Long midfaces suck - People still cope

o_Owtf

o_Owtf

Iron
Joined
Dec 4, 2025
Posts
127
Reputation
124
The underrated impact of the midface - People still don't understand what a long midface is

I stumbled upon an old thread earlier today. I was about to necropost on it with some analysis for posterity, but my response started to become a bit longer so I thought that I'd just start a new thread. I've only frequented this forum for like 2-3 months, but all the time I see people trying to bring up faulty arguments/counterexamples to combat the notion that short, compact midfaces are superior. I split these arguments into two camps which I intend to adress with the help of two examples.

Exhibit A: Ostensibly long midfaces, long face ≠ long midface
1620241304688



1620241369183





1620241433428





1620241488798




1620241533193



1620241658684

People keep talking about the length of the midface and its impact of attractiveness, and I saw it brought up here again with regards to Prince William, who used to be surprisingly attractive considering how much the sands of time have eroded his looks. Despite what people are willing to believe in the thread I linked, Prince William does not have a long midface (or at least he didn't in these pictures when he still was young.) He actually has an ideal midface ratio of 1.00. Also, the FWHR and midface ratio are correlated, and his FWHR is 606 px / 333 px = 1.82, maybe not completely ideal but definitely quite good. This serves as further indication that his midface isn't long, although that's neither here nor there.
1766815587977


Yet people look at him, and many other similar examples I keep seeing, and say "damn look he has a long midface but he slays!" Demonstrably, he doesn't have a long midface at all, but other problems that you mistake for a long midface. What's actually going on is that his jaw is very square + suboptimal FWHR. Look at these two images for a comparison.
1766815642910


See how this edit completely changes the character of his face? The midface is completely unchanged, I haven't touched his eyes, nose, nor mouth. However, I suspect that only few of the people who initially say that he has a long midface in the left picture still say that he has a long midface when they see the right picture. For some reason, this is really difficult for people to grasp.

Exhibit B: Faulty comparisons, sometimes a short midface appears long

I saw another thread last week where people yet again claimed that having a compact face is bad. The proof was apparently some eboy going around and showing a "narrow" face guy, and a borderline obese "short" face edit to various women. No surprise, they unanimously rated the former as more attractive than the latter. Horsecels rejoiced in the thread, unaware of the fact that the two pictures had the EXACT same midface ratio, a short, very ideal 1.05. The only reason the more attractive guy appeared to have a narrow face was because he was being compared against a subject with an artificially increased FWHR through excessive adipose tissue. The craniofacial morphology of the images could've for all intents and purposes been identical, both had very robust, short faces. They seriously looked at this guy and said he had a narrow face:
1766815355233


"206 px / 197 px = 1.05 narrow faces are clearly superiar saar":lul: my point is that even if you understand what the midface is, you can still be deceived into thinking that a short midface is long and that a long midface is short just by comparison. This is actually kind of hopefuel for horsecels, if you keep comparing yourself to models like Jordan Barrett you will be ever dissatisfied with your midface, but keep in mind that he's at the true extreme end, you might not have it as bad as you think.

Conclusion / TL;DR

This post is meant to illuminate the constant equivocation I see between having a long "midface" in the sense of your face appearing less compact, and a truly long midface. You can have a face that appears long due to a bad face shape, poor eyebrows, insufficient soft tissue volume, etc, and people take that to mean that they have a long midface. A long midface is a much more specific thing. A long midface is, with few exceptions, a direct result of poor maxillofacial development. Prince William wasn't attractive in the photos IN SPITE of his LONG midface, he was attractive specifically BECAUSE of his SHORT midface, which compensated for other deficiencies. And just because an midface appears long doesn't mean that it neccesarily is long in the grand scheme of things. People need to stop coping about this, as far as I'm aware there are ZERO benefits to having a long midface.
1766815313161


Please do not get discouraged if you have a long midface. I myself have a midface ratio that is a bit lower than the ideal range, and this is not meant to be ropefuel nor crab mentality. You can still be considered highly attractive by many women even with an unideal midface, take Mads Mikkelsen, Keanu Reeves, and Brandon Lee for instance. Some women consider you attractive even if you have a true sasquatch face like David Schwimmer and Adam Driver. But seriously dudes stop coping trying to convince yourselves that it isn't a flaw, it's so sad and frustrating to see the cope. Just work with whatever you've got and improve what you can. Let the dreams of an ideal midface go, and ride into the sunset with your horse faces.
1766815419921
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Incelforeever, gonion wanter, LTNUser and 9 others
Thought you guys would find this interesting since you participated in the thread earlier this week I mentioned @Incelforeever @OldSpice @wearegettingtohtn @harmonytingfam @Clark @aids @wishIwasSalludon @tightmason @wastedspermcel @jester @Swarthy Knight @Daddy's Home @comingtothisJFL @Tool @notgraycel245969 @AustrianMogger @LTNUser
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever, OldSpice, LTNUser and 2 others
amazing hopefuel 😻
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Gurt., LTNUser, youravgarabltn and 1 other person
what do you use to measure ratios?

also you can only tag 5 people at a time
so only the first 5 people you tagged were notified
@o_Owtf
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and o_Owtf
what do you use to measure ratios?

also you can only tag 5 people at a time
so only the first 5 people you tagged were notified
@o_Owtf
I see, thanks I'm a total noob. I use https://imageonline.io/measure-image/. It's not perfect but it's nice because it's in the browser and you can quickly just crop a bit of your screen and paste it directly without creating a file on your computer, so it's blazing fast.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and urban legend
I see, thanks I'm a total noob. I use https://imageonline.io/measure-image/. It's not perfect but it's nice because it's in the browser and you can quickly just crop a bit of your screen and paste it directly without creating a file on your computer, so it's blazing fast.
all right thanks man, just followed you :love::eek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and o_Owtf
@aids @wishIwasSalludon @tightmason @wastedspermcel @jester
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser
@Swarthy Knight @Daddy's Home @comingtothisJFL @Tool @notgraycel245969
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser
@AustrianMogger @LTNUser
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser
agree zero direct benefits with a longish midface only indirect with height as a longer midface a lot of times means taller
 
  • +1
Reactions: o_Owtf, LTNUser, notgraycel245969 and 1 other person
95335878 242117403549201 1667082401444347052 n78b062de12d66854914a8e390ac69de8

true horse, but looks good
 
  • +1
Reactions: o_Owtf and LTNUser
WHY AM I THE ONLY MAN IN MY FAMILY WITH A HORSE FACE???
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: o_Owtf, KIKihltn and LTNUser
This should be water, idk where the cope that a long midface isnt bad came from:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser
The underrated impact of the midface - People still don't understand what a long midface is

I stumbled upon an old thread earlier today. I was about to necropost on it with some analysis for posterity, but my response started to become a bit longer so I thought that I'd just start a new thread. I've only frequented this forum for like 2-3 months, but all the time I see people trying to bring up faulty arguments/counterexamples to combat the notion that short, compact midfaces are superior. I split these arguments into two camps which I intend to adress with the help of two examples.

Exhibit A: Ostensibly long midfaces, long face ≠ long midface
1620241304688



1620241369183





1620241433428





1620241488798




1620241533193



1620241658684

People keep talking about the length of the midface and its impact of attractiveness, and I saw it brought up here again with regards to Prince William, who used to be surprisingly attractive considering how much the sands of time have eroded his looks. Despite what people are willing to believe in the thread I linked, Prince William does not have a long midface (or at least he didn't in these pictures when he still was young.) He actually has an ideal midface ratio of 1.00. Also, the FWHR and midface ratio are correlated, and his FWHR is 606 px / 333 px = 1.82, maybe not completely ideal but definitely quite good. This serves as further indication that his midface isn't long, although that's neither here nor there.
View attachment 4469167

Yet people look at him, and many other similar examples I keep seeing, and say "damn look he has a long midface but he slays!" Demonstrably, he doesn't have a long midface at all, but other problems that you mistake for a long midface. What's actually going on is that his jaw is very square + suboptimal FWHR. Look at these two images for a comparison.
View attachment 4469170

See how this edit completely changes the character of his face? The midface is completely unchanged, I haven't touched his eyes, nose, nor mouth. However, I suspect that only few of the people who initially say that he has a long midface in the left picture still say that he has a long midface when they see the right picture. For some reason, this is really difficult for people to grasp.

Exhibit B: Faulty comparisons, sometimes a short midface appears long

I saw another thread last week where people yet again claimed that having a compact face is bad. The proof was apparently some eboy going around and showing a "narrow" face guy, and a borderline obese "short" face edit to various women. No surprise, they unanimously rated the former as more attractive than the latter. Horsecels rejoiced in the thread, unaware of the fact that the two pictures had the EXACT same midface ratio, a short, very ideal 1.05. The only reason the more attractive guy appeared to have a narrow face was because he was being compared against a subject with an artificially increased FWHR through excessive adipose tissue. The craniofacial morphology of the images could've for all intents and purposes been identical, both had very robust, short faces. They seriously looked at this guy and said he had a narrow face:
View attachment 4469160

"206 px / 197 px = 1.05 narrow faces are clearly superiar saar":lul: my point is that even if you understand what the midface is, you can still be deceived into thinking that a short midface is long and that a long midface is short just by comparison. This is actually kind of hopefuel for horsecels, if you keep comparing yourself to models like Jordan Barrett you will be ever dissatisfied with your midface, but keep in mind that he's at the true extreme end, you might not have it as bad as you think.

Conclusion / TL;DR

This post is meant to illuminate the constant equivocation I see between having a long "midface" in the sense of your face appearing less compact, and a truly long midface. You can have a face that appears long due to a bad face shape, poor eyebrows, insufficient soft tissue volume, etc, and people take that to mean that they have a long midface. A long midface is a much more specific thing. A long midface is, with few exceptions, a direct result of poor maxillofacial development. Prince William wasn't attractive in the photos IN SPITE of his LONG midface, he was attractive specifically BECAUSE of his SHORT midface, which compensated for other deficiencies. And just because an midface appears long doesn't mean that it neccesarily is long in the grand scheme of things. People need to stop coping about this, as far as I'm aware there are ZERO benefits to having a long midface.
View attachment 4469153

Please do not get discouraged if you have a long midface. I myself have a midface ratio that is a bit lower than the ideal range, and this is not meant to be ropefuel nor crab mentality. You can still be considered highly attractive by many women even with an unideal midface, take Mads Mikkelsen, Keanu Reeves, and Brandon Lee for instance. Some women consider you attractive even if you have a true sasquatch face like David Schwimmer and Adam Driver. But seriously dudes stop coping trying to convince yourselves that it isn't a flaw, it's so sad and frustrating to see the cope. Just work with whatever you've got and improve what you can. Let the dreams of an ideal midface go, and ride into the sunset with your horse faces.
View attachment 4469163
Mirin cope, prince william obviously has long midface:feelsuhh: your measuring skills leave lot to be desired

Long midface is dimorphic, Longer midface stretches the skin, appearing leaner and better looking. Long midface > short midface
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser
He has a horse midface, dumbass grey dont post again
IMG 3314

IMG 3313
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser
He has a horse midface, dumbass grey dont post again
View attachment 4469736
View attachment 4469734
Alright, let's use your measurements. 59.68 px / 71.91 px = 0.83. This is ridiculously low, not even Adam Driver has this low, who I think even you will agree has a longer midface than Prince Harry.
1766846897363

242 px / 281 px = 0.86.

What's actually going on is that if you look you'll see that Prince Harry is looking downwards in the majority of his photos, also pretty sure in the photo you used. In people with recessed faces, looking downwards makes your midface ratio higher, and with people in forward grown faces, it makes the midface ratio lower. This is because the line formed between the eye and the upper lip, which we use to measure the midface ratio, is more vertical in the former compared to the latter. This is crucial because we don't use the line directly to measure the midface ratio, but rather its (hopefully mostly) horizontal projection on the lens of the camera. The IPD is largely conserved with vertical movement.

1766849174430

This is diagram I made for another purpose and actually shows the cheekline, but the principle is the same and hopefully it illusrates what I'm talking about. Basically, when a forward grown person with a short midface looks downwards we should actually expect the midface ratio to go up, because when we look at the face the projection won't be as squished vertically, as opposed to the recessed person projection will not change as much relatively speaking, perhaps even going backwards and giving the appearance of a shorter midface than when looking forward. When Prince Harry looks down and gets a longer face, that's indicative of the fact that his midface isn't particularly long at all.

It's nigh impossible to do something like this just with pictures, you'd preferably want to take actual skull measurements. I just wanted to show that his midface is by no means particularly long. The core point wasn't to make a perfect measurement, it wasn't really even to show that Prince Harry has a short midface, the point is that sometimes a midface can appear longer than it is because of a poor jaw, poor FHWR, poor eyebrow spacing, etc. I'm not claiming that I'm perfect at measuring ratios, If this is something you want to claim, then by all means do it. I'm not going to contest it because it wont impact my argument to be wrong by a couple 1/100ths. But if you want to critique that aspect then ffs at least compare apples to apples.
 

Attachments

  • 1766847782179.png
    1766847782179.png
    585.2 KB · Views: 0

Similar threads

Arthas
Replies
8
Views
121
Arthas
Arthas
randomsub5fromsouth
Replies
3
Views
416
ganjachifer
ganjachifer
foreveriqletsigma
Replies
10
Views
129
ultramogkiller2000
ultramogkiller2000

Users who are viewing this thread

  • bansh
Back
Top