Just lol, look at what these ugly Hindus think of themselves.

CFW432

CFW432

ABOS. MUST. DIE.
Joined
Jan 2, 2020
Posts
14,089
Reputation
19,744


Lmao the amount of Hindus that are lightskin number in the few millions at most, out of a population of almost a billion. And they tend to be gentically related more to pakistanis, than their ugly bihari and south indian hindu counterparts :feelskek:

I've seen these memes more and more recently, where the Hindus are portraying themselves as lightskin, while portraying muslims as being brown or dark skin:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Even though harrapaworld percentages show that vast majority of muslims in india are gentically similar to hindu middle and upper castes, meanwhile 1/3RD OF HINDUS ARE DALITS AND TRIBALS LMFAO, WHILE ONLY 1% OF MUSLIMS ARE DALITS AND TRIBALS. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:





Hindus, apna darkskin aukat me raho :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241025_125835_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241025_125835_Chrome.jpg
    455.9 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: silently_said, diditeverbegin, sportsmogger and 11 others


Lmao the amount of Hindus that are lightskin number in the few millions at most, out of a population of almost a billion. And they tend to be gentically related more to pakistanis, than their ugly bihari and south indian hindu counterparts :feelskek:

I've seen these memes more and more recently, where the Hindus are portraying themselves as lightskin, while portraying muslims as being brown or dark skin:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Even though harrapaworld percentages show that vast majority of muslims in india are gentically similar to hindu middle and upper castes, meanwhile 1/3RD OF HINDUS ARE DALITS AND TRIBALS LMFAO, WHILE ONLY 1% OF MUSLIMS ARE DALITS AND TRIBALS. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:





Hindus, apna darkskin aukat me raho :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:

What are u even ranting about? Most Muslims in South Asia or anywhere are generational Muslims who left their old religions in the past like hundreds of years ago u dumb pajeet. Ofc muzzies wouldn’t have their Dalit status stuck to them. Jfl at this retarded idiot. Also why are u always talking about looks being specific to a nationality or religion? U do know anybody can become Hindu right? The ancestors of most south Asians were Hindu and the remaining were other dharmic religions
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: the_machinist_786 and mayo mogger
1729880621942
 
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: A1kek and CFW432
What are u even ranting about? Most Muslims in South Asia or anywhere are generational Muslims who left their old religions in the past like hundreds of years ago u dumb pajeet. Ofc muzzies wouldn’t have their Dalit status stuck to them. Jfl at this retarded monkey
Jfl retard there are dalit muslims, there are castes/tribal/biradari system in south asian muslims. Its not practiced as strictly like hindus ofc, (im of "mixed caste" descent myself), but yes dalit muslims do exist.
 


Lmao the amount of Hindus that are lightskin number in the few millions at most, out of a population of almost a billion. And they tend to be gentically related more to pakistanis, than their ugly bihari and south indian hindu counterparts :feelskek:

I've seen these memes more and more recently, where the Hindus are portraying themselves as lightskin, while portraying muslims as being brown or dark skin:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Even though harrapaworld percentages show that vast majority of muslims in india are gentically similar to hindu middle and upper castes, meanwhile 1/3RD OF HINDUS ARE DALITS AND TRIBALS LMFAO, WHILE ONLY 1% OF MUSLIMS ARE DALITS AND TRIBALS. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:





Hindus, apna darkskin aukat me raho :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:

Fuck these pajeets man i wish all of them would just perish man
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksmaxxing223
Aryan indians and shit skin pakis, I see nothing wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: Guiltyfeelings
Jfl retard there are dalit muslims, there are castes/tribal/biradari system in south asian muslims. Its not practiced as strictly like hindus ofc, (im of "mixed caste" descent myself), but yes dalit muslims do exist.
Yes they do but those are recent converts . What I’m saying is that last paragraph of urs where u point out Hindus having more Dalits than Muslims. What does that even mean Jfl? Obviously there would be more Hindu Dalits retard. U think Muslims for hundreds of years kept their Dalit status? Yeah no becoz it’s a Hindu thing
 
Bro Indians are all Fitzpatrick 1 skin and A10s bro didn't you hear Hitler was indian bro Aryan brotherhood Heil Hitler 1488
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: looksmaxxing223, mayo mogger, Cholesterol-Man and 4 others
Yes they do but those are recent converts . What I’m saying is that last paragraph of urs where u point out Hindus having more Dalits than Muslims. What does that even mean Jfl? Obviously there would be more Hindu Dalits retard. U think Muslims for hundreds of years kept their Dalit status? Yeah no becoz it’s a Hindu thing
Just fucking lol retard, yes the muslim dalits still kept their status because the muslim middle and upper castes that also converted and remembered who the lower and dalit castes were before they converted too. There are tons of muslim low caste people that have been "low caste" for centuries lol.
 
