LL Is Not That Dangerous AT ALL

randomvanish

randomvanish

České srdce, otevřené všem!
Joined
Mar 20, 2020
Posts
13,117
Reputation
16,862
you all are just poor. of course you would face problems if you get it in russia, india or turkey. i really don't think anyone will face problems with a surgeon like paley, mahbobuian.

it's safe. over if you don't lengthen your legs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: hypergamy, Deleted member and incel194012940
just have chicken legs theory
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: randomvanish
Lost mobility is real. But not as much as some on this forum claim.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: hypergamy and ROTTING
yea but some people on quora say you dont stop growing until 30 sooo ima wait on LL :Comfy::Comfy:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17429, looksforlife, Deleted member and 1 other person
Lost mobility is real
biomechanic will be fucked up. you need 2 years to adapt your body, to get 90%~%100 athletic ability. body can adapt far more invasive accidents than LL.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: hypergamy, ROTTING, Deleted member and 2 others
source: trust me bro
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21221, Deleted member 20618 and randomvanish
you talk about it everyday, are you gonna get it?
You already oldcel if I remember right
 
source: trust me bro
so what, you don't trust me?
Captain Phillips GIF
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member and Stopping@Nothing19
you talk about it everyday, are you gonna get it?
You already oldcel if I remember right
26. i won't do it because i can't pay 100k$ and get off my wagecuck job for 1 year obviously. my company doesn't work remote anyway.


but let's say i have that money, i would do it in a wink.
 
biomechanic will be fucked up. you need 2 years to adapt your body, to get 90%~%100 athletic ability. body can adapt far more invasive accidents than LL.
I’ve heard an interesting thought experiment. If you were a runner, who lengthened his legs by 10%, and lost 5% of their function

it would increase your athletic potential
 
1 cm of LL is probably 100x safer than 1 cm of jaw osteotomy
 
I’ve heard an interesting thought experiment. If you were a runner, who lengthened his legs by 10%, and lost 5% of their function

it would increase your athletic potential
hmm. i also read that if you are flexible enough, (like if you can do front splits) then you won't suffer from LL. because your body already in a great flexible shape. so maybe pre-LL might boost your post-op incredibly.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: incel194012940
1 cm of LL is probably 100x safer than 1 cm of jaw osteotomy
how??? and 1 cm jaw osteotomy is a lot tbh.
biomechanic will be fucked up. you need 2 years to adapt your body, to get 90%~%100 athletic ability. body can adapt far more invasive accidents than LL.
does bimax fukk up biomechanics??
 
  • WTF
Reactions: thecel
Exactly

compilation rate is gonna be higher, it’s a shorter bone in a much more sensitive area of the body
are you trying to say bimax is more dangerous than LL? Id have a hard tiime believing that.

or are you saying a LARGE bimax (anything greater than 8-10 mm) is more dangerous than LL?
 
  • WTF
Reactions: thecel
Exactly

compilation rate is gonna be higher, it’s a shorter bone in a much more sensitive area of the body
afaik issues with LL arise from soft tissue stretching rather than bones
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaAscender, Deleted member 17244, ROTTING and 1 other person
are you trying to say bimax is more dangerous than LL? Id have a hard tiime believing that.

or are you saying a LARGE bimax (anything greater than 8-10 mm) is more dangerous than LL?
mm for mm, yes

a conservative LL and a large bimax probably have similar problems
 
@Predeterminism
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17829
Man I swear height is the toughest thing to change in the entire planet, seriously wish I hadn't been cursed with subhuman height. I would trade height problems in a heartbeat with some other shit.
 
get it in turkey its safe u dumb coper
 
yeah I’m 176 as well. +8cm means safely 6ft so yeah
Why would you need +8? More risk? Just to be 6ft in just about any shoe
 
Why would you need +8? More risk? Just to be 6ft in just about any shoe
nah 8cm is the most you can do with no complications

176+8 = 184cm which is 6ft barefoot

Jfl I don’t wanna be 6ft in shoes, barefoot 6ft is what counts
 
nah 8cm is the most you can do with no complications

176+8 = 184cm which is 6ft barefoot

Jfl I don’t wanna be 6ft in shoes, barefoot 6ft is what counts
The simple way to say 6 foot in shoes is “short”
 

Similar threads

lifeless
Replies
55
Views
494
darodcel
darodcel
Hexxon07
Replies
34
Views
668
Deleted member 104116
D
Mugwump
Replies
22
Views
225
Mugwump
Mugwump
xDw28
Replies
12
Views
807
[jawcel]
J
Akatlyn
Replies
36
Views
1K
nuttheb
nuttheb

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top