Lizzo and Nietzsche: An Analysis

[TryingToLooksmax]

Lizzo, body positive recording artist known for her smash hits, "Truth Hurts" and "Juice," is a great example of master morality and realizing your will to power, two elements fundamental to the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche.

Throughout Lizzo's early life, she has had many interactions, both romantically and otherwise, with men adverse to the cloth. These men, who Lizzo christens "Fuckboys," have done severe mental and emotional damage to Lizzo through their lies and deceit and she expresses this rage and discontentment through her music.

Friedrich Nietzsche also went through a battle with his own personal demons, specifically the demons of religious morality. Nietzsche, a self avowed atheist believed that the majority of people based their moral compass on religious belief or on some other kinds of moral absolutes like natural goodness. Nietzsche's departure from religion caused him to lack a moral system from which to derive his actions. He speaks about this in his "Parable of the Madman." Nietzsche writes: "God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him." In this line, Nietzsche reminisces on the meaning he has lost. Without God, there is no source for moral wisdom and thought, but ourselves. We have overcome the usefulness of God as an explanation for natural phenomenon but we have not outgrown the need for a God to guide our personal and interpersonal interactions.

Nietzsche defines two possible moral systems: either we can continue to believe in what our society and what our families tell us and live the lives of slaves, never questioning the truth or we could search for our own moral truth and live for ourselves and what we value. Nietzsche defines the unquestioning masses as believing in slave morality and the people that live for their own truths as being masters.

Lizzo, before releasing her hit single, defined her moral system around trying to impress men AKA fuckboys who left her and used just as God had used Nietzsche and his life for his own gain. Lizzo stared into the abyss that was the fuckboys and they stared back into her. They used her without a moment's recourse

But Lizzo wasn't resigned to a life of slavery and began to live for herself and realized her will to power she began to receive direct messages for men that were trying to have sex with her and she did have sex with those men, but not for them - for her.


In conclusions, Lizzo realized her will to power by letting random men cum in her.

 

[Deleted member 685]

Cool dude, bloody cool, man.

 

[TryingToLooksmax]

Cool dude, bloody cool, man.

 

[Krezo]

Where S is a subject, sp is a skeptical possibility, such as the brain in a vat hypothesis, and q is a knowledge claim about the world:

• If S doesn't know that not-sp, then S doesn't know that q
• S doesn't know that not-sp
• Therefore, S doesn't know that q

 

[Deleted member 685]

View attachment 101371

I don't like deformedaspergercel

 

[TryingToLooksmax]

I don't like deformedaspergercel

Where S is a subject, sp is a skeptical possibility, such as the brain in a vat hypothesis, and q is a knowledge claim about the world:

• If S doesn't know that not-sp, then S doesn't know that q
• S doesn't know that not-sp
• Therefore, S doesn't know that q

 

[Krezo]

The problem of induction is the philosophical question of whether inductive reasoning leads to knowledge understood in the classic philosophical sense,[1] highlighting the apparent lack of justification for:

1. Generalizing about the properties of a class of objects based on some number of observations of particular instances of that class (e.g., the inference that "all swans we have seen are white, and, therefore, all swans are white", before the discovery of black swans) or
2. Presupposing that a sequence of events in the future will occur as it always has in the past (e.g., that the laws of physics will hold as they have always been observed to hold). Hume called this the principle of uniformity of nature.[2]

The problem calls into question all empirical claims made in everyday life or through the scientific method, and, for that reason, the philosopher C. D. Broad said that "induction is the glory of science and the scandal of philosophy." Although the problem arguably dates back to the Pyrrhonism of ancient philosophy, as well as the Carvaka school of Indian philosophy, David Hume popularized it in the mid-18th century.

 

[TryingToLooksmax]

The problem of induction is the philosophical question of whether inductive reasoning leads to knowledge understood in the classic philosophical sense,[1] highlighting the apparent lack of justification for:

1. Generalizing about the properties of a class of objects based on some number of observations of particular instances of that class (e.g., the inference that "all swans we have seen are white, and, therefore, all swans are white", before the discovery of black swans) or
2. Presupposing that a sequence of events in the future will occur as it always has in the past (e.g., that the laws of physics will hold as they have always been observed to hold). Hume called this the principle of uniformity of nature.[2]

The problem calls into question all empirical claims made in everyday life or through the scientific method, and, for that reason, the philosopher C. D. Broad said that "induction is the glory of science and the scandal of philosophy." Although the problem arguably dates back to the Pyrrhonism of ancient philosophy, as well as the Carvaka school of Indian philosophy, David Hume popularized it in the mid-18th century.

 

[BrettyBoy]

I don't like deformedaspergercel

He’s a bluepilled cuckold.