S
stunna
Kraken
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2022
- Posts
- 15,195
- Reputation
- 22,559
A bit of preface. We often hear that we should go outside and take a look at couples. Supposedly we are going to see a lot of ugly dudes with attractive women, thus disproving black pill. So I did exactly that, I went to popular meeting spots for young people in my city: a shopping center, McDonald’s, college town. I spend there about 6 hours in total observing couples and taking notes.
Methodology: originally I wanted to divide men and women in two categories, height and face beauty but since I haven’t seen a single pair where guy would be shorter than his girl, I will only judge facial aesthetic and give a percentage of guys over 6 foot. If I had any doubts about hight, I would try to compare myself to them (I am 6 foot). When it comes to face I go mostly by first impression, then I look for symetry, skin condition and balding signs, included fat as well. Having more than one of negative traits was a strike to “ugly zone” so why I mean unattractive, I mean average and ugly. I may sound harsh but I have seen maybe 10 really ugly people in total. I also excluded people visibly over 30yo, I care only about my generation anyways.
Results: I have seen in total 112 couples, most approximately between 16-26. In 0 cases men was shorter than woman, in 3 cases they were same height +-1 inch. Whooping percentage of guys were 6 feet or more, 82 of them, what gives us 73%. (Average in my country is 5’11”)
And now attractiveness, 68 couples (60%) were a combination of attractive male, attractive female. 25 (22%) were attractive male, unattractive female.
9 (8%) were combination of unnatractive male and attractive female
10 (9%) were combination of unnatractive male and unattractive female.
Conclusions: dating market is largely dominated by attractive people, However unattractive women seems to more likely be dating than unattractive men. Moreover being at least as tall as female seems to be prerequisite to date in gen z, however above average hight guys heavily outperform other men.
Opinion: after conducting my little experiment, I have no clue what the hell those normies are yapping about…
Methodology: originally I wanted to divide men and women in two categories, height and face beauty but since I haven’t seen a single pair where guy would be shorter than his girl, I will only judge facial aesthetic and give a percentage of guys over 6 foot. If I had any doubts about hight, I would try to compare myself to them (I am 6 foot). When it comes to face I go mostly by first impression, then I look for symetry, skin condition and balding signs, included fat as well. Having more than one of negative traits was a strike to “ugly zone” so why I mean unattractive, I mean average and ugly. I may sound harsh but I have seen maybe 10 really ugly people in total. I also excluded people visibly over 30yo, I care only about my generation anyways.
Results: I have seen in total 112 couples, most approximately between 16-26. In 0 cases men was shorter than woman, in 3 cases they were same height +-1 inch. Whooping percentage of guys were 6 feet or more, 82 of them, what gives us 73%. (Average in my country is 5’11”)
And now attractiveness, 68 couples (60%) were a combination of attractive male, attractive female. 25 (22%) were attractive male, unattractive female.
9 (8%) were combination of unnatractive male and attractive female
10 (9%) were combination of unnatractive male and unattractive female.
Conclusions: dating market is largely dominated by attractive people, However unattractive women seems to more likely be dating than unattractive men. Moreover being at least as tall as female seems to be prerequisite to date in gen z, however above average hight guys heavily outperform other men.
Opinion: after conducting my little experiment, I have no clue what the hell those normies are yapping about…
