Let’s see who of you incels is the smartest.

[emeraldglass]

Answer me this, and let’s see who is the smartest of you all.

Spoiler: Answer

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

The store didn't lose any money. Here's why:

1. The man stole a $100 bill from the register, which was the store's money. So, initially, the store lost $100.

2. However, the man used that stolen $100 bill to purchase $70 worth of goods. This means the store received the stolen money back as part of the purchase.

3. The man received $30 in change. This change came from the store's register, but it's part of the $100 he initially stole.

So, in the end, the store didn't lose any additional money. It's essentially back to where it started, having lost $100 due to the theft.

 

[Aypo129]

100

 

[longjohnmong]

$30 plus the cost of the $70 worth of goods, provided the guy wouldn't have spent the $70 at the store if he hadn't stolen the money. If he was already planning on spending $70 then the store lost $100.

 

[Aypo129]

Unironically the kind of shit @Dr. Bludy would do irl

 

[Dr. Bludy]

30$

 

[emeraldglass]

30$

Wrong. Click the spoiler for the answer.

 

[Dr. Bludy]

Wrong. Click the spoiler for the answer.

No Ik im right

 

[Deleted member 43403]

Ain't Reading Allat

 

[emeraldglass]

No Ik im right

 

[Dr. Bludy]

View attachment 2462847

We are the clowns...

 

[Deleted member 31971]

I’m not the manager , so there is no answer

 

[Sprinkles]

 

[Primalsplit]

Store lost a 100$ in total, but then they also did some business off of 70$ worth of goods. So the store lost 100$ but then made whatever profit they would make from 70$ trade.

Is this a fucking trick question? It's literally so easy.

 

[Dr. Bludy]

Store lost a 100$ in total, but then they also did some business off of 70$ worth of goods. So the store lost 100$ but then made whatever profit they would make from 70$.

Is this a fucking trick question? It's literally so easy.

Dumbass nigher he went with a 100bill he bought 70$ of goods so the only money the store lost is 30$ YOU STUPID MIDWITS!!!

 

[Deleted member 19442]

Store lost a 100$ in total, but then they also did some business off of 70$ worth of goods. So the store lost 100$ but then made whatever profit they would make from 70$ trade.

Is this a fucking trick question? It's literally so easy.

Brutal common sense pill.

 

[emeraldglass]

Store lost a 100$ in total, but then they also did some business off of 70$ worth of goods. So the store lost 100$ but then made whatever profit they would make from 70$ trade.

Is this a fucking trick question? It's literally so easy.

Are you certain you didn't take a peek at the spoiler beforehand?

 

[Deleted member 4397]

 

[Gengar]

I must be dumb because my answer is $0.

 

[HighCasteJew]

100$

 

[Dr. Bludy]

ITS 30$ STUPID FAGG STOP LYING

 

[emeraldglass]

I must be dumb because my answer is $0.

De winkel heeft geen EXTRA geld verloren. Hier is waarom:

1. De man stal een briefje van $100 uit de kassa, wat het geld van de winkel was. Dus in eerste instantie verloor de winkel $100.

2. Echter, de man gebruikte dat gestolen briefje van $100 om goederen ter waarde van $70 te kopen. Dit betekent dat de winkel het gestolen geld terugkreeg als onderdeel van de aankoop.

3. De man ontving $30 wisselgeld. Dit wisselgeld kwam uit de kassa van de winkel, maar het maakte deel uit van de $100 die hij aanvankelijk had gestolen.

Dus, uiteindelijk heeft de winkel geen extra geld verloren. Het is in wezen terug waar het begon, nadat het $100 verloor als gevolg van de diefstal.

 

[_MVP_]

I dont know its mindfuck to think about it

Intuitively i would say 100

 

[Gengar]

De winkel heeft geen EXTRA geld verloren. Hier is waarom:

1. De man stal een briefje van $100 uit de kassa, wat het geld van de winkel was. Dus in eerste instantie verloor de winkel $100.

2. Echter, de man gebruikte dat gestolen briefje van $100 om goederen ter waarde van $70 te kopen. Dit betekent dat de winkel het gestolen geld terugkreeg als onderdeel van de aankoop.

3. De man ontving $30 wisselgeld. Dit wisselgeld kwam uit de kassa van de winkel, maar het maakte deel uit van de $100 die hij aanvankelijk had gestolen.

Dus, uiteindelijk heeft de winkel geen extra geld verloren. Het is in wezen terug waar het begon, nadat het $100 verloor als gevolg van de diefstal.

Dus het antwoord is $0?

 

[Magnum Opus]

Lol at the monkeys in this thread.
The store owner lost 100$ because he gave the customer the goods for free, as the customer paid the owner with the owner's money.
He gave out 70$ in goods + the 30$ change so GG, say goodbye to 100$.

 

[Yliaster]

fun fact : most people are googling the answer/s

only fooling yourself btw

 

[iam good boy]

View attachment 2462837
Answer me this, and let’s see who is the smartest of you all.

