LL IS COPE

[Deleted member 8080]

 

[W0KESTMOTHF]

what does this prove?

 

[Deleted member 9699]

imagine thinking foids can tell the difference

 

[KDA Player]

Literally saying the opposite of old studies I saw about men.

 

[Alibaba69]

op is a cuck who wants to commit suicide because he's short, see this image for proof. LL is the only surgery that is guaranteed to turn you from truecel to might get teen love.

 

[Pillarman]

what does this prove?

that higher leg to torso ratio is unattractive compared to normal one, which doesn't make sense

 

[Deleted member 685]

imagine thinking foids can tell the difference

 

[W0KESTMOTHF]

that higher leg to torso ratio is unattractive compared to normal one, which doesn't make sense

Foids don't give a shit about leg to torso ratio jfl they care more about your height

 

[Lev Peshkov]

Bruh I frauded with straighy up all the lifts today and got hit on lots kek

 

[EckhartTollemaxx]

that higher leg to torso ratio is unattractive compared to normal one, which doesn't make sense

True, there's only so much your torso can grow before you have to grow the legs proportionally.

But the study could be right about men with the same height looking better with longer torsos.

This conflicts with the fact that women like men who look like they can fight, long arms are a part of good fighting potential.

I doubt there's lots of men with long arms and short legs or that it'd look good.

 

[Deleted member 8080]

True, there's only so much your torso can grow before you have to grow the legs proportionally.

But the study could be right about men with the same height looking better with longer torsos.

This conflicts with the fact that women like men who look like they can fight, long arms are a part of good fighting potential.

I doubt there's lots of men with long arms and short legs or that it'd look good.

i have long arms and long legs already

 

[bimaximum]

omg look that disgusting long femur

 

[Tomas Twardowski]

le coping mechanism

 

[RapGod]

LL is not a big deal for most people with normal torsos, as long as you do 1.5-2 inches of an increase but at that point is the surgery even worth it? In the future I hope they have a less invasive form of LL that allows people to increase between 1.5-2 inches relatively easily and pain free. I'd hop on that ASAP.

 

[OCDMaxxing]

op is a cuck who wants to commit suicide because he's short, see this image for proof. LL is the only surgery that is guaranteed to turn you from truecel to might get teen love.

View attachment 702539View attachment 702540

True, you can always wear low cut jeans and long shirts to balance body

 

[Germania]

Just go for a head implant mate. I got an 2" implant and the IOIs of girls went craaaaaaaazy. It's legit lifefuel

 

[orthochadic]

View attachment 702553
omg look that disgusting long femur

He slays

 

[orthochadic]

Muscles comprnsante body proportions

 

[RapGod]

True, you can always wear low cut jeans and long shirts to balance body

Cope. you will look like you're lowriding if you wear your pants lower, the jeans won't go around your ass properly. You will also look like a fucking joke when you tuck in your shirts or sit down. LL is only good for long torso large armspan manlets that look dwarfish because of their short legs, and would actually look better with longer legs.

Muscles comprnsante body proportions

That's the only way it could work tbh. Gotta simeonpandamaxx. He looks ok.

 

[Tom2004]

long legs are aesthetic keep coping like a retard OP

 

[Deleted member 2157]

that higher leg to torso ratio is unattractive compared to normal one, which doesn't make sense

it's the opposite as long limbs, short torso has always been attractive and dominant

 

[MulattoTrenMaxxer]

Long torso looks absolutely subhuman

 

[Good_Little_Goy]

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.170399

"The effects of LBR depended on the image format. In particular, a curve-fitting analysis indicated that the optimally-attractive LBR for silhouettes was fractionally below the baseline, whereas the optima for more detailed computer-generated images was approximately 0.5 s.d. above the baseline and was similar for all three skin-tones. In addition, the participants' sensitivity to changes in the LBR was lowest for the silhouettes and highest for the grey figures. Our results add to evidence that the most attractive LBR is close to, but slightly above, the population mean, and caution that the effects of limb proportions on attractiveness depend on the ecological validity of the figures."

The mean LBR was 0.491 with a standard deviation of 0.015 btw

LBR = leg to body ratio

it's something to keep in mind with LL especially going large lengths, especially given that 0.5 of the standard deviation from the average is a pretty small deviation in terms of actual length of the legs, this will be even more pronounced the more manlet you are.

The figures used in OPs image seem to be drawn but he didn't provide source so idk but:

"Our studies produced two key findings. First, that the effects of leg-to-body ratio on male attractiveness depend on the format of the figures; in particular, both the optimum LBR and the sensitivity to deviations from that optimum are lower for silhouettes than for more realistic rendered figures.... In any case, the main implication of our findings regarding image format, when coupled with those of other researchers, is that previous studies of LBR that used drawings or silhouette stimuli should be treated with caution."

Given this treat it with caution, height >>> proportions

another thing to note is that the highest LBR ratio they test (3 s.d. above the mean, 0.535) isn't particularly unattractive in comparison to the ideal so the height difference would definitely outweighs the negatives in this scenario, but maybe this doesn't apply to you, using the distribution they give, you can find out what the effects of your proportions post LL would have on your attractiveness, if they are in the study range.

maybe u can find some study where they model height and LBR idk

@youngmaxxing

 

[Deleted member 7866]

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.170399

"The effects of LBR depended on the image format. In particular, a curve-fitting analysis indicated that the optimally-attractive LBR for silhouettes was fractionally below the baseline, whereas the optima for more detailed computer-generated images was approximately 0.5 s.d. above the baseline and was similar for all three skin-tones. In addition, the participants' sensitivity to changes in the LBR was lowest for the silhouettes and highest for the grey figures. Our results add to evidence that the most attractive LBR is close to, but slightly above, the population mean, and caution that the effects of limb proportions on attractiveness depend on the ecological validity of the figures."

The mean LBR was 0.491 with a standard deviation of 0.015 btw

LBR = leg to body ratio

it's something to keep in mind with LL especially going large lengths, especially given that 0.5 of the standard deviation from the average is a pretty small deviation in terms of actual length of the legs, this will be even more pronounced the more manlet you are.

The figures used in OPs image seem to be drawn but he didn't provide source so idk but:

"Our studies produced two key findings. First, that the effects of leg-to-body ratio on male attractiveness depend on the format of the figures; in particular, both the optimum LBR and the sensitivity to deviations from that optimum are lower for silhouettes than for more realistic rendered figures.... In any case, the main implication of our findings regarding image format, when coupled with those of other researchers, is that previous studies of LBR that used drawings or silhouette stimuli should be treated with caution."

Given this treat it with caution, height >>> proportions

View attachment 704976

another thing to note is that the highest LBR ratio they test (3 s.d. above the mean, 0.535) isn't particularly unattractive in comparison to the ideal so the height difference would definitely outweighs the negatives in this scenario, but maybe this doesn't apply to you, using the distribution they give, you can find out what the effects of your proportions post LL would have on your attractiveness, if they are in the study range.

maybe u can find some study where they model height and LBR idk

@youngmaxxing

Will read tmr

 

[Good_Little_Goy]

Will read tmr

If you aren't interested in LL then don't bother tbh it's a bit rambling
but I thought you might be hence the tag

I see so many low iq takes on this subject but that is the evidence based 'guide' pretty much

 

[Deleted member 8758]

Just walk on stilts theory.

 

[Deleted member 6305]

Long legs = high class look