Long vs Compact face

B

biggestlooksmaxxer

Bronze
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Posts
294
Reputation
121
I don't think having a long face isn't bad unless it's above 1.5. There are a bunch of actors with longer faces than the ideal 1.33 - 1.38 ratio like Henry Cavill and Matt Bomer that are considered very attractive.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel, wishIwasSalludon and WellDevelopedIndian
And Keanu Reeves has a long face as well
 
I'm talking about the total fwhr from hairline to chin and from zygo to zygo
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Agreed. A face that isn’t short can still be chiseled and well defined.
IMG 1717
IMG 0712
IMG 2367
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2386.jpeg
    IMG_2386.jpeg
    154.9 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: biggestlooksmaxxer
Matt Bomer 1.43, Henry Cavill 1.44, Keanu Revees, 1.44.
 
  • +1
Reactions: WellDevelopedIndian
Brad Pitt has 1.43 ratio
 
  • +1
Reactions: WellDevelopedIndian
I don't think having a long face isn't bad unless it's above 1.5. There are a bunch of actors with longer faces than the ideal 1.33 - 1.38 ratio like Henry Cavill and Matt Bomer that are considered very attractive.
long face is not good
 
  • +1
Reactions: penaldinho and jeff1234
I don't think having a long face isn't bad unless it's above 1.5. There are a bunch of actors with longer faces than the ideal 1.33 - 1.38 ratio like Henry Cavill and Matt Bomer that are considered very attractive.
There’s a difference between a long face and a tall skull, looking like a horse is not good but having a wide and tall skull mogs short compact ones. Look at Jason Statham for example or Chico
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Nochills

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: copercel123
True
There’s a difference between a long face and a tall skull, looking like a horse is not good but having a wide and tall skull mogs short compact ones. Look at Jason Statham for example or Chico
 
There’s a difference between a long face and a tall skull, looking like a horse is not good but having a wide and tall skull mogs short compact ones. Look at Jason Statham for example or Chico
I cant measure jasons beacause he doesnt have hairline to measure from LOL
 
I cant measure jasons beacause he doesnt have hairline to measure from LOL
You can see his skull is wide and tall without him having a hairline, picture Leonardo Dicaprio with the same haircut which is bald. He’d look like an Asian monk
 
Keanu Revees
 

Attachments

  • image (1).png
    image (1).png
    1.6 MB · Views: 0
You can see his skull is wide and tall without him having a hairline, picture Leonardo Dicaprio with the same haircut which is bald. He’d look like an Asian monk
Yeah leo has a compact face
 
You can see his skull is wide and tall without him having a hairline, picture Leonardo Dicaprio with the same haircut which is bald. He’d look like an Asian monk
Obviously it all depends on the other features as well
 
you can look great with both

its like blue vs green eyes
 
you can look great with both

its like blue vs green eyes
True and it all depends on the other features as well
 
  • +1
Reactions: Akhi
I don't think having a long face isn't bad unless it's above 1.5. There are a bunch of actors with longer faces than the ideal 1.33 - 1.38 ratio like Henry Cavill and Matt Bomer that are considered very attractive.
how are you measuring brah, henry cavill and matt bomer have a ratio between 1.33-1.38
 
True and it all depends on the other features as well
theres many chad examples of people with long faces

same goes for short faces

its not a factor that nukes anyone
 
  • +1
Reactions: flatcheck213
how are you measuring brah, henry cavill and matt bomer have a ratio between 1.33-1.38
How are you measuring? I measuring the same way ive shown inside the images
 
how are you measuring brah, henry cavill and matt bomer have a ratio between 1.33-1.38
Im making sure to use far distance photos so the lens distortion doesnt fuck up any measurements
 
how are you measuring brah, henry cavill and matt bomer have a ratio between 1.33-1.38
matt bomer is 1.5 and ill show u rq
 
I feel like a slightly long face mogs

Not horse faced tho

Compact faces look primitive and ogre


This is ideal
IMG 7078
 
  • +1
Reactions: Evgeniy291
There should be own ratios for tall and compact skulls, because both of them make ratios subhuman tier even though usually they have appeal.
 
anything above 1.4 looks like a horse, exactly like keanu reeves
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
You want far distant measurements
 
You want far distant measurements
far distant makes your face wider and shorter, no point it would make it longer, this pictures are made with a 50mm proffesional camera from far away, its just cropped up
 
anything above 1.4 looks like a horse, exactly like keanu reeves
Genuinely asking, do you know what lens distortion is? They use special lens in porn to make penises bigger as well
 
far distant makes your face wider and shorter, no point it would make it longer, this pictures are made with a 50mm proffesional camera from far away, its just cropped up
 

Attachments

  • image (2).png
    image (2).png
    1.4 MB · Views: 0
  • image (1).png
    image (1).png
    1.6 MB · Views: 0
  • image.png
    image.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
Genuinely asking, do you know what lens distortion is? They use special lens in porn to make penises bigger as well
do you know how lens distortion works? FAGGOT, if its close up it would make face longer, and more distant photos would make it wider and shorter, fucking retard use your fucking brain grey
 
do you know how lens distortion works? FAGGOT, if its close up it would make face longer, and more distant photos would make it wider and shorter, fucking retard use your fucking brain grey
Ive just proven you wrong lmao. Why are u so made for. I just gone over your measurements lol and it came out to 1.41 or 1.42 not 1.36
 
stop measuring, your missing 3mm each side .....
You measure from the zygo to zygo lmao not the fucking ear to ear lol
 
stop measuring, your missing 3mm each side .....
That would be the zygo arch if i wear to measure from there lol and its known that you dont measure from there. You measure from cheekbone to cheekbone and from the hairline to the bottom of the chin
 
To calculate your total fwhr you need to divide the length of the face by its width. The width of the face is measured by the width of the cheekbones. And the length is from the tip of chin to the hairline.
 
stop measuring, your missing 3mm each side .....
Like i said, you dont measure from that far back because thats considered the arch no the cheekbone
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    39.4 KB · Views: 0
That would be the zygo arch if i wear to measure from there lol and its known that you dont measure from there. You measure from cheekbone to cheekbone and from the hairline to the bottom of the chin
bro, every good rater measures from that.......

its whatever is visible from the front
 
Like i said, you dont measure from that far back because thats considered the arch no the cheekbone
alr bro your asking chatgpt for measurements, ill stop responding here
 
alr bro your asking chatgpt for measurements, ill stop responding here
I aint asking chatgpt for measurements, i just asked if the arch is different from the cheekbone and it said yes
 

Similar threads

maxlooksmax
Replies
27
Views
978
uOrca
uOrca
I
Replies
3
Views
355
toolateforme
toolateforme
midgetfacecumer
Replies
17
Views
2K
Napoleon1800
Napoleon1800
maxlooksmax
Replies
30
Views
1K
maxlooksmax
maxlooksmax

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top