Jflll famous pornstar who did jewish ir porn is actually mixed

[BigBiceps]

This is actually really anti semitic...

 

[gamma]

@BrendioEEE @TeraCope54 christians used to hate and persecute jews, because jews killed Jesus

Antisemitism in Christianity - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[BrendioEEE]

You are similar because you share the most dna with the rest of europeans, but you STILL have ethnic admixture and ethnic pheno that other europeans don't and you can't be white with that.

If that was true, when you put Middle Eastern DNA clusters and Genetic Data on the genetic axis, they would appear on screen, but they do not, they are off the axis.

Projecting much? Pagans weren't the ones who embraced judean culture and allowed jews to take over institutions. Christians did that.

Considering Jews literally are pagans who believe in Babylonian Blood Gods, I mean...Jews preyed on the weak and vulnerable for example in Weimar for example to help spread degeneracy and lead people away from God/Christianity and substitute it for hedonism, and after WW2 was lost, and Jews had pretty much full control of the west, wow will you look at that, Christianity is on the decline, really makes you think.

>posting subjective translations from lbgtq and jewish historians who want to tarnish norse mythology Kys. They're doing the same for med history, yet you're citing them. Real european moment.

Why would I be in favor of a blasphemous religion, and more importantly, why would I be in favor of people who don't even fully believe in it, and just hate Christians?

Christians are known for being devout believers and living life according to the bible, right?

I mean considering there's far more actual Christians even in a world where barely any exist, than any non-larping pagan, yes actually. I have yet to actually see a pagan who genuinely believes in the bullshit religion they spout, let alone knows it's origins or why they believe in it.

Nobody worships satan, these are jidf theories they released into right wing circles to poison the well.

Extremely ironic. "Nobody is worshipping Satan Goy, haha we promise". Funny how, it's the same Jews in the MSM who are making fun of this aswell, despite decades of evidence to the contrary, not to mention everything from Bohemian Grove, to Elite Parties on public record, to even private emails, and exposes that are constantly trying to be scrubbed from the internet.

This isn't some Q-Anon cringe conspiracy theory, if you want an entry point into this from someone who was even a skeptic about this, I suggest you watch this dudes video's about human trafficking

Mouthy Buddha

Welcome. It means a lot to me that some of you care enough to contribute. I work hard on every project, and your help will improve the quality on every metric. May we journey together. https://www.subscribestar.com/mouthy-buddha https://www.patreon.com/user?u=5149972

www.bitchute.com

Beyond that there's also all the weird experiments and shit they do to communicate with demons using psychedelics, I could write an entire paper on that with the evidence I have, same people typically aswell.

Nice fear-mongering kike, but there has never been less antisemitism than today. Go write something antisemitic online under your real name and your life will be destroyed.

Fear mongering? Are you braindead? How is that fear mongering? The only people who would be afraid of "Anti-Jewish Sentiment" are the Jews, have something you want to admit?

Irony.

You've proven time and time again, you're blatantly willing to deny historical fact.

 

[BigBiceps]

@BrendioEEE @TeraCope54 christians used to hate and persecute jews, because jews killed Jesus

Antisemitism in Christianity - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

They still do, christianity is just not widely practicioned in west anymore.

 

[BrendioEEE]

@BrendioEEE @TeraCope54 christians used to hate and persecute jews, because jews killed Jesus

Antisemitism in Christianity - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

The New Testament is as Anti-Jew as Mein Kampf.

 

[BigBiceps]

The New Testament is as Anti-Jew as Mein Kampf.
View attachment 1404577

Lutheran church nowadays be like:
And then BBC turned water to wine and made all the snow bunnies drink cum from his cock yo yo

 

[BrendioEEE]

Lutheran church nowadays be like:
And then BBC turned water to wine and made all the snow bunnies drink cum from his cock yo yo
View attachment 1404585

Tbh jfl, holy fuck it is over for these snakes larping as Christians.

 

[BigBiceps]

Tbh jfl, holy fuck it is over for these snakes larping as Christians.

I'm thinking of leaving lutheran church and joining either catholic or orthodox church. The lutherans use tax payer money here in Finland to hide refugees who are to be thrown out and weren't admitted a refuge.