Just fucking lol retard, yes the muslim dalits still kept their status because the muslim middle and upper castes that also converted and remembered who the lower and dalit castes were before they converted too. There are tons of muslim low caste people that have been "low caste" for centuries lol.
Mostly lower castes converted to Islam and Christianity and this is a widespread view. It was the upper castes who actually held together the system so there was less conversions overall lol. Also Islam doesn’t have a caste system at all but they do have a class system like every society and since it’s in South Asia it’s often confused with the caste system. I wonder why a muzzie like u obsessed with hating Hindus somehow value upper caste or whatever bs? U do know that modern government caste census is entirely based on economic factors right and even then they did a shit job becoz of the thousands of castes in India. It’s not based on “fair skin Saar”. So in the end , the upper caste Muslims aren’t really always the “Brahmins” lmao. Lastly, since it’s Islam u can’t expect the caste system to be as rigid as Hinduism so that’s why they have less Dalits percentage wise. Apart from the government census, in the Muslim community itself, there’s probably little difference among most muslims hence the reason most of them aren’t discriminated and just grouped together in higher percentages than Hindus who are more strict when it comes to castes.That was what I’m trying to say in the previous replies
 
@Jason Voorhees
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Mostly lower castes converted to Islam and Christianity and this is a widespread view. It was the upper castes who actually held together the system so there was less conversions overall lol. Also Islam doesn’t have a caste system at all but they do have a class system like every society and since it’s in South Asia it’s often confused with the caste system. I wonder why a muzzie like u obsessed with hating Hindus somehow value upper caste or whatever bs? U do know that modern government caste census is entirely based on economic factors right and even then they did a shit job becoz of the thousands of castes in India. It’s not based on “fair skin Saar”. So in the end , the upper caste Muslims aren’t really always the “Brahmins” lmao. Lastly, since it’s Islam u can’t expect the caste system to be as rigid as Hinduism so that’s why they have less Dalits percentage wise. Apart from the government census, in the Muslim community itself, there’s probably little difference among most muslims hence the reason most of them aren’t discriminated and just grouped together in higher percentages than Hindus who are more strict when it comes to castes.That was what I’m trying to say in the previous replies
Mostly lower castes converted to Islam and Christianity and this is a widespread view. It was the upper castes who actually held together the system so there was less conversions overall lol.
Lmao everyone from every strata of society converted for different reasons. For low castes, they converted because of the equality that islam preached, that wasnt inherent in hinduism. For high castes they usually converted for more pragmatic reasons, such as being able to hold lands if they came from a landholding castes, or avoiding paying jizya for non being muslim, or converting to islam so they could rise through the ranks of the mughal administration more easily without being discriminated against unlike if they were still hindu.


Also Islam doesn’t have a caste system at all but they do have a class system like every society and since it’s in South Asia it’s often confused with the caste system.
You're right. Islam doesnt have a caste system. I never said that every muslim from around the world practiced caste or biradari. This is strictly a south asian thing and holdover that south asian muslims brought over with them whenever they converted to islam.

I wonder why a muzzie like u obsessed with hating Hindus somehow value upper caste or whatever bs?
lmao it has nothing to do with valuing upper castes. A common insult that hindus like to do with south asian muslims is claim that every single south asian muslim is descended from a converted low caste :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:, they do this to sneakily snide their casteism against south asian muslims in order to think they are better than them. I simply prove this whole misconception wrong by showing genetic scores from harrapaworld which show that south asian (particularly indian muslims), tend to be more genetically similar to middle and high caste/general castes hindus, rather than they are lower castes. Muslims from lower castes and dalits exists, no one is denying that, but overall they literally dont even make up 1% of the total south asian muslim population. Unlike the fact that a third of hindus are dalits and tribals :forcedsmile:.

U do know that modern government caste census is entirely based on economic factors right and even then they did a shit job becoz of the thousands of castes in India. It’s not based on “fair skin Saar”.

You're right lmao, its not based on skin color, its based on genetics lmao. But its a common accepted fact that the more upper you are in the caste system, the higher the chance of being lighter skin you are. Everyone knows that upper castes are lighter than middle and lower castes on average. Than middle castes are lighter than low castes on average. And then low caste being darker than middle and upper castes, with dalits and tribals obviously being the darkest out of everyone. :forcedsmile:

And by proving that most muslims are descended from converted middle and high upper/general castes, compared to hindus, i have also proven that muslims are on average, more lighter skin than hindus. :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:

So in the end , the upper caste Muslims aren’t really always the “Brahmins” lmao.
Upper castes doesnt just mean brahmins lol, their are also kshatriya as well, and there are tons of muslim rajpoots (especially in pakistan).

