Jordan Peterson is the personification of a Redditor/Intellectual

ReadBooksEveryday

ReadBooksEveryday

Forum User Of The Year 2022,2023, Pro Kaligula
Contributor
Joined
May 21, 2022
Posts
12,523
Reputation
44,845
I mean just watch this shit JFL



look at those hand gestures, saying a billion words about axiomatic , dichotomy’ ,monad, etc. & the constant word play. All this to say the sacred value of a woman is to have a child.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 31971, optimisticzoomer, try2beme and 12 others
He sounds like he is 90 years old. His voice is so aged by saying all of this shit.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 31971, Debetro, bloomercel and 2 others
Interviewer: "Have you ever answered a yes or no question with a one-word response?"

JP: "Well, see, as a world-class linguist I have to say it depends on what you mean by 'word.' Do you mean the smallest unit of meaningful language? In that case, what would 'well' have meant in the beginning of my response just now? And by 'answer' do you mean just a response to a question or are there any underpinnings of having to 'answer to' someone in a hierarchical sense? Because hierarchies change the context of the question being asked to less of a casual, optional answer into more of a demand, even if it's unintentional, due to power structures. And that's because these, let's say, power structures have been around since time immemorial. Lobsters have power structures. But you know what social construct they didn't have? Infanticide. And I can confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt, since I'm a fully-credentialed marine biologist because I've been going to the aquarium and studying the animals there for 40 years, that lobsters have no rules about infanticide. In fact, if we go back further in evolutionary history, which I can speak to as an evolutionary biologist, we see that many species, in fact, had no gender roles and no particular role at all in the life of offspring. This was before trees and lobsters, so it must be hardwired into our brains to not care for our young and have no distinguishable gender roles. But if we're going by the most numerous animals on earth, we have to at least look to ants to figure out how we should structure gender in society. One queen who flies around, mates, and pumps out babies until she does while a harem of men provide her with a huge mansion and are at her beck and call. But wouldn't that be discrimination based on gender? Not if you're a cultural Marxist. That's just the type of matriarchal society they want. I know this because I, myself, am a professor of feminist studies. So, in answer to your question, I don't think that we should allow pineapples on pizza unless the top is the hearty meat because we can't have sweetness represented as the topmost layer, as sweetness is often permissiveness and is therefore chaos. We must temper this with order, which is the meaty structure of the ham."
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 31971, 6ft4, Moggkrates and 16 others
what’s the book of the day

about to go to the third largest library in the world to do my daily studies
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: optimisticzoomer and ReadBooksEveryday
The worst thing with these people is that they know how much image sells so they keep doing it.

They don't actually speak like that because they genuinely are that way, it's just a character they play. Many who meet them in real life testify to that.

Also Peterson is a cuck with no values anyways. He just needs empathy and has a justified inferiority complex so when people started praising him he thought himself as the new Roberspierre of the west.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bloomercel, nofap, Sprinkles and 3 others
He sounds like a gender studies feminist but in the other opposite of content.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bloomercel, Sprinkles, piec and 2 others
He thinks hes smarter than he really is
 
  • +1
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday
I mean just watch this shit JFL



look at those hand gestures, saying a billion words about axiomatic , dichotomy’ ,monad, etc. & the constant word play. All this to say the sacred value of a woman is to have a child.

An extremely complex way to say something simple.
Jordan Peterson is cool though; he loves to use those hand gestures and use sophisticated vocabulary.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bloomercel, ReadBooksEveryday and Sprinkles
He's not as bad as this guy



Same as Jordan Peterson, all this guy has to say was 'becoz muh freedom'.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday
We need to go back to the days when intellectuals were based. Jung, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, etc.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: try2beme, ReadBooksEveryday and Sprinkles
allat just to watch his daughter get pounded by a balding recessed redpiller
 
  • JFL
Reactions: bloomercel and ReadBooksEveryday
I don't like his voice
 
  • +1
Reactions: try2beme and ReadBooksEveryday
Interviewer: "Have you ever answered a yes or no question with a one-word response?"

JP: "Well, see, as a world-class linguist I have to say it depends on what you mean by 'word.' Do you mean the smallest unit of meaningful language? In that case, what would 'well' have meant in the beginning of my response just now? And by 'answer' do you mean just a response to a question or are there any underpinnings of having to 'answer to' someone in a hierarchical sense? Because hierarchies change the context of the question being asked to less of a casual, optional answer into more of a demand, even if it's unintentional, due to power structures. And that's because these, let's say, power structures have been around since time immemorial. Lobsters have power structures. But you know what social construct they didn't have? Infanticide. And I can confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt, since I'm a fully-credentialed marine biologist because I've been going to the aquarium and studying the animals there for 40 years, that lobsters have no rules about infanticide. In fact, if we go back further in evolutionary history, which I can speak to as an evolutionary biologist, we see that many species, in fact, had no gender roles and no particular role at all in the life of offspring. This was before trees and lobsters, so it must be hardwired into our brains to not care for our young and have no distinguishable gender roles. But if we're going by the most numerous animals on earth, we have to at least look to ants to figure out how we should structure gender in society. One queen who flies around, mates, and pumps out babies until she does while a harem of men provide her with a huge mansion and are at her beck and call. But wouldn't that be discrimination based on gender? Not if you're a cultural Marxist. That's just the type of matriarchal society they want. I know this because I, myself, am a professor of feminist studies. So, in answer to your question, I don't think that we should allow pineapples on pizza unless the top is the hearty meat because we can't have sweetness represented as the topmost layer, as sweetness is often permissiveness and is therefore chaos. We must temper this with order, which is the meaty structure of the ham."
Impossible to not read in his choice.

Still JFLing at the clean your room tweet you posted lets see that again.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday
When your function is to be a word-puller, you realise that the messaging intent has been lost and the meaning consequently.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Paul7, try2beme, Moggkrates and 2 others
God Jordan Cuckerson is something else. He portrays himself as a rationalist and scientist, while babbling esoteric dogmatic shit and spreading values that rely on religion and retarded ideologies. Also when he debates real philisophers and not some college kids, he fails miserably. Most of his takes are just valid claims. You could claim the exact opposite, and there would be the same amount of evidence for that. Just a high iq cult leader, that thinks he knows how the world works. Also lol at his misuse of authority. Talking about philosophy, physics, god and all that shit, while beeing a psychologist
 
  • +1
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday and try2beme
It wasn't that bad, but the conclusion was lacking.
 
God Jordan Cuckerson is something else. He portrays himself as a rationalist and scientist, while babbling esoteric dogmatic shit and spreading values that rely on religion and retarded ideologies. Also when he debates real philisophers and not some college kids, he fails miserably. Most of his takes are just valid claims. You could claim the exact opposite, and there would be the same amount of evidence for that. Just a high iq cult leader, that thinks he knows how the world works. Also lol at his misuse of authority. Talking about philosophy, physics, god and all that shit, while beeing a psychologist
Textbook psychology graduate and redpiller

A disgusting combination
 
  • +1
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday and Moggkrates
He's as bad as David Laid


 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2381 and ReadBooksEveryday
You are probably in the Dunning Kruger bracket if you are not humbled by this conversation.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday and Deleted member 31971

Similar threads

Nodesbitch
Replies
5
Views
256
car12345
car12345
ugly_man
Replies
2
Views
158
2022cel
2022cel
Nodesbitch
Replies
1
Views
155
Nodesbitch
Nodesbitch
Nodesbitch
Replies
26
Views
1K
AlphaLooksmaxxer666
AlphaLooksmaxxer666
carbonprynt
Replies
88
Views
2K
therockissigma
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top