 

[gamma]

Lutheran church nowadays be like:
And then BBC turned water to wine and made all the snow bunnies drink cum from his cock yo yo
View attachment 1404585

Catholic is better tbh, we don't have women or gays as priests

 

[BigBiceps]

Catholic is better tbh, we don't have women or gays as priests

I'd immediately become catholic, but there's not proper catholic churches in Finland, and only catholics are some romanian construction workers. There's some orthodox churches tho.

 

[BrendioEEE]

I'm thinking of leaving lutheran church and joining either catholic or orthodox church. The lutherans use tax payer money here in Finland to hide refugees who are to be thrown out and weren't admitted a refuge.

I have been to one Lutheran Church that banned women from being pastors in America, but it still wasn't good enough for me honestly. I want to go to whatever fucking church this dude is a part of honestly.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

according to some ppl in this thread christianity is anti white and anti christian, and meds are also not white
what achievements do non christian non meds have towards white civilization?

 

[gamma]

only catholics are some romanian construction workers

You met @WontStopNorwooding so

 

[BigBiceps]

according to some ppl in this thread christianity is anti white and anti christian, and meds are also not white
what achievements do non christian non meds have towards white civilization?

Ask what achievements people who have been counted in thousands for over 1000 years can provide to a civilization of millions? Are you dumb?

 

[fras]

If that was true, when you put Middle Eastern DNA clusters and Genetic Data on the genetic axis, they would appear on screen, but they do not, they are off the axis.

If you’d be as versed in history as you claim, you would know that Southern Euros ARE basically completely Middle Eastern and the only reason they have European admixture today is because Germanic people actually went down there and raped them all.

Al-Andalus - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

This went on for 700 years. Yea bro, Iberians are totally European.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Ask what achievements people who have been counted in thousands for over 1000 years can provide to a civilization of millions? Are you dumb?

why are you attacking me? all i tried to prove is that to claim that only these people who have been counted in thousands are white, is dumb because then whites havent achieved anything, no matter if theyre in the 1000s or not. I never said i hate them or dont count them as white

 

[Deleted member 13787]

If you’d be as versed in history as you claim, you would know that Southern Euros ARE basically completely Middle Eastern and the only reason they have European admixture today is because Germanic people actually went down there and raped them all.

Al-Andalus - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

This went on for 700 years. Yea bro, Iberians are totally European.

spanish ppl are 80% pure white and northern spaniards are like 95% pure white

 

[fras]

spanish ppl are 80% pure white and northern spaniards are like 95% pure white

Please explain how this can be possible when the original populations descended from groups such as the Phoenicians (Middle Easterners) and the countries were colonized by Arabic invaders for 700 (!) years. It is biologically impossible.

The only reason Euro DNA ended up there (in the modern population that is), is because the Visigoths, Vandals etc. spread their seed.

The Reconquista does not negate this either. You think after 700 years they could tell who has Arabic ancestry and expelled everyone who had it?

 

[BrendioEEE]

If you’d be as versed in history as you claim, you would know that Southern Euros ARE basically completely Middle Eastern and the only reason they have European admixture today is because Germanic people actually went down there and raped them all.

Al-Andalus - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

This went on for 700 years. Yea bro, Iberians are totally European.

Why is it that many Chinese in parts of China who were raped by Mongols, you can find Mongolian admixture in their DNA to pretty high degrees even in some Areas from even this long of a time after it has happened, but when you place most Southern European DNA on a genetic cluster map, such as this, they're clustered together with central, northern, and eastern europeans, and if Middle Easterners were thrown into the data, they would be off screen to the bottom right?

Either they're lying about genetics according to you, or you know nothing about genetics, and the history of Southern Europe. I'm guessing the latter.

Yes, Islamic-Conquest into Europe, and even some of North Africa like Egypt, did alter the genetic makeup of certain countries, such as Greece, Egypt, and Turkey, however, clearly when taking a lot at DNA from Spaniards, Italians, Southern French, and The Portuguese, we can clearly see the impact on those countries clearly wasn't enough to do anything drastic, or the evidence would be there, like it is for the Chinese who have been raped by Mongols, or various other parts of the world that have mutt races from interbreeding and conquest.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Please explain how this can be possible when the original populations descended from groups such as the Phoenicians (Middle Easterners) and the countries were colonized by Arabic invaders for 700 (!) years. It is biologically impossible.

The only reason Euro DNA ended up there (in the modern population that is), is because the Visigoths, Vandals etc. spread their seed.

The Reconquista does not negate this either. You think after 700 years they could tell who has Arabic ancestry and expelled everyone who had it?

why do they have so much r1b haplogroup then

r1b is white, its has been white since 10s of thousands of years ago


"Haplogroup R* originated in North Asia just before the Last Glacial Maximum (26,500-19,000 years ago). This haplogroup has been identified in the remains of a 24,000 year-old boy from the Altai region, in south-central Siberia (Raghavan et al. 2013). This individual belonged to a tribe of mammoth hunters that may have roamed across Siberia and parts of Europe during the Paleolithic. Autosomally this Paleolithic population appears to have contributed mostly to the ancestry of modern Europeans and South Asians, the two regions where haplogroup R also happens to be the most common nowadays (R1b in Western Europe, R1a in Eastern Europe, Central and South Asia, and R2 in South Asia)."

 

[fras]

Why is it that many Chinese in parts of China who were raped by Mongols, you can find Mongolian admixture in their DNA to pretty high degrees even in some Areas from even this long of a time after it has happened, but when you place most Southern European DNA on a genetic cluster map, such as this, they're clustered together with central, northern, and eastern europeans, and if Middle Easterners were thrown into the data, they would be off screen to the bottom right?
View attachment 1404598
Either they're lying about genetics according to you, or you know nothing about genetics, and the history of Southern Europe. I'm guessing the latter.

Yes, Islamic-Conquest into Europe, and even some of North Africa like Egypt, did alter the genetic makeup of certain countries, such as Greece, Egypt, and Turkey, however, clearly when taking a lot at DNA from Spaniards, Italians, Southern French, and The Portuguese, we can clearly see the impact on those countries clearly wasn't enough to do anything drastic, or the evidence would be there, like it is for the Chinese who have been raped by Mongols, or various other parts of the world that have mutt races from interbreeding and conquest.

You are aware that the Arabic population has drifted away in the meantime genetically? Of course it’s gonna be different now. Also what you seem to be forgetting is that Germanic tribes did alter the population in SE, something that obviously didn’t happen in the Middle East (or at least to a much smaller degree). Taking this into account, the populations will very obviously have some sort of difference. The overlap is still there.

What is for certain though is that Southern Europeans overlap greatly with Turks. Yet people will call Turks non white. This is where it becomes completely contradictory.

 

[TeraCope54]

If that was true, when you put Middle Eastern DNA clusters and Genetic Data on the genetic axis, they would appear on screen, but they do not, they are off the axis

Doesn't matter, meds still look closer to ethnics than whites.

Considering Jews literally are pagans who believe in Babylonian Blood Gods,

Take your meds schizo and stop projecting. Abrahamism isn't paganism.

Why would I be in favor of a blasphemous religion

Why are you citing jewish and lgbt historians? Answer the question.

let alone knows it's origins

Ironic since most christcucks don't know where christianity came from and who jesus was.

This isn't some Q-Anon cringe conspiracy theory

Sure sounds like that, schizo, those theories are intentionally muddying the waters of antisemitism, but you already know that, kike.

You've proven time and time again, you're blatantly willing to deny historical fact.

Irony again. You are utterly denying judean roots of christianity and then projecting it onto me.

 

[fras]

why do they have so much r1b haplogroup then

r1b is white, its has been white since 10s of thousands of years ago


"Haplogroup R* originated in North Asia just before the Last Glacial Maximum (26,500-19,000 years ago). This haplogroup has been identified in the remains of a 24,000 year-old boy from the Altai region, in south-central Siberia (Raghavan et al. 2013). This individual belonged to a tribe of mammoth hunters that may have roamed across Siberia and parts of Europe during the Paleolithic. Autosomally this Paleolithic population appears to have contributed mostly to the ancestry of modern Europeans and South Asians, the two regions where haplogroup R also happens to be the most common nowadays (R1b in Western Europe, R1a in Eastern Europe, Central and South Asia, and R2 in South Asia)."

View attachment 1404605

This again? We’ve already determined multiple times that it is from Asia/the Middle East.

Let me remind you that r1b was even found among the Huns, that doesn’t make them white. It’s also found in a good part of Turks and even Iraqis.

If you keep up your claim, then you must admit that Turks and Arabs are white by your definition.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

This again? We’ve already determined multiple times that it is from Asia/the Middle East.

Let me remind you that r1b was even found among the Huns, that doesn’t make them white. It’s also found in a good part of Turks and even Iraqis.

If you keep up your claim, then you must admit that Turks and Arabs are white by your definition.

its found to a rly small degree...
only 16% in turkey
not more than 18% in the middle east

 

[Deleted member 13787]

We’ve already determined multiple times that it is from Asia/the Middle East.

its from north eurasia, which doesnt make it non white

 

[fras]

its found to a rly small degree...
only 16% in turkey
not more than 18% in the middle east
View attachment 1404616

You’re aware that this means it’s at least about 1 in 5 people? Possibly more due to the tests only being done on small groups. That is a huge amount.

Also we have to take indirect descent from certain haplogroups into consideration. When a man with haplogroup XYZ has daughters, it’s not visible in the Y chromosome anymore, but his DNA was still passed on. This is why realistically, almost the entire population of Southern Europe descends from haplogroup J indirectly.

Also again, 700 years of colonization is going to leave a massive mark. Almost the entire peninsula was ruled by Arabs.

 

[fras]

its from north eurasia, which doesnt make it non white

By this logic Turks and other Turkic groups such as Azerbaijanis and Kazakhs are white too. Yet you’ll call them Asian.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

You’re aware that this means it’s at least about 1 in 5 people? Possibly more due to the tests only being done on small groups. That is a huge amount.

Also we have to take indirect descent from certain haplogroups into consideration. When a man with haplogroup XYZ has daughters, it’s not visible in the Y chromosome anymore, but his DNA was still passed on. This is why realistically, almost the entire population of Southern Europe descends from haplogroup J indirectly.

Also again, 700 years of colonization is going to leave a massive mark. Almost the entire peninsula was ruled by Arabs.

it doesnt mean 1 in 5 people, its means the average person is 1/5 proto indo aryans which is beliveable, middle easterners resemble whites much more than blacks or asians

 

[fras]

it doesnt mean 1 in 5 people, its means the average person is 1/5 proto indo aryans which is beliveable, middle easterners resemble whites much more than blacks or asians

So Middle Easterners are white then? If that is the case, all of the crying about them immigrating to Western nations should be redundant.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

By this logic Turks and other Turkic groups such as Azerbaijanis and Kazakhs are white too. Yet you’ll call them Asian.

theyre asian because they have asian culture and such
and theyre much more genetically distant, and theyre mongoloids and dont look white at all

 

[Deleted member 13787]

So Middle Easterners are white then? If that is the case, all of the crying about them immigrating to Western nations should be redundant.

you think 1/5 white is white and 4/5 others is not middle eastern/arab?

 

[fras]

theyre asian because they have asian culture and such
and theyre much more genetically distant, and theyre mongoloids and dont look white at all

But they are the people that inhabited Siberia and the Middle East, where r1b originated. So it is an immigrant haplogroup.

 

[BrendioEEE]

You are aware that the Arabic population has drifted away in the meantime genetically? Of course it’s gonna be different now.

If the Middle Eastern parties that partook in the conquest of Europe were so genetically similar for barely any drift to happen on the genetic map to happen when the conquest was happening, then you would literally have to say, the invading parties were white.

Honestly, i'm not completely against that concept to some degree, I definitely don't agree with it entirely, however, many parts of North Africa, and The Middle East, were no different genetically to Ancient Rome, and Ancient Greece, even after they fell, however, you are right, that genetically, they did drift, dramatically, but that doesn't really do this argument any favors, according to the genetic data, the argument would have to be "they did manage to rape/conquest Southern Europe to an extreme degree, but genetically they were so similar it caused little to no effect in the long run" or "They were genetically different, but most of the remnants of Southern Europe who survive and exist today, are not descendants in a major way if at all of said conquest/rape"

Personally from what I have seen from the genetic data, at least in the countries I mentioned prior, the latter seems to be more accurate, and there are even many Southern Europeans who genetically don't differ much at all from the genetic data we have from ancient romans or ancient greeks.

Also what you seem to be forgetting is that Germanic tribes did alter the population in SE, something that obviously didn’t happen in the Middle East (or at least to a much smaller degree). Taking this into account, the populations will very obviously have some sort of difference. The overlap is still there.

But the same thing happened in China with the mongols, and there are many Chinese groups who also bred with the Mongolian mutts, and yet the genetic data is far more clear on the effects of that. Have you ever seen a genetic map of Chinese DNA? It's somehow even less clustered together than all of Europe combined itself because of mongrelization.

What is for certain though is that Southern Europeans overlap greatly with Turks. Yet people will call Turks non white. This is where it becomes completely contradictory.

Some Turks are definitely 100% white, but there are clear effects from Islamic Conquest that actually are visible, genetically, and visually for that matter.

 

[Deleted member 13626]

Keep coping, your country is full of Middle Eastern haplogroups (red, green, orange etc.) plus Asian (yellow).

You will never be European.

also kys with your outbreeding cope, Italy is absolutely loaded with immigrants as well + its birthrate is at 1.3. Romania is at 1.7, most of EE is at about 1.4 and the Balkans are at about 1.5 Meanwhile Iceland is at 1.8 and rising. So if anything the mutt nations will die out by themselves and their lands can be resettled by Vikings again.

"Vikings" lmao, western europe and northerm europe are done for, no one is rising, no vikings, no rising birth rates

Also look closer to other nations dumb fuck. If we go by your logic then poland, ukraine, hungary and slovakia and so on arent european because they got "haplogroups"

The green color in Romania's pie chart is from greco romans not jews, arabs. Learn history and see that the Roman Empire influenced a lot of Romania dumb uncultured roach.

You mentioned the color red , look at other nations. Majority are red, does it make them middle eastern or african as you said? "Muh red yellow green middle eastern "

The yellow standa for slavic influence. Last time i checked slavs aren't arabs, africans, or asians. You're the one coping here

 

[Deleted member 13787]

But they are the people that inhabited Siberia and the Middle East, where r1b originated. So it is an immigrant haplogroup.

they split off from whites a long time ago, look at when P splits into R and Q
and when they immigrated they became what we know as white people
we dont call mesolithic europeans as white, and only them, we call people who inhabited europe from the bronze age onwards white
and R1a and R1b were well assimilated into europe at that point
+ nobody has pure native european mesolithic dna, only some croats have 71% l2 haplogroup which is proto european, are they the whitest?

 

[fras]

"Vikings" lmao, western europe amd northerm europe are done for, no one is rising, no vikings, no rising birth rates

Also look closer to other nations dumb fuck. If we go by your logic then poland, ukraine, hungary and slovakia and so on arent european because they got "haplogroups"

The green color in Romania's pie chart is from greco romans not jews, arabs. Learn history and see that the Roman Empire influenced a lot of Romania dumb uncultured roach.

You mentioned the color red , look at other nations. Majority are red, does it make them middle eastern or african as you said? "Muh red yellow green middle eastern "

The yellow standa for slavic influence. Last time i checked slavs aren't arabs, africans, or asians. You're the one coping here

So many insults and so little actual content from your shitskin peanut brain.

Western Euros aren’t Nordic, so they are irrelevant in this context.

Almost the entirety of EE was colonized by Ottomans. Fear the Tvrkish Bvll you utter subhuman.

Yes, red is an immigrant haplogroup. Just because it spread so much doesn’t negate that.

Haplogroup r1a, which you call Slavic, originated in Asia. If you have this group, that makes you a descendant of Asian invaders.

Now kys you 60 IQ rat.

 

[BrendioEEE]

Doesn't matter, meds still look closer to ethnics than whites.

Keep denying biological reality.

Take your meds schizo and stop projecting.

Abrahamism isn't paganism.

That's cool, but Abrahamism isn't Judaism either, Babylonian Talmudism is.

Why are you citing jewish and lgbt historians? Answer the question.

Am I? How about this question, is there proof that what they're saying about paganism is inaccurate?

Ironic since most christcucks don't know where christianity came from and who jesus was.

True, most so called "Christians" are about as retarded as you, haven't read the bible, and don't know what a Jew is, or where Galileans came from, and how The Bible is pretty Anti-Jew.

Sure sounds like that, schizo, those theories are intentionally muddying the waters of antisemitism, but you already know that, kike.

Oh, there aren't any theories here, just facts, which you're quite keen on denying.

Irony again. You are utterly denying judean roots of christianity and then projecting it onto me.

