Just try to be a poor black man on South America and see how that shit goes

I said “treated”now it’s whites trying to cater to blacks because they don’t want to be seen as racist no knowing how deeply fucked the black community truly is.
It's a lost cause, blacks are best off in their own nation

That way when they fail there will be no Whitey around to blame
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
It's a lost cause, blacks are best off in their own nation

That way when they fail there will be no Whitey around to blame
Most black nations in the Caribbean’s like Haiti were doomed to fail because of western influence. I think segregation should had never left the USA but blacks are Americans they share nothing culturally to any African anymore
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511 and Danish_Retard
We were here longer than a lot of whites jfl :lul:
Tbqh if you think jfl there is many italians and irishs who live in murica for less time than blacks
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511 and Danish_Retard
No they aren't Americans, they have not assimilated

Why should blacks leave? Because Whites and Blacks are two different biological animals that will never be able to coexist together and the civilization that America was built on was based around White people and their morals and standards of living
How are they not muricans when there is many white muricans who live in murica for far less time than blacks jfl

And what you call "white morals" its just the morals of many nations along history, many of them were not even white to begin with, such as the christianity values that are originally from middle eastern races etc
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
Most black nations in the Caribbean’s like Haiti were doomed to fail because of western influence. I think segregation should had never left the USA but blacks are Americans they share nothing culturally to any African anymore
Cope, Haiti fell all on its own accord before any western nation intervened

Segregation was a temporary solution but the cat is out of the bag and won't happen again, its time for blacks to leave

Blacks are not Americans they never assimilated, its like if a White American was forced to move to England he may be uncomfortable leaving his home nation at first but within a couple generations his children will be fully assimilated
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
How are they not muricans when there is many white muricans who live in murica for far less time than blacks jfl

And what you call "white morals" its just the morals of many nations along history, many of them were not even white to begin with, such as the christianity values that are originally from middle eastern races etc
Cope, Christianity ( New Testament ) was invented before Judaism ( Talmud ) or Islam ( Quran )
 
  • Ugh..
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511, Deleted member 7112 and Uglybrazilian
Cope, Haiti fell all on its own accord before any western nation intervened

Segregation was a temporary solution but the cat is out of the bag and won't happen again, its time for blacks to leave

Blacks are not Americans they never assimilated, its like if a White American was forced to move to England he may be uncomfortable leaving his home nation at first but within a couple generations his children will be fully assimilated
How Haiti was given a billion dollar debt that they had to pay because of them rebelling against their masters. Then they put a ban embargo banning any shipment to Haiti than the USA occupations not recognising Haiti as it’s own nation
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
How Haiti was given a billion dollar debt that they had to pay because of them rebelling against their masters. Then they put a ban embargo banning any shipment to Haiti than the USA occupations not recognising Haiti as it’s own nation
Because the Blacks in Haiti did not maintain the civilzation the French built their, after the French left no new innovations or even mere proper maintence was performed, it crumbled within a short amount of time

Don't give me a sob story every nation has its sorrows, the USA was fighting off the British its entire existence and didn't have the foundation of Haiti, Germany lost two World Wars and still is a major player in the World today
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
2632
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511 and Deleted member 7112
Its funny how there is whites who unironically believe, deep in their hearts, that blacks are privileged bc of affirmative action and whites being prohibited of calling blacks "macacos/monos" jfl

As a black man living in a favela you'll either be a cashier/construction worker or probably get killed by the age of 21 if you try to be a criminal

Your best chance is to become a football player or singer, otherwise you'll either be poor or die young


Why are whites so fuckin spoiled?? Those niggas have the whole world and get mad when blacks/ethnics get small things such as affirmative action or racist words proihibition, or some random tyrone being superman on a movie
Damn man, I used to be more rightist n shiet, but the more time goes by and the more I see how fucked up racism is in Brazil the more I stay on the left
Mainly racism coming from women, Brazilian women are the most racist in the world
Not even chads mulattos like Brian Whittaker do well on my Chadfishies in this shithole
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511, Uglybrazilian and Beetlejuice
Because the Blacks in Haiti did not maintain the civilzation the French built their, after the French left no new innovations or even mere proper maintence was performed, it crumbled within a short amount of time

Don't give me a sob story every nation has its sorrows, the USA was fighting off the British its entire existence and didn't have the foundation of Haiti, Germany lost two World Wars and still is a major player in the World today
They did though how exactly are you supposed to develop with a crazy debt like hati. America was a big place while Haiti is a small islands. Hatit didn’t crumble to nothing after the French the city was still maintained I can show you photos if you like
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
How is that even possible
The age of the text that the religion is based around

