Aypo129
Luminary
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2022
- Posts
- 7,798
- Reputation
- 10,142
While
Authoritarian Monarchy
Dictatorship of all kinds
And Socialism/Communism/Fascism/Natsoc
...are vastly inferior to democracy.
A Liberal Monarchy is superior to Democracy which is also inferior to Anarcho-Capitalist.
Let me give you reason why
Monarchs, unlike democratic rulers, tend to have preferences of Long time saving rule aka enhancing state reserves; therefore, they avoid, if at all possible, wars and high taxes for fear of hurting the state’s long-term capital value. Second, there is a clear distinction between rulers and ruled under a monarchy; this “class consciousness,” as encourages the public to resist governmental excesses
States, by nature, tend to expand, as the rulers try to increase the amount of territory under their jurisdiction. Furthermore, rulers will tend to confiscate wealth at an increasing rate. In short, a state’s rulers naturally utilize its resources for their own benefit.
In a monarchy, the royal family “owns” the state, since the reigning monarch maintains control of the state until his death, passing ownership to his heir. The state is, in effect, privately owned
A monarch will tax his subjects, but he will keep taxes as low as possible because, since he literally “owns” the state, he has an incentive to keep his subjects as productive as possible. High taxes ultimately decrease the state’s long-term capital value because, when people produce things of value, they expect to profit from their work.
However, if taxes are high, they have little incentive to keep producing, as the fruits of their labor will only go to the state. Therefore, as taxes increase, productivity decreases. High taxes, then, reduce the state’s long-term capital value and, therefore, the monarch’s future tax revenue.
As a result, monarchs tend to have low time preferences and thus keep taxes low to maintain the capital value of their taxation monopoly. In fact, monarchs frequently ran their own “normal” businesses so that they did not have to support themselves exclusively with tax revenue.
I will give you an example of this
Currently both Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates Dubai are some of the fastest growing nations and cities because of their nature of monarchy with any given time highest savings rate of 40% and Very high levels of societal stability
Some people may say for example they are inferior in terms of Natural rights provided to citizens of United states
This is inherently the wrong argument to make regarding these society.
These Cities and Meccas inherently do not incorporate these natural rights as their society prefers this culture and way of living
This is in direct contrast to Liechtenstien which was also monarchy for very long time where there is much more natural rights and Same levels of success
I would say that United states is currently Inferior to Dubai,Cayman islands, Liechtenstien etc. as the US although founded in a superior construction of BOTH natural rights and economic freedom is currently performing mediocre in Both these categories .
There is for example the 2nd amendment which is in my opinion the most important right written in any constitution which has been distorted to only MEAN people can have guns
People should have guns AND there should be no standing millitary that is superior to the militia of the STATE
When Americans vote to increase millitary budget or atleast allow such gigantic federal millitary to exist THEY ARE VIOLATING the 2nd amendment.
America also has high progressive taxes,higher corporate taxes than canada and most importantly a worldwide recipient tax with 8000 pages of regulations.
So WHILE DUBAI,Cayman islands, Saudi arabia are specific society that do not base themselves over the Natural rights instead choosing outdated religion
they are still successful more so than america since they are working on the basis of their own model and morality.
i won't even talk about Europe/Britain/other place
Their Monarchy and democracy both are a failure
TLDR-> there is no tldr this time read this it's something that might give you a different perspective
Authoritarian Monarchy
Dictatorship of all kinds
And Socialism/Communism/Fascism/Natsoc
...are vastly inferior to democracy.
A Liberal Monarchy is superior to Democracy which is also inferior to Anarcho-Capitalist.
Let me give you reason why
Monarchs, unlike democratic rulers, tend to have preferences of Long time saving rule aka enhancing state reserves; therefore, they avoid, if at all possible, wars and high taxes for fear of hurting the state’s long-term capital value. Second, there is a clear distinction between rulers and ruled under a monarchy; this “class consciousness,” as encourages the public to resist governmental excesses
States, by nature, tend to expand, as the rulers try to increase the amount of territory under their jurisdiction. Furthermore, rulers will tend to confiscate wealth at an increasing rate. In short, a state’s rulers naturally utilize its resources for their own benefit.
In a monarchy, the royal family “owns” the state, since the reigning monarch maintains control of the state until his death, passing ownership to his heir. The state is, in effect, privately owned
A monarch will tax his subjects, but he will keep taxes as low as possible because, since he literally “owns” the state, he has an incentive to keep his subjects as productive as possible. High taxes ultimately decrease the state’s long-term capital value because, when people produce things of value, they expect to profit from their work.
However, if taxes are high, they have little incentive to keep producing, as the fruits of their labor will only go to the state. Therefore, as taxes increase, productivity decreases. High taxes, then, reduce the state’s long-term capital value and, therefore, the monarch’s future tax revenue.
As a result, monarchs tend to have low time preferences and thus keep taxes low to maintain the capital value of their taxation monopoly. In fact, monarchs frequently ran their own “normal” businesses so that they did not have to support themselves exclusively with tax revenue.
I will give you an example of this
Currently both Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates Dubai are some of the fastest growing nations and cities because of their nature of monarchy with any given time highest savings rate of 40% and Very high levels of societal stability
Some people may say for example they are inferior in terms of Natural rights provided to citizens of United states
This is inherently the wrong argument to make regarding these society.
These Cities and Meccas inherently do not incorporate these natural rights as their society prefers this culture and way of living
This is in direct contrast to Liechtenstien which was also monarchy for very long time where there is much more natural rights and Same levels of success
I would say that United states is currently Inferior to Dubai,Cayman islands, Liechtenstien etc. as the US although founded in a superior construction of BOTH natural rights and economic freedom is currently performing mediocre in Both these categories .
There is for example the 2nd amendment which is in my opinion the most important right written in any constitution which has been distorted to only MEAN people can have guns
People should have guns AND there should be no standing millitary that is superior to the militia of the STATE
When Americans vote to increase millitary budget or atleast allow such gigantic federal millitary to exist THEY ARE VIOLATING the 2nd amendment.
America also has high progressive taxes,higher corporate taxes than canada and most importantly a worldwide recipient tax with 8000 pages of regulations.
So WHILE DUBAI,Cayman islands, Saudi arabia are specific society that do not base themselves over the Natural rights instead choosing outdated religion
they are still successful more so than america since they are working on the basis of their own model and morality.
i won't even talk about Europe/Britain/other place
Their Monarchy and democracy both are a failure
TLDR-> there is no tldr this time read this it's something that might give you a different perspective
