Deleted member 14543
Selling High Quality Ropes At Competitive Prices
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2021
- Posts
- 3,286
- Reputation
- 6,367
What is it that makes conor look so masculine and good compared to the interviewer. He looks like a little bitch.
So far I've worked out:
Interviewer has a recessed little bitch boy jaw.
Conor has a good chin to begin with but also imitates more forward growth with the shape of his beard - looks masculine as fuck
Conors Skin fade looks younger, slicker and more intimidating
Conors short on top looks masculine af as you would expect
Conors neck looks bigger = more masculine
Conor has more of a colour, the other guy is pastey as fuck = unhealthy
The interviewer has a pointy skinny upturned woman-like nose = feminine
Dressing the part. Conors suit mogs the interviewers suit. But the interviewer couldve just got a $200 not checkered suit and got it tailored for cheap and be on par with conor
Maybe more prominent zygos and brow ridge due to genetics or due to the fact that conor has been involuntarily bone smashing for the last 20 years
Can you guys spot anything else?
Do you think this guy could be on par with mcgregors look and masculinity if he: got a nicer suit, mewed, got a forward growth imitating beard, got a skinfade, got a bit of colour (beta carotene), trained to increase frame size + neck size?