King Leopold II is innocent

foidkiller42

foidkiller42

never look at a face for too long
Joined
Apr 17, 2026
Posts
260
Reputation
159
King Leopold never killed 10 million Africans during his reign, when he came gained rule over the Congo, he freed MANY African slaves that had been held there by arab slave traders, many of which left to go back to their homes, this caused a famine due to the lack of free labour, which resulted in 1-2 million dead, these 2 factors are the main factors why the Congo's population decreased after Leopold took control, also, the Belgians didn't chop their hands off, most of the time when someone committed a crime like stealing it would usually be either another Congolese or a Arab trying to enforce the old laws that had been in place before the Belgians took ownership of the areas, for some this is sad news, that Leopold wasn't a -10 million 🥷🏿 killer, the idea that the belgians committed all these atrocities was first stated by the writer Adam Hochschild, a man of Jewish Germanic descent
1783366442914
, hence his name. Adam Hochschild took the chance to produce anti White Belgian propaganda in his book, "King Leopold's ghost". The jews see the the white race as their enemy, which would explain why he even decided to make the book, and since there was such little discussion of the Congo, he probably saw it as a great opportunity to twist the events in the Congo to frame the Belgians. by making it a book he knew idiots would believe it without a second thought.
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteegyptian
bruh this actually took me some time why is no one seeing this
 
King Leopold never killed 10 million Africans during his reign, when he came gained rule over the Congo, he freed MANY African slaves that had been held there by arab slave traders, many of which left to go back to their homes, this caused a famine due to the lack of free labour, which resulted in 1-2 million dead, these 2 factors are the main factors why the Congo's population decreased after Leopold took control, also, the Belgians didn't chop their hands off, most of the time when someone committed a crime like stealing it would usually be either another Congolese or a Arab trying to enforce the old laws that had been in place before the Belgians took ownership of the areas, for some this is sad news, that Leopold wasn't a -10 million 🥷🏿 killer, the idea that the belgians committed all these atrocities was first stated by the writer Adam Hochschild, a man of Jewish Germanic descentView attachment 5324161, hence his name. Adam Hochschild took the chance to produce anti White Belgian propaganda in his book, "King Leopold's ghost". The jews see the the white race as their enemy, which would explain why he even decided to make the book, and since there was such little discussion of the Congo, he probably saw it as a great opportunity to twist the events in the Congo to frame the Belgians. by making it a book he knew idiots would believe it without a second thought.
Disagree
 
King Leopold never killed 10 million Africans during his reign, when he came gained rule over the Congo, he freed MANY African slaves that had been held there by arab slave traders, many of which left to go back to their homes, this caused a famine due to the lack of free labour, which resulted in 1-2 million dead, these 2 factors are the main factors why the Congo's population decreased after Leopold took control, also, the Belgians didn't chop their hands off, most of the time when someone committed a crime like stealing it would usually be either another Congolese or a Arab trying to enforce the old laws that had been in place before the Belgians took ownership of the areas, for some this is sad news, that Leopold wasn't a -10 million 🥷🏿 killer, the idea that the belgians committed all these atrocities was first stated by the writer Adam Hochschild, a man of Jewish Germanic descentView attachment 5324161, hence his name. Adam Hochschild took the chance to produce anti White Belgian propaganda in his book, "King Leopold's ghost". The jews see the the white race as their enemy, which would explain why he even decided to make the book, and since there was such little discussion of the Congo, he probably saw it as a great opportunity to twist the events in the Congo to frame the Belgians. by making it a book he knew idiots would believe it without a second thought.
water, he didn't do shit

1783367674136
 
id rather live nexto mongoloid russian gopniks then indians
as much as i hate browns. i'd take the brownest dirtiest indian over a russian. russians are just unbearable. though other slavs like ukrainians are ok.
 
as much as i hate browns. i'd take the brownest dirtiest indian over a russian. russians are just unbearable. though other slavs like ukrainians are ok.
do u consider lithuanians as slavs?
 

Similar threads

Polish_Looksmaxer
Replies
1
Views
22
ngannou
N
spezisigma
Replies
1
Views
16
spezisigma
spezisigma
Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
Replies
17
Views
144
zennn
zennn
TheGreatDetective
Serious The WHITE KING
Replies
17
Views
115
Chadeep
Chadeep
g4rlic
Replies
3
Views
17
g4rlic
g4rlic

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top