The Jews and Muslims both claim their religion was first, before the New Testament, it was just passed down orally for 100's if not 1000's of years before being wrote down
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
Germany was supported
Haiti was not
Because the Blacks in Haiti did not maintain the civilzation the French built their, after the French left no new innovations or even mere proper maintence was performed, it crumbled within a short amount of time

Don't give me a sob story every nation has its sorrows, the USA was fighting off the British its entire existence and didn't have the foundation of Haiti, Germany lost two World Wars and still is a major player in the World today
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
The age of the text that the religion is based around

The Jews and Muslims both claim their religion was first, before the New Testament, it was just passed down orally for 100's if not 1000's of years before being wrote down
Ok but christianity was also passed down orally for much time till it was finally registered in a book, and still christians consider the old testament and its values as divine, specially protestants (ironically, the major religious group in nordic/anglo nations)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
They did though how exactly are you supposed to develop with a crazy debt like hati. America was a big place while Haiti is a small islands. Hatit didn’t crumble to nothing after the French the city was still maintained I can show you photos if you like
The city was maintained when America went in to fix Haiti on 3 seperate occasions

If you are interested in objective truth I recommend you check out a book called " Where Black Rules White: A Journey Across and about Haiti "

Its a very honest book by a British scholar, he makes various observations about Haiti and the people and their way of life

He isn't a white supremacist, he's actually sympathetic to the blacks which is why he decided to visit
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
The city was maintained when America went in to fix Haiti on 3 seperate occasions

If you are interested in objective truth I recommend you check out a book called " Where Black Rules White: A Journey Across and about Haiti "

Its a very honest book by a British scholar, he makes various observations about Haiti and the people and their way of life

He isn't a white supremacist, he's actually sympathetic to the blacks which is why he decided to visit
Again this was around the time with the ban embargo ( meaning that no nation at that time would accept any trade with hatian people and at that time that were currently paying a debt to France so the government couldn’t hire anyone to maintian anything because they were to busy paying France. They didn’t fully pay the debt off until 1947.

most of the people there didn’t want to work the so plantations and sugar fields due to the intense ptsd due to the working conditions by the French this was noted by a lot of visitors. Again it still wouldn’t matter if they did work the fields that French debt stopped any real development in hati for the Perceivable future
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
Damn man, I used to be more rightist n shiet, but the more time goes by and the more I see how fucked up racism is in Brazil the more I stay on the left
As if the left did something to end racism.
Mainly racism coming from women, Brazilian women are the most racist in the world
Not even chads mulattos like Brian Whittaker do well on my Chadfishies in this shithole
middle class women yes
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
Two different races of people living in the same territory has always lead to conflict and there is no possible way to prevent this
Conflict will always arise regardless of how homogeneous the population is so this argument doesn’t make sense. Europeans have had hundreds of wars together.
Now you could mention some West-European countries which haven’t seen any major conflicts within their population for 80 years but that’d be irrelevant, since we’re not exclusively talking about large conflicts ( & the countries themselves haven’t had homogenous populations for decades) and conflict did regularly occur for the vast majority of the continent’s history.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511 and Deleted member 4106
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
Conflict will always arise regardless of how homogeneous the population is so this argument doesn’t make sense. Europeans have had hundreds of wars together.
Now you could mention some West-European countries which haven’t seen any major conflicts within their population for 80 years but that’d be irrelevant, since we’re not exclusively talking about large conflicts ( & the countries themselves haven’t had homogenous populations for decades) and conflict did regularly occur for the vast majority of the continent’s history.
European conflicts don't end in genocide, you deny the fact homogenous nations have less crime and murder ?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
You cry like a woman, must be a nigger.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
European conflicts don't end in genocide,
They sometimes do, but that’s not even the initial point you were making, you were talking about conflicts, not exclusively conflicts resulting in genocides.
you deny the fact homogenous nations have less crime and murder ?
Again, how does this relate to what I said or you initially said?

Less conflict and no conflict isn’t the same.

You made a positive statement “Two different races of people living in the same territory has always lead to conflict” and I told you conflicts will arise regardless of racial diversity, Europe’s broad history being a testament to that.

You can’t just silently retreat from your initial claim, making it seem like you made a reasonable one.

But alright, let’s take a look at what you’re saying, the homogeneity of a nation does play a role in it’s crime statistics (for a plethora of reasons) but so does the poverty, unemployment, poor healthcare, mental illness etc... in a nation so to exclusively look at it while disregarding other factors would be foolish.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511, Danish_Retard and Deleted member 7112
They sometimes do, but that’s not even the initial point you were making, you were talking about conflicts, not exclusively conflicts resulting in genocides.
You made a positive statement “Two different races of people living in the same territory has always lead to conflict” and I told you conflicts will arise regardless of racial diversity, Europe’s broad history being a testament to that.
I should have said European conflicts dont always lead to genocide where as racial conflicts tend to always lead to genocide

Ok, let me say this, two different races of people living in the same territory leads to more conflict than if the nation was homogenous
You can’t just silently retreat from your initial claim, making it seem like you made a reasonable one.

