring say, the Chinese) the impulse is precisely the opposite. When confronted with order and structure, the impulse is to get angry, they get upset and anxious.
Now we understand today why that is, IQ, environmental adaptations, cultural norms, etc. We see the reasons for these differences, but this is today when there are thousands of people conversing with each other on the topic, diligently researching and even today many people have a hard time coming to grips with this information.
Imagine how unbelievably racist you had to be to come to this conclusion back in say, 1900. That's just incredible really. No one even cared back then because the thought that their country would be randomly invaded by a zillion foreigners was just that, foreign. Yet the jew back then had this penetrating insight.
Just contrast what the average white man would do if he were suddenly dropped in Zimbabwe or idk, some random South American backwater town. If he isn't the soyboy type, he would first and foremost try to make friends, he would then try and be of some use to the people there to establish a positive relationship, he may then try and build something for any reason if not just to try and leave back to where he came from. The opposite is true for many of the people from these places. They get dropped into white society and their first instinct is to start trouble, commit crimes, take advantage and steal.
The jew figured all of this out before anyone was able to conceive how this could possibly matter, and I guess wouldn't have mattered had the jew not figured it out.
So the jew long ago, before anyone realized they needed to be on guard against it, began dropping foreigners into countries they didn't belong, slowly at first and then by the boat load. They did antagonize many of them but also I think they didn't for many. In any case, how much antagonism does a Jew need to do to make you disregard the reality in front of your eyes? Why would an African hate a white man when every white man he comes across is cordial with him? Would the white man not have faith that the African would readily come to conclusion that there is no malice between them and their efforts are best directed towards cooperation?
See that is the white man's mistake, and the reason the jew is truly the master racist. The jew realized first that the African would not come to this conclusion, because regardless what the jew may tell him about the white man, the African is so unbelievably retarded that he would, on his own, find reason to be upset with the white man and that he would so reliably do this that you can just put him around the white man and guarantee it like a mechanism in a clock.
History will have shown that the white man for all his assertions of racial discrimination, of his Hitler edits and Nazi Germany and calipers against Negro nostrils and Ku Klux Klans and colonizations, were not the superior racists as they would have liked to be. That title will firmly sit with the jew.
How incredible is that?
The white man studying foreign races in some clinical, anthropological manner, almost purely out of intellectual curiosity like studying an ant or a bird and for all of this rigorous study it was not the white man but the jew who first realized that this information had value beyond simple classification.
It was the jew who realized that most non white people are so dysfunctional relative to white society that merely presenting them in it was enough to sow its destruction.
Imagine that. Introduce a white person to a foreign culture and what do they do? Usually they have a stimulating effect, they improve it in some way or another. It's in their nature to bring order onto their environment. For many of these other races (barring say, the Chinese) the impulse is precisely the opposite. When confronted with order and structure, the impulse is to get angry, they get upset and anxious.
Now we understand today why that is, IQ, environmental adaptations, cultural norms, etc. We see the reasons for these differences, but this is today when there are thousands of people conversing with each other on the topic, diligently researching and even today many people have a hard time coming to grips with this information.
Imagine how unbelievably racist you had to be to come to this conclusion back in say, 1900. That's just incredible really. No one even cared back then because the thought that their country would be randomly invaded by a zillion foreigners was just that, foreign. Yet the jew back then had this penetrating insight.
Just contrast what the average white man would do if he were suddenly dropped in Zimbabwe or idk, some random South American backwater town. If he isn't the soyboy type, he would first and foremost try to make friends, he would then try and be of some use to the people there to establish a positive relationship, he may then try and build something for any reason if not just to try and leave back to where he came from. The opposite is true for many of the people from these places. They get dropped into white society and their first instinct is to start trouble, commit crimes, take advantage and steal.
The jew figured all of this out before anyone was able to conceive how this could possibly matter, and I guess wouldn't have mattered had the jew not figured it out.
So the jew long ago, before anyone realized they needed to be on guard against it, began dropping foreigners into countries they didn't belong, slowly at first and then by the boat load. They did antagonize many of them but also I think they didn't for many. In any case, how much antagonism does a Jew need to do to make you disregard the reality in front of your eyes? Why would an African hate a white man when every white man he comes across is cordial with him? Would the white man not have faith that the African would readily come to conclusion that there is no malice between them and their efforts are best directed towards cooperation?
See that is the white man's mistake, and the reason the jew is truly the master racist. The jew realized first that the African would not come to this conclusion, because regardless what the jew may tell him about the white man, the African is so unbelievably retarded that he would, on his own, find reason to be upset with the white man and that he would so reliably do this that you can just put him around the white man and guarantee it like a mechanism in a clock.
History will have shown that the white man for all his assertions of racial discrimination, of his Hitler edits and Nazi Germany and calipers against Negro nostrils and Ku Klux Klans and colonizations, were not the superior racists as they would have liked to be. That title will firmly sit with the jew.
Last edited:
