OneTwoThree
Everyone will be ugly sooner or later.
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2022
- Posts
- 1,315
- Reputation
- 1,726
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
CopeKeynes and Marx were correct.
Keynes is the reason our economy is dogshit and Marx was a commie jewKeynes and Marx were correct.
Keynes is right. If you implement austerity via classical economics, you automatically send the economy into a Depression.Hayek was right and his policies should be implemented
Keynes is the reason our economy is dogshit and Marx was a commie jew
Depression is inevitable. The best thing to do is nothing as the market will regulate itself. Intervening in the market will make everything worseKeynes is right. If you implement austerity via classical economics, you automatically send the economy into a Depression.
Depression is inevitable. The best thing to do is nothing as the market will regulate itself. Intervening in the market will make everything worse
I'm not ancap or libertarian, but they are right on economics that's just a fact.Not arguing with ancap bullshit
noKeynes and Marx were correct.
Recently (1-2 months ago), Gisele Bündchen was invited to attend a party and she received a fee of $600,000 just for her presence. Meanwhile, the waiters who worked at the party were paid only $50 for that night. Marx's theory of surplus value implies that the value of something is intrinsic to the labor/effort/difficulty it took to produce. Tell me, who do you think had more work during that party? Why did Gisele Bündchen received hundreds of thousands of dollars that night while the waiters, who clearly had more work to do by serving and entertaining the customers, earned much less? Marx's theory of surplus value is complete bullshit.Keynes and Marx were correct.
this is very low iqRecently (1-2 months ago), Gisele Bündchen was invited to attend a party and she received a fee of $600,000 just for her presence. Meanwhile, the waiters who worked at the party were paid only $50 for that night. Marx's theory of surplus value implies that the value of something is intrinsic to the labor/effort/difficulty it took to produce. Tell me, who do you think had more work during that party? Why did Gisele Bündchen received hundreds of thousands of dollars that night while the waiters, who clearly had more work to do by serving and entertaining the customers, earned much less? Marx's theory of surplus value is complete bullshit.
wdym, did i said something wrong?this is very low iq
You have clearly never actually read Marx, David Ricardo or any classical/neoclassical economist for that matter (and the Austrian School of Economics is literally meme-tier economics, that shit only has relevance because it serves the status quo).wdym, did i said something wrong?
Austrian school of economics is the only right one, the rest are the terraplanists of economyYou have clearly never actually read Marx, David Ricardo or any classical/neoclassical economist for that matter (and the Austrian School of Economics is literally meme-tier economics, that shit only has relevance because it serves the status quo).
Go read the classics and do an economics course on the side, thank me later, I'm speaking from my personal experience as a former ancap (meme ideology).Austrian school of economics is the only right one, the rest are the terraplanists of economy
Austrian school of economics is the only right one, the rest are the terraplanists of economy
none of these theories matter when you're comparing them on paper, just look a the outcomes. keynesian economics is a disaster wherever it is adopted. it's the commie's foot in the door that's why they love it. they love the idea, not because it works.
I'm not ancap or libertarian, but they are right on economics that's just a fact.
Cope
Hayek was right and his policies should be implemented
Keynes is the reason our economy is dogshit
IslamYour ideology only helps the wealthy, which you will never become. Social mobility is incredibly difficult, and without ways to help the lower class, the poor have no chance of becoming wealthy.
Prove it
Cope
none of these theories matter when you're comparing them on paper, just look a the outcomes. keynesian economics is a disaster wherever it is adopted. it's the commie's foot in the door that's why they love it. they love the idea, not because it works.
this is very low iq
Opinions on @Sprinkles being a Keynesian and in favor of central bankingKeynes and Marx were correct.
Marx was a retard.Keynes and Marx were correct.
hes an archonic evil kali yuga semitic saturnic satanic middle easternerOpinions on @Sprinkles being a Keynesian and in favor of central banking
Yeah but had no solution. Just like black pillers about life. We know the truth but can’t do anything about itKeynes and Marx were correct.
No they were not correct. Keynes was an evil faggot and Marx was a kikeYeah but had no solution. Just like black pillers about life. We know the truth but can’t do anything about it
@Sprinkles is this the reason why ur a Keynesian because ur satanic?hes an archonic evil kali yuga semitic saturnic satanic middle easterner
Marx was right on point about where capitalism will eventually lead. Everything he said would happen is literally happening I don’t give a fuck if he is a Jew faggot when what he said was trueNo they were not correct. Keynes was an evil faggot and Marx was a kike
@Sprinkles is this the reason why ur a Keynesian because ur satanic?
No he was a faggot. @Jason Voorhees @Michael Myers fuck keynesKeynes was right.
Didn't see an argument.No he was a faggot. @Jason Voorhees @Michael Myers fuck keynes
capitalism is crap but communism is way worse, my famiy's pigs were taken in the 80s for example, and in the 40s my great great grandfather was taken to the gulagI. After seceding from the USSR, Estonia's poverty rate increased from 1% to 37%.If capitalism is better, explain it
II. Latvia seceded from the Soviet Union in 1991. As a result of the bourgeois counterrevolution, Latvia's poverty rate increased from 1% in the late 1980s to 22% in 1995.
III. Due to the capitalist counterrevolution, poverty increased from 1% in the late 1980s to 30% in 1994. In 2009, the IMF cut wages for Lithuanian health and education workers by 20% to 40%.
IV. In December 1989, the West pressured the GDR into adopting a 3:1 exchange rate between the Eastern and Western currencies even though the eastern mark had a much higher purchasing power for basic consumer goods. Westerners flowed into the GDR and plundered the country by buying commodities for less than 10% of their normal prices using the new exchange rate.
The majority of East Germans only began to support unification in 1990, when Westerners had dropped the GDR's standard of living by more than two-thirds by shopping there with the 3:1 exchange rate. At this time, they still wanted a left-wing government. Western conservatives promised to establish a 1:1 exchange rate if bourgeois parties won the GDR's elections, leading those parties to narrowly win the 1990 elections and impose a capitalist counterrevolution.