" You speak in absolutes, Im a computer and unable to decipher between exaggeration for verbal effect and literal expressions "
But alright, let’s take a look at what you’re saying, the homogeneity of a nation does play a role in it’s crime statistics (for a plethora of reasons) but so does the poverty, unemployment, poor healthcare, mental illness etc... in a nation so to exclusively look at that while disregarding other factors would be foolish.

Indoctorinated much? America in the 1930's during the Great Depression was far safer and far less crime than today, lets not look at the obvious difference that America is no longer a White Nation no no

lets look at poverty rates and poor healthcare, that must be why there is much more crime nowadays, specifically in areas that don't have a large percentage of Whites living there
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
The user above me got dropped on his head as a baby not once repeatedly
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
Indoctorinated much? America in the 1930's during the Great Depression was far safer and far less crime than today, lets not look at the obvious difference that America is no longer a White Nation no no
In the long term, violent crime in the United States has been in decline since colonial times. The homicide rate has been estimated to be over 30 per 100,000 people in 1700, dropping to under 20 by 1800, and to under 10 by 1900.[3]

After World War II, crime rates increased in the United States, peaking from the 1970s to the early-1990s. Violent crime nearly quadrupled between 1960 and its peak in 1991. Property crime more than doubled over the same period. Since the 1990s, however, contrary to common misconception,[4] crime in the United States has declined steadily, and has significantly declined by the late 1990s and also in the early 2000s.
I should have said European conflicts dont always lead to genocide where as racial conflicts tend to always lead to genocide
literally changing your statement
Indoctorinated much? America in the 1930's during the Great Depression was far safer and far less crime than today, lets not look at the obvious difference that America is no longer a White Nation no no
Great Depression, Second World War, Cold War, Vietnam War. Are you really going to ignore these historic events?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511 and Alexanderr
In the long term, violent crime in the United States has been in decline since colonial times. The homicide rate has been estimated to be over 30 per 100,000 people in 1700, dropping to under 20 by 1800, and to under 10 by 1900.[3]

After World War II, crime rates increased in the United States, peaking from the 1970s to the early-1990s. Violent crime nearly quadrupled between 1960 and its peak in 1991. Property crime more than doubled over the same period. Since the 1990s, however, contrary to common misconception,[4] crime in the United States has declined steadily, and has significantly declined by the late 1990s and also in the early 2000s.
I highly doubt crime has went down in the past decade, need to check that source and see when it was done

Also the homicide rate needs clarificarion, homicide was probably very high in a time when Americans were fighting Brits and Indians
literally changing your statement

Great Depression, Second World War, Cold War, Vietnam War. Are you really going to ignore these historic events?
Those were all caused by Jews, they fund the wars and cause economic depressions with their central banking system

And they arent population killing each other but conflicts between nations

The central bank problem is older than America it goes back to Britain with first Bank, Bank of England

The most violent conflicts in recent history were caused by Communism not war, which is also Jewish
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511 and Deleted member 4106
I should have said European conflicts dont always lead to genocide where as racial conflicts tend to always lead to genocide
So I suppose you admit your intial argument was absolute nonsense then. Great we can agree on that, surprised it took you that long however.
" You speak in absolutes, Im a computer and unable to decipher between exaggeration for verbal effect and literal expressions "
Ah, okay. The “let me conveniently lay down my nonsensical statement as pure hyperbole so I don’t look too stupid”. Fallacy of inductive hyperbole. Over-daring statements of any kind could be called "hyperbole” afterward.
Indoctorinated much? America in the 1930's during the Great Depression was far safer and far less crime than today, lets not look at the obvious difference that America is no longer a White Nation no no

lets look at poverty rates and poor healthcare, that must be why there is much more crime nowadays, specifically in areas that don't have a large percentage of Whites living there
I know you suffer from extreme tunnel vision but this really doesn’t make you look any smarter.

Of course it’d be logical to look at the greater context, identifying the factors at play, how all the factors relate to each other and what the result of them is, instead of looking at one like a moron and coming to brash conclusions.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511, Danish_Retard and Jagged0
So I suppose you admit your intial argument was absolute nonsense then. Great we can agree on that, surprised it took you that long however.

No it wasn't nonsense at all, racial conflicts do to tend to lead to genocide and so is worth noting
Ah, okay. The “let me conveniently lay down my nonsensical statement as pure hyperbole so I don’t look too stupid”. Fallacy of inductive hyperbole. Over-daring statements of any kind could be called "hyperbole” afterward.

