Just realized why negro zygos look like shit

dimorphism

dimorphism

Tyronelite Potential
Joined
Aug 23, 2022
Posts
13,336
Reputation
17,916
I never realized why negro zygos looked so ''droopy'' compared to white ones.

1668339793013
1668339853515


At first i thought it could be something of climatic adaptation or robustcity of the arch, but i couldn't find any proof.

As i did my daily skulltism research i encountered an ancient skull and realized:

It's prognathism

''long thin jaws, giving a hollow appearance to the cheek'' - OED

Apparently prognathism chisel the zygos forwardly:

1668340322264
1668340331871
1668340342328


(Ancient hominin, dinka, and upper paleolithic european skulls)


But africans are stuck in this sort of evolutionary limbo where their prognathism is not enough protrusive to chisel their zygos forwardly enough, yet not orthognathous to make them laterally protrusive instead.

Over for us tbh
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS and Racky
I have flat but wide zygos (wide relative to rest of skull)
Is this distinct to any race or just randomly occurring based on ones specific parents?
 
I have flat but wide zygos (wide relative to rest of skull)
Is this distinct to any race or just randomly occurring based on ones specific parents?
i see this most often on gooks, the ones with flat faces but have laterally wide zygos from the front
 
I never realized why negro zygos looked so ''droopy'' compared to white ones.

View attachment 1948422View attachment 1948425

At first i thought it could be something of climatic adaptation or robustcity of the arch, but i couldn't find any proof.

As i did my daily skulltism research i encountered an ancient skull and realized:

It's prognathism

''long thin jaws, giving a hollow appearance to the cheek'' - OED

Apparently prognathism chisel the zygos forwardly:

View attachment 1948437View attachment 1948438View attachment 1948439

(Ancient hominin, dinka, and upper paleolithic european skulls)


But africans are stuck in this sort of evolutionary limbo where their prognathism is not enough protrusive to chisel their zygos forwardly enough, yet not orthognathous to make them laterally protrusive instead.

Over for us tbh
Pardon the low IQ but I don't really understand what you mean.

>''long thin jaws, giving a hollow appearance to the cheek'' - OED
But this citation is referring to mandibular prognathism more specifically "lantern jaws"
1668342308900

Not alveolar prognathism.
Shit like this :
1668342028200


Most blacks don't have mandibular prognathism, the protrusion is moreso alveolar. So this citation is completely irrelevant here.
 
  • +1
Reactions: gymmaxedhorse and dimorphism
Pardon the low IQ but I don't really understand what you mean.

>''long thin jaws, giving a hollow appearance to the cheek'' - OED
But this citation is referring to mandibular prognathism more specifically "lantern jaws"
View attachment 1948478
Not alveolar prognathism.
Shit like this :
View attachment 1948459

Most blacks don't have mandibular prognathism, the protrusion is moreso alveolar. So this citation is completely irrelevant here.
My bad i was sure it was supporting my theory
But ur avi is lol, mukasa is protrusive enough, that's why he zygo-mogs
Blacks should select for prognathic genes ASAP
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: datboijj and Racky
i see this most often on gooks, the ones with flat faces but have laterally wide zygos from the front
they have best bone structure

did u get cucked by asian chad? just say so if u did
 
they have best bone structure

did u get cucked by asian chad? just say so if u did
WTF how did you know i got cucked by a chang recently? maybe I was projecting too hard in my comment.

1668346290836


He looks like this btw.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: gymmaxedhorse
I have flat but wide zygos (wide relative to rest of skull)
Is this distinct to any race or just randomly occurring based on ones specific parents?
Just prenatal t trait
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top