Lastly, since it’s Islam u can’t expect the caste system to be as rigid as Hinduism so that’s why they have less Dalits percentage wise.
You're right, its not as strict as hinduism, but it is still somewhat commonly practice. South asian muslims will still usually ask for caste or biradari from perspective matches during the marriage process. A jutt will ask for a jutt. A syed for a syed. Pathan for a pathan etc etc etc...

there’s probably little difference among most muslims hence the reason most of them aren’t discriminated and just grouped together in higher percentages than Hindus who are more strict when it comes to castes.
Nope lol, muslims from different regions in south asia are definitley genetically far from each other. A tamil muslim and a punjabi muslim are definitley not genetically close AT ALL. A punjabi hindu would be more genetically closer to a punjabi muslim, than a tamil muslim for instance.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
:lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: MA_ascender
You're right lmao, its not based on skin color, its based on genetics lmao. But its a common accepted fact that the more upper you are in the caste system, the higher the chance of being lighter skin you are. Everyone knows that upper castes are lighter than middle and lower castes on average. Than middle castes are lighter than low castes on average. And then low caste being darker than middle and upper castes, with dalits and tribals obviously being the darkest out of everyone. :forcedsmile:

And by proving that most muslims are descended from converted middle and high upper/general castes, compared to hindus, i have also proven that muslims are on average, more lighter skin than hindus. :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:
“It’s not based on skin colour but genetics” nigga that’s what I mean. Yes usually upper castes are lighter on avg. u didn’t prove anything about Muslims being upper castes genetically. Most Muslims were still lower castes that’s widely accepted belief. Ur claim also doesn’t make sense when upper castes are a minority throughout the subcontinent’s history so them converting at such high levels like u claim would have weakened the very strict caste system and looking at the numbers just doesn’t make sense for there to be so many Muslims in South Asia in the present day lmao. Every source says lower castes were the majority (cos guess what they are the majority of the population anyways) who converted to escape discrimination from the caste system.

All ur other ramblings I already replied. I keep making the distinction between Hindu caste system and the reservation system the government uses but u keep trying to brush that off so stay coping ig. It literally just means that the Muslims who escaped didn’t all just turn into generational Dalits and get pinned down by the original caste system. That’s where u get such low lvls of Dalits in Muslims becoz they aren’t discriminated as badly as Hindu Dalits by their fellow communities. So yeah this reservation system is almost entirely based on economic factors. U can throw ur last paragraph out the window coz I was talking about social discrimination not genetic discrimination lmao so u misread.

Finally I only heard of Muslims being similar to Hindus in genetics(just like Hindus most are lower and some are upper castes) so idk where exactly u got the source that they are closer to upper caste genetically
 
“It’s not based on skin colour but genetics” nigga that’s what I mean. Yes usually upper castes are lighter on avg. u didn’t prove anything about Muslims being upper castes genetically. Most Muslims were still lower castes that’s widely accepted belief. Ur claim also doesn’t make sense when upper castes are a minority throughout the subcontinent’s history so them converting at such high levels like u claim would have weakened the very strict caste system and looking at the numbers just doesn’t make sense for there to be so many Muslims in South Asia in the present day lmao. Every source says lower castes were the majority (cos guess what they are the majority of the population anyways) who converted to escape discrimination from the caste system.

All ur other ramblings I already replied. I keep making the distinction between Hindu caste system and the reservation system the government uses but u keep trying to brush that off so stay coping ig. It literally just means that the Muslims who escaped didn’t all just turn into generational Dalits and get pinned down by the original caste system. That’s where u get such low lvls of Dalits in Muslims becoz they aren’t discriminated as badly as Hindu Dalits by their fellow communities. So yeah this reservation system is almost entirely based on economic factors. U can throw ur last paragraph out the window coz I was talking about social discrimination not genetic discrimination lmao so u misread.

Finally I only heard of Muslims being similar to Hindus in genetics(just like Hindus most are lower and some are upper castes) so idk where exactly u got the source that they are closer to upper caste genetically
Lmao dumbfuck yes the majority of muslims are descended from the middle and high caste Hindus.

the only people that say that south Asian muslims are all descended from lower castes are literally just Hindus who want to cope and try to show superiority to us even though your all darker and shorter and uglier than us on average. Literally no third party source claims that south Asian muslims are all descended from lower caste Hindus :feelskek:


Look and weep you kala manlet:
EVERY HINDU GET IN HERE AND FINALLY LEARN THAT YOUR INFERIOR TO US AND FINALLY STOP COPING. I'M TIRED OF POSTING THESE OVER AND OVER AGAIN :feelskek::
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241026_030357_Reddit.jpg
    Screenshot_20241026_030357_Reddit.jpg
    359.8 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_20241026_025850_Reddit.jpg
    Screenshot_20241026_025850_Reddit.jpg
    265.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_20241026_025904_Reddit.jpg
    Screenshot_20241026_025904_Reddit.jpg
    345.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_20241026_025918_Reddit.jpg
    Screenshot_20241026_025918_Reddit.jpg
    316.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_20241026_025933_Reddit.jpg
    Screenshot_20241026_025933_Reddit.jpg
    463.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_20241026_025953_Reddit.jpg
    Screenshot_20241026_025953_Reddit.jpg
    607.3 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Bjornn
“It’s not based on skin colour but genetics” nigga that’s what I mean. Yes usually upper castes are lighter on avg. u didn’t prove anything about Muslims being upper castes genetically. Most Muslims were still lower castes that’s widely accepted belief. Ur claim also doesn’t make sense when upper castes are a minority throughout the subcontinent’s history so them converting at such high levels like u claim would have weakened the very strict caste system and looking at the numbers just doesn’t make sense for there to be so many Muslims in South Asia in the present day lmao. Every source says lower castes were the majority (cos guess what they are the majority of the population anyways) who converted to escape discrimination from the caste system.

All ur other ramblings I already replied. I keep making the distinction between Hindu caste system and the reservation system the government uses but u keep trying to brush that off so stay coping ig. It literally just means that the Muslims who escaped didn’t all just turn into generational Dalits and get pinned down by the original caste system. That’s where u get such low lvls of Dalits in Muslims becoz they aren’t discriminated as badly as Hindu Dalits by their fellow communities. So yeah this reservation system is almost entirely based on economic factors. U can throw ur last paragraph out the window coz I was talking about social discrimination not genetic discrimination lmao so u misread.

Finally I only heard of Muslims being similar to Hindus in genetics(just like Hindus most are lower and some are upper castes) so idk where exactly u got the source that they are closer to upper caste genetically
As you can see the harrapaworld scores show that pakistanis are racially superior to all indians. And that indian muslim communities tend to fall inbetween middle and high caste Hindu communities. With only 1 community of muslims (UP muslim set 2) being the low caste/ dalit related community.

Seethe and cope kala manlet.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bjornn
Lmao dumbfuck yes the majority of muslims are descended from the middle and high caste Hindus.

the only people that say that south Asian muslims are all descended from lower castes are literally just Hindus who want to cope and try to show superiority to us even though your all darker and shorter and uglier than us on average. Literally no third party source claims that south Asian muslims are all descended from lower caste Hindus :feelskek:


Look and weep you kala manlet:
EVERY HINDU GET IN HERE AND FINALLY LEARN THAT YOUR INFERIOR TO US AND FINALLY STOP COPING. I'M TIRED OF POSTING THESE OVER AND OVER AGAIN :feelskek::
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20241026_121129.png
    IMG_20241026_121129.png
    973.1 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Guiltyfeelings and CFW432


Lmao the amount of Hindus that are lightskin number in the few millions at most, out of a population of almost a billion. And they tend to be gentically related more to pakistanis, than their ugly bihari and south indian hindu counterparts :feelskek:

I've seen these memes more and more recently, where the Hindus are portraying themselves as lightskin, while portraying muslims as being brown or dark skin:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Even though harrapaworld percentages show that vast majority of muslims in india are gentically similar to hindu middle and upper castes, meanwhile 1/3RD OF HINDUS ARE DALITS AND TRIBALS LMFAO, WHILE ONLY 1% OF MUSLIMS ARE DALITS AND TRIBALS. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:





Hindus, apna darkskin aukat me raho :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:

shitskins argue whose whiter meanwhile actual white ppl are just white and dont need a historian to prove theyre white
 
  • +1
Reactions: CFW432
shitskins argue whose whiter meanwhile actual white ppl are just white and dont need a historian to prove theyre white
As a Muslim i dont even mind claiming the pheno of the Muslim drawing. South Asian Muslims tend to be that light. :forcedsmile:

It's Hindus that are literally dark asf on average but are claiming to be white with green eyes, that is the huge cope :feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: isis_Bleach
Fuck off shit skin paki, I'm gonna bomb your house
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mayo mogger, Bjornn and CFW432
and there are tons of muslim rajpoots (especially in pakistan).
Dindu copers online (usually non-Rajputs) say that "saar, you can't be muzzlim and rajpoot, bcoz rajpoot is kshatriya and muzzlim doesn't do castes." They think your genetics alter because of your religious beliefs. Absolutely delulu. Furthermore, Kshatriyas were even held in higher esteem than Brahmins at one point because they defended their faith and land against the invaders. I wonder if @franziz is one of these dindu copers. Meanwhile actual Rajputs even if they are Hindu or Sikh will accept the fact Islamic Rajputs exist and claim them as their own. I read online there's a collective effort online to target Rajputs, it's often non-Rajput dindus but also Jatts and Gujjars, trying to claim some Rajputs are Gujjars. There's also the genetic community where people will use samples and give it a fake name. Therefore even Vahaduo results should be taken with a grain of salt unless proven they are what they claim to be. Too many fake simples around. Imagine a Dalit using the sample of Tajik and naming it Dalit_Tamil_Nadu. That's an extreme example but that's the kinda stuff you are bound to see, something to that effect. A lotta dindus are just straight up pathetic, along with the Gujjar trolls.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mayo mogger
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: handsomegrapist, Xangsane, Donquixote and 1 other person
Dindu copers online (usually non-Rajputs) say that "saar, you can't be muzzlim and rajpoot, bcoz rajpoot is kshatriya and muzzlim doesn't do castes." They think your genetics alter because of your religious beliefs. Absolutely delulu. Furthermore, Kshatriyas were even held in higher esteem than Brahmins at one point because they defended their faith and land against the invaders. I wonder if @franziz is one of these dindu copers. Meanwhile actual Rajputs even if they are Hindu or Sikh will accept the fact Islamic Rajputs exist and claim them as their own. I read online there's a collective effort online to target Rajputs, it's often non-Rajput dindus but also Jatts and Gujjars, trying to claim some Rajputs are Gujjars. There's also the genetic community where people will use samples and give it a fake name. Therefore even Vahaduo results should be taken with a grain of salt unless proven they are what they claim to be. Too many fake simples around. Imagine a Dalit using the sample of Tajik and naming it Dalit_Tamil_Nadu. That's an extreme example but that's the kinda stuff you are bound to see, something to that effect. A lotta dindus are just straight up pathetic, along with the Gujjar trolls.
yes , its about blood

majority of kshtriyas and jatts still use their lastname but practise islam/sikhism
 
I live west bengal and visited a lot of other states i have seen persian looking,light eyes muslims a lot but one average Indian hindus are lighter (not like thumbnail not even kashmiri look like that)than indian muslims
 
Lmao dumbfuck yes the majority of muslims are descended from the middle and high caste Hindus.

the only people that say that south Asian muslims are all descended from lower castes are literally just Hindus who want to cope and try to show superiority to us even though your all darker and shorter and uglier than us on average. Literally no third party source claims that south Asian muslims are all descended from lower caste Hindus :feelskek:


Look and weep you kala manlet:
EVERY HINDU GET IN HERE AND FINALLY LEARN THAT YOUR INFERIOR TO US AND FINALLY STOP COPING. I'M TIRED OF POSTING THESE OVER AND OVER AGAIN :feelskek::
Ain’t no way ur this retarded LMFAO. Nigga u just screenshotted bunch of tables and expect it to prove ur point? Pakis are northwestern so obviously they would have more steppe “superior” dna so u don’t have to mention that . Ur Indian tables are all just multiple Hindu castes but just one Muslim section and some don’t even have Muslim sections like the Punjabi and haryana sections for example. It’s like u didn’t even make an effort here . How do u know they didn’t just specifically target an upper caste Muslim community in some like the Andhra section where there’s many Hindu communities but just two Muslim ones? The fucking Kashmir to uttarakand is so broad of an area too so I don’t know what ur comparing anymore. Kashmir has more steppe overall than regions down south so that’s unfair to compare. Ur retarded schizo ass might gobble this up but this is too little to conclude anything. Btw I’m not even picking a side here . Im actually neutral in this topic by claiming that Muslims are just like Hindus in terms of caste distribution and lower castes will always make the majority of both of em becoz they are the majority of overall population. It’s not an offense to say most converts were lower castes either so I think ur just projecting insecurities lil bro coz I can gladly admit most Hindus are low castes lmao
 
Last edited:
Dindu copers online (usually non-Rajputs) say that "saar, you can't be muzzlim and rajpoot, bcoz rajpoot is kshatriya and muzzlim doesn't do castes." They think your genetics alter because of your religious beliefs. Absolutely delulu. Furthermore, Kshatriyas were even held in higher esteem than Brahmins at one point because they defended their faith and land against the invaders. I wonder if @franziz is one of these dindu copers. Meanwhile actual Rajputs even if they are Hindu or Sikh will accept the fact Islamic Rajputs exist and claim them as their own. I read online there's a collective effort online to target Rajputs, it's often non-Rajput dindus but also Jatts and Gujjars, trying to claim some Rajputs are Gujjars. There's also the genetic community where people will use samples and give it a fake name. Therefore even Vahaduo results should be taken with a grain of salt unless proven they are what they claim to be. Too many fake simples around. Imagine a Dalit using the sample of Tajik and naming it Dalit_Tamil_Nadu. That's an extreme example but that's the kinda stuff you are bound to see, something to that effect. A lotta dindus are just straight up pathetic, along with the Gujjar trolls.
Religion has nothing to do with genetics coz it’s just belief. The OP is the only one coming up with stuff like Muslims are superior and they are also upper caste on avg when I’m refuting by saying they are just like any other community in South Asia and Muslims in each region are from the same genetic background as those of other religions but this retard is sending me random ass tables proving nothing jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: the_machinist_786 and Gengar
Ain’t no way ur this retarded LMFAO. Nigga u just screenshotted bunch of tables and expect it to prove ur point? Pakis are northwestern so obviously they would have more steppe “superior” dna so u don’t have to mention that . Ur Indian tables are all just multiple Hindu castes but just one Muslim section and some don’t even have Muslim sections like the Punjabi and haryana sections for example. It’s like u didn’t even make an effort here . How do u know they didn’t just specifically target an upper caste Muslim community in some like the Andhra section where there’s many Hindu communities but just two Muslim ones? The fucking Kashmir to uttarakand is so broad of an area too so I don’t know what ur comparing anymore. Kashmir has more steppe overall than regions down south so that’s unfair to compare. Ur retarded schizo ass might gobble this up but this is too little to conclude anything. Btw I’m not even picking a side here . Im actually neutral in this topic by claiming that Muslims are just like Hindus in terms of caste distribution and lower castes will always make the majority of both of em becoz they are the majority of overall population. It’s not an offense to say most converts were lower castes either so I think ur just projecting insecurities lil bro coz I can gladly admit most Hindus are low castes lmao
Lol "specifically target upper caste muslim community", even though it quite literally shows UP dalit muslims lol. How much more are you going to cope?


"It’s not an offense to say most converts were lower castes either so I think ur just projecting insecurities lil bro coz I can gladly admit most Hindus are low castes lmao"

Lmao hindus definitley use it as a insult lol. Its just a typical casteist insult for hindus to try to show their superiority to us, even though we are literally better looking than you in every way. But anyway, i have no problem admitting that dalit muslims exist, i dont know why you think im denying that. It is a offense to insinuate that most converts are lower castes, especially when you literally dont have any evidence to back it up besides what some ugly 5 foot dark BJP paan spitter tells you on whatever propaganda channels you watch :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:. Most muslim castes have their own history which will clearly tell you their origins.



Anyway your a genetically inferior coping hindu (typical), even after showing you the DNA stats you want to cope lmao. Theres nothing more to be done here.

@Gengar

Look at this, lmao, even after showing these dindus LITERAL DNA PROOF, they still want to cope :forcedsmile:
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Gengar
Ain’t no way ur this retarded LMFAO. Nigga u just screenshotted bunch of tables and expect it to prove ur point? Pakis are northwestern so obviously they would have more steppe “superior” dna so u don’t have to mention that . Ur Indian tables are all just multiple Hindu castes but just one Muslim section and some don’t even have Muslim sections like the Punjabi and haryana sections for example. It’s like u didn’t even make an effort here . How do u know they didn’t just specifically target an upper caste Muslim community in some like the Andhra section where there’s many Hindu communities but just two Muslim ones? The fucking Kashmir to uttarakand is so broad of an area too so I don’t know what ur comparing anymore. Kashmir has more steppe overall than regions down south so that’s unfair to compare. Ur retarded schizo ass might gobble this up but this is too little to conclude anything. Btw I’m not even picking a side here . Im actually neutral in this topic by claiming that Muslims are just like Hindus in terms of caste distribution and lower castes will always make the majority of both of em becoz they are the majority of overall population. It’s not an offense to say most converts were lower castes either so I think ur just projecting insecurities lil bro coz I can gladly admit most Hindus are low castes lmao


Keep coping retarded hindu :lul:



"The caste system has existed in some form in India for at least 3,000 years. It is a social hierarchy passed down through families, and it can dictate the professions a person can work in as well as aspects of their social lives, including whom they can marry. While the caste system originally was for Hindus, nearly all Indians today identify with a caste, regardless of their religion.

The survey finds that three-in-ten Indians (30%) identify themselves as members of General Category castes, a broad grouping at the top of India’s caste system that includes numerous hierarchies and sub-hierarchies. The highest caste within the General Category is Brahmin, historically the priests and other religious leaders who also served as educators. Just 4% of Indians today identify as Brahmin.

Most Indians say they are outside this General Category group, describing themselves as members of Scheduled Castes (often known as Dalits, or historically by the pejorative term “untouchables”), Scheduled Tribes or Other Backward Classes (including a small percentage who say they are part of Most Backward Classes).

Hindus mirror the general public in their caste composition. Meanwhile, an overwhelming majority of Buddhists say they are Dalits, while about three-quarters of Jains identify as members of General Category castes. Muslims and Sikhs – like Jains – are more likely than Hindus to belong to General Category castes. And about a quarter of Christians belong to Scheduled Tribes, a far larger share than among any other religious community."


PF 062921 India 040
6zic6zqm9ai51
 


Keep coping retarded hindu :lul:



"The caste system has existed in some form in India for at least 3,000 years. It is a social hierarchy passed down through families, and it can dictate the professions a person can work in as well as aspects of their social lives, including whom they can marry. While the caste system originally was for Hindus, nearly all Indians today identify with a caste, regardless of their religion.

The survey finds that three-in-ten Indians (30%) identify themselves as members of General Category castes, a broad grouping at the top of India’s caste system that includes numerous hierarchies and sub-hierarchies. The highest caste within the General Category is Brahmin, historically the priests and other religious leaders who also served as educators. Just 4% of Indians today identify as Brahmin.

Most Indians say they are outside this General Category group, describing themselves as members of Scheduled Castes (often known as Dalits, or historically by the pejorative term “untouchables”), Scheduled Tribes or Other Backward Classes (including a small percentage who say they are part of Most Backward Classes).

Hindus mirror the general public in their caste composition. Meanwhile, an overwhelming majority of Buddhists say they are Dalits, while about three-quarters of Jains identify as members of General Category castes. Muslims and Sikhs – like Jains – are more likely than Hindus to belong to General Category castes. And about a quarter of Christians belong to Scheduled Tribes, a far larger share than among any other religious community."


View attachment 3262110View attachment 3262113
u don’t understand this census at all. It’s based on economic factors only and these categories are assigned by the government so they can try to better understand society and make reservations accordingly . When people who are surveyed respond to the question, they really only respond with the category the government assigned them in their community certificate or whatever . So let’s be clear that this system here is fully decided by the government. Since the Mughal and British took over India there has been many opportunities for the Muslims to progress economically and socially. India’s independence continued that as well. So even if these Muslim lower castes improved economically and got assigned an OBC doesn’t make them genetically have higher steppe u fucking retard lmao. U legit the typa person to skim through details like an npc and swallow any study or survey that seems to fit ur narrative
 


Keep coping retarded hindu :lul:



"The caste system has existed in some form in India for at least 3,000 years. It is a social hierarchy passed down through families, and it can dictate the professions a person can work in as well as aspects of their social lives, including whom they can marry. While the caste system originally was for Hindus, nearly all Indians today identify with a caste, regardless of their religion.

The survey finds that three-in-ten Indians (30%) identify themselves as members of General Category castes, a broad grouping at the top of India’s caste system that includes numerous hierarchies and sub-hierarchies. The highest caste within the General Category is Brahmin, historically the priests and other religious leaders who also served as educators. Just 4% of Indians today identify as Brahmin.

Most Indians say they are outside this General Category group, describing themselves as members of Scheduled Castes (often known as Dalits, or historically by the pejorative term “untouchables”), Scheduled Tribes or Other Backward Classes (including a small percentage who say they are part of Most Backward Classes).

Hindus mirror the general public in their caste composition. Meanwhile, an overwhelming majority of Buddhists say they are Dalits, while about three-quarters of Jains identify as members of General Category castes. Muslims and Sikhs – like Jains – are more likely than Hindus to belong to General Category castes. And about a quarter of Christians belong to Scheduled Tribes, a far larger share than among any other religious community."


View attachment 3262110View attachment 3262113

Lol "specifically target upper caste muslim community", even though it quite literally shows UP dalit muslims lol. How much more are you going to cope?


"It’s not an offense to say most converts were lower castes either so I think ur just projecting insecurities lil bro coz I can gladly admit most Hindus are low castes lmao"

Lmao hindus definitley use it as a insult lol. Its just a typical casteist insult for hindus to try to show their superiority to us, even though we are literally better looking than you in every way. But anyway, i have no problem admitting that dalit muslims exist, i dont know why you think im denying that. It is a offense to insinuate that most converts are lower castes, especially when you literally dont have any evidence to back it up besides what some ugly 5 foot dark BJP paan spitter tells you on whatever propaganda channels you watch :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:. Most muslim castes have their own history which will clearly tell you their origins.