Fallacy this, fallacy that, have you ever brought up what exactly is the benefit of having more than once race in the same territory ? Whites are going extinct I would rank that higher on my list than different types of food or music which I could still enjoy by downloading a soundtrack or buying a cookbook
I know you suffer from extreme tunnel vision but this really doesn’t make you look any smarter.

Because my IQ is determined by your opinion of my views
Of course it’d be logical to look at the greater context, identifying the factors at play, how all the factors relate to each other and what the result of them is, instead of looking at one like a moron and coming to brash conclusions.

Yes lets include every single factor under the Sun to determine why things are bad in America now except for the fact America is no longer a White nation, we should look at every other factor of why the Whites killed off the Native Americans surely there were millions of reasons we could investigate besides the fact two different races living in the same territory tends to bring out disastrous results consistently throughout history
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
No it wasn't nonsense at all, racial conflicts do to tend to lead to genocide and so is worth noting
Last time I’ll reiterate everything to you like a toddler.

It absolutely was, besides racial conflicts commonly leading to genocide wasn’t what you originally asserted so you’re seemingly slow or willfully ignoring your initial statement so let me bring it up again.
Two different races of people living in the same territory has always lead to conflict and there is no possible way to prevent this
You later back out of his claim after I point out it’s absolute nonsense, because conflicts happen regardless of racial diversity.
I should have said European conflicts dont always lead to genocide where as racial conflicts tend to always lead to genocide

Fallacy this, fallacy that, have you ever brought up what exactly is the benefit of having more than once race in the same territory ?
Nope, because it’s not my task or really relevant to what I was initially saying.
Because my IQ is determined by your opinion of my views
I doubt it could get any lower even if it was.
Yes lets include every single factor under the Sun to determine why things are bad in America now except for the fact America is no longer a White nation, we should look at every other factor of why the Whites killed off the Native Americans surely there were millions of reasons we could investigate besides the fact two different races living in the same territory tends to bring out disastrous results consistently throughout history
You really do like employing logical fallacies frequently, don’t you?

Alright, here’s a proposition since you’re apparently put off by how often I make note of them (which I wouldn’t have to if you didn’t implement them ceaselessly), I’ll let you guess which one it is this time.

To wrap up this quarrel which has gone long overdue.

Humans (regardless of population homogeneity) will always, at some point reside in conflict of some sort, end of.

If you don’t agree with or understood what was said, I suggest you re-read my posts and maybe they’ll start making sense, maybe.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511 and Danish_Retard
Last time I’ll reiterate everything to you like a toddler.

It absolutely was, besides racial conflicts commonly leading to genocide wasn’t what you originally asserted so you’re seemingly slow or willfully ignoring your initial statement so let me bring it up again.

You later back out of his claim after I point out it’s absolute nonsense, because conflicts happen regardless of racial diversity.



Nope, because it’s not my task or really relevant to what I was initially saying.

I doubt it could get any lower even if it was.

You really do like employing logical fallacies frequently, don’t you?

Alright, here’s a proposition since you’re apparently put off by how often I make note of them (which I wouldn’t have to if you didn’t implement them ceaselessly), I’ll let you guess which one it is this time.

To wrap up this quarrel which has gone long overdue.

Humans (regardless of population homogeneity) will always, at some point reside in conflict of some sort, end of.

If you don’t agree with or understood what was said, I suggest you re-read my posts and maybe they’ll start making sense, maybe.

Sorry bro this giant wall of text and you couldn't make one argument why I should be happy the White Race is going extinct

I dont care if White people get into conflicts, usually instigated by Jews, I care if the White Race lives on

You can deny it all you want but two races living together will end in genocide and the White Race is currently losing numbers at a rapid pace, something which would not happen if they lived homogenously
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511
Sorry bro this giant wall of text and you couldn't make one argument why I should be happy the White Race is going extinct

I dont care if White people get into conflicts, usually instigated by Jews, I care if the White Race lives on

You can deny it all you want but two races living together will end in genocide and the White Race is currently losing numbers at a rapid pace, something which would not happen if they lived homogenously
30C91950 DADF 4E2D ADA5 FC931CC7452D
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13511 and Danish_Retard
Damn man, I used to be more rightist n shiet, but the more time goes by and the more I see how fucked up racism is in Brazil the more I stay on the left
Mainly racism coming from women, Brazilian women are the most racist in the world
Not even chads mulattos like Brian Whittaker do well on my Chadfishies in this shithole
Ja chupou o pau de um negão hoje? Seu baitola 🧐
 

Similar threads

got.daim
Replies
68
Views
3K
joshuaofnavi
joshuaofnavi
D
Replies
72
Views
17K
Deleted member 111512
D
Edgarpill
Replies
49
Views
5K
sillybilly
sillybilly
heightmaxxing
Replies
56
Views
6K
lurking truecel
lurking truecel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top