life is either painful or boring

[wollet2]

then you die and repeat

 

[Abhorrence]

boredom is painful

 

[wollet2]

boredom is painful

i guess. boredom is the least pain we can get

 

[Reckless Turtle]

repeat

So you're Hindi now?

 

[wollet2]

So you're Hindi now?

i believe in reincarnation

 

[Reckless Turtle]

i believe in reincarnation

No wonder you're miserable.

 

[Bewusst]

Boring is good

 

[High Cortisol Chad]

And equilibrium of your mood is dictated by your genetics

 

[incel194012940]

i believe in reincarnation

it’s well established that memories, habits, ect can survive death and reincarnate, many regressions are legit

however the continuity of your consciousness, as well as the idea everyone has yet to be proven. Why can some people reincarnate before they die? Why do some people have multiple reincarnations at once? (researchers always brush/dismiss why 100k cleopatras exist). How can someone “reincarnate” into an adult (famous case in india)

I suspect many people are “empty vessels”, ie have no consciousness or soul

 

[Deleted member 29710]

it’s well established that memories, habits, ect can survive death and reincarnate, many regressions are legit

however the continuity of your consciousness, as well as the idea everyone has yet to be proven, I suspect many people are “empty vessels”, ie have no consciousness or soul

Philosophical zombie - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A philosophical zombie (or "p-zombie") is a being in a thought experiment in philosophy of mind that is physically identical to a normal person but does not have conscious experience.[1] For example, if a philosophical zombie were poked with a sharp object, it would not feel any pain, but it would behave exactly the way any conscious human would. Philosophical zombie arguments are used against forms of physicalism and in defense of the "hard problem of consciousness", which is the problem of accounting in physical terms for subjective, intrinsic, first-person, what-it's-like-ness experiences. Proponents of philosophical zombie arguments, such as the philosopher David Chalmers, argue that since a philosophical zombie is by definition physically identical to a conscious person, even its logical possibility refutes physicalism, because it establishes the existence of conscious experience as a further fact.[2] Philosopher Daniel Stoljar points out that zombies need not be utterly without subjective states, that even a subtle psychological difference between two physically identical people, such as in the taste of coffee, is enough refute physicalism.[3] Such arguments have been criticized by many philosophers. Some physicalists, such as Daniel Dennett, argue that philosophical zombies are logically incoherent and thus impossible, or that all humans are philosophical zombies;[4][5] others, such as Christopher Hill, argue that philosophical zombies are coherent but metaphysically impossible.[6]

 

[incel194012940]

Philosophical zombie - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A philosophical zombie (or "p-zombie") is a being in a thought experiment in philosophy of mind that is physically identical to a normal person but does not have conscious experience.[1] For example, if a philosophical zombie were poked with a sharp object, it would not feel any pain, but it would behave exactly the way any conscious human would. Philosophical zombie arguments are used against forms of physicalism and in defense of the "hard problem of consciousness", which is the problem of accounting in physical terms for subjective, intrinsic, first-person, what-it's-like-ness experiences. Proponents of philosophical zombie arguments, such as the philosopher David Chalmers, argue that since a philosophical zombie is by definition physically identical to a conscious person, even its logical possibility refutes physicalism, because it establishes the existence of conscious experience as a further fact.[2] Philosopher Daniel Stoljar points out that zombies need not be utterly without subjective states, that even a subtle psychological difference between two physically identical people, such as in the taste of coffee, is enough refute physicalism.[3] Such arguments have been criticized by many philosophers. Some physicalists, such as Daniel Dennett, argue that philosophical zombies are logically incoherent and thus impossible, or that all humans are philosophical zombies;[4][5] others, such as Christopher Hill, argue that philosophical zombies are coherent but metaphysically impossible.[6]

Daniel dennett is a moron redditor and his book has been debunked

I treat rocks as equal to humans because it’s possible either one does/doesn’t have a soul

 

[Abhorrence]

i guess. boredom is the least pain we can get

 

[wollet2]

Philosophical zombie - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A philosophical zombie (or "p-zombie") is a being in a thought experiment in philosophy of mind that is physically identical to a normal person but does not have conscious experience.[1] For example, if a philosophical zombie were poked with a sharp object, it would not feel any pain, but it would behave exactly the way any conscious human would. Philosophical zombie arguments are used against forms of physicalism and in defense of the "hard problem of consciousness", which is the problem of accounting in physical terms for subjective, intrinsic, first-person, what-it's-like-ness experiences. Proponents of philosophical zombie arguments, such as the philosopher David Chalmers, argue that since a philosophical zombie is by definition physically identical to a conscious person, even its logical possibility refutes physicalism, because it establishes the existence of conscious experience as a further fact.[2] Philosopher Daniel Stoljar points out that zombies need not be utterly without subjective states, that even a subtle psychological difference between two physically identical people, such as in the taste of coffee, is enough refute physicalism.[3] Such arguments have been criticized by many philosophers. Some physicalists, such as Daniel Dennett, argue that philosophical zombies are logically incoherent and thus impossible, or that all humans are philosophical zombies;[4][5] others, such as Christopher Hill, argue that philosophical zombies are coherent but metaphysically impossible.[6]

isnt that similar to Solipsism?

also idk sounds like an emotional argument made by an incel to hate on chads and normies. i mean sure thye might be dumber or less self aware but idk if they dont have an experience. it could be a possibility yeah, sounds interesting. do you think animals have an experience?

it’s well established that memories, habits, ect can survive death and reincarnate, many regressions are legit

however the continuity of your consciousness, as well as the idea everyone has yet to be proven. Why can some people reincarnate before they die? Why do some people have multiple reincarnations at once? (researchers always brush/dismiss why 100k cleopatras exist). How can someone “reincarnate” into an adult (famous case in india)

I suspect many people are “empty vessels”, ie have no consciousness or soul

i think most cases of people regressing past lives etc have been debunked im not sure. idk if anything transfers


about the empty vessels i believe some people dont have the mental capability to enjoy things like others would or to feel certain vibes.

ie i was born with a brain that would really appreciate fucking a lot of women i believe some chads dont feel the same mental pleasure. although i lost it after