Logical fallacy everyone on this forum makes

[Deleted member 15827]

P (B/A) being high is not equal to P(B/C) being low or not possible

Eg.

Let B be the proposition someone slays
Let C be the condition someone is not tall
Let A be the condition the male is tall

Then P(B/A) means the probability a tall male will slay hard

But many refute this saying bs like height doesn't matter because P( B/ C) occurs.

That is a male gets a girl and he happens to be short so height doesn't matter.

This is the most prevalent argumentative/ logical fallacy I see on this site since P ( B/A) has no relationship with P (B/C) unless one considers height bell curve etc. saying one is high does not automatically mean the other is low because they do not intersect on a bell diagram

 

[youngmax]

but height is a spectrum

 

[Deleted member 17531]

dude i dont fucking care just for god sake's give me enough low inhib to ask for numbers

 

[Deleted member 15827]

dude i dont fucking care just for god sake's give me enough low inhib to ask for numbers

Alcohol

 

[bogii]

wtf is this math or what are you trying to do here

 

[Deleted member 15827]

wtf is this math or what are you trying to do here

Bayesian probability

 

[Britmaxxer]

you need face on top of height to compete in 2022.

 

[Deleted member 15827]

you need face on top of height to compete in 2022.

No u need dick on top of balls

 

[currylightskin]

No u need dick on top of balls

the only right answer here

 

[Erik-Jón]

High iq post but doesn’t make a difference For alien cels like me