Karl Marx disproves the derivative

RichCoopersRoomate

RichCoopersRoomate

Im a pretty high value guy
Joined
Jun 14, 2026
Posts
355
Reputation
770
1784432398100


Calculus has fallen, its over

@Wicket @imontheloose
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Saint Casanova, Bars, overtier1011 and 6 others
Interesting
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Alienmaxxer and RichCoopersRoomate

Attachments

  • 61D4A67F-FFA0-49D5-9A2D-64C9463A4DB3.jpeg
    61D4A67F-FFA0-49D5-9A2D-64C9463A4DB3.jpeg
    63.8 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: Bars and RichCoopersRoomate
Fuck that nigga
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Reinhard_Heini and RichCoopersRoomate
My fav marx moment was when he called lassalle a jewish nigger
 
  • JFL
Reactions: RichCoopersRoomate
What a retard
ok tbf he was writing this before Calculus was rigorously defined. Before people like Cauchy, Weierstrass, Riemann etc developed analysis Calculus was seen with extreme skepticism. Somewhat understandably, its easy to see why the behavior infinitesimals could seem like a ridiculous concept, and it was indeed seen as such by many.
1784475814135


For example alot of proofs in physics rely on the idea of higher order differentials like df*dg being treated as 0. Which I admittedly was skeptical of until I was shown when this assumption is true and when it fails using analysis. So I find the early skepticism towards calculus understandable.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Alienmaxxer
ok tbf he was writing this before Calculus was rigorously defined. Before people like Cauchy, Weierstrass, Riemann etc developed analysis Calculus was seen with extreme skepticism. Somewhat understandably, its easy to see why the behavior infinitesimals could seem like a ridiculous concept, and it was indeed seen as such by many.
View attachment 5386140

For example alot of proofs in physics rely on the idea of higher order differentials like df*dg being treated as 0. Which I admittedly was skeptical of until I was shown when this assumption is true and when it fails using analysis. So I find the early skepticism towards calculus understandable.
I mean i have a bachelors in math so i know what you’re saying, but those quotes are from pre-19th century. Marx was 19th century and was writing after cauchy and weierstrass already made calculus rigorous (which is around 1820). So this nigga doesn’t even have that excuse jfl he’s just being a dumbass
 
  • JFL
Reactions: RichCoopersRoomate
I know nothing about even basic math but what is even supposed to be the contradiction here?
 
I know nothing about even basic math but what is even supposed to be the contradiction here?
Because the differential is not just “zero” , nor is dy/dx a fraction. The derivative is a limiting value, meant to describe the local behavior of a function.
 
Last edited:
I mean i have a bachelors in math so i know what you’re saying, but those quotes are from pre-19th century. Marx was 19th century and was writing after cauchy and weierstrass already made calculus rigorous (which is around 1820). So this nigga doesn’t even have that excuse jfl he’s just being a dumbass
over for marx then
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Alienmaxxer

Similar threads

shandingo
Replies
24
Views
233
shandingo
shandingo
Looksmarxer67
Replies
2
Views
36
Looksmarxer67
Looksmarxer67
foidkiller42
Replies
14
Views
52
Whatever
Whatever
speak
Replies
8
Views
121
iblameeian
iblameeian

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →