Reckless Turtle
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2021
- Posts
- 17,314
- Reputation
- 23,992
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I only get tagged by this weird hobbies dude, it's beyond over for me because of not being nt even on org...
The women's fashion shows in Brazil are very stacked.another brazilian gem
Only a khvirgin would consistently belittle women's appearances...Can land a Boeing 747 on that fivehead
From here on out, vote based on the difference between the woman's height and your height (in inches).
Completely average, nearing below average roastie.
Yuck.
Looks like the type of foid that you'd find scrubbing toilets in a hotel.
Her ass is the only part of her body that is pleasing to look at
Meaning ~176 cm?with that body type
no... most girls go for tall guys, but every skinny girls fantasize about tall buff guys... she is skinny + 5'9 so she defo a heightist... idk who her boyfriend or exes look like but I bet they all 6'2 +Meaning ~176 cm?
Meaning ~176 cm?
That's a homosexual stylist and she's seated.View attachment 2411220
only dude she posted on her insta... TALL INCEL... since she 5'9 and he towers over her by a whole head he's prolly 6'4-6'5
I only get tagged by this weird hobbies dude, it's beyond over for me because of not being nt even on org...
I only get tagged by this weird hobbies dude, it's beyond over for me because of not being nt even on org...
4/10
Place your vote.every single girl with that body type is heightist (literally)... she a 0 for me therefore
That's that literal swedish youtube tranny.
Stop trying to drag @HarrierDuBois down to your level.That's that literal swedish youtube tranny.
Sooner or later your stats will start contradicting themselves if you keep voting 5 for everyoneStop trying to drag @HarrierDuBois down to your level.
Source?you keep voting 5 for everyone
You after the amount of people you have rated 10 exceeds its statistical occuranceSource?
Which is?the amount of people you have rated 10
any white female modelWhich is?
You constantly deflect and strawman.any white female model
its called answering the questionYou constantly deflect and strawman.
You've failed to correctly answer two questions in this thread.its called answering the question
the latter i answered and the previous i shut down because its irrevelantYou've failed to correctly answer two questions in this thread.
No, because you didn't give an amount.the latter i answered
It isn't irrelevant because it questions whether you even know what you're arguing.the previous i shut down because its irrevelant
theres no need for thatNo, because you didn't give an amount.
It isn't irrelevant because it questions whether you even know what you're arguing.
There's a need for it if you don't want to look stupid.theres no need for that
You would need to provide a source to determinecome on reckless turtle, you arent a sheep use common sense. i dont need to compile sources over your own behaviour which you are already intuitvely aware of
whether you even know what you're arguing.
She is 0.75 standard deviations below the mean
Its over for my plates
Im stuck being manlet forever
there is no need to provide sources if it alreadys preemptively understood its your own behaviour its granted that you are familiarized with it and you already know the source is your own post history. dont play retardedThere's a need for it if you don't want to look stupid.
You would need to provide a source to determine
Deflection and strawman, as expected.there is no need to provide sources if it alreadys preemptively understood its your own behaviour its granted that you are familiarized with it and you already know the source is your own post history.
Ironic (or maybe not).dont play retarded
everything is of relevance, whether you are unable to comprehend it or not is purely on your own sake.Deflection and strawman, as expected.
Still waiting on you to support these claims. Until you do, you're just rambling.i make a claim
you keep voting 5 for everyone
the amount of people you have rated 10
again, i dont need to draw it out for youStill waiting on you to support these claims. Until you do, you're just rambling.
you keep voting 5
Source?
you already know the source is your own post history
again, i dont need to draw it out for you
There's a need for it if you don't want to look stupid.
being unable to use common sense yesThere's a need for it if you don't want to look stupid.
Which you've been doing this entire time.being unable to use common sense
Which you've been doing this entire time.
you keep voting 5
Source?
you already know the source is your own post history
That's that literal swedish youtube tranny.
Place your vote.She is 0.75 standard deviations below the mean