Anyway your a genetically inferior coping hindu (typical), even after showing you the DNA stats you want to cope lmao. Theres nothing more to be done here.

@Gengar

Look at this, lmao, even after showing these dindus LITERAL DNA PROOF, they still want to cope :forcedsmile:
I didn’t include that one UP muzzie stat and suddenly ur right? Lmao nigga what about all the other tables that don’t prove anything at all jfl? I also clearly mentioned the Andhra table as an example when I asked the question about “ what if they are upper caste Muslim community “. Ur literally braindead. A guy like u thinking a few percentages of dna separates superior and inferior has low iq fr. Any avg Muslim pajeet is literally a clone of any Hindu one lmao autistic fuck
 
Religion has nothing to do with genetics coz it’s just belief. The OP is the only one coming up with stuff like Muslims are superior and they are also upper caste on avg when I’m refuting by saying they are just like any other community in South Asia and Muslims in each region are from the same genetic background as those of other religions but this retard is sending me random ass tables proving nothing jfl
Precisely, religion and genetics are not related and yet these idiots online will try to claim otherwise. Yes, this is especially true for northern Punjabis but not so much for others. Northern Punjabis cluster with each other regardless of religion. I have a few Sikhs as my closest genetic matches and some Hindus too, due to my background as a Northern Punjabi. A lot of Sikhs and Hindus migrated to Eastern Punjab after 1947. My village was overwhelmingly Islamic but we had some Hindus living there too. One of their descendants visited our village some decades later because he wanted to see his ancestral village and that is a heartwarming story of which I won't share the details here, but I can PM if interested.
 
Arent the whitest indians(Kashmiris) muslim??
 
@
Gengar
@Gengar

Look at this, lmao, even after showing these dindus LITERAL DNA PROOF, they still want to cope :forcedsmile:
Using DNA arguments is my trump card against the delulu jeets on plebbit but I have decided instead of using that, to just trigger them by saying the stuff they don't like hearing. 😹😹😹 DNA simply cannot be argued, end of discussion. Like the soycucks say online, "sCiENCe doES nOt CAre abOUt YOUr feElinGs. :soy:"
 
  • +1
Reactions: CFW432
Arent the whitest indians(Kashmiris) muslim??
They (Islamic Kashmiris) don't consider themselves to be Indians and want a separate country (many wanted to join Pakistan, but not anymore). But yes, most Kashmiris are Islamic but they can be divided into two groups. The people from the Valley who are Islamic and lighter and the Pandits who are Hindus and are genetically different to each other. That said, there are light people in other northwestern states too. I have seen Rors who could pass for Slavic due to their coloring. Rors have the largest amount of Steppe ancestry, more than any other ethnic group in South Asia. Jatts also have a lot of Steppe ancestry but I do not think it is as much as Rors. But genotype and phenotype are two different things. I have seen people with high Steppe looking pretty much like your average Punjabi. 😹😹😹😹😹😹😹
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sportsmogger
 
  • +1
Reactions: sportsmogger
They (Islamic Kashmiris) don't consider themselves to be Indians and want a separate country (many wanted to join Pakistan, but not anymore). But yes, most Kashmiris are Islamic but they can be divided into two groups. The people from the Valley who are Islamic and lighter and the Pandits who are Hindus and are genetically different to each other. That said, there are light people in other northwestern states too. I have seen Rors who could pass for Slavic due to their coloring. Rors have the largest amount of Steppe ancestry, more than any other ethnic group in South Asia. Jatts also have a lot of Steppe ancestry but I do not think it is as much as Rors. But genotype and phenotype are two different things. I have seen people with high Steppe looking pretty much like your average Punjabi. 😹😹😹😹😹😹😹
Show me pls
 
The so-called Muslim Rajpoots of Tattistan are actually larpers. Genetically they're the same as local population, but some Ranghars and Rajasthani Rajpoot migrant descendants in Tattistan are legitimate ones. Also the Khatris which came to India from Tattistan in 1947 are also legitimate Kshatriyas who left Kshatriyahood
 
  • +1
Reactions: EatRiceBeNice
The so-called Muslim Rajpoots of Tattistan are actually larpers. Genetically they're the same as local population, but some Ranghars and Rajasthani Rajpoot migrant descendants in Tattistan are legitimate ones. Also the Khatris which came to India from Tattistan in 1947 are also legitimate Kshatriyas who left Kshatriyahood
OP is a recessed skullet subhuman, he just spouts shit to escape his shitty life
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: CFW432 and the_machinist_786
Pakistani detected
 
  • JFL
Reactions: CFW432

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top