RichCoopersRoomate
Im a pretty high value guy
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2026
- Posts
- 355
- Reputation
- 770
Calculus has fallen, its over
@Wicket @imontheloose
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
its funny how mathematicians still haven't realized thisInteresting
Marx was kinda interesting, clearly misunderstood,: he was labelling himself a aryan, while believing the Russians were moscovian tartars, i’d say it’s based
What a retard
bro I couldn't stop laughing when i saw thisWhat a retard
ok tbf he was writing this before Calculus was rigorously defined. Before people like Cauchy, Weierstrass, Riemann etc developed analysis Calculus was seen with extreme skepticism. Somewhat understandably, its easy to see why the behavior infinitesimals could seem like a ridiculous concept, and it was indeed seen as such by many.What a retard
Funny considering marx himself was a jewMy fav marx moment was when he called lassalle a jewish nigger
no way bruv< Hal pfp
< Never read usogui![]()
no way bruv![]()
Nigga of course i have< Hal pfp
< Never read usogui![]()
I mean i have a bachelors in math so i know what you’re saying, but those quotes are from pre-19th century. Marx was 19th century and was writing after cauchy and weierstrass already made calculus rigorous (which is around 1820). So this nigga doesn’t even have that excuse jfl he’s just being a dumbassok tbf he was writing this before Calculus was rigorously defined. Before people like Cauchy, Weierstrass, Riemann etc developed analysis Calculus was seen with extreme skepticism. Somewhat understandably, its easy to see why the behavior infinitesimals could seem like a ridiculous concept, and it was indeed seen as such by many.
View attachment 5386140
For example alot of proofs in physics rely on the idea of higher order differentials like df*dg being treated as 0. Which I admittedly was skeptical of until I was shown when this assumption is true and when it fails using analysis. So I find the early skepticism towards calculus understandable.
Because the differential is not just “zero” , nor is dy/dx a fraction. The derivative is a limiting value, meant to describe the local behavior of a function.I know nothing about even basic math but what is even supposed to be the contradiction here?
over for marx thenI mean i have a bachelors in math so i know what you’re saying, but those quotes are from pre-19th century. Marx was 19th century and was writing after cauchy and weierstrass already made calculus rigorous (which is around 1820). So this nigga doesn’t even have that excuse jfl he’s just being a dumbass