Look good from the front and but my side profile is shit

[A23ghskung]

Title

 

[NoPainNoChick]

No pics no care

 

[FrenchareMedCucks]

front and 3/4 matters . Brad Pitt has Normie side profile and moggs

 

[Deleted member 18840]

front and 3/4 matters . Brad Pitt has Normie side profile and moggs

Lifefuel cuz my 3/4 is model tier. Sadly my side >>> my front too but less brutally

 

[eduardkoopman]

Lifefuel cuz my 3/4 is model tier. Sadly my side >>> my front too but less brutally

irl.

80 percent of the time, people see us in 3/4 types of angles

 

[Adon]

Indication that your soft tissue carries your face. This also means that as you age and the soft tissue sags you will likely age like milk.

 

[A23ghskung]

Indication that your soft tissue carries your face. This also means that as you age and the soft tissue sags you will likely age like milk.

You nailed it exactly, can you expand furthermore on the idea that soft tissue = carries my face

 

[Adon]

You nailed it exactly, can you expand furthermore on the idea that soft tissue = carries my face

Sure. Take hooding as an example. Somebody like Chico has high set eyebrows and a weak brow ridge (usually related) yet still has hooded eyes due to amazing fat pads. Contrast this to someone like Christian Bale who has a great frontal bone and brow ridge with low set brows. Despite this, he doesn’t have as much hooding as Chico. This is because Christian Bale’s soft tissue (eye area fat pads) are inferior (in my opinion) to Chico’s thus resulting in inferior hooding. The same thing can be applied to orbital vector and the infraorbital region where the orbital vector is determined by a combination of both anterior cheekbone projection (infraorbital rim projection) and fat. I see a lot of misinformation on this site regarding orbital vectors but it is the case that a negative orbital vector can be made positive via fat grafting (a popular surgery in Korea). This is just 2 examples of bone vs soft tissue. Other features like lip thickness, alar base width etc are also ‘soft tissue’ and can be ideal despite having inferior bone structure.

 

[Deleted member 26824]

h

Sure. Take hooding as an example. Somebody like Chico has high set eyebrows and a weak brow ridge (usually related) yet still has hooded eyes due to amazing fat pads. Contrast this to someone like Christian Bale who has a great frontal bone and brow ridge with low set brows. Despite this, he doesn’t have as much hooding as Chico. This is because Christian Bale’s soft tissue (eye area fat pads) are inferior (in my opinion) to Chico’s thus resulting in inferior hooding. The same thing can be applied to orbital vector and the infraorbital region where the orbital vector is determined by a combination of both anterior cheekbone projection (infraorbital rim projection) and fat. I see a lot of misinformation on this site regarding orbital vectors but it is the case that a negative orbital vector can be made positive via fat grafting (a popular surgery in Korea). This is just 2 examples of bone vs soft tissue. Other features like lip thickness, alar base width etc are also ‘soft tissue’ and can be ideal despite having inferior bone structure.

high iq af. too bad you dont exist on here anymore. maybe anyone else stumbles on here and can answer me if trimax can save soft tissue from aging like milk in this context?