Yes, Judeans had nothing to do with the roots of Christianity whatsoever. The Tribe of Judah however, similar name I guess, maybe easy to confuse if you're a fucking historically illiterate brainlet.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

So many insults and so little actual content from your shitskin peanut brain.

Western Euros aren’t Nordic, so they are irrelevant in this context.

Almost the entirety of EE was colonized by Ottomans. Fear the Tvrkish Bvll you utter subhuman.

Yes, red is an immigrant haplogroup. Just because it spread so much doesn’t negate that.

Haplogroup r1a, which you call Slavic, originated in Asia. If you have this group, that makes you a descendant of Asian invaders.

Now kys you 60 IQ rat.

vikings probably were 2/3 R haplogroup which makes them not nordic according to you
r1a is white

 

[fras]

they split off from whites a long time ago, look at when P splits into R and Q
and when they immigrated they became what we know as white people
we dont call mesolithic europeans as white, and only them, we call people who inhabited europe from the bronze age onwards white
and R1a and R1b were well assimilated into europe at that point
+ nobody has pure native european mesolithic dna, only some croats have 71% l2 haplogroup which is proto european, are they the whitest?

So if a haplogroup is integrated long enough it becomes European? Then Arabs with haplogroup J are going to be European at one point.

Haplogroup J already is present in massive amounts in Southern Europe, so why not just count it as native?

You see where the problem arises? You either apply this logic properly or you don’t apply it at all.

Whatever the case, Southern Euros resemble the average Turkish person way more then the average unmixed European person. If Turks are non white (which a lot of people here claim), then Southern Europeans are non white as well by default.

 

[fras]

vikings probably were 2/3 R haplogroup which makes them not nordic according to you
r1a is white

Of course they had solid amounts of R haplogroups. But we have to look at the reason why that happened. They took slaves from Eastern Europe to their lands (r1a) and they had leftover admixture from Bronze Age immigrants (r1b). On the same token they also had (and still have today) the highest amount of I1, which is undoubtedly the Nordic essence.

Are/were they mixed? No doubt. But they had/have way, way less admixture than Southern Europeans.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Haplogroup J already is present in massive amounts in Southern Europe

nah
37% in the most middle eastern parts like crete and cyprus
even in greece its only 23%
greece is as middle eastern as middle easterners are white
and then in other countries its found at lower and lower rates
also its found only in 13% in spain
also nordic people have asian dna, infact swedes have 9.5% asian dna and 2.5% middle eastern

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Of course they had solid amounts of R haplogroups. But we have to look at the reason why that happened. They took slaves from Eastern Europe to their lands (r1a) and they had leftover admixture from Bronze Age immigrants (r1b). On the same token they also had (and still have today) the highest amount of I1, which is undoubtedly the Nordic essence.

Are/were they mixed? No doubt. But they had/have way, way less admixture than Southern Europeans.

southern euros like balkanites have more I than R haplogroup tho, and I2 is as european as I1

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Whatever the case, Southern Euros resemble the average Turkish person way more then the average unmixed European person.

and proto indo aryans resembled the average nordic way more than middle eastern and asian, if we apply this logic theyre also white

 

[fras]

nah
37% in the most middle eastern parts like crete and cyprus
even in greece its only 23%
greece is as middle eastern as middle easterners are white
and then in other countries its found at lower and lower rates
also its found only in 13% in spain
also nordic people have asian dna, infact swedes have 9.5% asian dna and 2.5% middle eastern

J is just one of them though. Almost half of Portugal belongs to either J (Middle Eastern), G (Middle Eastern), K (Middle Eastern) or E3b (North African). We also have to take into consideration that a solid amount of the Arab invaders had R1b themselves. What does that tell you about the Southern European population? Also don’t forget you can have indirect descend. You could have a non immigrant haplogroup but still descend from one if he only had daughters.

 

[fras]

nah
37% in the most middle eastern parts like crete and cyprus
even in greece its only 23%
greece is as middle eastern as middle easterners are white
and then in other countries its found at lower and lower rates
also its found only in 13% in spain
also nordic people have asian dna, infact swedes have 9.5% asian dna and 2.5% middle eastern

No doubt Nordic people have admixture, but it’s smaller. The numbers you named obviously confirm this.