Spoiler: Answer

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

The store didn't lose any money. Here's why:

1. The man stole a $100 bill from the register, which was the store's money. So, initially, the store lost $100.

2. However, the man used that stolen $100 bill to purchase $70 worth of goods. This means the store received the stolen money back as part of the purchase.

3. The man received $30 in change. This change came from the store's register, but it's part of the $100 he initially stole.

So, in the end, the store didn't lose any additional money. It's essentially back to where it started, having lost $100 due to the theft.

He still didnt lost the virginity

 

[emeraldglass]

Dus het antwoord is $0?

0 extra dollars maar in totaal 100 dollar

 

[Yliaster]

Google is the real MVP of this thread

the app which can make anyone seem smart

 

[Deleted member 14693]

I must be dumb because my answer is $0.

And you study computer science?

 

[Supreme]

The store didn't lose any money. Here's why:

1. The man stole a $100 bill from the register, which was the store's money. So, initially, the store lost $100.

2. However, the man used that stolen $100 bill to purchase $70 worth of goods. This means the store received the stolen money back as part of the purchase.

3. The man received $30 in change. This change came from the store's register, but it's part of the $100 he initially stole.

So, in the end, the store didn't lose any additional money. It's essentially back to where it started, having lost $100 due to the theft.

 

[Deleted member 41390]

Then he proceeds to shoot the cashier in the face and clear the register. So however much was in the register. Boom. 200iq. Killyourself I’m a a genius.

 

[Magnum Opus]

Then he proceeds to shoot the cashier in the face and clear the register. So however much was in the register. Boom. 200iq. Killyourself I’m a a genius.

Peter Griffin tier answer

 

[Deleted member 41390]

Peter Griffin tier answer

Peter genius.

 

[Primalsplit]

Dumbass nigher he went with a 100bill he bought 70$ of goods so the only money the store lost is 30$ YOU STUPID MIDWITS!!!

Then the store lost 70$ worth of goods. What about that?

 

[Primalsplit]

Are you certain you didn't take a peek at the spoiler beforehand?

Well, some of us have brains.

 

[Dr. Bludy]

Then the store lost 70$ worth of goods. What about that?

Atleast my answers was original you just clicked the spoiler you sheep

 

[AspiringMogger]

Store lose $70 in assets, and $30 cash

 

[emeraldglass]

The store didn't lose any money. Here's why:

1. The man stole a $100 bill from the register, which was the store's money. So, initially, the store lost $100.

2. However, the man used that stolen $100 bill to purchase $70 worth of goods. This means the store received the stolen money back as part of the purchase.

3. The man received $30 in change. This change came from the store's register, but it's part of the $100 he initially stole.

So, in the end, the store didn't lose any additional money. It's essentially back to where it started, having lost $100 due to the theft.

Literally just copied my answer from the spoiler

 

[Primalsplit]

Atleast my answers was original you just clicked the spoiler you sheep

You're just cringe. Your math is wrong, your is iq low, your answers are incorrect. Don't cope with "muh original answer".

And I didn't open the spoiler before answering.

 

[Gengar]

And you study computer science?

Yes. Problem?

 

[Gengar]

0 extra dollars maar in totaal 100 dollar

Brutal. Ik ben kankerdom.

 

[emeraldglass]

Brutal. Ik ben kankerdom.

Nee zeker niet. Ik moest zelf ook even nadenken en focussen voor het antwoordt. De vraag is zo ontworpen om je hoofdpijn te bezorgen.

 

[Gengar]

Nee zeker niet. Ik moest zelf ook even nadenken en focussen voor het antwoordt. De vraag is zo ontworpen om je hoofdpijn te bezorgen.

Ik studeer computer science, ik heb al genoeg hoofdpijn. Discrete wiskunde, lineaire algebra, programmeren..

 

[emeraldglass]

Ik studeer computer science, ik heb al genoeg hoofdpijn. Discrete wiskunde, lineaire algebra, programmeren..

Discrete wiskunde? Zo discreet dat niemand het snapt.

 

[Gengar]

Discrete wiskunde? Zo discreet dat niemand het snapt.

Behalve de ekte ekte nerds.

 

[Bojack]

100 dollars

 

[emeraldglass]

Behalve de ekte ekte nerds.

Over for not nerdcels

 

[Gengar]

Over for not nerdcels

Was ik maar een nerd. Dan sliep ik door deze studie.

 

[emeraldglass]

Was ik maar een nerd. Dan sliep ik door deze studie.

Hoe gaat het eigenlijk met je studie? Ik veronderstel dat je nu je vrije tijd veel meer waardeert dan vroeger, of niet?

 

[Gengar]

Hoe gaat het eigenlijk met je studie? Ik veronderstel dat je nu je vrije tijd veel meer waardeert dan vroeger, of niet?

Ik heb best wel veel vrije tijd om eerlijk te zijn maar het zijn wel lange dagen. Ik zit van 9 tot 4 meestal. Studie is wel lastig omdat ik nooit goed was met wiskunde en het zijn juist wiskundige modelen waarop gefocust wordt maar ik kom er wel als ik gewoon aandachtig leer en dergelijke. Hoe gaat het bij jou, bhai?