There's a bias in rating

[WonkyChin186]

Guys who look punchable, have bad fwhrs, long midfaces, an obvious failo, not intimidating(unrelated to dimo) or have small or weak bones in general get underrated more than they should here

You can have all of that and still be chad btw, I see a guy who would receive top10% treatment irl based on his face and everyone is calling him ltn

You can have no obvious failos but just be unappealing and therefore low ltn but on org people see "i see nothing objectively wrong so he must be mtn"

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Looks are subjective.

I rate based on what i find appealing

 

[WonkyChin186]

Looks are subjective.

I rate based on what i find appealing

To be ""objectively"" average facially, that means the average woman sees you as average on average, like a bell curve on what they would rate you (factored for them saying most are ugly), that's how it's "subjective" but it's completely objective at the end of the day

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

To be ""objectively"" average facially, that means the average woman sees you as average on average, like a bell curve on what they would rate you (factored for them saying most are ugly), that's how it's "subjective" but it's completely objective at the end of the day

Your objective rating is the average of the subjective ratings

 

[WonkyChin186]

Your objective rating is the average of the subjective ratings

Yes

 

[WonkyChin186]

.