 

[Deleted member 13626]

So many insults and so little actual content from your shitskin peanut brain.

Western Euros aren’t Nordic, so they are irrelevant in this context.

Almost the entirety of EE was colonized by Ottomans. Fear the Tvrkish Bvll you utter subhuman.

Yes, red is an immigrant haplogroup. Just because it spread so much doesn’t negate that.

Haplogroup r1a, which you call Slavic, originated in Asia. If you have this group, that makes you a descendant of Asian invaders.

Now kys you 60 IQ rat.

So if slavs originated in asia, how come most don't look asian or have any asian influence except in their dna?

So what if the ottomans fucked us? They didnt leave any footprint on how most people look, you probably havent seen a romanian, a bulgarian or balkan people in person. Even if they have a little turkish dna, they dont look turkish at all. Its like saying the uk colonized africa , and then what happened? Nothing, africans are still niggers and dont have any british features , only in their dna

I know western europeans arent nordics you idiot i never said that, i mentioned them because you claimed that red color is middle eastern and not white and by your logic only nordics are white which is bs. Keep coping with all of this stupid data youre copy pasting , normies see white passing as white even if their dna isnt white at all. Only autists focus so much on tribes and all that.

 

[fras]

southern euros like balkanites have more I than R haplogroup tho, and I2 is as european as I1

The Balkans were subject to Mongol, Ottoman and Hunnic invasions (and others as well) though. This never happened in Northern Europe. One reason for the still large presence of I2 could be that the men with I2 kept some of their good traits (maybe height or just physical strength) and thus they still reproduced more than others.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

G (Middle Eastern)

eh, its caucasian and belonged to caucasian farmers, plus if we look at modern day georgians they look pretty white to me so i dont consider it pure white but neither do i see it the same way as J

K (Middle Eastern)

on the eupedia article K is not even mentioned because it is found so little

E3b (North African)

i consider it part white since ancient greeks and romans probably had a substantial amount of it, and i consider them white, but i am aware that it has a nonwhite origin. I consider it assimilated sorta, but only the e-v13 branch

We also have to take into consideration that a solid amount of the Arab invaders had R1b themselves.

that share of r1b is what made these arabs a little bit white, just because they shared some dna with europeans doesnt mean that dna isnt white

You could have a non immigrant haplogroup but still descend from one if he only had daughters.

which is why nordics share a lot more MTdna with southern euros than Ydna

 

[fras]

So if slavs originated in asia, how come most don't look asian or have any asian influence except in their dna?

So what if the ottomans fucked us? They didnt leave any footprint on how most people look, you probably havent seen a romanian, a bulgarian or balkan people in person. Even if they have a little turkish dna, they dont look turkish at all. Its like saying the uk colonized africa , and then what happened? Nothing, africans are still niggers and dont have any british features , only in their dna

I know western europeans arent nordics you idiot i never said that, i mentioned them because you claimed that red color is middle eastern and not white and by your logic only nordics are white which is bs. Keep coping with all of this stupid data youre copy pasting , normies see white passing as white even if their dna isnt white at all. Only autists focus so much on tribes and all that.

„Don’t look Asian“ yet nearly all have short skulls, recessed faces, low nasal bridges, dark hair and round faces.

In all anthropological works the Europid man is visualized as having blonde hair and blue eyes.

Africa is the most genetically diverse place on this planet and there are hundreds of different phenos found there, including those that have obvious colonizer influence. Of course 60 IQ shits like you will never mention this because you’re pulling all your theories straight from your brown ass.

So keep lying to yourself you dumb mutt fuck.

Kys.

 

[TeraCope54]

Am I? How about this question, is there proof that what they're saying about paganism is inaccurate

Literally everything they say is inaccurate. They are disgusted by norse paganism as it represented european culture so they seek to tarnish it. For example, normies often say that thor is trans because of jew and tranny writers who say how he wore a dress once. What really happened
>Thor dresses like a woman for 1 day because he is tricked into it by Loki
>The story clearly states that dressing like a woman is shameful and Thor himself is ashamed of this action
>Story ends with Thor ripping off his dress and killing every Jotun with his hammer and fists

Misinterpretation is mistranslation of norse mythology is used to tarnish and humiliate european culture. They are doing the same to meds so I'm surpirsed that a proud med christian like you would cite them. Or you're just a kike.