LOL this low-tier Fatima on Bumble seems to think it was a compliment

[lifestyle21873]

If you looked that good then you wouldn't need a morph. This is quite ridiculous

Link the morph

 

[Ocelot]

Objectively and honestly speaking, I am not bullshitting you. IRL I look good. Not outstandingly Chad good, but good and good enough for all these girls I've matched with to be down. None of them are spectacular looking. I wouldn't lie to you. Some people just don't look good in photographs and I am one. All these girls use makeup and several filters anyway, so what I've done is hardly a cheat.

Can you post the morph you are using?

 

[sytyl]

View attachment 630219

View attachment 630220

View attachment 630222



View attachment 630245





This one's Becky, but like cuddly Becky. Baby land-whale. Based on past-experience they are actually better in bed. I'm ngl. It's a trade-off guys. Don't hate.

View attachment 630226

View attachment 630227

View attachment 630228

actually mirin that you asked for sex and didn't instantly get unmatched

 

[Blackgymmax]

No. There is a thing called being photogenic.

From Quora:
"In my experience, the main reason for the difference between our true image and the photographic image is the lens. Most lenses distort the image, and this distortion is extreme in cheap cameras or mobile phone cameras. This distortion allows for a more panoramic view, but you pay the price of distorting the image. Some people will look good because the distorted version of their image results in an appealing image. It is still distorted and far removed from the original, but it just so happens that the distortion is pleasing to the eye. Cases where someone complains that they look bad in photographs or that they are not photogenic is usually because their distorted image is not appealing to the eye. To prove this is true, you can use a lens with very little distortion, such as the Canon 85mm f/1.2L. The closer the number is to 1, the less distortion you get. In this case the lens has a value of 1.2, very close to 1, and it’s a lens especially thought for portraiture. The only problem is that such a lens costs in the region of $2000. That is only for the lens. You need a good camera to attach it to.

Then there is a secondary source of distortion which is worth mentioning, which are the flash lights on cheap cameras or mobile phones. They are completely wrong in the sense that they project frontal light, which results in squashing the image like pancake. Again, some people’s faces when distorted in this way result in a not too displeasing image. Lighting properly a face to take a photograph is an art unto itself, not to be left in the hands of instagrammers or other people armed with a mobile phone and a flash."

You sharpened your jaw, changed your IPD, canthal tilt, debloated midface

 

[Copeful]

You sharpened your jaw, changed your IPD, canthal tilt, debloated midface

Where are you seeing his morph?

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Can you post the morph you are using?

My eyebrows were fucked at the time.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

You sharpened your jaw, changed your IPD, canthal tilt, debloated midface

Midface is already fine. My eye-area and skin lighting were the major changes.

 

[ChestBrah]

would be chadlite at 12% bodyfat

 

[Deleted member 7580]

“90% of the eggs are gone by 30, so I’m sure egg carton is empty now, the fuck you mean you want kids someday? “

 

[Deleted member 6908]

would be chadlite at 12% bodyfat

Appreciate that encouragement, but probably not at 5'8

 

[sytyl]

Appreciate that encouragement, but probably not at 5'8

5'8 can fraud to 5'10 which is enough imo

edit: read it wrong, yeah chadlite needs like 6'0 minimum

 

[Deleted member 4438]

YOU FUCKING INDIAN PLUMBER

DID YOU JUST CAME OUT OF THE SEWERS YOU CLEANED A MINUTE AGO

 

[Deleted member 6908]

.

 

[Deleted member 3526]

My eyebrows were fucked at the time.

View attachment 630263

use this pic

 

[Deleted member 3702]

use this pic
View attachment 630360

Alien lookz theory ?

 

[Deleted member 6908]

use this pic
View attachment 630360

Oh yeah that looks completely natural. Nothing detectably off about that at all. No you're right. Ok sure, right on it!

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Are you fucking mad?