Jordan Peterson talks about rupert

[Deleted member 25710]

aka @JudgeandJury



@Makhachev @JackTheKnife @Manletmachine

 

[Deleted member 23239]

ubermarginal told me that jordan peterson is a midwit so i disregard his opinion

 

[JackTheKnife]

Rupert is maybe 93IQ.

 

[Deleted member 29796]

ubermarginal told me that jordan peterson is a midwit so i disregard his opinion

On philosophy, yeah. I don't feel like going back and forth, but if I cared, I could find him making clear logical errors, someone who is adept in philsophy doesn't make these errors. So that's what my opinion is based on.

I do enjoy hearing him speak within his field, and sometimes I listen to him because he is eccentric and true to himself, although flawed, still true to himself. But he is dumb on philosophy.

 

[JackTheKnife]

On philosophy, yeah. I don't feel like going back and forth, but if I cared, I could find him making clear logical errors, someone who is adept in philsophy doesn't make these errors. So that's what my opinion is based on.

I do enjoy hearing him speak within his field, and sometimes I listen to him because he is eccentric and true to himself, although flawed, still true to himself. But he is dumb on philosophy.

Earth to @Reconstitution, he'll humiliate you in any philosophical debate, no matter how small.

 

[Deleted member 29796]

Earth to @Reconstitution, he'll humiliate you in every philosophical debate, no matter how small.

He 100% wouldn't and I don't say that to brag. Like I would bet the house on that. I have had many debates, more than him, unless he debates in private. So no, but keep thinking daddy is so smwart.

 

[Deleted member 29796]

God I hate "figures" they get dickrode so much by simpletons. People thinking Peterson is good on philosophy

These clowns can do no wrong in their eyes. Celeb dick riders, fuck off, get a brain.

 

[JackTheKnife]

He 100% wouldn't and I don't say that to brag. Like I would bet the house on that. I have had many debates, more than him, unless he debates in private. So no, but keep thinking daddy is so smwart.

I don't like the guy, he's boring. But you're beyond delusional you midwit fuck.

 

[JackTheKnife]

Yo @Reconstitution I actually feel sorry for you

 

[Deleted member 29796]

Yo @Reconstitution I actually feel sorry for you

badphilosophy: search results - jordan peterson

r/Badphilosophy is definitely not closed as part of the protest against Reddit's API changes. You're just not an approved submitter.

old.reddit.com

inb4 "reddit "

Fucking retard, you are too stupid to know how stupid you are. It's amazing.

 

[JackTheKnife]

@Reconstitution You actually need to kys, a dog can maybe beat you in a debate with a random sequence of barking.

 

[Deleted member 29796]

@Reconstitution You actually need to kys, a dog can maybe beat you in a debate with a random sequence of barking.

- I make statemate
- dumbasses call me out
- they get slapped
- then resort to the above



One question though, if you will, do you know what a contradiction is, logically? And if so, would you say that someone that makes logical contradictions isn't adept at logic? And if so, is it possible to be a novice in logic and adept at philosophy?

 

[JackTheKnife]

One question though, if you will, do you know what a contradiction is, logically? And if so, would you say that someone that makes logical contradictions isn't adept at logic? And if so, is it possible to be a novice in logic and adept at philosophy?

I'm shooting myself live if you can read Critique of Pure Reason and comprehend it in the intended way. Some fat dork read 2 articles on reddit and now he's thinking he can actually challenge Peterson to a philosophical debate because he found (by other people) some contradiction. The ''you suck his dick'' argument doesn't work. Yes he's much smarter than you, billion times better read, and just by reading some of your posts on the forum I know that you have exactly 0% chance of doing it. I shouldn't even answer to you.

 

[Deleted member 29796]

The thought of Peterson being some philosophical worldender is peak

Fool, in a debate about fucking veganism I would crush Peterson, he would undoubtedly resort to "muh hierarchy" or "muh religion". And I would have him in contradiction at least once in that debate.

But keep thinking those charlatans are worth a damn. I swear you can tell how smart a man is by who he follows, because he can't see the faults of who he follows, he must be dumber than that man, so I know @JackTheKnife is dumb as fuck given how dumb Peterson is, on philosophy. And either you won't acknowledge he has made clear logical contradictions or you are too dumb to, or just a fucking dickriding liar.



@Crusile Thoughts on philosophy god Peterson?

 

[JackTheKnife]

@

@Crusile Thoughts on philosophy god Peterson?

Just tag a 42yo pedo that i destroyed already theory.

 

[Deleted member 29796]

I'm shooting myself live if you can read Critique of Pure Reason and comprehend it in the intended way. Some fat dork read 2 articles on reddit and now he's thinking he can actually challenge Peterson to a philosophical debate because he found (by other people) some contradiction. The ''you suck his dick'' argument doesn't work. Yes he's much smarter than you, billion times better read, and just by reading some of your posts on the forum I know that you have exactly 0% chance of doing it. I shouldn't even answer to you.

He can definitely be much smarter me, he doesn't know more about logic, and I think he is poor on philosophy, you are exposing how simple you are, to everyone else though.

 

[JackTheKnife]

He can definitely be much smarter me, he doesn't know more about logic, and I think he is poor on philosophy, you are exposing how simple you are, to everyone else though.

You can't even debate logic with him, you can't follow it all the way. You're a joke. And stop writing like such a faggot, holy shit. I don't think I ever told that to anybody. You really sound like a queer.

 

[Deleted member 29796]

You can't even debate logic with him, you can't follow it all the way. You're a joke. And stop writing like such a faggot, holy shit. I don't think I ever told that to anybody. You really sound like a queer.

Show* me proof of Peterson demonstrating ability in formal logic. Please.

 

[JackTheKnife]

So me proof of Peterson demonstrating ability in formal logic. Please.

ok just a second.

 

[Deleted member 21716]

Just tag a 42yo pedo that i destroyed already theory.

pedo?

 

[incel194012940]

God I hate "figures" they get dickrode so much by simpletons. People thinking Peterson is good on philosophy

These clowns can do no wrong in their eyes. Celeb dick riders, fuck off, get a brain.

he’s obviously smart but he has the most normie center right psychologist opinions ever which make it ignorant cringe to idolize him

he even alternates between muh Jung and muh science seemingly randomly to keep to boomers ideology

 

[incel194012940]

He 100% wouldn't and I don't say that to brag. Like I would bet the house on that. I have had many debates, more than him, unless he debates in private. So no, but keep thinking daddy is so smwart.

i THINK he would sigh, go on 10 minutes rant on his idea about the general psychology behind your idea and everyone would clap

 

[Crusile]

The thought of Peterson being some philosophical worldender is peak

Fool, in a debate about fucking veganism I would crush Peterson, he would undoubtedly resort to "muh hierarchy" or "muh religion". And I would have him in contradiction at least once in that debate.

But keep thinking those charlatans are worth a damn. I swear you can tell how smart a man is by who he follows, because he can't see the faults of who he follows, he must be dumber than that man, so I know @JackTheKnife is dumb as fuck given how dumb Peterson is, on philosophy. And either you won't acknowledge he has made clear logical contradictions or you are too dumb to, or just a fucking dickriding liar.



@Crusile Thoughts on philosophy god Peterson?

Jack knife is an annoying chihuahua who is trollin you. He says nothing of substance in his "arguments" becos he's a European who isn't fluent in english. Likely using Google translate, even

 

[longjohnmong]

inb4 "reddit "

reddit